Estudo de fase II de pregabalina para prevenção de náuseas e vômitos induzidos por quimioterapia / Phase II study of pregabalin for the prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting

Para avaliar o papel da pregabalina na proteção das náuseas e vômitos induzidos pela quimioterapia, foi realizado um ensaio clínico de fase II, aleatorizado, duplamente cego, controlado por placebo, para investigar se a pregabalina poderia melhorar o controle completo das náuseas e vômitos (desfecho primário). Inscrevemos 82 pacientes virgens de quimioterapia, programados para receber quimioterapia moderadamente e altamente emetogênica. Todos os doentes receberam ondansetron 8mg por via intravenosa, dexametasona 10mg antes da quimioterapia no primeiro dia e, dexametasona 4 mg por via oral, b.d., nos dias dois e três. Os doentes foram distribuídos aleatoriamente para tomar pregabalina 75 mg ou placebo, bd, desde a noite anterior à quimioterapia até ao quinto dia. A resposta completa global não foi estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos (53,7 versus 48,8%, respetivamente, no grupo da pregabalina e no grupo de controlo (P=0,65)). Também não houve diferença estatística significativa durante a fase aguda (primeiras 24 horas) e a fase tardia (24-120h): 80,5% versus 82,9% (P=0,77), 53,7 versus 51,2% (P=0,82), respectivamente. Neste estudo não foi identificada ação da pregabalina na prevenção de náuseas e vômitos induzidos por quimioterapia. Número de registo no Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04181346.

To evaluate the role of pregabalin in the protection of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, we performed a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate whether pregabalin could improve the complete control of nausea and vomiting (primary end point). We enrolled 82 chemotherapy-naive patients, scheduled to receive moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy. All patients received IV ondansetron 8mg, dexamethasone 10mg before chemotherapy on day one and oral dexamethasone 4mg, b.d., on days two and three. Patients were randomly assigned to take pregabalin 75mg or placebo, bd, from the night before chemotherapy to day five. The overall complete response was not statistically significant between the groups (53.7 versus 48.8%, respectively, in the pregabalin group and the control group (P=0.65)). There was also no significant difference during the acute phase (first 24 hours) and delayed phase (24-120h): 80.5% versus 82.9% (P=0.77), 53.7 versus 51.2% (P=0.82), respectively. There is no role for pregabalin preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Clinicaltrial.gov registration number: NCT04181346.

Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in the Management of Arterial Stiffness and Target Organ Damage in Patients with Hypertension

Abstract Background Arterial stiffness and hypertension are strong predictors of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are first-line antihypertensive agents in reducing blood pressure and arterial stiffness. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the effects of ACEI and ARB in reducing arterial stiffness and preventing target organ damage in patients with hypertension. Methods This observational study included 654 participants who attend routine consultations at an outpatient hypertension clinic in 2 university hospitals. Patients were interviewed, and they underwent central and peripheral blood pressure measurements. Doppler echocardiography, carotid ultrasound, biochemical tests, and anthropometric parameters were carried out. Shapiro-Wilk, chi-square, and Fisher's exact test were used. A significance level of 5% was adopted. Results A total of 659 participants were evaluated in the study (398 from the ARB group and 256 from the ACEI group). Age, body mass index (BMI), central and peripheral blood pressure measurements, pulse wave velocity (PWV), left ventricular mass index, and carotid intima-media thickness did not show differences between the groups (p > 0.05). After linear regression analysis, the ACEI group had lower values of total vascular resistance (TVR) (p = 0.003) and augmentation pressure (p = 0.008), when compared to the ARB group. Conclusion This study showed that the ACEI group had a greater reduction in augmentation pressure and PWV. There were no differences between the groups regarding the improvement of outcomes related to central arterial pressure, PWV, and cardiac and vascular target organ damage.

Dual orexin receptor antagonists for the treatment of insomnia: systematic review and network meta-analysis / Antagonistas duais do receptor de orexina para o tratamento da insônia: revisão sistemática e metanálise em rede

Abstract Background Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown that dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are effective in the treatment of chronic insomnia. However, the superiority of one particular DORA over the others remains unclear. Objective To perform a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of different DORAs in patients with chronic insomnia. Methods The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for RCTs that compared DORA with placebo in patients ≥ 18 years of age with a diagnosis of insomnia disorder. We pooled outcomes for wake time after sleep onset (WASO), latency to persistent sleep (LPS), total sleep time (TST), and adverse events (AEs). Results We included 10 RCTs with 7,806 patients, 4,849 of whom received DORAs as the intervention. Overall, we found that DORAs were associated with the improvement of all analyzed efficacy outcomes. Concerning TST, an apparent dose-dependent pattern was noticed, with higherdoses relating to a longerTST. Lemborexant 10mg provided the largest reduction in WASO (at month 1) in minutes (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −25.40; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = −40.02- −10.78), followed by suvorexant 20/15mg (SMD = −25.29; 95%CI = −36.42- −14.15), which also appeared to provide the largest decrease in long-term WASO (SMD = −23.70; 95%CI = −35.89- −11.51). The most frequent AEs were somnolence, nasopharyngitis, and headache, with rates of up to 14.8%. Conclusion Our results suggest that DORAs are associated with greater efficacy when compared with placebo in the treatment of insomnia, a complex 24-hour sleep disorder. Additionally, dosing might play an important role in the management of chronic insomnia.

