Clinical Significance of Resection Type and Margin following Surgical Treatment for Primary Sarcoma of the Spine: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective multi-center study.OBJECTIVES: To analyze oncological outcomes according to the resection type and surgical margin following surgical treatment for primary spinal sarcoma.SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Previous studies using registry databases have shown that surgery and negative margins were associated with improved survival for primary spinal sarcoma. However, few studies have comprehensively analyzed the clinical significance of the resection type and surgical margin for the oncological outcomes of this rare malignancy.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for primary spinal sarcoma between 1997 and 2016 at two tertiary medical centers. Overall survival and the occurrence of local recurrence and distant metastasis were compared between the groups using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and the log-rank test.RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (21 males,12 females) with a mean age of 45.1 years and a median follow-up of 36 months were included. There were 13 (39.4%) chondrosarcomas, 12 (36.4%) osteosarcomas, and eight different histological diagnoses. The cohort was categorized into four groups: 1) total en bloc resection with a negative margin (n=12; 36.4%), 2) total en bloc resection with a positive margin: (n=5; 15.2%), 3) total piecemeal resection (n=12; 36.4%), and 4) subtotal resection (n=4; 12.1%). Total en bloc resection with a negative margin was associated with improved overall survival (p=0.030) and less distant metastasis (p=0.025) and local recurrence (p=0.004).CONCLUSIONS: Achieving a negative margin through total en bloc resection, although technically demanding, improves oncological outcomes in primary spinal sarcoma.

Survival and Recurrence Rate after Treatment for Primary Spinal Sarcomas

OBJECTIVE: We have limited understanding on the presentation and survival of primary spinal sarcomas. The survival, recurrence rate, and related prognostic factors were investigated after treatment for primary sarcomas of the spine. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical records and radiological data was done for 29 patients in whom treatment was performed due to primary sarcoma of the spine from 2000 to 2010. As for treatment method, non-radical operation, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy were simultaneously or sequentially combined. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), ambulatory function, and pain status were analyzed. In addition, factors affecting survival and recurrence were analyzed : age ( or =43), gender, tumor histologic type, lesion location (mobile spine or rigid spine), weakness at diagnosis, pain at diagnosis, ambulation at diagnosis, initial treatment, radiation therapy, kind of irradiation, surgery, chemotherapy and distant metastasis. RESULTS: Median OS was 60 months, the recurrence rate was 79.3% and median PFS was 26 months. Patients with distant metastasis showed significantly shorter survival than those without metastasis. No factors were found to be significant relating to recurrence. Prognostic factor associated with walking ability was the presence of weakness at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Primary spinal sarcomas are difficult to cure and show high recurrence rate. However, the development of new treatment methods is improving survival.