RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has proven safe and effective for pulmonary wedge resection and lobectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of uniportal VATS segmentectomy by comparing its outcomes with those of the multiportal approach at a single center. METHODS: The records of 84 patients who underwent VATS segmentectomy from August 2010 to August 2018, including 33 in the uniportal group and 51 in the multiportal group, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Anesthesia and operative times were similar in the uniportal and multiportal groups (215 minutes vs. 220 minutes, respectively; p=0.276 and 180 minutes vs. 198 minutes, respectively; p=0.396). Blood loss was significantly lower in the uniportal group (50 mL vs. 100 mL, p=0.013) and chest tube duration and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the uniportal group (2 days vs. 3 days, p=0.003 and 4 days [range, 1–14 days] vs. 4 days [range, 1–62 days], p=0.011). The number of dissected lymph nodes tended to be lower in the uniportal group (5 vs. 8, p=0.056). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience indicates that uniportal VATS segmentectomy is safe and feasible in well-selected patients. A randomized, prospective study with a large group of patients and long-term follow-up is necessary to confirm these results.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anestesia , Tubos Torácicos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Transporte Iónico , Tiempo de Internación , Ganglios Linfáticos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por VideoRESUMEN
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of 3D thoracoscopic system in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uniportal VATS) for the treatment of thoracic diseases. Methods 7 cases of thoracic diseases were accomplished with 3D thoracoscope from Nov 2015 to Dec 2015, including 3 cases of lobectomy, 2 cases of wedge resection of pulmonary tumor, 2 cases of mediastinal mass. Results All the operations were completed successfully, without conversion to open surgery. All the patient recovery successfully. The data of operative time, bleeding volume, postoperative chest tube drainage and hospital time and postoperative complications were counted. No complications and tumor recurrence or metastasis were observed during the followed 3 months. Conclusion 3D thoracoscopic system can be used in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uniportal VATS) safely and provide high-definition and better sense of depth which facilitate the operation more precise and safer.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the efficacy of uniportal VATS and single utility port VATS in treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax.Method From January 2013 to December 2015, we retrospectively collected clinical data of 53 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax who were treated with uniportal VATS, as study group; compared with control group: 53 patients received single utility port VATS in the same period. The clinical data was compared between the two groups, including the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, drainage time, postoperative extubation time, postoperative pain score, postoperative hospitalization and recurrence.Results All patients were successfully completed the operation, no death and serious complications occurred. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood lose, duration of chest drainage, duration of hospital stay and incidence of serious postoperative complications between two groups (P > 0.05). Mean Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) score for 24 h post-operative pain was: (2.60 ± 0.71) for uniportal VATS and (3.38 ± 0.84) for single utility port VATS (P > 0.05), 72 h post-operative pain was: (1.30 ± 0.51) for uniportal VATS and (1.58 ± 0.62) for single utility port VATS (P > 0.05). Follow up 5 ~ 36 months, median follow up was 19 months. No recurrence occurred during follow up.Conclusions The study suggested that both surgical approaches to spontaneous pneumothorax are safe and effective. Significant differences were found for early post-operative pain between the two approaches, the uniportal way is better. It is worthy of clinical promoting.