RESUMEN
Background: The traditional bowel preparation compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder (PEG) has poor tolerance in some patients due to the need for a large amount of water, which has a limited cleaning effect and affects the visual field of observation. Therefore, it is of clinical significance to find a bowel cleaning method with strong cleaning power, high safety and is acceptable to most of the patients. Aims: To explore the efficacy and safety of PEG combined with linaclotide in bowel preparation. Methods: A total of 414 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: control group (3 L PEG group), observation group A (3 L PEG+290 μg linaclotide), observation group B (2 L PEG+290 μg linaclotide). The primary outcome was the efficacy of bowel preparation based on the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS), the secondary outcomes were withdrawal time, time interval from preparation to colonoscopy, incidence of complications, cecal insertion rate, detection rates of polyps, adenoma, hemorrhoid and other diseases. BBPS score in constipation subgroup was analyzed. Results: The appropriate bowel preparation rate, BBPS score, and detection rates of polyps and hemorrhoid in observation group A were significantly higher than those in control group and observation group B (P0.05). There were no significant differences in cecal insertion rate, incomplete colonoscopy rate, detection rates of adenoma and other diseases, withdrawal time, time interval from preparation to colonoscopy, and incidence of adverse reactions among the three groups (P>0.05). BBPS score in constipation patients in observation group A was significantly higher than that in observation group B and control group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Linaclotide is safe and effective as an adjuvant for bowel preparation. 3 L PEG combined with linaclotide can improve the quality of bowel cleaning.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE：To inves tigate the application effect and safety of modified compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder（SF-PEG）in intestinal preparation method for patients with constipation undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS ：From Jan. 2020 to Aug. 2020，160 patients with constipation undergoing colonoscopy in anorectal department of the affiliated hospital of North Sichuan Medical College were randomly divided into observation group and control group ，with 80 cases in each group. The patients in the control group took 2 boxes of SF-PEG （mixed into 3 000 mL warm water ）orally at 3：00 a.m. on the day of examination，and finished within 2 hours. The patients in the observation group took 1 box of SF-PEG （mixed into 1 500 mL warm water）at 20：00 the night before the examination and 5：00 in the morning of the day of examination ，and drank it within 1 hour；1 bottle of Dimethylsiloxane powder （mixed into 75 mL warm water ）was taken orally at 7：00 a.m. on the inspection day. The satisfaction of intestinal preparation ，intestinal bubble score ，operation time of colonoscopy ，detection of polyps ，tolerance rate ， acceptance rate of repeating intestinal preparation of patients and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. RESULTS ：The patients of 2 groups successfully completed bowel preparation and colonoscopy. The intestinal preparation total satisfaction rate ，intestinal bubble satisfaction rate ，polyp detection rate ，tolerance rate and repeating intestinal preparation acceptance rate of patients of observation group were significantly higher than control group （P＜0.05），while the incidence of nausea and vomiting and total incidence of adverse reactions were significantly lower than control group （P＜0.05），and the operation time of colonoscopy was significantly shorter than control group （P＜0.05）. CONCLUSIONS ：Oral administration of SF-PEG in batches combined with Dimethylsiloxane powder for bowel preparation in patients with constipation before colonoscopy have the advantages of high satisfaction with bowel preparation ，less intestinal bubbles ，short operation time ，high detection rate of polyps，high tolerance rate of patients ，high acceptance rate of repeating intestinal preparation and less adverse reactions. It is a safe and effect method for intestinal preparation.