Segmentectomía lateral izquierda laparoscópica en donante vivo para trasplante hepático adulto-pediátrico

Introducción: La segmentectomía lateral izquierda es el procedimiento más empleado para la cirugía del donante en trasplante hepático con donante vivo adulto-pediátrico (THDVA-P), y ha demostrado ser seguro y reproducible. Sin embargo, la información aún es escasa respecto al abordaje laparoscópico. Objetivo: El objetivo de este artículo es dar a conocer los resultados posoperatorios de la segmentectomía lateral izquierda laparoscópica (SLI-L) para THDVA-P. Materiales y Método: Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo, observacional, de un solo centro, Hospital del Salvador; con vasta experiencia en trasplante hepático y en resecciones hepáticas laparoscópicas. Se ofreció realizar el procedimiento de SLI-L para la cirugía del donante vivo. Se describe la técnica quirúrgica y los resultados posoperatorios de los donantes. Resultados: Entre abril de 2015 y enero de 2021, 36 pacientes, 25 de ellos hombres, fueron sometidos a SLI-L. El 86% eran madre o padre del receptor, con una mediana de 30 años (19-45). Mediana de tiempo operatorio de 360 min (240-480). Hubo conversión en un caso debido a sangrado venoso de difícil manejo y en dos oportunidades se utilizó técnica mano asistida por la misma causa. Morbilidad Clavien-Dindo III en un paciente debido a fuga biliar precoz, manejada con prótesis vía colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica exitosamente. La mediana de hospitalización fue de 4 días (3-12) y no hubo mortalidad. Conclusión: La SLI-L ha evolucionado, desde un procedimiento innovador hasta convertirse en el actual procedimiento estándar para THDVA-P. Los buenos resultados en términos de morbimortalidad sugieren que podría ser una técnica segura y reproducible en contextos similares al del centro.

Introduction: Living donor left lateral sectionectomy is a well-established alternative in cadaveric donor pediatric liver transplantation. This procedure has proven to be safe and reproducible. However, laparoscopic approach is still under development and evidence of its feasibility is limited. Aim: The aim of this article is to present the surgical technique and postoperative outcomes of the cases of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy performed in this center. Materials and Method: A retrospective, observational, single center study was conducted in Hospital del Salvador. From 04/2015 - 01/2021 laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy was offered for donor surgery. We present the surgical technique, perioperative care, and early postoperative outcomes in donors. Results: This series includes 36 patients, 25 (69%) of them were males. A total of 31 (86%) donors were mother or father of the recipient. Median age of donors was 30 years (19-45), median operative time was 360 min (240-480). All the patients underwent laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy. Conversion was necessary in one case due to difficult management of a venous bleeding. Clavien-Dindo Morbidity III, in one patient who required endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to an early bile leak. Median hospitalization was 4 days (3-14). There was no mortality. Conclusion: Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy has proven to be safe and reproducible. This technique has evolved from an innovative procedure to become the current standard of practice in our center, with excellent results in terms of morbidity and mortality.

Application of the Laennec capsule approach in laparoscopic anatomical sectionectomy / 中华消化外科杂志

Laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy (LAH) has been widely approved as an essential procedure for safety and availability, and has gradually become the mainstream method of hepatec-tomy. Through a renewed understanding of the Laennec capsule, the authors have found that there exists a natural gap between the Laennec capsule and the adjacent tissues, such as Glisson pedicles and hepatic veins. Consequently, Laennec capsule can serve as the anatomical approach for LAH. The left lobe, right anterior lobe and right posterior lobe has an independent Glisson pedicle respectively, which can be used to perform Glisson pedicle transection sectionectomy via Laennec capsule approach without damaging the liver parenchyma. The exposure of hepatic veins on the detached plane can also be achieved through this approach. Laennec capsule approach provides a new idea for laparoscopic anatomic liver sectionectomy, which is safe, reliable, convenient and highly repeatable.

Current Status of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Experiences from Tertiary Center

Laparoscopic liver resection has been widely accepted nowadays for selective cases of liver diseases. Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and minor LLR are considered standard practice worldwide and cautious introduction of major laparoscopic liver resections like hemihepatectomies, central sectionectomy etc.. in institutions having experienced liver surgeons. Because of increasing young liver donor, laparoscopic donor hepatectomy is becoming popular, which gives better cosmetic outcomes. Many clinical trials compared laparoscopic liver resection safety, long term outcomes with open procedures. More recently, advances in laparoscopic instruments and techniques encouraged Korean surgeons to choose a laparoscopic procedure as one of the treatment options for benign or malignant diseases of liver.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy vs. Open Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Single Center Experience

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery has become the mainstream surgical operation due to its stability and feasibility. Even for liver surgery, the laparoscopic approach has become an integral procedure. According to the recent international consensus meeting on laparoscopic liver surgery, laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) might be a new standard of care for left lateral surgical lesions. This study was designed to compare open LLS to laparoscopic LLS. METHODS: In total, 82 patients who had undergone LLS at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital between 2008 and 2015 were enrolled in this study. Among them, 59 patients underwent open LLS and 23 underwent laparoscopic LLS. These two groups were compared according to general characteristics and operative outcomes. RESULTS: The data analysis results showed that laparoscopic liver resection is superior to open liver resection in terms of the amount of bleeding during the operation and the duration of hospital stay. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of operation time (p value=0.747). The amount of bleeding during the operation was 145.5±149.4 ml on average for the laparoscopic group and 320±243.8 ml on average for the open group (p value=0.005). The mean duration of hospital stay was 10.7±5.8 days for the laparoscopic surgery group and 12.2±5.1 days for the open surgery group (p value=0.003). CONCLUSION: This study showed that laparoscopic LLS is safe and feasible, because it involves less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. For left lateral lesions, laparoscopic LLS might be the first option to be considered.

Gaining Experience before Establishing a Totally Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy as a Standard Procedure

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to present our experience before establishing laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) of the liver as a standard procedure, and to show efficacy of a totally LLLS compared to an open left lateral sectionectomy (OLLS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed and compared clinical outcomes (operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, complication rate, etc) for 29 patients who underwent LLLS and 27 patients who underwent OLLS between January, 2002 and December, 2009. To see the learning curve for LLLS, we arbitrarily divided the LLLSs we did into an early group (ELLLS) and a late group (LLLLS) based on when they were operated on relative to case number 14. RESULTS: Mean operative times for the ELLLS, LLLLS and OLLS groups were 269.7+/-102.6, 210.0+/-47.9 and 289.1+/-72.8 minutes, respectively. Mean operative time was significantly shorter (p<0.05) in the LLLLS than the OLLS group. Mean intra-operative blood loss was also less in the LLLLS group than the OLLS group (80.00+/-224.2 ml vs. 195.15+/-405.4 ml). Post-operative hospital stay was shorter in the LLLLS group than the OLLS group (9.9+/-4.0 versus 16.9+/-9.1, p=0.071). CONCLUSION: The totally LLLS is a safe, feasible treatment option that can be a standard procedure with better outcomes in selected patients after an initial learning curve.