Resumo Antecedentes Inúmeros ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) têm demonstrado que os antagonistas duais do receptor de orexina (dual orexin receptor antagonists, DORAs, em inglês) são eficazes no tratamento da insônia. Contudo, restam dúvidas quanto à superioridade de um DORA com relação aos outros. Objetivo Realizar uma meta-análise em rede para avaliar a eficácia de diferentes DORAs em pacientes com insônia. Métodos Foram feitas buscas nas bases de dados Medline, Embase e Cochrane Central por ECRs que comparassem DORAs e placebo em pacientes ≥ 18 anos de idade com diagnóstico de insônia. Os seguintes desfechos foram selecionados: tempo desperto após o início do sono (wake time after sleep onset, WASO, em inglês), latência para o sono persistente (latency to persistent sleep, LPS, em inglês), tempo total de sono (total sleep time, TST, em inglês), e efeitos adversos (EAs). Resultados Incluímos 10 ensaios clínicos com 7,806 pacientes, 4,849 dos quais receberam DORAs como intervenção. Os DORAs foram associados à melhoria de todos os desfechos de eficácia analisados. Em relação ao TST, um aparente padrão de dependência da dose foi identificado, com doses maiores se associando a um maior TST. Lemborexant 10 mg proporcionou a maior redução em WASO (no primeiro mês) em minutos (diferença padronizada das médias [standardized mean difference, [SMD], em inglês) = −25.40; intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%] = −40.02- −10.78), seguido de suvorexant 20/15mg (SMD = −25.29; IC95% = −36.42- −14.15), o qual também proporcionou a maior diminuição em WASO no longo prazo (SMD = −23.70; IC95% = −35.89- −11.51). Os EAs mais frequentes foram sonolência, nasofaringite e cefaleia, com taxas de até 14.8%. Conclusão Nossos resultados sugerem que os DORAs estão associados a uma maior eficácia quando comparados com placebo no tratamento da insónia, um complexo transtorno do sono de 24 horas. Além disso, a dosagem pode desempenhar um papel importante no manejo da insónia crônica.

De-escalação de inibidores dos receptores P2Y12 após intervenção coronária percutânea / P2Y12 inhibitor de-escalation after percutaneous coronary interventions

Em pacientes que apresentam síndromes coronárias agudas e são tratados com intervenção coronária percutânea, a prescrição do esquema antiplaquetário duplo, composto de ácido acetilsalicílico e um inibidor dos receptores P2Y12, é mandatória, contribuindo para a redução de eventos cardíacos maiores. No entanto, ao mesmo tempo em que previne eventos isquêmicos, essa associação pode precipitar complicações hemorrágicas maiores, o que é mais comumente observado quando são prescritos os medicamentos mais potentes, como o prasugrel ou o ticagrelor. Essas constatações levaram à procura de alternativas terapêuticas capazes de manter a proteção contra eventos isquêmicos e, ao mesmo tempo, prevenir a ocorrência de hemorragias. Uma das estratégias que está em estudo é a de-escalação dos inibidores P2Y12, que consiste no uso dos medicamentos mais potentes numa fase precoce após o procedimento, com substituição deles pelo clopidogrel, após um período de, em geral, 30 dias de evolução; outra possibilidade seria a simples redução da dose do fármaco de maior potência, algo que, até o momento, só pode ser cogitado com o prasugrel. A de-escalação pode ser feita de forma guiada, utilizando testes de mensuração objetiva da agregação plaquetária ou exames para avaliar o perfil genético dos pacientes, ou não guiada, na qual o cardiologista simplesmente faz a substituição ou redução da dose ao fim do período estipulado, sem o auxílio de exames complementares. A literatura contempla ensaios clínicos com essas duas opções de estratégia, os quais são discutidos nesta revisão. Até o momento, nenhuma diretriz médica recomenda de forma explícita o uso regular dessa alternativa terapêutica.

In patients who have acute coronary syndromes and are treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, the prescription of a dual antiplatelet regimen, consisting of acetylsalicylic acid and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is mandatory, contributing to the reduction of major cardiac events. However, while preventing ischemic events, this association may precipitate major bleeding complications, which is more commonly seen when more potent drugs, such as prasugrel or ticagrelor, are prescribed. These findings led to the search for therapeutic alternatives that could maintain the protection against ischemic events and, at the same time, prevent the occurrence of hemorrhages. One of the strategies being studied is de-escalation of P2Y12 inhibitors, which consists of the use of more potent drugs in an early phase after the procedure, replacing them with clopidogrel, after a period of, in general, 30 days of clinical course. Another possibility would be to simply reduce the dose of the most potent drug, which so far can only be considered with prasugrel. De-escalation can be done in a guided way, using objective measuring tests of platelet aggregation or exams to assess the genetic profile of patients, or unguided, in which the cardiologist simply replaces or reduces the dose at the end of the stipulated period, with no ancillary tests. The literature includes clinical trials with these two strategy options, which are discussed in this review. So far, no medical guideline explicitly recommends the regular use of this therapeutic alternative.

