RESUMEN
Resumen: En un paciente con artrosis unicompartimental de rodilla grave, donde se agotaron los tratamientos conservadores que tiene clínica dolorosa localizada en el lado afectado y con alteración del eje reductible, la prótesis unicompartimenal de rodilla (PUR) es la primera opción para nuestro grupo de trabajo. Dentro del estudio para confirmar el diagnóstico y planificar la cirugía destacan las radiografías de rodillas con carga, radiografía de Rosenberg y telerradiografías de extremidades inferiores. El objetivo de la cirugía es reemplazar la zona afectada, restituyendo la anatomía con un adecuado balance de partes blandas. Respecto al alineamiento el desafío es no sobrecargar el lado contrario ni tampoco el de la prótesis. Existen de platillo móvil y fijo y aunque los resultados clínicos y de supervivencia son semejantes, en los últimos años con la incorporación de la cirugía robótica, la balanza se ha inclinado para el uso de los platillos fijos. En pacientes con artrosis unicompartimental los resultados clínicos y funcionales son mejores con PUR y tiene menos complicaciones que cuando se usan prótesis totales (PTR). La supervivencia estudiada en registros es menor que para PTR, pero cuando se usa en centros de alto flujo en que el porcentaje de PUR es cercano a un tercio del total con una estricta selección de pacientes, la duración es tan buena como en la PTR.
Abstract: In a patient with severe unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis where conservative treatments have been exhausted, with painful symptoms located on the affected side and with a reducible axis, the unicompartmental knee prosthesis (UKP) is the first option for our work group. Within the study to confirm the diagnosis and plan the surgery, weight-bearing knee x-rays, Rosenberg x-rays, and teleradiographs of the lower extremities stand out. The objective of surgery is to replace the affected area, restoring the anatomy with an adequate balance of soft tissues. Regarding alignment, the challenge is not to overload the opposite side or that of the prosthesis. There are mobile and fixed plates and although the clinical and survival results are similar, in recent years with the incorporation of robotic surgery, the balance has tipped towards the use of fixed plates. The clinical and functional results are better and there are fewer complications than when total knee prostheses (TKP) are used in the same type of patients. The survival studied in registries is lower than for TKP, but when used in high-flow centers where the percentage of UKP is close to a third of the total with strict patient selection, the duration is as good as in PTR.
RESUMEN
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of high tibial osteotomy(HTO) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA) for knee unicompartmental osteoarthrits(KOA) using Meta analysis. Methods The controlled clinical trial literatures of HTO and UKA treating KOA were retrieved, the database including Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang Data, CNKI, VIP Data, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCO and Embase, and the search period was limited to the beginning of the database to July 2018. The literature was screened and evaluated, and Review Manager 5.3 software was used for Meta analysis. Results A total of 19 articles including 1359 knee joints were included. Meta analysis results showed that HTO was superior to UKA in range of motion (ROM) (P<0.05). For the indicators, including excellent rate, Lysholm score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, complications, repair rate, blood loss, length of stay, ambulation time, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and femorotibial angle (FTA), UKA was superior to HTO (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the repair rate between open wedge HTO (OWHTO) and UKA in the sub-group analysis. There were no significant differences in the operation time and Tegner exercise score between HTO and UKA ( all P>0 . 05 ) . Conclusions Both HTO and UKA have their own advantages and disadvantages. It is necessary to properly choose the operation according to the patient's condition and psychological expectation.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study is to evaluate chinical and radiological results of open wedge high tibial osteotomy using Aescula(R) plate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninity one patients who have unicompartmental osteoarthritis with varus deformity were treated by open wedge high tibial osteotomy with Aescula(R) plate and followed up at least 2 years. Clinically, visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM) and hospital for special surgery (HSS) score were evaluated. Radiologically, tibio-femoral angle, mechanical axis, medial proximal tibia angle and posterior slope were measured. All complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: During the follow-up VAS improved from 8.3 to 2.1, ROM were checked preoperatively from 1.3degrees to 137degrees and from 1.8degrees to 136.1degrees at last follow up. And HSS score improved from 76.8 to 91. Preoperative tibio-femoral angle was 0.4degrees of varus, mechanical axis 6.4degrees of varus, medial proximal tibia angle 84.4degrees and posterior slope 9.3degrees. Radiologic results at last follow up revealed significant improvements by 8.3degrees of valgus for tibio-femoral angle, 1.8degrees of valgus for mechanical axis and 90.1degrees for medial proximal tibia angle. Mean posterior slope was 10.4degrees which increased 1.1degrees compared with preoperative one. And there was one fixation failure that needed re-operation. CONCLUSION: Open wedge high tibial osteotomy using Aescula(R) provided excellent clinical and radiological results at 2 years follow-up.