RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the predictors of the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of ureteral calculi, and to evaluate the predictive value of the maximum ureteral wall thickness (UWT) in the treatment of ureteral calculi with ESWL.Methods:The clinical data of 138 patients with ureteral calculi treated with ESWL in the Second People's Hospital of Hefei from January 2020 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 91 males and 47 females. The age was (50.9±14.8) years old. The body mass index was (25.3±3.6) kg/m 2. The stones of 73 cases were located on the left side and 65 cases were on the right side. 70 cases had upper ureteral stones, 18 cases had middle ureteral stones, and 50 cases had lower ureteral stones. The median length of the stone was 8.5 (7.5, 10.5) mm. The CT value of the stone was 509 (343, 783) HU. The anteroposterior diameter of the renal pelvis was 12.0 (10.1, 16.0) mm, and UWT was (2.8 ± 0.8) mm. All patients underwent urinary non-contrast CT before lithotripsy, and the UWT of the stone bed was measured on the CT images. According to the stone removal situation 2 weeks after the operation, the patients were divided into a successful lithotripsy group and a failed lithotripsy group. Univariate analysis was used to compare the differences of various indicators between the two groups, and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the independent predictors of ESWL in the treatment of ureteral calculi for the indicators. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) of each independent predictor, and the cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity were analyzed. Results:All operations were successfully completed, and the success rate of the first-stage lithotripsy was 71.7% (99/138). The results of univariate analysis showed that the stone length diameter, stone CT value, anteroposterior diameter of renal pelvis, stone skin distance, and UWT were significantly different between the successful lithotripsy group and the failure group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, stone side and stone location ( P>0.05). The results of multivariate logistic analysis showed that stone length ( OR=1.393, P=0.015), stone CT value ( OR=1.002, P=0.043) and UWT ( OR=17.997, P<0.001) were all for the efficacy of ESWL in the treatment of ureteral stones. The ROC curve was used to compare the three independent predictors. The area under the UWT curve was the largest (AUC=0.898, P<0.001), followed by the length of the stone (AUC=0.744, P<0.001), and the CT value of the stone (AUC=0.672, P= 0.002). The cut-off value for UWT was 3.19 mm, which had a sensitivity of 91.9% and a specificity of 71.8% for predicting the success of ESWL lithotripsy. When dividing the patients into thin wall group (UWT ≤3.19 mm) and thick wall group (UWT>3.19 mm) according to the cut-off value, the success rates of one-stage lithotripsy in the two groups were 89.2% (91 / 102) and 22.2% (8/36), respectively ( P<0.05). Conclusions:UWT, calculus length and calculus CT value are independent predictors of the efficacy of ESWL in the treatment of ureteral calculi, and UWT has the best predictive value. When UWT≤3.19 mm, the success rate of ESWL in the treatment of ureteral calculi is higher.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the clinical indicators which could be used to differentiate incarcerated stones from unincarcerated stones by comparing clinical characteristics of patients.Methods 96 patients who were diagnosed as ureteral stones treated by ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) from June 2017 to November 2017 were selected in the study.Clinical characteristics of patients were collected.The total study consisted of 62 male and 34 female patients.The patients' age ranged from 24 to 78 years old and average age was (54.5 ± 12.7) years old.There were 35 patients were diagnosed as ureteral stones with hypertension,9 patients with diabetes,85 patients with hydronephrosis,respectively.The number of patients,whose stone located in upper ureters,middle ureters and lower ureters were 49,19,28,respectively.The average of maximum stone diameter,maximum cross-sectional area of the stone,stone volume,hounsfield units of stone and maximum ureteral wall thickness (UWTmax) at the stone site were (7.75 ± 2.68) mm,(36.12 ± 24.43) mm2,(304.06 ± 303.39) mm3,(755.75 ± 318.05) HU,and (3.18 ± 1.13) mm,respectively.Percussion tenderness over kidney region were positive in 11 cases,weak positive in 64 cases and negative in 21 cases,respectively.Stone-free rate after operation were 93.8％.Patients were divided into two groups,incarcerated or unincarcerated,and statistical differences between clinical characteristics of the two groups were analyzed by univariate analysis.The differences were further compared by multivariate logistic regression analysis to find independent predictors of impacted stones.The ROC curve was used to find the optimal UWT for diagnosis of impacted stone.The accuracy of this value was evaluated and patients were grouped by this value to compare the differences between groups.Results The operation and follow-up were successfully performed in all patients.Univariate analysis showed there were no statistical significance differences in gender [(24 males and 16 females)vs.