La posición del analista / The Man with the Tape Recorder

En el año 1967 Jean Paul Sartre publica en la revista Les temps modernes, una desgrabación que le hiciera llegar Jean Jacques Abrahams, de una sesión con su psiquiatra y analista con quien se atendía desde hacía catorce años, y que registró en un magnetófono. En esta entrevista el paciente le reprocha al analista su falta de responsabilidad en la tarea de curarlo, cargando las tintas sobre el uso de ciertos conceptos teóricos con el fin de influenciarlo negativamente. La respuesta del analista refiere a la molestia de grabar esta sesión y su decisión de no continuar en presencia del aparato de grabación, poniendo en juego su propia dificultad en el manejo de las demandas y las resistencias del paciente. La publicación que Sartre decide llevar a cabo tiene la pretensión de elevar a ejemplo paradigmático una sesión psicoanalítica, que a nuestro entender fue indudablemente desastrosa. Nos proponemos en el siguiente artículo relevar los desaciertos éticos, a partir del análisis de la posición que toma el analista en torno al manejo de la transferencia, para contraponer a la intención desaprobatoria de Sartre, lo que precisamente no debería ser el Psicoanálisis. Por otro lado, en relación suplementaria con el escrito, hemos actualizado el guión de "El hombre del Magnetófono" y recreado la representación en una grabación de zoom

In 1967 Jean Paul Sartre published in Les temps modernes magazine a recording of a session between Jean Jacques Abrahams and his psychiatrist and analyst, with whom he had been treating for fourteen years, and which he recorded on a tape recorder. In this interview, the patient reproaches the analyst for his lack of responsibility in the task of curing him, and criticizes the use of certain theoretical concepts in order to influence him negatively. The analyst's response refers to the inconvenience of recording this session and his decision not to continue in the presence of the recording device, jeopardizing his own difficulty in handling the demands and patient resistances. The publication that Sartre decided to carry out is intended to elevate a psychoanalytic session to a paradigmatic example, which in our opinion was undoubtedly disastrous. In the following article, we propose to relieve ethical mistakes, based on the analysis of the position taken by the analyst regarding the handling of transference, to oppose Sartre's disapproving intention, which precisely should not be Psychoanalysis. On the other hand, in addition to the written, we have updated the script of "The Man with the Tape Recorder" and recreated the representation in a zoom recording.

O estatuto do real em Lacan: dos primeiros escritos ao seminário VII, a ética da psicanálise / The statute of the real in Lacan: from the first writings to the VII seminar - the psychoanalysis' ethics

Este trabalho visa elucidar a noção de Real em Lacan, dos primeiros escritos ao seminário VII, A Ética da Psicanálise. Inicialmente, privilegiam-se as relações: Imaginário e Real; Simbólico e Real; Simbólico, Imaginário e Real. Após sua elucidação, avança-se para a transição do conceito de Real, refazendo o percurso dos Seminários e textos referentes a eles. No Seminário VII, dedicado à Ética da Psicanálise, vislumbra-se a relação entre o Real e das Ding. Vê-se, aqui, que o Real é da ordem da coisa. Conclui-se o trabalho afirmando que Lacan, mais à frente, formulará o Real como sendo da ordem do impossível.

This article seeks to elucidate the notion of Real in Lacan, from the first writings to the VII seminar, Psychoanalysis' Ethics. Initially, are privileged Imaginary and Real; Symbolic and Real; Symbolic, Imaginary and Real. After their elucidation, it is advanced to the transition of the Real concept, re-doing the course fron Seminars to referring texts. In the VII Seminar, dedicated to the Psychoanalysis' Ethics, the relations between the Real and das Ding are glimpsed. The Real is seen as from the Thing order. The work is concluded affirming that Lacan, later, will formulate the Real as belonging from the impossible order.