Research progress on liver transplantation for drug-induced liver injury / 器官移植

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a type of necrotizing and inflammatory liver disease caused by certain commonly-used drugs, Chinese herbal medicines or dietary supplements. In severe cases, it may lead to acute liver failure. Without liver transplantation, the fatality could reach up to 80%. It is of significance to master the indications of liver transplantation. Several prognostic scoring systems have been developed to help clinicians to decide which patients need urgent liver transplantation, such as King's College criteria (KCC) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring systems. However, these scoring methods have been developed for a long period of time and lack of modifications. Therefore, scholars have proposed several new scoring systems, such as acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring systems, which provide novel ideas for the evaluation of liver transplantation. As an important treatment measure for drug-induced acute liver failure, urgent liver transplantation has greatly improved the survival rate of patients. In this article, the classification, clinical diagnosis, liver transplantation evaluation and prognosis of DILI were summarized, aiming to provide reference for the treatment of DILI by liver transplantation.

Value of oxygenation index in assessment of outcome of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome treated by mechanical ventilator / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective To determine the value of oxygenation index in assessing the outcome of mechanical ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Methods From September 2008 to September 2013,patients meeting the Berlin definition of ARDS were evaluated in this retrospective study.Data included oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) on day before,and day 1 and day 3 after mechanical ventilation.The levels of PaO/FiO2 on day before and day 1 after mechanical ventilation were compared between 28-day survivors and non-survivors.Results There were 236 patients meeting the criteria of the Berlin Definition for diagnosis and treated with mechanical ventilation.The mean score of APACHIE Ⅱ and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) at the beginning were (19.1 ± 3.0) and (10.8 ±2.5),respectively,while oxygenation index on day before mechanical ventilation was (150.3 ± 62.6) mmHg.According to the hypoxemia grade,patients were divided into mild (n =36),moderate (n =122) and severe (n =78) ARDS,and their levels of PaO2/FiO2 were (80.1 ± 8.1),(162.3 ± 19.9) and (261.6 ± 22.3) mmHg,respectively.There were 92 non-survivors and 144 survivors.No obvious difference in oxygenation index of non-survivors among on day before、and day 1 and day 3 after mechanical ventilation.There was statistically significant difference in oxygenation index between on day before and day 1 after mechanical ventilation in survivors (P ＜ 0.05).Compared with the survivors,the score of APACHE Ⅱ,SOFA,and oxygenation index on day 3 were associated with increased mortality in the non-survivors,respectively (P ＜ 0.05).In respect to the mortality,the cut-off point of score of oxygenation index set at ＜ 180 mmHg on Day 3,an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was 0.749 with statistically significance (P ＜ 0.05),leading to sensitivity 61.7％ and specificity 93.2％.The relationship between prognosis and antibiotic resistance did not have statistically significance.Conclusions Data of oxygenation index on early phage of ARDS may be valuable to predict the outcome.A strong predictor of adverse outcome in such conditions was the score of oxygenation index on Day 3 ≤ 180 mmHg.

The Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis Admitted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit / 대한구급학회지

BACKGROUND: Patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis usually resulted in admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) during hospitalization. When admitted to the ICU, the mortality was high. The aim of this study is to identify multiple prognostic factors for mortality and to analyze the significance of prognostic survival model with each scoring system in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis who was admitted to the ICU. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2008, 60 consecutive patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis were admitted in the ICU and retrospectively reviewed. Prognostic models used were Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), model for end-stage liver disease with incorporation of serum sodium (MELD-Na), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA). The predictive prognosis was analyzed using the area under the receiver's operating characteristics curve (AUC). RESULTS: The median follow up period was 20 months, and ICU mortality was 17% (n = 10). A total of 24 patients (40%) died during the study period. The average survival of five prognostic models was related with the severity of the disease. All of the five systems showed significant differences in the cumulative survival rate, according to the scores on admission, and the MELD-Na had the highest AUC (0.924). Multivariate analysis showed that bilirubin and albumin were significantly related to mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The CPT, MELD, MELD-Na, APACHE II, and SOFA may predict the prognosis of patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. The MELD-Na could be a better prognostic predictor than other scoring systems.

Sequential organ failure assessment score in evaluation of the outcome of patients with acute poisoning / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective To analyze the status of multiple organ failure in patients with acute poisoning and to investigate the relationship between sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and prognosis. Method A retrospective review of 76 patients admitted to emergency intensive care unit in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University for acute poisoning was carried out. Data about heart rate, blood pressure, blood oxygen saturation, blood gas analysis, rutine blood examination (WBC,platelet,albumin, ALT,total bilirubin, BUN,creatinine, CK, CK-MB, blood glucose), dosage of vascular active agents and mental status were documented at admission and 48 h after admission. SOFAs were counted at admission (SOFA ) and 48 h after admission (SOFA ) and then a comparison was made between survivors and victims. Results There was no significant difference in SOFA between survivors and victims ( P = 0.26) , but significant difference in SOFA48 as well as SOFA was shown between survivors and victims (P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the SOFA48 of renal and nervous systems were the independent predictors with acute poisoning (P = 0.003 and 0.012 respectively). Spearman correlation analysis implicated that ALT,CK-MB, WBC,base excess (BE) and blood glucose (BG) had correlation with SOFAs48. Conclusions SOFA shows its score eorrellated with the prognosis of poisoning with a-cute poisoning and it is a practical method in eveluating the outcome of patients with acute poisoning.

The SOFA Score to Evaluate Organ Failure and Prognosis in the Intensive Care Unit Patients / 결핵및호흡기질환

BACKGROUND: The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score can help to assess organ failure over time and is useful to evaluate morbidity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of SOFA score as a descriptor of multiple organ failure in critically ill patients in a local unit hospital, and to compare with APACHE III scoring system. METHODS: This study was carried out prospectively. A total of ninety one patients were included who admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) in Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital from May 1 through June 30, 2000. We excluded patients with a length of stay in the ICU less than 2 days following scheduled procedure, admissions for ECG monitoring, other department and patients transferred to other hospital. The SOFA score and APACHE III score were calculated on admission and then consecutively every 24 hours until ICU discharge. RESULTS: The ICU mortality rate was 20%. The non-survivors had a higher SOFA score within 24 hours after admission. The number of organ failure was associated with increased mortality. The evaluation of a subgroup of 74 patients who stayed in the ICU for at least 48 hours showed that survivors and non-survivors followed a different course. In this subgroup, the total SOFA score increased in 81% of the non-survivors but in only 21% of the survivors. Conversely, the total SOFA score decreased in 48% of the survivors compared with 6% of the non-survivors. The non-survivors also had a higher APACHE III score within 24 hours and there was a correlation between SOFA score and APACHE III score. CONCLUSION: The SOFA score is a simple, but effective method to assess organ failure and to predict mortality in critically ill patients. Regular and repeated scoring enables patient's condition and clinical course to be monitored and better understood. The SOFA score well correlates with APACHE III score.