RESUMEN
Introdução: A cirurgia ortognática envolve manipulação da arquitetura óssea facial, através de osteotomias, para restaurar a forma e a função, corrigindo a má oclusão, as desproporções maxilomandibulares e assimetrias faciais. O planejamento virtual em cirurgia ortognática é realizado com ajuda de softwares que utilizam as medidas reais do esqueleto craniofacial e registros da oclusão do paciente, através de uma análise 3D. Método: Foram avaliados 18 pacientes com deformidades dentofaciais, de acordo com a classificação de Angle submetidos a cirurgia ortognática com o uso do planejamento virtual, entre 2018 e 2019. Os critérios de inclusão foram pacientes entre 16 e 60 anos com desproporções maxilo-mandibulares nas quais o tratamento ortodôntico isolado não era suficiente. Os critérios de exclusão foram a presença de lesões císticas ou tumorais nos maxilares e comorbidades clínicas que contraindicavam a cirurgia. O planejamento virtual foi realizado em todos os pacientes, utilizando o software Dolphin® Imaging 11 e os guias cirúrgicos confeccionados em impressora 3D. Resultados: O guia cirúrgico intermediário apresentou adaptação perfeita nas faces oclusais promovendo grande estabilidade para o reposicionamento e fixação da maxila na oclusão intermediária. Os 18 pacientes operados responderam como "totalmente satisfeitos" em relação ao resultado estético-funcional nessa série estudada. Foi encontrada uma semelhança muito grande da posição do esqueleto maxilofacial no planejamento virtual préoperatório e o obtido no pós-operatório, através da avaliação das telerradiografias. Conclusão: O planejamento virtual em cirurgia craniomaxilofacial possui inúmeras vantagens, como diminuição do tempo laboratorial pré-operatório, maior precisão na confecção dos guias cirúrgicos e melhor reprodutibilidade dos resultados simulados.
Introduction: Orthognathic surgery involves the manipulation of facial bone architecture through osteotomies to restore form and function, correcting malocclusion, maxillomandibular disproportions, and facial asymmetries. Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery is carried out with the help of software that uses real measurements of the craniofacial skeleton and records of the patient's occlusion through 3D analysis. Method: 18 patients with dentofacial deformities were evaluated, according to Angle's classification, who underwent orthognathic surgery using virtual planning between 2018 and 2019. The inclusion criteria were patients between 16 and 60 years old with maxylo-mandibular disproportions in which orthodontic treatment alone was not sufficient. Exclusion criteria were the presence of cystic or tumoral lesions in the jaw and clinical comorbidities that contraindicated surgery. Virtual planning was carried out on all patients, using Dolphin® Imaging 11 software and surgical guides made with a 3D printer. Results: The intermediate surgical guide presented perfect adaptation on the occlusal surfaces, promoting great stability for the repositioning and fixation of the maxilla in intermediate occlusion. The 18 operated patients responded as "completely satisfied" in relation to the aesthetic-functional result in this series studied. A very great similarity was found between the position of the maxillofacial skeleton in the preoperative virtual planning and that obtained post-operatively through the evaluation of teleradiography. Conclusion: Virtual planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery has numerous advantages, such as reduced pre-operative laboratory time, greater precision in the creation of surgical guides, and better reproducibility of simulated results.
RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and precautions of O-arm combined with navigation-assisted steotomy and hemivertebra resection for congenital cervicothoracic hemivertebra.Methods:From February 2016 to October 2020, the clinical data of 12 patients with cervicothoracic hemivertebra admitted in Henan Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, including 5 males and 7 females, aged 9.4±2.6 years (range, 4-15 years). Intraoperative neural monitoring system was used to ensure the safety of surgical correction process and O-arm navigation system assisted the implantation of pedicle screws,hemivertebra resection, and scoliosis deformity correction. Postoperative CT was used to evaluate the accuracy of screw placement, and routine preoperative and postoperative X-ray films of the full-length spine in standing position were taken to measure the coronal and sagittal Cobb angles. The correction rate of scoliosis and kyphosis, internal fixation, shoulder height difference and bone graft fusion were calculated at the final follow-up.Results:A total of 108 pedicle screws were inserted in 12 patients, and the screw placement accuracy rate was 96.3% (104/108). The follow-up time was 37.9±10.2 months (range, 24-61 months). The number of fused segments was 5.4±1.1 (range, 4-7). One week after surgery, the correction rate of Cobb angle was 78.5%±3.2% for scoliosis and 70.1%±5.4% for kyphosis. There were statistically significant differences in side and kyphosis Angle and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 score between preoperative and 1 week after surgery ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the operation and the last follow-up ( P>0.05). At the last follow-up, all the 12 patients achieved gradeⅠ fusion. SI was 2.4±0.8 cm before operation, 1.0±0.6 cm at 1 week after operation, and 0.7±0.5 cm at last follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant ( F=38.30, P<0.001). No pseudojoint formation, significant loss of correction Angle, or rupture of internal fixation relaxant occurred during the operation or during follow-up. Conclusion:O-arm combined with navigation-assisted steotomy and hemivertebra resection for the treatment of congenital cervicothoracic hemivertebra has the advantages of good orthopedic effect, reduced radiation exposure and fewer complications, and accurate pedicle screw implantation and hemivertebra resection.
RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the surgical method and clinical effect of O-arm navigation mini-open burring for osteoid osteoma.Methods:Eighteen patients with osteoid osteoma were treated with O-arm guided grinding drill from June 2021 to May 2022, including 15 males and 3 females, the age was (18.4 ±10.9) years (range 2 to 44 years), and the course of disease ranged from 1 week to 3 years (mean 14.2 months). The lesions sites included 6 cases of proximal femur, 3 cases of distal femur, 4 cases of proximal tibia, 1 case of distal tibia, 2 cases of proximal fibula and 1 case of distal and proximal humerus. During the operation, the O-arm navigation was used to determine the location of the focus, the muscle and soft tissue was peeled off to the bone surface through a 1-4 cm small incision, the channel retractor was placed, and the burr was registered as a navigation recognition device to gradually remove the bone on the surface of the tumor nest, and the tumor nest was scraped with a curette for pathological examination; according to the navigation image, the focus was enlarged removed with burr and the grinding range was confirmed by the O-arm X-ray machine before the end of the operation. The patients were followed up for 6 to 15 months (mean 9.5 months). CT scans were performed before and after surgery for imaging comparison in order to figure out whether it had residual lesions or recurrence. The visual analogue score (VAS) of pain was used as a parameter for evaluating the clinical efficacy.Results:The operation time of 18 cases was 40-175 min, with an average of 89.3 min. The time required to establish navigation image was 18.0 ±4.1 min (range 13 ~ 22 min). The length of the incision was 2.7±1.1 cm (range 1-4 cm). All patients achieved complete curettage of the lesions, and osteoid osteoma was confirmed by pathology after operation. All the patients could move to the ground 24 hours after operation, and the pain was significantly relieved from 3 to 7 d after operation, and the pain almost disappeared 3 months after operation. The VAS score of 18 cases was 5.33±1.24 before surgery, 2.79±1.32 on the 3rd day, 1.86±1.21 on the 7th day, 0.86±0.93 on the 1st month, 0.33±0.48 on the 3rd month, and 0.09±0.29 on the 6th month after operation, and the difference was statistically significant ( F=58.50, P<0.001). There were no serious complications during and after operation, and the success rate of treatment (no recurrence of symptoms, no residual recurrence of imaging lesions, no serious complications after operation) was 100%. Conclusion:Treatment of osteoid osteoma with mini-open excision using burrs under the navigation of O-arm is a simple, safe, minimally invasive and efficient technique. Intraoperative precise positioning and the use of burr with navigation to remove a larger area than the tumor nest are the keys to successful treatment.
