Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CT scan with oral and intravenous contrast versus CT scan with intravenous contrast alone in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma / 中华创伤杂志(英文版)

PURPOSE@#Abdominal CT scan using oral and intravenous (IV) contrast is helpful in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal injuries. However, the use of oral and IV contrast delays the process of diagnosis and increases the risk of aspiration. It has also been shown that CT scan with IV contrast alone is as helpful as CT scan with oral and IV contrast and rectal CT scan in detecting abdominal injuries. Therefore, the present study aims to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of CT scan with oral and IV contrast versus CT scan with IV contrast alone in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).@*METHODS@#Altogether 123 BAT patients, 60 (48.8%) women and 63 (51.2%) men with the mean age of (40.4 ± 18.7) years who referred to the emergency department of Imam Khomeini Educational and Medical Center in Sari, Iran (a tertiary trauma center in north of Iran) from November 2014 to March 2017 and underwent abdominal CT scans + laparotomy were investigated. Those with penetrating trauma or hemodynamically unstable patients were excluded. The participants were randomly allocated to two groups: abdominal CT scan with oral and IV contrast (n = 63) and CT scan with IV contrast alone (n = 60). No statistically significant difference was found between two groups regarding the hemodynamic parameters, age, gender, injury mechanisms (all p > 0.05). The results of CT scan were compared with that of laparotomy results. The collected data were recorded in SPSS version 22.0 for Windows. Quantitative data were presented as mean and SD.@*RESULTS@#The sensitivity and specificity of CT scan using oral and IV contrast in the diagnosis of BAT were estimated at 96.48 (95% CI: 90.73 - 99.92) and 92.67 (95% CI: 89.65 - 94.88), respectively; while CT scan with IV contrast alone achieved a comparable sensitivity and specificity of 96.6 (95% CI: 87.45 - 99,42 and 92.84 (95% CI: 89.88 - 95.00), respectively.@*CONCLUSION@#CT scan with IV contrast alone can be used to assess visceral injuries in BAT patients with normal hemodynamics to avoid diagnostic delay.

The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Gastric Cancer Recurrence after Curative Gastrectomy

PURPOSE: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scans are frequently performed for the screening or staging of malignant tumors. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of gastric cancer recurrence after curative gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty nine patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy due to gastric cancer and had 18F-FDG PET/CT and contrast CT scans within 2 weeks for surveillance in asymptomatic patients (n = 11) or to clarify suspected recurrence (n = 78) were consecutively collected and retrospectively analyzed. They had clinical follow-up for at least 12 months after PET/CT and CT scans. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 89 patients (16.9%) were diagnosed with recurrent gastric cancer in 21 organs. Forty one organs showed an increase in FDG uptake, and only 9 of these organs were diagnosed with recurrent gastric cancer by 18F-FDG PET/CT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the 18F-FDG PET/CT were 42.9%, 59.7%, 29.3%, 78.2%, and 57.3%, respectively. On the CT scan, 18 of 21 recurrent gastric cancers were detected, and 7 cases were in agreement with the 18F-FDG PET/CT. The sensitivity and specificity of the CT scan were 85.8% and 87.3%, respectively, which are superior to the 18F-FDG PET/CT. When we diagnosed a recurrence based on either 18F-FDG PET/CT or CT scans, the sensitivity increased to 95.2% and the specificity decreased to 45.6%, when compared with the contrast CT scan alone. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT is an insufficient diagnostic method in detection of recurrence after curative gastrectomy, and even less accurate than contrast CT scan alone.

Value of Fat-Density Oral Contrast Agent for CT of the Pancreas and the Gastrointestinal Tract / 实用放射学杂志

The 76 cases given 12.5% peanut oil emulsion were compared with the 103 cases given 2% iodine solution in abdominal CT scan. The results showed that 12.5% peanut oil emulsion was better than 2% iodine solution (P

Thoracic Disc Herniations

Thoracic disc herniation is so uncommon that only four cases have been literally reported to Korean Neurosurgical Journal Since 1972. Authors report here another 7 cases of thoracic disc herniation and analyse clinical findings and surgical outcome of 11 cases including 4 cases previously reported from other hospitals. Results are as follows: 1) Male dominancy in incidence was quite evident(10 : 1), and most patients were middle aged(30-50). 2) About a half of the patients had sudden onset of spinal cord compression symptoms, and the remaining half had insidious onset. 3) In 7 of 11 patients, diagnosis could be done by myelography alone, but in 4 of 11 cases, myelographic findings were equivocal and contrast CT scan were required for confirmation. 4) Thoracic disc herniations were more frequent in mid-thoracic discs(T5-T8 disc). 5) Considering the direction and location of disc herniations, 7 cases were paramedian, 2 cases central and 1 case was posterolateral. 6) Transthoracic transpleural approach were adequate for central or paramedian disc herniations, and posterolateral or transpedicular approach for lateral herniations.