Analysis Of Completeness Of Blood Vacuume Tube Filling At A Clinical Laboratory Attached To Tertiary Care Center, A Cross Sectional Study

Background:Overfilled and under filled tube are most important cause of pre-analytical error and failure to complete requested examination in sample. The study was performed to analyse relationship betweentime of receiving of sample, location of sample, type of vacuum tube, method of collection, total volume required in a patient and volume incompleteness.Material And Methods:The study involved collection and patient samples data, i.e. receiving time of sample, place of collection, type of vacuum tube, blood collection method, total volume required in a patient, measurement of volume before processing. Average incompleteness of vacuum tube was calculated and average relationship between incompleteness and these parameters done.Result:Average incompleteness in OPD samples is better than Non-OPD samples. Averageincompleteness is better during 9 am to 12 am than early morning hour s. Incompleteness with relation to vacuum tube type is in general Plain > (EDTA/Fluoride) > Citrate. Average incompleteness better in sample collected with vacuum tube needle with holder than use of syringe. Average incompleteness increases as total volume required in a patient increases.Conclusion:Dedicated phlebotomist and use of vacuum tube needle with holder is required to bring overall improvement in completeness of blood collection.

Comparison between Medion Vacuon Tube and BD Vacutainer Tube for Clinical Laboratory Practice

BACKGROUND: Most of the blood-test samples are collected and carried in vacuum tubes. We have compared a newly developed vacuum tube, ‘Vacuon’ (Medion, Korea) and ‘BD Vacutainer®’ (BD, USA) in three common clinical assays, i.e., hematological, chemical, and immunological tests. METHODS: A sum of 60 healthy volunteers were recruited in our study and their peripheral blood samples were collected in the tubes of the two brands. EDTA-tube samples were evaluated using 25 hematological tests. Serum separating tube samples were analyzed for 24 chemical parameters and the 3 thyroid hormones. The results were statistically analyzed using the paired t-test and Bland-Altman plot. In addition, the assay outcomes at t=0 hr were compared with those at t=24±2 hr for each of the tubes. RESULTS: The assay results of 22 hematological parameters, 24 chemical parameters, and 3 thyroid hormones had a statistically significant correlation between the 2 brands of vacuum tubes (t=0 hr). Two hematological parameters (mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration [MCHC] and cell hemoglobin concentration mean [CHCM]) showed higher mean values, while a hematological parameter (lobularity index [LI]) showed lower mean values in Vacuon than BD Vacutainer (t=0 hr). The results after 24 hr showed similarity between the 2 brands, with some inconsistent results in BD Vacutainer (Mean platelet volume [MPV], plateletcrit [Pct], eosinophil, calcium, and triiodothyronine) and Vacuon (MPV, hemoglobin distribution width [HDW], CHCM, Pct, eosinophil, and calcium). CONCLUSIONS: BD Vacutainer and Vacuon tube showed good statistical concordance rate with some exceptions in the hematological parameters (MCHC, CHCM, and LI).

The clinical value of new-utility anal vacuum tube in preventing anastomotic fistula after colorectal cancer anterior resection / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective To discuss the clinical value of new- utility anal vacuum tube in preventing anastomotic fistula after colorectal cancer anterior resection. Methods Ninety-six patients having underwent the colorectal cancer anterior resection were divided into new-utility anal vacuum tube group and normal anal vacuum tube group by random digits table method with 48 cases each. The complication, anus exhaust time and postoperative drainage volume were compared between 2 groups. Results The incidences of tube defluxion, proctalgia, anus skin damage, bed sheet pollution and anastomotic fistula in new-utility anal vacuum tube group were significantly lower than those in normal anal vacuum tube group: 6.25% (3/48) vs. 31.25% (15/48), 10.42% (5/48) vs. 41.67% (20/48), 0 vs. 25.00%(12/48), 6.25%(3/48) vs. 60.42%(29/48), 2.08%(1/48) vs. 12.50%(6/48), the anus exhaust time was significantly shorter than that in normal anal vacuum tube group:(44.1 ± 8.9) h vs. (48.9 ± 9.6) h, the postoperative drainage volumes form the first day to fifth day were significantly more than those in normal anal vacuum tube group: (31.2 ± 15.1) ml vs. (15.6 ± 8.2) ml, (25.3 ± 13.2) ml vs. (15.8 ± 6.5) ml, (15.6 ± 9.1) ml vs. (10.3 ± 4.5) ml, (104.3 ± 38.2) ml vs. (90.6 ± 12.3) ml and (93.7 ± 32.5) ml vs. (80.7 ± 18.9) ml, and there were statistical differences (P<0.01 or <0.05). The patients in new-utility anal vacuum tube group had different symptoms, but patients could tolerate. Conclusions The new-utility anal vacuum tube can reduce the incidence of anastomotic fistula, and be safe and reliable, which is worthy of wide application.

A Comparison of the Rates of Hemolysis and Repeated Blood Sampling using Syringe needles versus Vacuum tube needles in the Emergency Department

PURPOSE: This study was done to compare the rates of hemolysis and repeated sampling in blood samples obtained by a syringe needle versus a vacuum tube needle. METHODS: A randomized, prospective study was used to evaluate the differences between the two blood sampling methods. The study group consisted of patients seen in the emergency department (ED) for blood sampling to determine electrolyte level. ED patients were randomly assigned to either the syringe group or the vacuum tube group. All blood samples were collected by experienced ED nurses and hemolysis was determined by experienced laboratory technologists. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five valid samples were collected (74 in the syringe group versus 71 in the vacuum tube group). 5 of 74 (6.8%) blood samples in the syringe group and 8 of 71 (11.3%) in the vacuum tube group hemolyzed. Repeated blood sampling occurred for 2 of 74 (2.7%) and 3 of 71 (4.2%) in each group respectively. There were no significant differences in rates of hemolysis and repeated sampling between two groups (B=1.97, p=.204; B=2.36, p=.345). CONCLUSION: Venipuncture with syringe needles can be recommended for ED nurses to obtain blood samples.

Evaluation of Green Vac-Tube in Clinical Laboratory Tests / 임상검사와정도관리

BACKGROUND: Vacuum tubes are widely used in the clinical laboratory for routine tests. We compared a newly developed Green Vac-Tube (SPM, Gimje, Korea) with Vacutainer (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and Vacuette (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) in routine chemistry and hematology tests. METHODS: A total of 101 volunteers, 81 patients and 20 healthy volunteer, were recruited and we had collected blood samples with three kinds of EDTA tubes and those of serum separating tubes. The samples were evaluated for chemistry and hematology tests using TOSHIBA 200FR (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) and ADVIA (Siemens, Deerfield, IL, USA) respectively. Their results were statistically analyzed by paired t-test and Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS: Their clinical utilities were examined by CLIA'88 programs. Paired t-test analysis revealed that the results of ALP, AST, total bilirubin, CO2, Hct and MCV showed statistically significant differences between Green Vac-Tube and previously used two vacuum tubes. Similar significant differences were also observed between previous two vacuum tubes. And 194 (4.37%) cases among 5,151 cases were in the critical region by Bland-Altman plot. All different cases, except Na+, K+ however, were clinically acceptable by CLIA'88 programs. CONCLUSIONS: Green Vac-tube has good analytical performance compared to previously-used tubes.