RESUMEN
@#As a minimally invasive procedure, micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) achieve desired therapeutic effect with minimal surgical intervention. The operation is relatively simple, and the effect of assisted orthodontic treatment is obvious. However, due to the lack of long-term follow-up studies, there is no unified consensus on the long-term stability of the procedure. This article reviews the research status of MOPs, biological and biomechanical mechanisms, clinical applications and limitations. MOPs can shorten orthodontic treatment time and accelerate tooth movement by exerting regional acceleratory phenomena (RAP). At the same time, this procedure will not damage the health of the periodontal tissue, and the postoperative bleeding and postoperative reaction are minor. In addition, the pain and discomfort of patients were relatively mild and acceptable. However, it also has limitations, mainly including the limited time of the RAP effect of MOPs. Although this procedure is a minimally invasive surgery, there is still a risk of treating regional bone defects. At present, it is still necessary to increase the sample size and extend the follow-up time to evaluate the long-term stability of MOPs.
RESUMEN
As limitações anatômicas do rebordo alveolar residual podem impedir a instalação de um implante osseointegrado. Nesses casos, procedimentos de regeneração óssea guiada são necessários para proporcionar osso alveolar suficiente em altura e/ou espessura para a inserção de implantes dentais. Este relato piloto de caso clínico apresenta um procedimento de aumento horizontal do rebordo ósseo usando um novo substituto ósseo aloplástico para proporcionar volume ósseo necessário para a colocação de um implante, avaliando também por meio de microtomografia o osso neoformado. O paciente do sexo masculino, 58 anos, não fumante, sem condições sistêmicas que pudessem afetar o procedimento cirúrgico, apresentava a ausência de um dente (primeiro pré-molar superior direito) e optou por instalar um implante para a reabilitação cirúrgico-protética desta área. A tomografia computadorizada pré-operatória mostrou que o osso residual tinha espessura insuficiente para a instalação de um implante, sendo necessária a realização de um procedimento cirúrgico para aumento ósseo horizontal. O paciente assinou um consentimento informado autorizando a realização dos procedimentos bem como a documentação científica do caso. Foi realizada cirurgia de regeneração óssea guiada (ROG) utilizando substituto ósseo particulado (Reprobone®) e uma membrana colágena (Biomend), para aumentar a espessura óssea vestíbulo-palatal. O paciente foi apropriadamente medicado e a cicatrização ocorreu sem intercorrências. Após 6 meses, a área foi reaberta e antes da instalação do implante uma biópsia óssea foi coletada para análise microtomográfica. A técnica de ROG proporcionou volume ósseo adequado para a colocação do implante. A análise microtomográfica da biópsia óssea resultou em 40,85% de volume ósseo cortical e 17,08% de biomaterial residual...
Anatomic limitations of the residual alveolar bone may impair implant placement. Alveolar ridge augmentation procedures are required in such cases to provide alveolar bone width and/or height for dental implant placement. This case report presents a horizontal ridge augmentation procedure using a new alloplastic bone substitute providing bone volume for implant placement, with micro-CT analysis of the newly formed bone. The patient was a 58-year-old male, non-smoker, with no systemic health conditions that could affect the surgical procedure, and reported the willingness of rehabilitating the edentulous area corresponding to the tooth 14 with an osseointegrated implant. The CBCT analysis revealed that residual alveolar bone width was too narrow for implant insertion, and therefore a bone augmentation procedure was necessary. The patient signed an informed consent form authorizing all procedures and scientific documentation. Guided bone regeneration was performed using ReproBone® granules and a collagen membrane (BioMend®) to increase the buccal-palatal bone width. The patient was properly medicated and healing was uneventful. After 6 months, the area was reopened and before placing an implant a bone biopsy was collected for micro-CT analysis. The bone augmentation procedure provided adequate bone volume for implant placement. The micro-CT results of the bone biopsy showed 40% of bone volume and 17% of remnant particles of the biomaterial after 6 months. It was concluded that this biomaterial may be used in such clinical situations as an alternative to autogenous bone blocks and still avoiding patient morbidity...