RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the cost-effectiveness of long-acting versus short-acting recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor in the treatment of III° and IV° bone marrow suppression after chemotherapy. Methods:The data of patients who presented with III and IV° bone marrow suppression after chemotherapy and received treatment with recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor from January 2018 to December 2019 were collected. These patients were divided into the short-acting recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor group (rhG-CSF group) and the long-acting recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor group (PEG-rhG-CSF group) group. Clinical efficacy, the incidence of adverse reactions, and cost-effectiveness were compared between the two groups.Results:There were 88 patients, aged (63.97 ± 11.64) years, in the rhG-CSF group. There were 80 patients, aged (63.26 ± 9.09) years in the PEG-rhG-CSF group. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Total response rate was 72.72% (64/88) in the rhG-CSF group and 78.75% (63/80) in the PEG-rhG-CSF group ( χ2 = 0.82, P = 0.360). The incidence of related adverse reactions was 7.95% (7/88) and 7.5% (6/80) in the rhG-CSF and PEG-rhG-CSF groups respectively ( χ2 = 0.01, P = 0.910). The average cost was (124.88 ± 113.07) yuan and (3 159.04 ± 505.05) yuan in the rhG-CSF and PEG-rhG-CSF groups respectively ( t = 51.68, P < 0.01). The cost-effectiveness ratio was 1.55 and 40.11 in the rhG-CSF and PEG-rhG-CSF groups respectively. Taking the rhG-CSF group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in the PEG-rhG-CSF group was 505.13. Conclusion:Long-acting and short-acting recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factors have similar curative effects and related adverse reactions in the treatment of III° and IV°bone marrow suppression after chemotherapy. The cost-effectiveness ratio of the rhG-CSF group is lower than that of the PEG-rhG-CSF group. Appropriate treatment schemes for increasing white blood cell levels should be selected based on the individual situation of the patient.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the role of clinical pharmacists in identifying adverse drug reactions (ADR), to draw clinical attention to the possibility of drug-induced lung injury caused by rhG-CSF, and distinguish them from infectious diseases. Methods A case of rhG-CSF induced acute lung injury was analyzed. After analyzing the relationship between rhG-CSF and acute eosinophilic pneumonia, exploring the possible mechanism, in combination with the patient's condition, the clinical pharmacist put forward the suggestion for the treatment of the disease. Results After receiving rhG-CSF, the patient's eosinophils increased, the pneumonia was aggravated, and the effect of anti-infection treatment was poor. Eosinophils pneumonia associated with rhG-CSF was considered. The patient's pulmonary symptoms improved after treatment with glucocorticoid in combination with withdrawal of antibiotics and antiviral drugs, and eosinophil returned to normal. Conclusion rhG- can cause rare eosinophilic pneumonia. The clinical pharmacist's participation in clinical treatment can help to identify drug-induced diseases, reorient the direction of treatment and ensure the success of clinical therapy.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE： To compare the cost-effectiveness of long-effect and short-effect granulocyte stimulating factor in prevention and treatment of bone marrow suppression induced by chemotherapy for lung malignancies， and to provide reference for rational drug use in the clinic. METHODS： A retrospective analysis was conducted for 132 cases who used granulocyte stimulating factor to prevent and treat bone marrow suppression induced by chemotherapy for lung malignancies in the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Zhengzhou University during Jan. 2017 to Jun. 2018. Among them， 60 cases were treated with Recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor injection （short-effect， group A）， and 72 cases were treated with Polyethylene glycol recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor injection （long-effect， group B）. Clinical efficacies， the occurrence of bone marrow suppression and ADR were compared between 2 groups. Cost was calculated， and cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by down-regulating 20％ drug price. RESULTS： The total response rates of group A and B were 71.7％ and 75.0％， without statistical significance （P＞0.05）. There was no statistical significance in the incidence and duration of bone marrow suppression or the incidence of ADR （P＞0.05）. Average treatment costs of the two groups were （335.91±180.34） and （1 982.75±603.15） yuan； the cost of group A was significantly lower than that of group B （P＜0.05）. The cost-effectiveness ratio of them were 4.69 and 26.44， while group A as a reference， incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of group B was 494.55. The sensitivity analysis results were in agreement with the cost-effectiveness analysis. CONCLUSIONS： The effectiveness of Recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor injection is similar to that of Polyethylene glycol recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor injection for the prevention and treatment of bone marrow suppression induced by chemotherapy for lung malignancies. But the cost-effectiveness ratio of the former is lower than that of the latter.