The cannabinoids mechanism of action: an overview / Mecanismo de ação dos canabinoides: visão geral

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The discovery of the psychoactive agent of Cannabis sativa (tetrahydrocannabinol - THC) in the second half of the 20th century originated the research that later came to identify dozens of other substances from this plant, including cannabinoids, terpenes and flavonoids. Ensuing description of their interaction sites in animals and humans, together with endogenous ligands, transport proteins as well as synthesis and degradation enzymes, revealed what came to be known as the endocannabinoid system. Several receptors participate in this system. CONTENTS: The first receptors to be discovered were called CB1 and CB2, both are G protein-coupled (GPCR). It is noteworthy that CB1 receptors are among the most abundant and widely distributed GPCR in the mammalian brain, with marked expression in basal ganglia, cerebellum and hippocampus, for instance; on the other hand, they are scarce in areas of the brainstem related to breathing control. In light of the multiplicity of pharmacological effects of cannabinoids, concomitant with the lack of more clarifying studies on their mechanisms of action despite the great interest in research on their therapeutic application, it is necessary to deepen the knowledge in this area. CONCLUSION: Considering the literature research conducted for the composition of this article, it is possible to conclude that cannabinoids have a broad spectrum of action mechanisms in the human body, and that more robust clinical studies are needed to better understand their broad therapeutic potential.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A descoberta do princípio psicoativo da Cannabis sativa (tetrahidrocanabinol - THC) na segunda metade do século XX inaugurou pesquisas que posteriormente vieram a identificar dezenas de outras substâncias a partir dessa planta, incluindo canabinoides, terpenos e flavonoides. A subsequente descrição dos sítios de interação dessas substâncias em animais e humanos, assim como seus ligantes endógenos, proteínas de transporte e enzimas de síntese e degradação, revelou o que veio a ser conhecido como sistema endocanabinoide. Diversos receptores participam deste sistema. CONTEÚDO: Os primeiros receptores a serem descobertos foram denominados CB1 e CB2, ambos são acoplados à proteína G (GPCR). É importante ressaltar que os receptores CB1 estão entre os GPCRs mais abundantes e amplamente distribuídos do encéfalo de mamíferos, com marcada expressão, por exemplo, em gânglios da base, cerebelo e hipocampo; em contrapartida, são escassos em áreas do tronco cerebral relacionadas ao controle da respiração. Diante da multiplicidade de efeitos farmacológicos dos canabinoides, concomitante à falta de estudos mais esclarecedores sobre seus mecanismos de ação apesar do grande interesse na pesquisa de sua aplicação terapêutica, é preciso aprofundar o conhecimento nessa área. CONCLUSÃO: Considerando as pesquisas bibliográficas realizadas para a composição deste artigo, é possível concluir que os canabinoides possuem um amplo espectro de mecanismos de ação no organismo humano, e que mais estudos clínicos robustos são necessários para que seja possível entender melhor o seu amplo potencial terapêutico.

The use of angiotensin receptor blockers in dementia prevention / O uso de bloqueadores de receptor de angiotensina na prevenção de demência

ABSTRACT: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia are preventable and highly prevalent diseases, as is systemic arterial hypertension. Thus, it is speculated that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be neuroprotective against AD. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate if the use of ARBs confers a neuroprotective effect on AD, through a systematic review. Methods: Studies published on Embase, LILACS, SciELO, and PubMed were evaluated. The selection of the studies included those that evaluated the use of antihypertensive drugs in individuals with a previous diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. The data were extracted with the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) form. The risk of bias was evaluated by the EPOC "Risk of bias tool." Results: A total of 12 articles were identified, and 3 articles were selected. Two of them analyzed the use of ARB/ACEI versus other antihypertensives and the development of dementia. Conclusion: There is a tendency for ARBs to be superior to other antihypertensives in preventing dementia.

RESUMO: A doença de Alzheimer (DA) e a demência são doenças potencialmente preveníveis, assim como a hipertensão arterial sistêmica. Dessa forma, especula-se que os bloqueadores dos receptores de angiotensina (BRA) tenham efeito neuroprotetor contra a DA. Objetivo: Avaliar se o uso de BRA confere efeito neuroprotetor para DA, por meio de uma revisão sistemática. Métodos: Foram avaliados estudos publicados nas plataformas Embase, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (Lilacs), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) e United States National Library of Medicine (PubMed). Os estudos incluídos avaliaram o uso de anti-hipertensivos em indivíduos com diagnóstico prévio de comprometimento cognitivo leve. Os dados foram extraídos com base no formulário da EPOC. Risco de viés foi avaliado por meio da ferramenta da Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) "Risk of bias tool". Resultados: Foram encontrados 12 artigos e três foram selecionados. Dois analisaram o uso de BRA/IECA vs. o uso de outros anti-hipertensivos e o desenvolvimento de demência. Conclusão: Há uma tendência de que os BRA sejam superiores a outros anti-hipertensivos na prevenção da demência.

