Implante secundario de lente en cámara anterior con apoyo angular versus lente suturado a iris / Secondary implantation of angle-supported lens in the anterior chamber versus iris-suture-fixated lens

Objetivo: Comparar los resultados del implante secundario de lentes intraoculares de cámara anterior rígido con apoyo angular y de lentes intraoculares plegables de cámara posterior suturados a iris, en cuanto a efectividad, seguridad y calidad de vida relacionada con la función visual (cuestionario NEI VFQ-23). Métodos: Se realizó un estudio cuasi experimental de 50 ojos de pacientes afáquicos sin soporte capsular, después de la cirugía de catarata, divididos en dos grupos según el tratamiento. Resultados: Se observó que en el grupo de pacientes tratados con lente intraocular suturado a iris el porcentaje de pacientes con una visión de 20/40 o más fue significativamente superior (96,0 vs. 60,0 , p = 0,000), mientras que los resultados del cuestionario de calidad de vida fueron menores en cuanto a la frecuencia de pacientes con visión de 20/200 o menos (0,0 vs. 16,0 por ciento, p = 0,110); la inducción de astigmatismo, la disminución de la densidad de células endoteliales (361,6 ± 220,5 vs. 556,1 ± 340, p = 0,021) y el porcentaje de pacientes con complicaciones (36,0 vs. 52,0 por ciento, p = 0,254). Conclusiones: Se logran mejores resultados con el implante de lente intraocular plegable suturado a iris(AU)

Objective: Compare the results of secondary implantation of rigid angle-supported intraocular lenses in the anterior chamber versus foldable iris-suture-fixated intraocular lenses in the posterior chamber, in terms of effectiveness, safety and vision-related quality of life (questionnaire NEI VFQ-23). Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted of 50 eyes of aphakic patients without capsular support after cataract surgery, who were divided into two groups according to the treatment indicated. Results: It was found that in the group treated with iris-suture-fixated intraocular lens implantation the percentage of patients with 20/40 vision or more was significantly higher (96.0 vs. 60.0 percent, p = 0.000), whereas the results of the quality of life questionnaire were lower in terms of frequency of patients with 20/200 vision or less (0.0 vs. 16.0 percent, p = 0.110), induction of astigmatism, endothelial cell density reduction (361.6 ± 220.5 vs. 556.1 ± 340, p = 0.021) and percentage of patients with complications (36.0 vs 52.0 percent, p = 0.254). Conclusions: Better results were obtained with the implantation of foldable iris-suture-fixated intraocular lenses(AU)

Resultados refractivos del implante secundario de lente en la cámara anterior con apoyo angular y de lente suturado a iris / Refractive results of anterior chamber angle-supported and iris-suture-fixated secondary lens implantation

Objetivo: Comparar los resultados refractivos del implante secundario de lentes intraoculares rígidos de la cámara anterior con apoyo angular y de lentes intraoculares plegables de la cámara posterior suturados a iris. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio casi experimental con control no equivalente (cohorte histórica). Se estudiaron 50 pacientes (50 ojos) con afaquia e inadecuado soporte capsular después de la cirugía de catarata, a quienes se les realizó implante secundario de lente intraocular con dos técnicas diferentes: lente intraocular en la cámara anterior con apoyo angular (25 ojos) y lente intraocular plegable de la cámara posterior suturado a iris (25 ojos). Resultados: Se observó que en el grupo de pacientes tratados con lente intraocular suturado a iris el porcentaje de pacientes con una visión de 20/40 o más fue significativamente superior (96,0 por ciento vs. 60,0 por ciento, p= 0,000) en los resultados refractivos obtenidos según el grupo de tratamiento. En el grupo A predominaron los pacientes que quedaron emétropes, seguidos de los pacientes miopes. En el grupo B predominaron los pacientes miopes y a diferencia del grupo anterior ningún paciente quedó hipermétrope. Conclusiones: La lente intraocular plegable de la cámara posterior suturada a iris mostró ser más eficaz, indujo menos astigmatismo y fue mejor en la predictibilidad de la esfera en un rango estricto de ± 1,00 dioptrías(AU)