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the effect of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder (SF-PEG) and Magnesium Sulfate (MgSO4) on intestinal tract preparation in patients with constipation. Methods 135 cases of constipation patients who underwent colonoscopy were selected. They were divided into A, B and C groups, each with 45 cases.Group A and group B received oral SF-PEG and 219.2 g (2 000 ml) at 5:00 to 7:00. Group A take 50% MgSO450 ml at 9:00, and then took 250 ml warm water.Group B received the same dose of MgSO4 at 7:00. The two groups were examined by colonoscopy at 11:00. Group C received oral compound SF-PEG 219.2 g (2 000 ml) at 10:00 to 12:00, and then took 50% MgSO450 ml at 14:00, received colonoscopy at 16:00. According to the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) score and parallel intraluminal bubble score. Determine the duration of bowel preparation process,and tolerance and adverse effects were recorded during bowel preparation. Results All patients completed bowel preparation and underwent a colonoscopy successfully. The scores of group A in BBPS were significantly higher than those in group B and group C (P < 0.05). In group A and group B, the score of parallel intraluminal bubble was lower than C, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The intestinal preparation time of A and B was less than that of group C, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the tolerance of patients was higher in group A and group B than that in group C (P < 0.05). In adverse reactions, group A and group B were lower than those in group C (P < 0.05). Conclusions When taking the time (5:00 to 7:00), intermittent polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder and Magnesium Sulfate can shorten the bowel preparation time and improve the quality of bowel preparation in patients with constipation.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of four different bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy.Methods 620 patients examined by coloscopy were randomized into four groups (group A,B,C and D),with each group in 155 cases.Group A received magnesium sulfate.Group B received compound polyethylene glycol.Group C received magnesium sulfate combined with simethicone.Group D received compound polyethylene glycol combined with simethicone.The quality and influencing factors,the detection of polyps and adverse events were compared between the four groups.Results The good bowel cleaning rate of group A,B,C and D were respectively 84.52％,91.61％,85.81％ and 94.19％.The good bowel cleaning rates of group A and C were higher than those of group B and D (x2 =4.32,P ＜ 0.05;x2 =7.63,P ＜ 0.05;x2 =4.10,P ＜ 0.05;x2 =6.06,P ＜ 0.05.).The bubble free rate of group A,B,C and D were 86.45 ％,87.74％,92.26％ and 90.96％.The bubble free rates of group C and D were higher than those of group A and B (x2 =4.17,P ＜ 0.05;x2 =4.76,P ＜ 0.05;x2 =5.02,P ＜ 0.05;x2 =4.23,P ＜ 0.05).The polyp detection rates of group A,B,C and D were 35.4％,36.8％,51.6％ and 54.2％.Group C and D showed higher quality of foam eliminating and detection rate of polyps as compared with group A and B (x2 =8.24,P ＜0.05;x2 =11.04,P ＜0.05;x2 =6.95,P ＜0.05;x2 =9.53,P ＜0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions of group A and C (21.3％ and 19.4％) were higher than group B and D (7.8％ and 6.5％) (x2 =11.86,P＜0.05;x2 =14.95,P ＜0.05;x2 =9.18,P ＜0.05;x2 =11.95,P ＜0.05).The frequency of colonoscopy,constipation,medication and examination time interval,bowel preparation methods and adverse events were the the influ ence factors of bowel preparation.Conclusion The quality of bowel preparation of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder is better than magnesium sulfate with high security.Treatment of combination with simethicone can improve bowel preparation quality.Many factors can affect bowel preparation,which need to be paid attention to.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the efficacy and comfort of oral polyethylene glycol at different time for painless colonoscopy preparation. Methods According to time of oral compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder, 173 painless colonoscopy patients were divided into group A, group B and group C. Patients in group A took 4 boxes of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder for colonic preparation at 22:00 on day 1 before the check, the time of painless colonoscopy is 8:30 ~ 10:30. Group B patients took 1 box of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder for colonic preparation at 20:00 on day 1 before the check and took 3 boxes at 5:00 am on check day, the time of painless colonoscopy is 10:30 ~ 12:30. Group C patients took 1 box of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder for colonic preparation at 20:00 on day 1 before the check and took 3 boxes at 7:00 am on check day, the time of painless colonoscopy is 13:30 ~ 15:30. At last, we compare the colon cleanliness and comfort of patients among the three groups. Results There was no significant difference in instetinal cleanliness among the 3 groups (P > 0.05), but there was greatly significant difference in subjective tolerance among 3 groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion The 3 methods of having boxes of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte power all have the satisfying effect for colonic preparation, but fractionated dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte power provides a better tolerance for bowel preparation of painless colonscopy.