Associação entre o Antagonismo do Sistema Renina-Angiotensina-Aldosterona e a Mortalidade Relacionada à COVID-19 em Pacientes com Hipertensão Relacionada ao Sobrepeso/Obesidade: um Estudo Retrospectivo de Coorte / Association between RAAS Antagonism and COVID-19-related Mortality in Patients with Overweight/Obesity-related Hypertension: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Resumo Fundamento Os bloqueadores dos receptores da angiotensina (BRA) e os inibidores da enzima conversora da angiotensina (IECA) aumentam a expressão de ACE2, que é um receptor para entrada de SARS-CoV-2 nas células. Embora as evidências sugiram que os IECA/BRA são seguros entre a população geral com COVID-19, sua segurança em pacientes com hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade merece uma avaliação mais aprofundada. Objetivo Avaliamos a associação entre o uso de IECA/BRA e a gravidade da COVID-19 em pacientes com hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade. Métodos O presente estudo incluiu 439 pacientes adultos com sobrepeso/obesidade (índice de massa corporal ≥ 25 kg/m2) e hipertensão, diagnosticados com COVID-19 e internados no University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic entre 1º de março e 7 de dezembro de 2020. Foram avaliadas a mortalidade e a gravidade da COVID-19 com base no tempo de internação hospitalar, internação em unidade de terapia intensiva, uso de oxigênio suplementar, ventilação mecânica e uso de vasopressores. A regressão logística multivariável foi usada para examinar as associações do uso de IECA/BRA com a mortalidade e outros marcadores de gravidade de COVID-19, com um alfa bilateral definido em 0,05. Resultados A exposição aos BRA (n = 91) e IECA (n = 149) antes da hospitalização foi significativamente associada a menor mortalidade ( odds ratio [OR] = 0,362, intervalo de confiança [IC] de 95% 0,149 a 0,880, p = 0,025) e menor tempo de internação hospitalar (IC 95% −0,217 a −0,025, p = 0,015). Adicionalmente, os pacientes em uso de IECA/BRA apresentaram uma tendência não significativa de menor internação em unidade de terapia intensiva (OR = 0,727, IC 95% 0,485 a 1,090, p = 0,123), uso de oxigênio suplementar (OR = 0,929, IC 95% 0,608 a 1,421,p = 0,734), ventilação mecânica (OR = 0,728, IC 95% 0,457 a 1,161, p = 0,182) e vasopressores (OR = 0,677, IC 95% 0,430 a 1,067, p = 0,093). Conclusão Os resultados sugerem que pacientes internados com COVID-19 e hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade que receberam IECA/BRA antes da internação apresentam menor mortalidade e COVID-19 menos grave do que aqueles que não estavam tomando IECA/BRA. Os resultados também sugerem que a exposição aos IECA/BRA pode proteger pacientes com hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade de COVID-19 grave e morte.

Abstract Background Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) increase the expression of ACE2, which is a receptor for entry of SARS-CoV-2 into cells. Though evidence suggests that ARB/ACEI are safe among the general population with COVID-19, their safety in patients with overweight/obesity-related hypertension deserves further evaluation. Objective We assessed the association between ARB/ACEI use and COVID-19 severity in patients with overweight/obesity-related hypertension. Methods This study included 439 adult patients with overweight/obesity (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2) and hypertension, diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic from March 1 to December 7, 2020. Mortality and severity of COVID-19 were evaluated based on length of stay in hospital, intensive care unit admission, use of supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the associations of ARB/ACEI use with mortality and other markers of COVID-19 severity, with a two-sided alpha set at 0.05. Results Exposure to ARB (n = 91) and ACEI (n = 149) before hospitalization was significantly associated with lower mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.362, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.149 to 0.880, p = 0.025) and a shorter length of stay (95% CI −0.217 to −0.025, p = 0.015). Additionally, patients using ARB/ACEI showed a non-significant trend toward lower intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.727, 95% CI 0.485 to 1.090, p = 0.123), use of supplemental oxygen (OR = 0.929, 95% CI 0.608 to 1.421, p = 0.734), mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.728, 95% CI 0.457 to 1.161, p = 0.182), and vasopressors (OR = 0.677, 95% CI 0.430 to 1.067, p = 0.093). Conclusion Results suggest that hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and overweight/obesity-related hypertension who were prescribed ARB/ACEI before admission to the hospital exhibit lower mortality and less severe COVID-19 than those who were not taking ARB/ACEI. The results also suggest that exposure to ARB/ACEI may protect patients with overweight/obesity-related hypertension from severe COVID-19 and death.

