Criação e validação de cenário simulado interprofissional para a pronação de pacientes com SDRA / Creation and validation of an interprofessional simulated scenario for the pronation of patients with ARDS

RESUMO Introdução: Este trabalho versa sobre a construção e validação de um cenário simulado com abordagem interprofissional, que permitirá a utilização no ensino e na educação permanente de profissionais da saúde por meio da metodologia ativa de simulação clínica. Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivos construir e validar um cenário simulado para a pronação de pacientes críticos com síndrome do desconforto respiratório agudo. Método: Trata-se de um estudo metodológico desenvolvido durante o ano de 2022 em uma universidade pública do Sul do Brasil e realizado em duas etapas: 1. delineamento do caso clínico e construção do cenário, e 2. validação de conteúdo e de aparência por 11 juízes com expertise em simulação clínica e/ou cuidado destinado ao paciente crítico, que atenderam aos critérios de Fehring. Aplicou-se um questionário do tipo Likert para a avaliação de 37 itens estabelecidos a partir do referencial de Fabri et al. Para medir o percentual de concordância entre os juízes, adotou-se o índice de validade de conteúdo (IVC). Resultado: Para a construção do cenário, desenvolveram-se o roteiro e guia de apoio ao facilitador e ao participante, e o roteiro para o ator simulado; um quadro de ações esperadas para cada participante; a relação de materiais e equipamentos necessários para o desenvolvimento; e o checklist de observação do desenvolvimento de competências e habilidades para cada profissão envolvida no cenário (médico, fisioterapeuta, enfermeiro e técnico de enfermagem). Os juízes eram predominantemente enfermeiros (63,6%), seguidos por fisioterapeutas (18,1%), médico (9%) e docente de enfermagem (9%). Os juízes responderam a um questionário que abordou os seguintes temas: "experiência prévia do participante/briefing", "conteúdo/objetivos", "recursos humanos", "preparo do cenário", "desenvolvimento do cenário" e "avaliação". Todos os itens obtiveram IVC superior ao desejável (0,80) e, portanto, foram considerados válidos. Além disso, os juízes realizaram sugestões de melhorias para o cenário, as quais foram acatadas ou rejeitas e discutidas com a literatura disponível. Conclusão: Este estudo permitiu criar e validar um cenário que reflete a prática real, ao mesmo tempo que oportuniza um ambiente seguro para os participantes e responde aos objetivos da aprendizagem interprofissional.

ABSTRACT Introduction: This work is focused on the construction and validation of a simulated scenario with an interprofessional approach, which will allow the use in the teaching and continuing education of health professionals through the active methodology of clinical simulation. Objective: To build and validate a simulated scenario for the pronation of critically ill patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Method: This is a methodological study developed in 2022 at a public university in Curitiba-PR, which occurred in two stages: 1) delineation of the clinical case and construction of the scenario; 2) content and appearance validation by 11 judges with expertise in clinical simulation and/or critical patient care, who met the Fehring's criteria. A Likert-type questionnaire was applied to evaluate 37 items based on the Fabri's reference. To measure the percentage of agreement among the judges, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was adopted. Results: To build the scenario, the script and support guide for the facilitator, the participant, and the script for the simulated actor; a table of expected actions for each participant; the list of materials and equipment needed for the development; and the checklist for observation of the development of competencies and skills for each profession involved in the scenario (physician, physical therapist, nurse, and nursing technician) were developed. The judges were predominantly nurses (63.6%), followed by physical therapists (18.1%), physicians (9%), and nursing lecturers (9%). The judges responded to a questionnaire that addressed "Prior Participant Experience/Briefing", "Content/Objectives"; "Human Resources"; "Scenario Preparation", "Scenario Development", and "Evaluation". All items scored higher than desirable Content Validity Index (0.80) and were considered valid. In addition, the judges suggested improvements to the scenario, which were accepted or rejected and discussed with the available literature. Conclusion: This study made it possible to create and validate a scenario that reflects actual practice while providing a safe environment for participants and meeting the goals of interprofessional learning.

