RESUMEN
Background: Clinical jaundice is evident in more than two-third neonates in their early neonatal life. Early identification of neonates at risk might allow early intervention and prevent complication. Objective of the study was to assess the cord blood bilirubin level as a tool to screen the risk of development of subsequent significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in term neonates.Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over a period of 2 years on 1040 healthy term neonates. Demographic profile, relevant maternal and neonatal information were recorded. Measurement of cord blood bilirubin, blood group/Rh typing and serum bilirubin at the end of 24 & 72 hours was done to predict significant hyperbilirubinemia.Results: Incidence of significant hyperbilirubinemia was 11.53%. Gender, gestational age, mode of delivery and birth weight had no correlation with development of significant jaundice. 800 (76.93%) neonates had cord blood bilirubin level ?3.0mg/dl and 240 (23.07%) neonate had cord blood bilirubin level >3.0mg/dl. Out of 240 (23.07%) neonates with higher cord bilirubin (>3.0 mg/dl), 108 (45%) had significant hyperbilirubinemia at the end of 24 hours with sensitivity 90.00%, specificity 85.65%, positive predictive value 45.00% and negative predictive value 98.50% while 110 (45.83%) neonates were observed with serum bilirubin >17mg/dl at the end of 72 hours with cord blood bilirubin >3mg/dl with sensitivity 91.67%, specificity 84.52% positive predictive value 45.83% and negative predictive value-98.61% and this difference was statistically significant.Conclusions: Neonates with cord blood bilirubin level ?3mg/dl can be safely discharged early whereas neonates with bilirubin >3mg/dl will need close follow up to check for development of subsequent significant jaundice. Hence cord blood bilirubin levels help to determine and predict the possibility of significant jaundice among healthy term neonates.
RESUMEN
Background: The objective of the study to compare the predictive ability of predischarge serum total bilirubin (STB) and clinical factors for significant hyperbilirubinemia (SHB) in newborn to observe the prediction of the hyperbilirubinemia.Methods: In the prospective study, enlist of healthy newborn infants with >35 weeks gestation, in a tertiary hospital in western India. The serum bilirubin between 36-48 hours of age and risk factors for SHB were identified before discharge. SHB was distinct as a bilirubin level that exceed or was within 1mg/dL (17'mol/L) of the hour-specific phototherapy conduct threshold recommended by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guideline on the management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.Results: Of 505 infants, 380 infants were included in final analysis, among which 70 babies (22.5%) developed SHB. On univariate analysis STB, gestational age (GA) and percentage of weight loss were found to be predictive of SHB. On multiple logistic regressions, the prognostic ability of predischarge STB is higher than that of percentage of weight loss and GA. The predictive accurateness of predischarge (<48 hours) STB level was comparable to that of percentage of weight loss (AUC=0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.93). However, the prediction model that combined multiple risk factors such as predischarge STB, GA and percentage of weight loss have the best accuracy for predicting SHB.Conclusions: Combination of specific clinical factors (gestational age and percentage of weight loss) with predischarge serum total bilirubin described best predicts development of considerable hyperbilirubinemia.
RESUMEN
La predicción del riesgo de hiperbilirrubinemia significativa a través de la medición de una bilirrubina previa al alta ha sido validada en neonatos. La estimación visual de la extensión de la ictericia es comúnmente usada para la decisión de la obtención de la prueba de bilirrubina. Determinar la confiabilidad de la evaluación visual de la ictericia en la detección del riesgo de hiperbilirrubinemia significativa. 123 neonatos fueron examinados antes del alta por un pediatra quien asignó la extensión de la ictericia según su progresión céfalo-caudal. Una medida simultánea de bilirrubina transcutánea fue hecha por otro observador. Luego se comparó la calificación del riesgo de hiperbilirrubinemia significativa por ambos métodos, a través de un nomograma clasificado por zonas de riesgo. Resultados: El porcentaje de coincidencia global en relación a la designación de riesgo por ambos métodos fue 73%, pero esta proporción decreció a 56,3% cuando se analizó sólo para las zonas de alto riesgo. De hecho, 18 (43,7%) de los 32 neonatos calificados de alto riesgo por la prueba transcutánea fueron erróneamente identificados por la evaluación visual como niños de bajo riesgo. A pesar de que la concordancia general entre la estimación visual de la ictericia y la bilirrubina real es aceptable, la confiabilidad de la valoración visual como el procedimiento primario para identificar el riesgo de una hiperbilirrubinemia significativa es limitada. La detección de la severidad de la ictericia debe basarse en otros métodos, como la medición de la bilirrubina sérica o transcutánea
Pre-discharge bilirrubin percentiles have proved to be useful in predicting which infants will develop significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. The extent of clinical jaundice is commonly used to decide when to take a sample test for serum bilirubin. To determine the reliability of visual assessment of jaundice in the identification of the risk of significant hyperbilirubinemia. Clinical estimate of cephalocaudal progression of jaundice was carried out by a pediatrician in 123 neonates. Transcutaneous bilirubin (TCB) was simultaneously measured by an independent observer. Measurements by both methods were plotted into a nomogram stratified by risk zones to determine their level of agreement as to the classification of the risk. General agreement between the two measurements was 73%. However, this proportion decreased to 56.3% when only high-risk zones were analyzed. In fact, 18 (43.7%) of the 32 infants with transcutaneous bilirubin levels in high-risk zones were missclasified as low-risk cases by visual estimate. Although there was good general agreement between clinical evaluation of jaundice and TCB, visual assessment was not fully reliable as a primary screening method to identify significant hyperbilirubinemia. Further means should be used to support decisions regarding this risk, such as serum bilirubin sampling or transcutaneous bilirubin