RESUMEN
Objective:To analyze the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in the Zista channel assisted by navigation for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods:The medical records of 156 patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis from January 2017 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into minimally invasive group, navigation open group and open group according to surgical method and navigation usage. 67 cases were treated with MIS-TLIF assisted by navigation in minimally invasive group. In the navigation open group, 31 cases underwent open TLIF surgery assisted by navigation, 58 cases were treated with open TLIF. The database was compared among the three groups including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospitalization time and complications. Evaluated the internal fixation and fusion according to CT, assessed the surgical results according to VAS, ODI and SF-36. The clinical effects were evaluated by MacNab scores at the last follow-up.Results:The amount of intraoperative blood loss in the minimally invasive group 116.39±25.88 ml was less than that in the navigation open group 293.94±61.67 ml and the open group 396.97±92.58 ml, and the difference was statistically significant ( F=296.01, P<0.001). The intraoperative blood loss in the navigation open group was less than that in the open group. The postoperative drainage in the minimally invasive group 80.55±27.29 ml, was less than that in the navigation open group 299.94±50.32 ml and the open group 304.86±84.34 ml, and the difference was statistically significant ( F=273.14, P<0.001). The postoperative hospitalization time in the minimally invasive group 3.42±1.00 d was less than that in the navigation open group 7.16±1.39 d and the open group 7.31±1.69 d, and the difference was statistically significant ( F=154.49, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the operation time ( F=0.15, P=0.859). At 2 weeks and 3 months after operation, the VAS score of low back pain in the open navigation group (3.84±0.82, 1.90±0.91) and the open group (3.67±0.92, 1.91±0.90) and ODI in the navigation open group (34.74%±11.66%, 28.68%±8.19%) and the open group (32.21%±10.66%, 27.17%±9.59%) were lower than those in the minimally invasive group (1.70±0.92, 0.96±0.73), (18.33%±7.43%, 19.15%±7.96%), and the difference were statistically significant [( F=96.63, P<0.001; F=25.12, P<0.001), ( F=45.59, P<0.001; F=18.99, P<0.001)]. The SF-36 score of the minimally invasive group 61.48±9.50 at the last follow-up was higher than that of the navigation open group 52.51±6.99 and the open group 53.48±7.66, and the difference was statistically significant ( F=18.97, P<0.001). In the same group, the VAS score, ODI score and SF-36 score at each follow-up time after surgery were statistical differences compared with those before surgery ( P<0.05). Postoperative follow-up CT showed that the fusion rate of the minimally invasive group was 94.0% (63/67), the navigation open group was 93.5% (29/31), the open group was 93.1% (54/58), and the difference between the three groups was not statistically significant (χ 2=0.05, P=0.978). The success rate and accuracy of one-time nail placement in the minimally invasive group and the navigation open group were higher than those in the open group, the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=17.17, P<0.001; χ 2=15.49, P=0.040). Dural rupture occurred in 1 patient in the minimally invasive group and 2 patients in the open group. The drainage and condition changes were closely observed after surgery. All patients were successfully extubated after surgery without complaining of other discomfort. One patient in the minimally invasive group had endplate destruction and mild intervertebral collapse during postoperative follow-up. There was 1 case of incisional fat liquefaction in each of the navigation open group and the open group. Subgroup analysis of the results of the three groups were roughly the same as the overall results. Conclusion:MIS-TLIF in the Zista channel assisted by navigation is a safe, effective, and worthy of promotion minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery with the advantages of less trauma and faster recovery in the treatment of different types of lumbar spinal stenosis.