Seroincidencia de anticuerpos IgG del SARS-CoV-2 y factores de riesgo en trabajadores sanitarios asintomáticos del hospital Departamental de Villavicencio

Objetivo: Estimar la seroincidencia acumulada de inmunoglobulinas (Ig) clase G (IgG) anti-SARS-CoV-2 en trabajadores de la salud asintomáticos y su asociación epidemiológica dentro de las áreas funcionales del Hospital Departamental de Villavicencio (HDV). Metodología: Se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional analítico longitudinal de una cohorte de trabajadores, donde cada 21 días, en tres oportunidades, se midieron IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 en suero sanguíneo, a través de ELISA indirecto, en una muestra representativa aleatoria (n= 105) de trabajadores sanitarios del hospital (N= 756). Como instrumento de recolección de datos se utilizó una encuesta, donde cada trabajador sanitario declaró no haber sido diagnosticado con COVID-19, e igualmente registró la información sobre las variables independientes: sexo, edad, condición laboral, área funcional y comorbilidades. Resultados: La prevalencia inicial para SARS-CoV-2 entre los trabajadores sanitarios asintomáticos del HDV fue de 9,52 % (IC 95 % 5,25-16,65). La seroincidencia acumulada durante 42 días fue de 12,38 % (IC 95 % 7,38-20,04). El riesgo relativo (RR) se utilizó para establecer los factores de riesgo asociados a las variables independientes. El sexo masculino (RR ajustado = 3,34, IC 95 % 1,98-5,86), obesidad (RR ajustado = 10,98, IC 95 % 1,41-85,98) y sexo femenino (RR ajustado = 2,15, IC 95 % 1,12-4,31) en las áreas funcionales de Hospitalización, Medicina Crítica y Urgencias, respectivamente, son factores de riesgo en el HDV. Conclusión: Un total de 13 de 105 trabajadores sanitarios del hospital seroconvirtieron positivamente para SARS-CoV-2 y fueron asintomáticos durante 42 días de seguimiento epidemiológico. Además, existen factores de riesgo importantes en su exposición a este virus en el HDV.

Objective: To estimate the cumulative seroincidence of antisars-CoV-2 immunoglobulin (Ig) class G (IgG) in asymptomatic health care workers and its epidemiological association within the functional areas of the Villavicencio Departmental Hospital (HDV). Methodology: A longitudinal analytical observational study of a cohort of workers was conducted in which anti- SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels in blood serum were measured every 21 days on three occasions using an indirect ELISA in a random representative sample (n = 105) of hospital health workers (N = 756). The data collection tool was a survey in which each healthcare worker indicated that they had not been diagnosed with COVID-19 and provided information on the independent variables: sex, age, job status, functional area, and comorbidities. Results: The baseline prevalence for SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic HDV healthcare workers was 9.52% (CI 95% 5.25-16.65). Cumulative seroincidence over 42 days was 12.38% (CI 95% 7.38-20.04). Relative risk (RR) was used to establish the risk factors associated with the independent variables. Male sex (adjusted RR 3.34, CI 95% 1.98-5.86), obesity (adjusted RR 10.98, CI 95% 1.41- 85.98) and female sex (adjusted RR 2.15, CI 95% 1.12-4.31) in the functional areas of Hospitalization, Critical Medicine and Emergency, respectively, are risk factors in the HDV. Conclusion: During 42 days of epidemiological follow-up, 13 out of 105 hospital healthcare workers seroconverted positively for SARS-CoV-2 and remained asymptomatic. Additionally, significant risk factors are associated with their exposure to this virus in the HDV.

