Treatment of Class II division I malocclusion having severe crowding, proclination with noncomplaint fixed functional appliance therapy, and frictionless mechanics

Our Objective was to treat a patient having proclined, protruded teeth along with a Class II Skeletal malocclusion. 0.022 × 0.028 inch MBT Brackets were placed, and leveling alignment was commenced. Individual canine retraction was carried out in both arches, followed by retraction of the incisors in the upper arch with a Burrstone's T Loop. E2Z Forsus fatigue resistance appliance was given for the correction of Class II malocclusion. Proclination, protrusion, and crowding were corrected along with Class II Skeletal base. Individual canine retraction along with frictionless mechanics and noncompliant functional correction has sufficient potential to prevent anchor loss and correct a Class II skeletal base.

Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Treatment with Combined Twin Block and Lip Bumper Appliances: A Case Report

ABSTRACT@#Functional appliances have been used over a century in clinical orthodontic treatments for skeletal Class II malocclusion patients. Its popularity is attributed to its high patient adaptability and ability to produce rapid treatment changes. The twin block and lip bumper can be combined depending on the patient’s cases. The purpose of therapy with twin block is effective in mandibular growth deficiencies to induce supplementary lengthening of mandibular by stimulating increased growth at the condylar cartilage. The patient was a ten-year-old male patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion. He had a convex facial profile, SNA (sella, nasion, A point) angle of 77.5°, SNB (sella, nasion, B point) angle of 73.0°, ANB (A point, nasion, B point) angle of 4.5°, overjet of 6.5 mm, overbite of 11/41 = 5.0 mm, 21/31 = 4.5 mm, abnormal upper labial frenulum, crossbite in the second left premolar of maxilla, crowded anterior teeth of mandibular, deficiency of mandibular growth, lower lip sucking habit, anterior teeth of maxilla with diastema and proclination. Orthodontic treatment for patient is a combination of twin block and lip bumper appliances. After seven months, frenectomy is used to eliminate and correct the spacing in the frenulum. After 10 months, the patient’s skeletal and profile had improved to skeletal Class I malocclusion, SNA angle of 78.0°, SNB angle of 75.0°, ANB angle of 3.0°, overbite and overjet of 4.0 mm, and the lower lip sucking habit had stopped. Twin block and lip bumper appliances are particularly good alternative treatment in managing selected cases of skeletal Class II malocclusion.

Micro-implanted-anchorage safety: cortical bone thickness in the maxillary posterior region of skeletal class II malocclusion / Seguridad en el micro-implante de anclaje: espesor del hueso cortical en la región posterior del maxilar en maloclusión de clase esquelética tipo II

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) measurement of cortical bone thickness and implantation angle in the maxillary posterior region was used to provide reference for the safety of Micro-Implanted-Anchorage (MIA) implantation in skeletal class II malocclusion. Twenty samples of CBCT images were collected from orthodontics patients (ages, 12-40 years) in Shanxi Medical University Stomatological Hospital, the thickness of cortical bone was measured at 45°, 60° and 90° from the alveolar crest, being at 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm, respectively. SPSS17.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data, and the one-way ANOVA and LSD method were compared. There was a significant difference in the thickness of the cortical bone obtained by implanting MIA at the same height of different angle (P≤0.05). The greater the inclination angle of the implanted MIA, the thicker the cortical bone. Also, the higher the implant site, the thicker the cortical bone thickness. Finally, the greater the thickness of the cortical bone in the maxillary posterior region of skeletal class II malocclusion, the greater the thickness of the cortical bone. At the same implantation height, implanted MIA with a tilt angle of 45º to 60º, 90º to obtain the best cortical bone thickness.

La medición del grosor del hueso cortical y del ángulo de implantación en la región posterior del maxilar por tomografía computarizada de haz cónico (TCHC) se utilizó para proporcionar una referencia para la implantación y el anclaje seguros de un Micro-Implante de Anclaje (MIA) en la maloclusión de clase esquelética tipo II. Veinte muestras de imágenes de TCHC fueron obtenidas de pacientes de ortodoncia (12-40 años) en el Hospital Estomatológico de la Universidad Médica de Shanxi. Se midió el grosor del hueso cortical a 45°, 60° y 90° de la cresta alveolar, encontrándose a 4 mm, 6 mm y 8 mm, respectivamente. Se utilizó el software estadístico SPSS 17.0 para analizar los datos, y se compararon con los métodos ANOVA y LSD de un factor. Hubo una diferencia significativa en el grosor del hueso cortical obtenido al implantar el MIA a la misma altura en diferentes ángulos (P <0,05). Cuanto mayor es el ángulo de inclinación del MIA implantado, más grueso es el hueso cortical. También, cuanto más alto es el sitio del implante, más grueso es el grosor del hueso cortical. Finalmente, cuanto mayor sea el grosor del hueso cortical en la región posterior del maxilar, en la maloclusión de clase esquelética tipo II, mayor será el grosor del hueso cortical.