Objective: Compare the refractive results of secondary implantation of rigid angle-supported intraocular lenses in the anterior chamber and foldable iris-suture-fixated intraocular lenses in the posterior chamber. Methods: A quasi-experimental non-equivalent control (historical cohort) study was conducted of 50 patients (50 eyes) with aphakia and inadequate capsular support after cataract surgery, who underwent secondary intraocular lens implantation with two different techniques: angle-supported intraocular lens in the anterior chamber (25 eyes) and foldable iris-suture-fixated intraocular lens in the posterior chamber (25 eyes). Results: In the group treated with iris-suture-fixated intraocular lens implantation the percentage of patients with 20/40 vision or more was significantly higher (96.0 percent vs. 60.0 percent, p= 0.000) in the refractive results obtained for each treatment group. In Group A a predominance was found of emmetropic, followed by myopic patients. In Group B myopic patients prevailed and unlike the other group no patient was hyperopic. Conclusions: Foldable iris-suture-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses proved more effective, induced less astigmatism and displayed better sphere predictability in a strict range of ± 1.00 diopters(AU)

A new surgical technique using steel suture for trans-scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses.

Background: A new emerging complication of trans‑scleral fixation of posterior chamber (PC) intraocular lens (IOL) with polypropylene suture is high rates of spontaneous dislocation of the IOL due to disintegration or breakage of suture. Materials: We report a new surgical technique of trans‑scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lens (SF PCIOL) with steel suture to eliminate the complication of dislocation of IOL fixed with polypropylene suture in one adult and a child. Results: We successfully achieved stable fixation and good centration of IOL after SF PCIOL with steel suture in these patient having inadequate posterior capsular support. Both eyes achieved best corrected visual acuity 20/40 at 18 months follow‑up. Conclusions: Steel suture is a viable option for trans‑scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lens.

Late-Onset Citrobacter koseri Endophthalmitis with Suture Exposure after Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation

A 54-year-old male patient was seen in clinic for ocular pain and decreased vision in the right eye with duration of two days. He underwent a cataract operation for his right eye 12 years ago, then a sclera-fixated secondary intraocular implantation and pars plana vitrectomy three years ago due to intraocular lens dislocation. At the initial visit, his visual acuity was restricted to the perception of hand motion. An edematous cornea, cells, flare with hypopyon, and exposed suture material at were observed at the six o'clock direction by slit lamp. Vitreous opacity was noted from B-scan ultrasonography. The patient was diagnosed with late-onset endophthalmitis and an intravitreal cocktail injection was done. On the next day, the hypopyon was aggravated, and therefore a pars plana vitrectomy was performed. A vitreous culture tested positive for Citrobacter koseri. After 12 weeks, the best corrected visual acuity of the right eye improved to 0.7 and a fundus examination revealed a relatively normal optic disc and retinal vasculature. We herein report the first case of endophthalmitis caused by Citrobacter koseri in Korea. Exposed suture material was suspected as the source of infection in this case and prompt surgical intervention resulted in a relatively good visual outcome.

Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation in Pediatric Aphakia

A retrospective study was done on secondary intraocular lens implantation in 19 children(22 eyes)who were not satisfied with aphakic glasses and were not tolerant with contact lenses.In all cases,postoperative visual acuity improved or remained at the preoperative level.In 10 cases,postoperative visual acuity was better than 20/40. After at least 12 months of follow-up,average difference of refractive power between the two eyes in the same patient is 0.79 diopter. Early postoperative complications related to secondary intraocular lens implantation were vitreous hemorrhage(1 eye)and IOL decentration. Vitreous hemorrhage was resorbed in three weeks.In case of IOL decentration,we repositioned the IOL.Late complcations during the follow-up period included development of dense capsular opacification in four eyes.They are all treated by Nd:YAG capsulotomy. After capsulotomy there were some improvement in visual acuity. From these results,secondary intraocular lens implantation appears to be a safe, effective method for correction of aphakic children who are not satisfied with aphakic glasses and/or intolerant of use of contact lenses.