Antagonistas do Sistema Renina-Angiotensina e Betabloqueadores na Prevenção da Cardiotoxicidade por Antraciclinas: Revisão Sistemática e Metanálise / Renin-angiotensin System Antagonists and Beta-blockers in Prevention of Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Resumo Fundamento As evidências que embasam o uso de inibidores do sistema-renina-angiotensina aldosterona (SRAA) e betabloqueadores para prevenção de cardiomiopatia induzida por antraciclinas são controversas. Objetivo Realizamos uma metanálise para avaliar a eficácia desses medicamentos na prevenção da cardiotoxicidade. Métodos A metanálise incluiu estudos prospectivos e randomizados com adultos submetidos à quimioterapia com antraciclina e comparou o uso de terapias SRAA ou betabloqueadores versus placebo com seguimento de 6 a 18 meses. O desfecho primário foi alteração da fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) durante a quimioterapia. Os desfechos secundários foram: a incidência de insuficiência cardíaca, mortalidade por todas as causas e alterações na medida do diâmetro diastólico final. A avaliação da heterogeneidade foi realizada por estratificação e meta-regressão. O nível de significância adotado foi p < 0,05. Resultados A busca resultou em 17 estudos, totalizando 1.530 pacientes. A variação (delta) da FEVE foi avaliada em 14 estudos. A terapia neuro-hormonal foi associada a um menor delta na FEVE pré-terapia versus pós-terapia (diferença média ponderada 4,42 [intervalo de confiança de 95% 2,3 a 6,6]) e maior FEVE final (p < 0,001). O tratamento resultou em menor incidência de insuficiência cardíaca (risk ratio 0,45 [intervalo de confiança de 95% 0,3 a 0,7]). Não houve efeito na mortalidade (p = 0,3). Para a análise da FEVE, foi documentada heterogeneidade substancial, não explicada pelas variáveis exploradas no estudo. Conclusão O uso de inibidores do SRAA e betabloqueadores para prevenção da cardiotoxicidade induzida por antraciclinas foi associado a redução menos pronunciada da FEVE, maior FEVE final e menor incidência de insuficiência cardíaca. Não foram observadas alterações na mortalidade. (CRD PROSPERO 42019133615)

Abstract Background The evidence supporting the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors and beta-blockers for the prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy is controversial. Objective We performed a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of these drugs in preventing cardiotoxicity. Methods The meta-analysis included prospective, randomized studies in adults receiving anthracycline chemotherapy and compared the use of RAAS inhibitors or beta-blockers versus placebo with a follow-up of 6 to 18 months. The primary outcome was change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of heart failure, all-cause mortality, and changes in end-diastolic measurement. Heterogeneity was assessed by stratification and meta-regression. A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted. Results The search resulted in 17 studies, totaling 1,530 patients. The variation (delta) in LVEF was evaluated in 14 studies. Neurohormonal therapy was associated with a lower delta in pre- versus post-therapy LVEF (weighted mean difference 4.42 [95% confidence interval 2.3 to 6.6]) and higher final LVEF (p < 0.001). Treatment resulted in a lower incidence of heart failure (risk ratio 0.45 [95% confidence interval 0.3 to 0.7]). There was no effect on mortality (p = 0.3). For analysis of LVEF, substantial heterogeneity was documented, which was not explained by the variables explored in the study. Conclusion The use of RAAS inhibitors and beta-blockers to prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity was associated with less pronounced reduction in LVEF, higher final LVEF, and lower incidence of heart failure. No changes in mortality were observed. (CRD PROSPERO 42019133615)

Advances in Medical Treatment of Primary Aldosteronism / 中国医学科学杂志(英文版)

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common form of secondary hypertension, with its main manifestations including hypertension and hypokalemia. Early identification of PA is extremely important as PA patients can easily develop cardiovascular complications such as atrial fibrillation, stroke, and myocardial infarction. The past decade has witnessed the rapid advances in the genetics of PA, which has shed new light on PA treatment. While surgery is the first choice for unilateral diseases, bilateral lesions can be treated with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). The next-generation non-steroidal MRAs are under investigations. New medications including calcium channel blockers, macrophage antibiotics, and aldosterone synthase inhibitors have provided a new perspective for the medical treatment of PA.

Research Progress of GABA Receptors in Alzheimer’s Disease / 中国生物化学与分子生物学报

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with the early symptom of A β plaque, tau hyperphosphorylation neuronal tangle formation in cells. At present, accumulated evidence shows that the changes of GABA receptors are closely related to AD. Some studies have shown that the expression level of each subunit of the GABA receptor changes in AD patients. Therefore, it is speculated that the changes of GABA subunits may be related to the pathogenesis of AD, but there is no better methods to improve AD by targeting GABA receptors. In order to further understand the relationship between the changes of GABA receptors and AD, this paper first reviewed the changes of GABA receptors in AD patients and animal models’ brains and found that there was differential expression in GABA(A) receptor subunits in AD patients. Then we summarized the changes of GABA receptor subunits in Alzheimer database. Based on the data, we found that a few GABA subunits had significant changes. The evidence shows that the change of GABA receptors alters the neural activity in the brain. Other studies have found that the treatment of mice with GABA receptor agonists and antagonists can improve the cognitive ability of mice. We hope that understanding the differential expression of GABA receptors in AD will provide a more accurate target for the treatment of AD.

Uso previo de antagonistas de la angiotensina II en pacientes hipertensos hospitalizados y mortalidad por COVID-19

Introducción: Actualmente existe un gran interés en establecer la relación entre la severidad de la infección por SARS-COV-2 en pacientes hipertensos usuarios de antagonistas de la angiotensina II (ARAII). Objetivo: Estudiar la relación entre el uso previo de antagonistas de la ARA II en pacientes hipertensos y la mortalidad por COVID-19. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo en un hospital de referencia en Lima, Perú, en pacientes hipertensos hospitalizados en marzo del 2021 por COVID-19 severo. Resultados: Ingresaron al estudio 101 pacientes, con una media de edad de 70.1 + 12.0 y sexo masculino 48%. Los usuarios de ARAII fueron 45 (45.6%) y no los tomaban 56 (54.4%). El Índice de comorbilidad de Charlson fue mayor en el grupo ARAII (3.6 + 1.56 vs 3.04 + 1.24) (p<0.05). La mortalidad total y por sexo (varones vs mujeres), entre los que usaban ARAII o no, fueron 57.8% vs 62% (p = 0.633) y 36.36% vs 63.64 % (p<0.05), respectivamente. La media de la concentración de deshidrogenasa láctica fue menor en los que tomaban ARAII comparado con los no usuarios, 394.18 + 152.3 vs 503.5 + 252.7 (p<0.05); no se observó diferencia significativa en el recuento de leucocitos, niveles séricos de Proteína C Reactiva, Ferritina, dímero D y fibrinógeno. Conclusión: Entre los pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 con hipertensión, el uso previo de ARAII no se asoció con riesgo de mortalidad.