Double jaw surgery – a modified surgical approach to treat skeletal class II

@#Patients with mandibular deficiency and skeletal class II malocclusions exhibit a wide spectrum of esthetic, cephalometric, and occlusal characteristics. The structure of chin determines facial attractiveness and is directly linked to a quality of life. Correction of dentoalveolar protrusion of maxilla is done by anterior maxillary subapical osteotomy by which anterior segment can be moved superiorly or inferiorly and posteriorly as indicated. Augmentation genioplasty is advocated to improve the overall facial esthetics of patient with mandibular deficiency. In skeletal class II malocclusions cases best results are obtained with double jaw surgery combined with the orthodontic treatment. This is a case report of skeletal class II malocclusion with mandibular deficiency and protruded maxilla in 22 year old female patient who was treated surgically by anterior maxillary subapical osteotomy and augmentation genioplasty along with the orthodontic treatment

Manejo del paciente con apiñamiento severo y mordida cruzada posterior bilateral con expansor maxilar tipo Hyrax

Las causas de las discrepancias transversales del maxilar superior pueden ser genéticas o ambientales. Se presenta un paciente de 17 años y 7 meses de edad. En su análisis clínico y radiográfico se diagnosticó como: Clase I esquelética, hiperdivergente, clase II molar y canina bilateral, mordida cruzada posterior bilateral, apiñamiento severo superior e inferior, órgano dental 22 cruzado. El tratamiento consistió de la fase de expansión maxilar y alineación, apertura de espacio para el 22, nivelación, detallado y retención. La aparatología utilizada brackets prescripción Roth ,022 x ,028, expansor maxilar tipo Hyrax, bandas en los molares 6's superiores, tubos bondeables en 6's y 7`s superiores e inferiores, open coil de Niti. La retención a cargo de circunferencial superior e inferior y fijo de 13-23 y 33-43, tiempo de tratamiento activo 1 año y 11 meses.

Causes of transverse discrepancies of the maxilla can be genetic or environmental. We present a patient of 17 years 7 months of age. In his clinical and radiographic analysis he was diagnosed as: Skeletal Class I, hyperdivergent, malocclusion class II bilateral molar and canine, bilateral posterior cross bite, severe upper and lower crowding, crossed dental organ. The treatment consisted of maxillary expansion and alignment, opening of space for 22, leveling, detailing and retention. The appliances used were brackets prescription Roth .022 x .028, maxillary expander type Hyrax, molar bands in the upper molars 6s, tubes in 6's and 7's upper and lower, open coil of Niti. The retention in charge of upper and lower circumferential retainer and a bonded retainer from 13- 23 and 33-43, time of active treatment 1 year 11 months.

Long-term pharyngeal airway changes after bionator treatment in adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusions / 대한치과교정학회지

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term changes in the pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional appliance treatment in adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusions. METHODS: Pharyngeal airway dimensions were compared between subjects with skeletal Class II malocclusions (n = 24; mean age: 11.6 +/- 1.29 years) treated with a Class II bionator and age-matched control subjects with skeletal Class I occlusions (n = 24; mean age: 11.0 +/- 1.21 years) using a series of lateral cephalograms obtained at the initial visit (T0), after treatment (T1), and at the completion of growth (T2). RESULTS: The length of the nasopharyngeal region was similar between adolescents with skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions at all time points, while the lengths of the upper and lower oropharyngeal regions and the pharyngeal airway areas were significantly smaller in the skeletal Class II adolescents before treatment when compared to the control adolescents (p < 0.05). However, following treatment with a functional appliance, the skeletal Class II adolescents had increased pharyngeal airway dimensions, which became similar to those of the control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Functional appliance therapy can increase the pharyngeal airway dimensions in growing adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusions, and this effect is maintained until the completion of growth.