RESUMEN
Objective:To compare the clinical outcome of navigation-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and posterior percutaneous plate fixation for Day type II crescent fracture dislocation of pelvis (CFDP).Methods:A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on clinical data of 40 patients with Day type II CFDP treated in General Hospital of Central Theater Command of PLA from January 2012 to June 2021. There were 23 males and 17 females, with age range of 42-73 years [(54.2±7.8)years]. A total of 19 patients were treated with navigation-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation (navigation group) and 21 with posterior percutaneous plate fixation (plate group). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and in-hospital time were compared between the two groups. The reduction quality was evaluated by Matta radiographic standard at day 2 after surgery. The functional recovery was assessed by Majeed functional score at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The postoperative complications were observed.Results:All patients were followed up for 10-24 months [(13.6±2.9)months]. The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and in-hospital time was (2.4±0.3)cm, (43.1±5.2)minutes, (48.4±18.4)ml and (14.4±1.9)days in navigation group, showing significant difference compared with plate group [(8.8±0.4)cm, (132.2±19.4)minutes, (302.9±57.5)ml, (18.9±3.7)days] (all P<0.01). According to Matta radiographic standard at day 2 after surgery, the excellent and good rate was 89% in navigation group (excellent in 13 patients, satisfactory in 4 and poor in 2) and 95% in plate group (excellent in 15 patients, satisfactory in 5 and poor in 1) ( P>0.05). According to Majeed criteria at 3 months after surgery, the excellent and good rate was 89% in navigation group (excellent in 12 patients, good in 5 and poor in 2) and 95% in plate group (excellent in 15 patients, good in 5 and poor in 1) ( P>0.05). According to Majeed criteria at 6 months after surgery, the excellent and good rate was 95% in navigation group (excellent in 14 patients, good in 4 and poor in 1) and 95% in plate group (excellent in 17 patients, good in 3 and poor in 1) ( P>0.05). There was no iatrogenic neurovascular injury. The incidence of complications was 11% (2/19) in navigation group, including one patients with sacroiliac screw loosening and one with posterior iliac screw penetrating the medial cortex of the bone, while that was 29% (6/21) in plate group, including two patients with skin tenderness, two with deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremity and two with incision infection ( P<0.05). Conclusions:For Day type II CFDP, both navigation-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and posterior percutaneous plate fixation can attain satisfactory efficacy, but the former has advantages of shorter operation time, less surgical trauma, less bleeding, shorter in-hospital time and lower incidence of complications.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the effect of internal external fixator assisted O-arm navigation imaging in the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures.@*METHODS@#From May 2019 to November 2019, 15 patients with unstable pelvic fractures were treated by intraoperative O-arm navigation imaging using INFIX technology. There were 6 males and 9 females. The age ranged from 24 to 66 years old. The course of disease ranged from 2 to 14 days. According to Tile classification, there were 1 case of B1 type, 8 cases of B2 type, 3 cases of C1 type, and 3 cases of C2 type. According to Young-Burgess classification, there were 8 cases of LC, 1 case of APC, 4 cases of VS, 2 cases of CM. Preoperative routine pelvic anteroposterior film, entrance position, exit position and pelvic CT three-dimensional reconstruction were performed. Intraoperative O-arm navigation system three-dimensional reconstruction and triplane scanning imaging were used to evaluate the effect of intraoperative reduction. The anterior pelvic ring was fixed with internal external fixator, and the posterior ring was fixed with sacroiliac screw, plate screw or lumbar iliac screw. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding and nail placement were observed and recorded. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated by Matta standard, and the postoperative function was evaluated by Majeed function score.@*RESULTS@#Wound healing was good in all patients without vascular, nerve and local irritation complications. All the 15 patients were followed up for 10 to 16 months. The fracture reduction was evaluated according to the Matta scoring standard, 9 cases were excellent results, 5 cases were good, and 1 case was medium. The Majeed functional score was 0 to 95 points.@*CONCLUSION@#The built-in external fixator assisted O-arm navigation imaging system in the treatment of unstable pelvic fractures. The reduction effect is evaluated in advance, the operation time is shortened, and the accuracy of internal fixation is improved. The operation is simple, safe and less bleeding. The operation is in line with the principles of minimally invasive medical treatment and precision medical treatment in orthopedics, which is conducive to the recovery of patients' postoperative function and rapid recovery.