Objetivo: Estimar a incidência zero acumulada de imunoglobulinas (Ig) classe G (IgG) anti-SARS-CoV-2 em profissionais de saúde assintomáticos e sua associação epidemiológica dentro das áreas funcionais do Hospital Estadual de Villavicencio (HDV). Metodologia: Foi realizado um estudo observacional analítico longitudinal de uma coorte de profissionais, no qual a cada 21 dias, em três ocasiões mediram-se IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 em soro sanguíneo, através de ELISA indireto, em uma amostra representativa aleatória (n = 105) de profissionais de saúde do hospital (N =756). Como instrumento de recolecção de dados foi usada uma pesquisa, onde cada profissional de saúde declarou não ter sido diagnosticado com COVID-19, e igualmente registrou a informação sobre as variáveis independentes: sexo, idade, condições de trabalho, área de atuação e comorbidades. Resultados: A prevalência inicial para SARS-CoV-2 entre os profissionais de saúde assintomáticos do HDV foi de 9,52% (IC 95% 5,25-16,65). A incidência zero acumulada durante 42 dias foi de 12,38% (IC 95% 7,38-20,04). O risco relativo (RR) foi utilizado para estabelecer os fatores de risco associados às variáveis independentes. O sexo masculino (RR ajustado 3,34, IC 95% 1,98-5,86), obesidade (RR ajustado 10,98, IC 95% 1,41-85,98) e sexo feminino (RR ajustado 2,15, IC 95% 1,12-4,31) nas áreas funcionais de Internação, Unidade de Terapia Intensiva e Urgências, respectivamente, são fatores de risco no HDV. Conclusão: Um total de 13 de 105 profissionais de saúde do hospital foram detectados positivamente para SARS-CoV-2 e foram assintomáticos durante 42 dias de seguimento epidemiológico. Além disso, existem importantes fatores de risco na sua exposição a este vírus no HDV.

REVIEW ON STRUCTURE, PATHOGENECITY, TRANSMISSIBILITY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HUMAN PATHOGENIC CORONAVIRUSES

Coronaviruses cause animal and human respiratory and bowel infections. They have not been deemed highly pathogenic to humans until the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2002 and 2003 in Guangdong province, China. Coronaviruses (CoVs) are large, enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses that can infect both animals and humans. Coronaviruses didn't just appear recently. They are large family of viruses that have been around for a long time. Formerly, coronaviruses (CoVs) were seen as relatively harmless respiratory pathogens to humans. However, two outbreaks of severe respiratory tract infection, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) caused high pathogenicity and mortality rates among human populations as a result of zoonotic CoVs crossing the species barrier. Now the recent detection of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19), added a new member in corona virus family.The novel coronavirus (COVID 19) is one of the member of coronavirus family which infect human. Scientists have divided coronaviruses into four sub- groupings, called alpha, beta, gamma and delta. Seven of these viruses can infect people. The four common coronaviruses are-229E(alpha), NL63(alpha), OC43(beta), HKU1(beta). The three less-common coronaviruses are- MERS-CoV(beta), SARS-CoV(beta), SARS-CoV-2. Our main target is to describe the the structure, Pathogenecity, Transmissibility and Epidemiology of above mentioned subgroups of corona viruses in our review

Dental workers in front-line of COVID-19: an in silico evaluation targeting their prevention

Abstract SARS-CoV-2 has high human-human transmission rate. The aerosols and saliva droplets are the main contamination source. Thus, it is crucial to point out that dental practitioners become a high-risk group of contagion by SARS-CoV-2. Based on this, protocols have been recommended to avoid cross-contamination during dental care; however, appropriate evidence has not yet been established. Objective Our study sought to make a screening, by in silico analysis, of the potential of mouth rinses used in dental practices to prevent the dental workers' contamination by SARS-CoV-2. Methodology Multiple sequence comparisons and construction of the phylogenetic tree were conducted using the FASTA code. Therefore, molecular docking investigation between SARS-CoV-2 proteins (Main Protease, Spike Glycoprotein, Non-structure Protein, and Papain-like Protease) and molecules used in dental practices (chlorhexidine digluconate, hydrogen peroxide, cetylpyridinium chloride, povidone-iodine, gallic acid, β-cyclodextrin, catechin, and quercetin) was performed using AutoDock Vina. Moreover, 2D interactions of the complex protein-ligand structure were analyzed by Ligplot+. Results The obtained results showed a remarkable affinity between SARS-CoV-2 proteins and all tested compounds. The chlorhexidine digluconate, catechin, and quercetin presented a higher affinity with SARS-CoV-2. Conclusions The overall results allowed us to suggest that chlorhexidine is the most suitable active compound in reducing the SARS-CoV-2 salivary load due to its better binding energy. However, in vivo studies should be conducted to confirm their clinical use.