Background: There is caurrently great interest in establishing the relationship between the severity of SARS-COV-2 infection in hypertensive patients who use angiotensin II antagonists (AIIRAs). Objective: To study the relationship between the previous use of angiotensin II antagonists (ARB) in hypertensive patients and mortality from COVID-19. Materials and methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital in Lima, Peru, in hypertensive patients hospitalized in March 2021 for severe COVID-19. Results: A total of 101 patients entered the study, with a mean age of 70.1 + 12.0 and 48% male. ARB users and non-users were 45 (45.6%) and 56 (54.4%), respectively. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was higher in the ARB group (3.6 + 1.56 vs 3.04 + 1.24) (p<0.05). Total and male vs women mortality, among those using ARBs or not, were 57.8% vs 62% (p = 0.633) and 36.36% vs 63.64% (p <0.05), respectively. Mean lactate dehydrogenase concentration was lower in those taking ARBs compared to non-users, 394.18 + 152.3 vs 503.5 + 252.7 (p<0.05); No significant difference was observed in the leukocyte count and serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, Ferritin, D-dimer and fibrinogen. Conclusion: Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with hypertension, prior use of ARBSs was not associated with mortality risk.

It is time anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies be considered first-line prophylaxis for migraine / Já é tempo de os anticorpos monoclonais anti-CGRP serem reconhecidos como profilaxia de primeira linha para a migrânea

ABSTRACT The result of more than thirty years of research, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are currently the state of the art for migraine preventive therapy. Their efficacy and safety, supported by an already large and growing body of evidence, are added by many other advantages: an early onset of action, favorable posology, negligible pharmacological interaction, and a broad-reaching efficacy in many challenging clinical contexts. When compared to standard prophylactics, these novel medications seem at least as efficacious, clearly more tolerable and, consequently, with a superior adherence profile. Furthermore, recently published analyses indicate that they are cost-effective, especially among those with chronic migraine. Yet, current guidelines endorse their use only after multiple other preventives have failed or have been deemed not tolerable. Although this recommendation may have been sensible at first, the now available data strongly point that time has come for anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies to be acknowledged as first-line treatments for migraine patients with severe disability. For these individuals, delaying treatment until several other alternatives have failed incurs in significant losses, both economically and to many relevant aspects of their lives.

RESUMO Frutos de mais de 30 anos de pesquisa, os anticorpos monoclonais anti-CGRP são atualmente o que há de mais moderno no tratamento preventivo da migrânea. À sua eficácia e segurança, já bem estabelecidos por um grande corpo de evidências, acrescentam-se outras vantagens: um início precoce de ação, posologia favorável, mínima interação farmacológica, e eficácia comprovada em uma variedade de contextos clínicos frequentemente desafiadores. Quando comparados a outros profiláticos, estas medicações aparentam ser ao menos tão eficazes, evidentemente mais toleráveis e, portanto, com melhor perfil de adesão. Ademais, estudos recentemente publicados indicam que elas são custo-efetivas, especialmente entre pacientes com migrânea crônica. Ainda assim, as diretrizes atuais orientam o seu uso apenas caso haja refratariedade ou intolerância a múltiplos outros preventivos. Apesar de esta recomendação poder ter sido sensata a priori, os dados disponíveis atualmente corroboram que já é tempo de estes anticorpos monoclonais serem reconhecidos como tratamentos de primeira linha para a migrânea associada à incapacidade grave. Para estes pacientes, demorar a oferecer este tratamento até que outras múltiplas alternativas tenham falhado, leva a perdas significativas, tanto economicamente quanto em múltiplos outros aspectos relevantes das suas vidas.

Tachykinin/neurokinin 3 receptor antagonists: In silico ADME/T analysis of novel compounds for menopause hot flashes therapy

SUMMARY Introduction: Neurokinin-B receptor (NK3R) activation is tightly involved in the onset of vasomotor symptoms during menopause, yet there are still no NK3R antagonistic drugs approved for hot flashes therapy. Determining the pharmacokinetic properties of current drug candidates is crucial for scaffold identification and prediction of feasible outcomes in future clinical trials. Aim: To develop a pharmacokinetic profile of new NK3R blockers with hot flashes reducing activity and by comparing them with trial-suspended NK3R antagonists (Osanetant & Talnetant), it is expected to identify enhanced properties in novel compounds. Methodology: For in silico evaluation, Smiles were retrieved from PubChem and DrugBank, and further analysis was carried out through ADMETlab and SwissADME to calculate compounds drug-likeness and pharmacokinetics. Results: Pavinetant & Fezoline-tant and SB-222.200 & SB-218.795 exhibited higher compliance with drug-likeness rules and more suitable physicochemical properties when compared to Osanetant & Talnetant. ADME/T evaluation showed considerable disparities between groups, yet no significant difference was reported. Pharmacokinetic properties varied irregularly among studied compounds. Conclusion: Novel NK3R antagonists exhibit enhanced properties when compared to formerly suspended ones. Fezolinetant is predicted to have more favorable outcomes based on in silico evaluation.

