Vacuna antitetánica adyuvada en alúmina en inmunización simultánea por vías mucosa y parenteral / Alum adjuvant tetanus vaccine in simultaneous immunization by mucosal and parenteral routes

El tétanos es causado por Clostridium tetani, bacteria Gram+ esporulada que produce una potente neurotoxina. Las vacunas parenterales producen IgG antitoxina tetánica (anti TT) protectores en múltiples dosis inductoras y de reactivación; vax-TET® es una vacuna cubana parenteral adsorbida en alúmina. La IgAS (secretora), principal anticuerpo protector mucoso, sólo es inducida por la vía mucosa. La vía oral, la inducción de IgA y su papel protector no han sido exploradas. SinTimVaS se aplica por vía mucosa y parenteral simultánea que induce IgG sistémica similares a la vía parenteral y adiciona de respuesta de IgA mucosa. Evaluamos el efecto de vax-TET® aplicado en SinTimVaS en ratones Balb/c y exploramos la influencia del adyuvante sobre la inducción de IgA anti TT. SinTimVaS indujo similares respuestas de IgG anti TT séricas que dos dosis de vax-TET® intramusculares; pero superiores a una dosis. Tres dosis de vax-TET® orales no indujeron IgG anti TT sérica, mientras que la adyuvación con el adyuvante Finlay Cocleato 1 (AFCo1) sí la indujeron. No se logró determinar la inducción de IgA anti TT mucosa con ninguna de las formulaciones adjuvadas con alúmina; pero si con la formulación AFCo1+TT. Podemos concluir que vax-TET® en SinTimVaS funcionó de forma similar a la inmunización parenteral establecida, por lo que sería posible reducir los esquemas multidosis con formulaciones de adyuvantes más potentes y se confirma que se requieren potentes adyuvantes para inducir IgA mucosa(AU)

Tetanus is caused by Clostridium tetani, a sporulated Gram+ bacterium that produces a potent neurotoxin. Parenteral vaccines produce protective tetanus antitoxin (anti TT) IgG in multiple induction and reactivation doses; vax-TET® is a Cuban parenteral vaccine adsorbed onto alumina. IgAS (secretory), the main mucosal protective antibody, is only induced by the mucous membrane. The oral route, the induction of IgA and its protective role have not been explored. SinTimVaS is applied by simultaneous mucosal and parenteral route that induces systemic IgG similar to the parenteral route and adds an IgA mucosal response. We evaluated the effect of vax-TET® applied in SinTimVaS in Balb/c mice and we explored the influence of adjuvant on the induction of anti-TT IgA. SinTimVaS induced similar serum anti TT IgG responses to two intramuscular doses of vax-TET®; but higher than one dose. Three doses of oral vax-TET® did not induce serum anti-TT IgG, whereas adjuvanted with adjuvant Finlay Cocleate 1 (AFCo1) did induce it. It was not possible to determine the IgA anti-TT mucous induction with any of the formulations adjuvanted with alumina; but with the formulation AFCo1 + TT it was induced. We can conclude that vax-TET® in SinTimVaS worked in a similar way to the established parenteral immunization, so it would be possible to reduce the multi-dose vaccination schemes with more potent adjuvant formulations and it is confirmed that powerful adjuvants are required to induce mucosal IgA(AU)

Effect of biotherapeutics on antitoxin IgG in experimentally induced Clostridium difficile infection.

Purpose: Recurrent diarrhoea after successful treatment of primary Clostridium difficile associated disease (CDAD) occurs due to bowel flora alterations and failure to mount an effective antibody response. Apart from antibiotics, risk factors include immunosuppressive and acid-suppressive drug administration. Biotherapeutics such as probiotic and epidermal growth factor (EGF) may offer potential effective therapy for CDAD. Materials and Methods: The effect of biotherapeutics in mounting an antibody response against C. difficile toxins was studied in BALB/c mice challenged with C. difficile after pre-treatment with ampicillin, lansoprazole or cyclosporin. Sera from sacrificed animals were estimated for antitoxin IgG by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Antitoxin IgG was significantly higher (P<0.05) in C. difficile challenged groups compared to unchallenged controls, but insignificant (P>0.05) in animals in which C. difficile was given after pre-treatment with cyclosporin compared to those without any pre-treatment, or pre-treatment with antibiotic or lansoprazole. In inter-subgroup comparisons also significant anomaly in production of antitoxin IgG was found. The antitoxin IgG levels were raised in animals administered C. difficile after pre-treatment with ampicillin, but lower in animals administered cyclosporin. High levels of antitoxin IgG were also found in the serum samples of animals receiving lansoprazole and C. difficile. Conclusions: Probiotics showed their beneficial effect by boosting the immune response as seen by production of antitoxin IgG. Oral administration of EGF did not affect the immune response to C. difficile toxins as significant increase was not observed in the serum antitoxin IgG levels in any of the groups investigated.