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the efficacy and comfort of oral polyethylene glycol at different time for painless colonoscopy preparation. Methods According to time of oral compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder, 173 painless colonoscopy patients were divided into group A, group B and group C. Patients in group A took 4 boxes of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder for colonic preparation at 22:00 on day 1 before the check, the time of painless colonoscopy is 8:30 ~ 10:30. Group B patients took 1 box of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder for colonic preparation at 20:00 on day 1 before the check and took 3 boxes at 5:00 am on check day, the time of painless colonoscopy is 10:30 ~ 12:30. Group C patients took 1 box of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder for colonic preparation at 20:00 on day 1 before the check and took 3 boxes at 7:00 am on check day, the time of painless colonoscopy is 13:30 ~ 15:30. At last, we compare the colon cleanliness and comfort of patients among the three groups. Results There was no significant difference in instetinal cleanliness among the 3 groups (P > 0.05), but there was greatly significant difference in subjective tolerance among 3 groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion The 3 methods of having boxes of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte power all have the satisfying effect for colonic preparation, but fractionated dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte power provides a better tolerance for bowel preparation of painless colonscopy.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the effect and psychological intervention of compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder in preoperative bowel preparation for gynecologic tumor patients. Methods According to the different drugs,nursing interventions will be January 2015 to March 2017 in third affiliated hospital of Tianjin medical university for surgical treatment of gynecological cancer patients 80 cases groups:control group with routine nursing intervention observation group with mannitol, psychological nursing and compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte with intervention;observation of two groups of patients improve psychological status and intestinal cleaning and the incidence of adverse reactions,the strict record related data and make comparative analysis. Results The psychological nursing and compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder(observation group)intervention in patients with gynecologic tumor significantly,the psychological state of patients with improvement than the control group,the bowel cleaning is better than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);two patients with adverse reaction rate comparison,the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion The preparation of intestinal tract tumor patients before gynecologic selection of psychological nursing and intervention effect of polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder can significantly improve the psychological state,full bowel cleansing patients with high effective rate,and will not increase the adverse reactions,and is worthy of clinical application.
RESUMEN
Objective The effects of compound Dachengqi Decoction and polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder in the effect of combined application of bowel preparation before colonoscopy.[Methods]From 2007 January to 2013 May, the outpatient clinic underwent endoscopy in 453 cases of patients, the patients were randomly divided into control group(192 cases) and compound Dachengqi Decoction group(261 cases). Colonoscopy bowel cleaning to control group with compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder; compound Dachengqi Decoction group were treated with compound Dachengqi Decoction and polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder; carry on the analysis comparison of related clinical indexes during colonoscopy in patients of 2 groups.[Results]Occurrence of Fufang Dachengqi Decoction group in the time of taking medicine and endoscopic doctor on intestinal cleaning satisfaction and the adverse reactions were superior to the control group, the difference was statistical y significant. [Conclusion]Fufang Dachengqi Decoction and polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder combined in application is effective, safe, fast, easy to be accepted by patients bowel preparation. It is conducive to the diagnosis and treatment of endoscopic, also suitable for intestinal bowel preparation before the operation, it is worthy of popularization and application.
RESUMEN
Objective To study the effect of magnesium citrate combined with compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder in bowel preparation before colonoscopy.Methods One hundred and six colonoscopy patients with lower digestive tract symptom were divided into study group (54 cases) and control group (52 cases) by random digits table method,the bowel preparation in study group was magnesium citrate combined with compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder,in control group was compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder.The lesions detection rate,bowel preparation quality,time of first defecation,number of defecation,time of colonoscopy,results of the electrolyte level and liver and kidney function after medication and adverse reaction were compared between two groups.Results There were no statistical differences in lesions detection rate,time of colonoscopy,results of the electrolyte level and liver and kidney function after medication between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).The total effective rate of bowel preparation quality in study group was significantly higher than that in control group [96.3％(52/54) vs.82.7％ (43/52)],the time of first defecation was significantly shorter than that in control group [(32.5 ± 26.1) rmin vs.(47.2 ± 22.4) min],the number of defecation was significantly much than that in control group [(8.2 ± 2.9) times vs.(6.2 ± 2.6) times],there were statistical differences (P ＜ 0.05).The incidence of nausea in study group was significantly lower than that in control group [22.2％ (12/54) vs.48.1％ (25/52)],there was statistical difference (P ＜ 0.05).There were no statistical differences in the incidences of vomiting,abdominal distention and abdominal pain between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Magnesium citrate combined with compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder used in preoperative bowel preparation for colonoscopy has better clinical application value.