Introducción: la activación del receptor de neuroquinina-B (NK3R) está estrechamente relacionada con la aparición de síntomas vasomotores durante la menopausia, no obstante, a la fecha no se reportan fármacos antagonistas de NK3R aprobados para el manejo de sofocos. La evaluación de las propiedades farmacocinéticas de los compuestos inhibidores de NK3R resulta indispensable para la identificación de potenciales farmacóforos y para la estimación de posibles resultados en ensayos clínicos. Objetivo: determinar las características farmacocinéticas de los nuevos compuestos inhibidores de NK3R con propiedades reductoras de los fogajes asociados a la menopausia, y por medio de un análisis comparativo con los antagonistas de NK3R cuyo ensayo clínico fue suspendido (Osanetant & Talnetant), se espera identificar propiedades superiores en los nuevos compuestos desarrollados. Metodología: se obtuvieron los códigos Smiles a partir de PubChem y DrugBank, posteriormente, el análisis se basó en el cálculo de las propiedades farmacocinéticas y drug-like mediante las plataformas ADMETlab y SwissADME. Resultados: Pavi-netant & Fezolinetant y SB-222.200 & SB-218.795 exhiben mejores propiedades fisicoquímicas y cumplen a mayor cabalidad las reglas drug-likeness al compararse con Osanetant & Talnetant. La evaluación ADMET reveló variaciones entre los grupos, pero ninguna fue significativa. Las propiedades farmacocinéticas varían de forma irregular entre los distintos compuestos. Conclusiones: los antagonistas de NK3R recientemente desarrollados exhibieron propiedades superiores frente a los compuestos de ensayos suspendidos. Los resultados del estudio in silico permiten deducir que el Fezolinetant podría tener mejores resultados en futuros ensayos clínicos.

Introdução: a ativação do receptor de neuroquinina-B (NK3R) está intimamente relacionada ao aparecimento de sintomas vasomotores durante a menopausa, entretanto, até o momento não há relatos de drogas antagonistas de NK3R aprovadas para o manejo das ondas de calor. A avaliação das propriedades farmacocinéticas de compostos inibidores de NK3R é essencial para a identificação de potenciais farmaco-foros e para a estimativa de possíveis resultados em ensaios clínicos. Objetivo: determinar as características farmacocinéticas dos novos compostos inibidores de NK3R com propriedades redutoras de ondas de calor associadas à menopausa, e através de uma análise comparativa com os antagonistas de NK3R cujo ensaio clínico foi suspenso (Osanetant & Talnetant), espera-se identificar propriedades superiores nos compostos recém-desenvolvidos. Metodologia: os códigos Smiles foram obtidos do PubChem e DrugBank, posteriormente, a análise foi baseada no cálculo das propriedades farmacocinéticas e farmacocinéticas utilizando as plataformas ADMETlab e SwissADME. Resultados: Pavinetant & Fezolinetant e SB-222.200 & SB-218.795 apresentam melhores propriedades físico-químicas e atendem mais plenamente às regras de ""drug-likeness" quando comparados ao Osanetant & Talnetant. A avaliação ADMET revelou variações entre os grupos, mas nenhuma foi significativa. As propriedades farmacocinéticas variam irregularmente entre os diferentes compostos. Conclusões: os antagonistas de NK3R recém-desenvolvidos exibiram propriedades superiores em relação aos compostos de teste suspensos. Os resultados do estudo in silico permitem-nos deduzir que o Fezolinetant poderá ter melhores resultados em futuros ensaios clínicos.

Disnea secundaria a ticagrelor posterior a arteriografía coronaria. Reporte de caso / Dyspnea secondary to ticagrelor posterior to coronary arteriography. Case report

Resumen Los antiagregantes plaquetarios son medicamentos ampliamente utilizados para la prevención y tratamiento de patologías aterotrombóticas, como lo es el síndrome coronario agudo. A pesar de tener un efecto benéfico, no están exentos de ocasionar múltiples alteraciones a nivel sistémico, como lo es la disnea en pacientes sometidos a manejo con ticagrelor. Se expone el caso de un paciente de 66 años con antecedente de cardiopatía isquémico-hipertensiva, tabaquismo pesado y alergia al ácido acetilsalicílico (ASA), con requerimiento de 2 arteriografías coronarias, quien presenta disnea en reposo en menos de 24 horas posterior al inicio de manejo antiagregante tromboprofiláctico con ticagrelor, que resuelve de forma satisfactoria tras la suspensión del medicamento. Al ser un efecto secundario relativamente frecuente en el marco del uso del ticagrelor, se hace relevante revisar los hallazgos en la literatura actual sobre la aparición de disnea en pacientes tratados con dicho fármaco, para así tener en cuenta posibles recomendaciones acerca del manejo de la disnea asociada a ticagrelor, basadas en el conocimiento actual. MÉD.UIS.2022;35(1): 9-15.

