A Trial of Surgical Clerkship for Developing Clinical Competency

PURPOSE: The surgery clerkship, focusing on the clinical competency, including critical thinking, problem solving, self-directed learning, autonomy and professionalism, were revised. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the students' assessment of the revised surgery clerkship program in order to improve the quality of surgical education. METHODS: Clinical competency was classified into 6 dimensions: intelligence, skill, relationship, attitude, problem solving performance, and autonomy. Problem based learning (PBL), procedural skill training, surgical anatomy, case discussion, pre-diagnosis at outpatient clinics, quiz, clinical performance assessment (CPA) and modified essay question (MEQ) were performed. Forty-nine 3rd year medical students participated during 2002. All students were asked to rate how far they had progressed in the 6 dimensions, in order to evaluate the course, and each program, and to suggest improvements at the end of the rotation. RESULTS: The students responded extremely positively and became been more motivated. They evaluated that the new clerkship had helped them increase their abilities in clinical reasoning, self-directed learning, problem solving and clinical techology, and to develop professionalism and autonomy. Most of students revealed that the PBL, case discussion, pre-diagnosis at outpatient clinics, CPA and MEQ programs were very helpful. They felt that procedural skill training and surgical anatomy programs required further improvements. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the new surgery clerkship was successful. The PBL, case discussion, pre-diagnosis at outpatient clinics, CPA and MEQ were valuable learning tools. More tools should be developed for procedural skill training and surgical anatomy education.

A Trial of Surgical Clerkship for Developing Clinical Competency

PURPOSE: The surgery clerkship, focusing on the clinical competency, including critical thinking, problem solving, self-directed learning, autonomy and professionalism, were revised. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the students' assessment of the revised surgery clerkship program in order to improve the quality of surgical education. METHODS: Clinical competency was classified into 6 dimensions: intelligence, skill, relationship, attitude, problem solving performance, and autonomy. Problem based learning (PBL), procedural skill training, surgical anatomy, case discussion, pre-diagnosis at outpatient clinics, quiz, clinical performance assessment (CPA) and modified essay question (MEQ) were performed. Forty-nine 3rd year medical students participated during 2002. All students were asked to rate how far they had progressed in the 6 dimensions, in order to evaluate the course, and each program, and to suggest improvements at the end of the rotation. RESULTS: The students responded extremely positively and became been more motivated. They evaluated that the new clerkship had helped them increase their abilities in clinical reasoning, self-directed learning, problem solving and clinical techology, and to develop professionalism and autonomy. Most of students revealed that the PBL, case discussion, pre-diagnosis at outpatient clinics, CPA and MEQ programs were very helpful. They felt that procedural skill training and surgical anatomy programs required further improvements. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the new surgery clerkship was successful. The PBL, case discussion, pre-diagnosis at outpatient clinics, CPA and MEQ were valuable learning tools. More tools should be developed for procedural skill training and surgical anatomy education.