A Systematic Literature Review of Current Therapeutic Approaches for COVID-19 Patients

Background:In December 2019, the pneumonia outbreak reported in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. WHO introduced a novel coronavirus and the virus named Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in January 2020. There are not any specific antiviral agents for coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19). Objective:Our review aimed to discuss treatment options and the efficacy of currently prescribed drugs and supportive care in COVID‐19 patients. Study Design:A literature review of the articles in the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE conducted. Results: Lopinavir/ritonavir combination was the most frequently used drug, followed by Arbidol and Oseltamivir and Methylprednisolone. Lopinavir/Ritonavir outcome showed the fever and respiratory infection improve in day two and day eight, respectively. Also, negative PCR of SARS‐CoV‐2 in days six and 7day was seen and finally these patients discharged in 10 days. Conclusions: Lopinavir/Ritonavir was the most improving administrated antiviral combination, which might be a good option for COVID-19 due to its availability. Although supportive care such as O2supplementary and IV fluid therapy has improved outcomes. There are not evidence forsuggesting a new treatment or a new drug, which mean the necessity of further investigations for drug research in a clinical trial for a conclusion about the optimum treatment

Keeping up with COVID-19: A review for family physicians

Background@#Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first identified in Wuhan, China in December 2019. This has rapidly spread worldwide, causing a pandemic. The Philippines ranks 3rd in Southeast Asia with more than 15,000 confirmed cases, and a case fatality rate of 6.01%, close to the global average of 6.33%.@*Objective and Methods@#This review aims to provide Family and Community Physicians the latest updates on epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment options, and prognosis of COVID-19. Online literature search was done with WHO and DOH websites prioritized for epidemiologic data, and MEDLINE for the most recent and relevant journal articles.@*Pathogenesis@#SARS-CoV-2, the etiologic agent of COVID-19, is an enveloped, positive sense single-stranded RNA virus which triggers immune-mediated responses responsible for most of the clinical manifestations of the disease. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 appears to play a critical role in viral entry and disease severity.@*Clinical Manifestations@#There have been reports of asymptomatic cases. Majority have mild illness, with common symptoms of fever, cough, headache and fatigue. Those who progress to the critical stage of the disease present with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, sepsis or Multiple Organ Dysfunction.@*Diagnostic Evaluation@#The definitive diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 requires an analysis of respiratory specimens collected through oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs. The reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is considered the confirmatory test. Serological rapid detection test (RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG may be done, but as an adjunct only because antibodies appear later in the course of disease. Imaging studies and other tests are used to monitor the severity of the condition, but not for diagnosis.@*Treatment and Prognosis@#Supportive therapy is the cornerstone of management. Currently, there is no FDA-approved drug or agent specifically for the treatment of COVID-19. Drugs being investigated for treatment are those that are currently used for other viral infections or indicated for other conditions. A vaccine is yet to be developed. Old age, the presence of comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular and lung diseases, and smoking history are risk factors that lead to severe complications and death.@*Conclusion@#COVID-19 has caused a global public health crisis. In the Philippines, cases are still on the rise. Majority of cases are mild. More severe and fatal disease is associated with old age and the presence of comorbidities. Definitive diagnosis is through RT-PCR. Supportive therapy is the cornerstone of management. The search continues for a proven, effective drug for treatment and vaccine for prevention of COVID-19.