Abstract Antiplatelet agents are widely used drugs for the prevention and treatment of atherothrombotic pathologies such as acute coronary syndrome, however, despite having a beneficial effect, they're not exempt from causing multiple systemic alterations, such as dyspnea in patients undergoing management with ticagrelor. We will now present the case of a 66-year-old patient with a history of hypertensive ischemic heart disease requiring 2 cardiac catheterizations, heavy smoking and allergic to Acetyl Salicylic Acid (ASA) who presented dyspnea at rest in less than 24 hours after the start of thromboprophylaxis management with ticagrelor, that resolves satisfactorily after discontinuation of the drug. Because it is a frequent side effect in the framework of the use of ticagrelor, it's relevant to review the current literature on the appearance of dyspnea in patients treated with ticagrelor, to highlight recommendations for the management of dyspnea associated with ticagrelor based on current knowledge. MÉD.UIS.2022;35(1): 9-15.

Effects of finasteride combined with tamsulosin hydrochloride on glandular microvessel density during the perioperative period in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia / 中国基层医药

Objective:To investigate the effects of finasteride combined with tamsulosin hydrochloride administered during the perioperative period on glandular microvessel density in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods:Ninety patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who received treatment in Wenzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine from August 2017 to August 2019 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to receive either oral tamsulosin hydrochloride alone (control group, n = 45) or oral finasteride combined with tamsulosin hydrochloride (observation group, n = 45) during the perioperative period of transurethral resection of the prostate. All patients received 6 weeks of medication. Clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, and urodynamic indexes, glandular microvessel density, International Prostatism Symptom Score, bother score, and urine color/degree of haematuria score pre- and post-treatment were compared between the two groups. Results:The maximum urinary flow rate in each group significantly increased 6 weeks after treatment compared with before treatment. The detrusor pressure and residual urine volume in each group decreased 6 weeks after treatment compared with before treatment. After 6 weeks of treatment, the maximum urinary flow rate was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group [(15.63 ± 2.26) mL/s vs. (13.14 ± 2.23) mL/s], and residual urine volume was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group [(29.19 ± 4.81) mL vs. (32.25 ± 5.52) mL, t = 5.26, 2.80, both P < 0.05). International Prostatism Symptom Score measured 6 weeks after treatment and urine color/degree of haematuria score measured 1 week after treatment were (12.09 ± 2.17) points and (1.51 ± 0.27) points, respectively in the observation group, which were significantly lower than those in the control group [(14.28 ± 2.22) points, (2.03 ± 0.38) points, t = 4.73, 7.48, both P < 0.05]. Factor VIII related antigen- and CD34-positive glandular microvessel density values in the observation group were (14.74 ± 3.05) counts/visual field and (19.41 ± 3.07) counts/visual field, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group [(18.08 ± 3.16) counts/visual field, (22.27 ± 3.16) counts/visual field, t = 5.10, 4.35, both P < 0.05]. The incidence of postoperative hematuria was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group [15.56% (7/45) vs. 35.56% (16/45), χ2 = 4.73, P < 0.05]. Conclusion:Compared with tamsulosin hydrochloride alone, finasteride combined with tamsulosin hydrochloride administered during the perioperative stage can greatly improve the urodynamic indexes of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, reduce microvessel density value, International Prostatism Symptom Score, bother score, and decrease the incidence of hematuria. The combined therapy provides a novel idea for preventing perioperative bleeding in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Research progress of finerenone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with chronic kidney disease / 中国临床药理学与治疗学

Finerenone is a new non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, which can prevent and treat type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with chronic kidney disease through antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrosis effects, and has a significant cardiovascular protection effect. Compared with traditional mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, finerenone has a higher selectivity. In this review, the basic introduction, basic research, clinical research and limitations of finerenone were reviewed in order to provide more ideas and options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with chronic kidney disease.

Otorhinolaryngological adverse effects of urological drugs

ABSTRACT Purpose: To describe the otorhinolaryngological adverse effects of the main drugs used in urological practice. Materials and Methods: A review of the scientific literature was performed using a combination of specific descriptors (side effect, adverse effect, scopolamine, sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, oxybutynin, tolterodine, spironolactone, furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, doxazosin, alfuzosin, terazosin, prazosin, tamsulosin, desmopressin) contained in publications until April 2020. Manuscripts written in English, Portuguese, and Spanish were manually selected from the title and abstract. The main drugs used in Urology were divided into five groups to describe their possible adverse effects: alpha-blockers, anticholinergics, diuretics, hormones, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Results: The main drugs used in Urology may cause several otorhinolaryngological adverse effects. Dizziness was most common, but dry mouth, rhinitis, nasal congestion, epistaxis, hearing loss, tinnitus, and rhinorrhea were also reported and varies among drug classes. Conclusions: Most of the drugs used in urological practice have otorhinolaryngological adverse effects. Dizziness was most common, but dry mouth, rhinitis, nasal congestion, epistaxis, hearing loss, tinnitus, and rhinorrhea were also reported. Therefore, doctors must be aware of these adverse effects to improve adherence to the treatment and to minimize damage to the health of patients.