Minimum Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment with Two Jaw Surgery Combined with Anterior Segmental Osteotmy in Skeletal Class II Malocclusion: A Case Report

Mandibular behavior in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion: a 5-year post-retention analysis

Aim: This study aimed to assess mandibular behavior in Class II subjects subjected to full orthodontic treatment with standard edgewise appliance and cervical headgear (Kloehn appliance) during the pubertal growth spurt period. Methods: Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 40 patients (21 females and 19 males) were performed at the beginning of the treatment (T0), at its end (T1) and at 5-year post-retention phase (T2) in order to quantify the cephalometric measurements (8 angular and 3 linear), representing the mandibular behavior in the anteroposterior and vertical senses. The mean age of female patients at T0, T1 and T2 was 11.4, 15 and 26 years, respectively, and for male patients it was 12.2, 16.7 and 28 years, respectively. All patients were treated in just one phase without extractions and not associating Class II intermaxillary elastics. Results: The effective treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion with conventional Edgewise fixed appliance and Kloehn cervical headgear did not interfere in the direction and amount of mandibular growth as well as remodeling at it is inferior border, with no influence in anti-clockwise rotation of the mandible. Themandibular growth was also observed after the orthodontic treatment, suggesting that it is influenced bygenetic factors. Conclusion: These observations may lead to the peculation that growing patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion and low mandibular plane are conducive to a good treatment and long-term stability.

Relación esquelética en la Clase II de Angle con crecimiento vertical por rotación posterior de la mandíbula: tratamiento con casquete extraoral de tracción alta y placa acrílica maxilar: observaciones clínicas y reporte de un caso / Skeletal class II relationship with vertical development and posterior mandibular rotation: highpull headgear and maxillary orthopedic splint treatment: clinic observations and a case report

El tratamiento ortopédico en pacientes que presentan una relación esquelética de clase II con crecimiento vertical por rotación mandibular posterior constituye un verdadero reto para el ortodoncista. La dirección y rotación del crecimiento maxilar y mandibular, a veces, dificulta la corrección de la discrepancia intermaxilar cuando se utilizan solamente aparatos ortopédicos.

Orthopedic correction of Class II Skeletal jaw discrepancies in growing children is a widely accepted treatment approach. The combination of maxillary orthopedic splints or activators with various extra oral appliances has been recommended for maximum orthopedic effect. This combination appears to allow better control of the vertical growth component, which is a critical factor in the correction of sagital skeletal jaw discrepancies.

Directional forces using skeletal anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class II div.1 malocclusion / 대한치과교정학회지

Tweed-Merrifield directional force technology is a very useful concept, especially for the treatment of Class II malocclusion. It has contributed to creating a favorable counter-clockwise skeletal change and balanced face, while head gear force using high pull J-hook (HPJH) in an appropriate direction is also essential to influence such results. Clinicians have encountered some problems concerning patients' compliance; however skeletal anchorage has been used widely of late because it does not necessitate patients' compliance, yet produces absolute anchorage. In this case, a good facial balance was obtained by Tweed-Merrifield directional force technology using HPJH together with skeletal anchorage, which provided anchorage control in the maxillary posterior area, torque control in the maxillary anterior area, and mandibular response. This indicates that skeletal anchorage can be used to reinforce sagittal and vertical anchorage in the maxillary posterior area during the retraction of anterior teeth. The author used HPJH for torque control, intrusion, and the bodily movement of maxillary anterior teeth during en masse movement. However, it is thought that such a result may also be achieved by substituting mini- or microscrews for HPJH. Consequently, Tweed-Merrifield directional force technology using skeletal anchorage for the treatment of Class II malocclusion not only maximizes the result of treatment but can also minimize patients' compliance.

A new protocol of the sliding mechanics with micro-implant anchorage(M.I.A.) / 대한치과교정학회지

Anchorage plays an important role in orthodontic treatment. Because of limited anchorage potential and acceptance problems of intra- or extraoral anchorage aids, endosseous implants have been suggested and used. However, clinicians have hesitated to use endosseous implants as orthodontic anchorage because of limited implantation space, high cost, and long waiting period for osseointegration. Titanium miniscrews and microscrews were introduced as orthodontic anchorage due to their many advantages such as ease of insertion and removal, low cost, immediate loading, and their ability to be placed in any area of the alveolar bone. In this study, a skeletal Class II patient was treated with sliding mechanics using M.I.A.(micro-implant anchorage). The maxillary micro-implants provide anchorage for retraction of the upper anterior teeth. The mandibular micro-implants induced uprighting and intrusion of the lower molars. The upward and forward movement of the chin followed. This resulted in an increase of the SNB angle, and a decrease of the ANB angle. The micro-implants remained firm and stable throughout treatment. This new approach to the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion has the following characteristics: . Independent of patient cooperation. . Shorter treatment time due to the simultaneous retraction of the six anterior teeth . Early change of facial profile motivating greater cooperation from patients These results indicate that the M.I.A. can be used as anchorage for orthodontic treatment. The use of M.I.A. with sliding mechanics in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion increases the treatment simplicity and efficiency.