(38 males and 18 females)],age [(53.4 ± 12.3) years vs.(48.7 ± 12.7) years],previous history of diabetes (4 cases vs.5 cases) and stone location [(19 upper stones,9 middle stones,12 lower stones) vs.(30 upper stones,10 middle stones,16 lower stones)],between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).Among the clinical characteristics of patients in incarcerated and unincarcerated groups,UWTmax were (4.15 ± 0.94) mm and (2.58 ± 0.76) mm,previous history of hypertension were 20 cases and 15 cases,ipsilateral URSL history were 14 cases and 10 cases,hounsfield units of stone were (847.66 ± 282.39) HU and (698.65 ± 325.50) HU,hydronephrosis were 40 cases and 50 cases,maximum stone diameter were (8.67 ± 2.28)mm and (7.17 ± 2.75)mm,maximum cross-sectional area of the stone were (43.83 ± 23.65) mm2 and (31.14 ± 23.64) mm2,stone volume were (386.20 ± 296.60) mm3 and (253.04 ± 296.29) mm3,percussion tenderness over kidney region were positive in 8 cases(20.0％),weak positive in 27 cases,negative in 5 cases and positive in 3 cases,weak positive in 37 cases,negative in 16 cases,respectively.The difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed UWTmax (OR =10.40,P ＜ 0.001) at the stone site was significantly correlated with impacted ureteral stones and it was an independent predictor of impacted stones.ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value of UWTmax was 3.26 mm.The sensitivity of the value to predict impacted stone is 82.5％ and the specificity is 87.5％.Depending on the cut off value of 3.26 mm,cases were divided into two groups,40 cases were in high UWTmax (≥3.26 mm)group and 56 cases were in low UWTmax (＜ 3.26 mm)group.Higher UWTmax was accompanied with a higher incidence of ureteral edema[77.5％ (31/40) vs.32.1％ (18/56)],polyps [30.0％ (12/40) vs.7.1％ (4/56)],strictures[37.5％ (15/40)vs.12.5％ (7/56)] and a lower stone-free rate[87.5％ (35/40) vs.98.2％ (55/56)].The difference was statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions UWTmax can be used to differentiate impacted stones from unimpacted stones before surgery.The patients with Higher UWTmax (≥3.26 mm) was accompanied with a higher incidence of stone impacted,ureteral edema,polyps,and strictures,and a lower rate of stone clearance.
RESUMEN
Objective To determine the predictive parameters of impacted ureteral stones and evaluate the predictive value of ureteral wall thickness for impacted ureteral stones.Methods A total of 93 patients with proximal ureteral stones from January 2017 to December 2017 were included in the study [71 males and 22 females,aged 30-80 years,and body mass index (23.7 ± 2.7) kg/m2].Both clinical and computed tomography urography (CTU) data were compared between patients with or without impacted ureteral stone,including sex,age,body mass index,renal pelvic diameter,longitudinal size of stone,transverse size of stone,stone surface area,stone volume,hounsfield units of stone,diameter of the ureter proximal to the stone,and ureteral wall thickness at the impacted ureteral stone site.The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the performance of each of the above-mentioned parameters for predicting the impacted ureteral stones.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to select the independent risk factors of impacted ureteral stones.Results Among 93 patients,38 (40.8％) patients were with impacted stones and 55 (59.1％) without impacted stones.Univariate analysis showed significant difference in ureteral wall thickness (t =6.344,P ＜ 0.001),diameter of the ureter proximal to the stone (U =607.5,P =0.001),longitudinal size of stone(U =580.5,P ＜0.001),transverse size of stone(t =4.172,P ＜0.001),stone surface area(U =508.5,P ＜ 0.001),stone volume (U =508.5,P ＜ 0.001) and hounsfield units of stone (t =6.344,P =0.006) between patients with or without impacted stones.Ureteral wall thickness(UWT)showed the largest area under curve (AUC) among those parameters (AUC =0.825,P ＜ 0.001),followed by stone surface area and stone volume.The optimal cut-off value of ureteral wall thickness was 3.16 mm,with sensitivity of 71.1％ and specificity of 85.5％.Multivariate analysis showed that ureteral wall thickness (Wald =18.709,P ＜ 0.001) and stone volume (Wald =8.391,P =0.004) were independent predictors of impacted stones.Conclusion Ureteral wall thickness was related to the presence of impacted ureteral stones and could be used for predicting impacted ureteral stones.