RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the bactericidal mechanism of electrolyzed oxidizing water (EOW) against Pseudomona aeruginosa (P.aeruginosa).Methods Bactericidal mechanism of EOW against P.aeruginosa was studied through intracellular protein leakage,nucleic acid,and cell membrane calcium ion permeability,2 ％ glutaraldehyde was used as positive control group,and normal saline (NS) was used as negative control group.Results The killing rates of EOW and 2％ glutaraldehyde to P.aeruginosa were both＞99.99％ with 30-second contact time,and 100.00％ with 60-second contact time.After 60-second contact with EOW,NS,and 2％ glutaraldehyde,the protein leakage of P.aeruginosa detected by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) were (96.00 ± 7.42),(94.15 ± 7.49),and (216.97 ± 10.35)μg/mL,respectively,difference was significant(F =613.20,P＜0.01),2％ glutaraldehyde group was higher than EOW group and NS group;protein leakage did not change with the increase of contact time(all P＞0.05).Electrophoretogram of random amplified polymorphic DNA showed high intensity dense band between 500-1000 Kb in EOW group and NS group,while 2％ glutaraldehyde group was without amplified bands.The fluorescence intensity of calcium ion of EOW group and 2％ glutaraldehyde group were both lower than that of NS group.Conclusion Bactericidal mechanism of EOW may be due to the damage of membrane permeability of P.aeruginosa,which causes Ca2+ leakage,but fails to cause protein leakage,the damage to nucleic acid is not obvious,DNA may not be a bactericidal target of EOW.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the disinfection effect of the endoscope disinfection machine with acidic oxidizing poten‐tial water on the fiber bronchoscopy .Methods Totlly 460 cases of contamination after diagnosis and treatment in the department , were randomly divided into experimental group (using electrolyzed oxidizing water as disinfectant ;according to the cleaning and dis‐infection of endoscope Koeman brand ECM‐03A type machine bronchoscope disinfection) and control group (with 2% glutaralde‐hyde disinfectant of the traditional five tank cleaning disinfection method ) ,evaluation of endoscopic surface cleanliness ,surface at‐tachment ,pipe blockage and bacterial colony detection .Results The experimental group was better than the control group in the aspects of endoscopic surface cleanliness ,mirror surface attachment ,pipe blockage and so on ;The number of sterile growth in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group ,both in the inner cavity sampling method and the outside sampling method .The number of cases of ≥20 CFU/piece in the experimental group was significantly less than that in the control group , with the cavity sampling method ,the qualified rate of the experimental group was also significantly higher than that of the control group ,the difference was statistically significant (P< 0 .05) .Conclusion The application of acidic oxidizing potential water as a disinfectant in the whole automatic endoscope disinfection machine significantly improve the quality of cleaning and disinfection ,at the same time ,and reduce human labor strength ,improve the application efficiency of fiber bronchoscopy ,worthy of promotion .
RESUMEN
Objective To compare the durability and cost-effectiveness of slightly acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water(SAEOW),ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) and glutaraldehyde (GA) in two conditions,i.e.,continuous machine cleaning and continuous manual cleaning.Methods The maximal numbers of endoscopes which were disinfected by the three disinfectants at its minimal effective concentration,as well as the corresponding costs were compared.The cost-effectiveness of three disinfectants were evaluated with revenue-incremental cost analysis.Results The number of endoscopes disinfected by ortho-phthalaldehyde was larger than that by two other disinfectants,140 ± 2 by machine wash and 226 ± 1 by hand washing;followed by glutaral disinfectant,88 ± 2 and 108 ± 2 by machine wash and hand wash,respectively;slightly acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water disinfected the least endoscopes,34 ± 2 and 39 ± 1 by machine wash and hand wash.There were significant differences among these three disinfectants (all P ＜ 0.05).Compared with GA,one more Yuan invested to OPA yielded 2.24 yuan more under the condition of machine wash and 3.14 yuan more under the condition of hand wash.Compared with GA,one Yuan invested in SAEOW produced 47.14 yuan by machine wash and 45.6 Yuan by hand wash.Conclusion Under full workload,orthophthalaldehyde shows the best durability among the three disinfectants,while slightly acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water shows the highest economic benefit.
RESUMEN
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of slightly acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water for the disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes.Methods Electrolyzed oxidizion water generator was utilized to produce the water,which was applied for the disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscopes.The disinfectant efficiency and effect were evaluated.Results A total of 215 samples were taken for bacterial culture after the disinfection.The mean sterilization efficiency of slightly acidic electrolyzed oxidized water and 2％ glutaraldehyde by machine were 99.92％ and 99.85％,respectively,while the mean sterilization efficiency were 99.85％ and 99.84％ by manual disinfection.There were no statistical significance between the two groups.The effective rates of both groups were 100％.No deformation or aging was observed in the endoscopes.The disinfectant caused no damage to the cleansing and disinfection.Conclusion It is feasible to apply slightly acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water to the disinfection of endoscopes.
RESUMEN
[Objective] To compare the disinfection effect of different disinfectants on disinfection effect of laryngeal endoscope,and seek for a more safe and effective disinfectant for laryngeal endoscope.[Methods] 180 laryngeal endoscope were divided into three groups with 60 of them in each group.Acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water(AEOW),2％ glutaraldehyde and orthophthalaldehyde were used for disinfection.Three minutes and five minutes after disinfection,the samples were got and underwent bacterial detection.The disinfection effect after three minutes and five minutes was compared.[Results] The qualified rate of disinfection and cost between AEOW,2％ glutaraldehyde and orthophthalaldehyde showed distinct difference.[Conclusions] Using acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water in the disinfection of laryngeal endoscope has advantages of fast,effective,low-cost,which can be applied in the clinical work.
RESUMEN
1.0,achieved the standard request of Disinfection Technology standard.RESULTS Through EOW disinfection,the bacteria were not found on the object surfac of transports and conformed to the object surface disinfection request of Disinfection Technology Standard.CONCLUSIONS Applying EOW to disinfection of polluted instrument recycling vehicle for clinical purpose can fulfill the State standards completely;EOW has strongly germicidal activity,also with characteristics as rapidity,safety and environment security,without any irritant odor.These results indicate a widely potential use of EOW as in hospital disinfection supply center,especially,with a positive significance in health care for pediatric patients.
RESUMEN
Objective To study the efficacy of the electrolyzed oxidizing water (EOW) in the oral irrigation of patients with oral trachea cannula. Methods 60 patients with oral trachea cannula were ran-domly divided into the experimental group and the control group, the experimental group received oral irri-gation with EOW,while the control group used normal saline. The oral irrigation efficacy was compared be-tween the two groups. Results In the experimental group,the bacterial clearance rate was 95.21% ,while the control one's was 37.19%, the stomatodysodia rate of the experimental group was 3.33%, the control one's was 86.60%, the oral fungus infection rate of the experimental group was 0% , the control one's was 43.33%, the incidence of dental ulcer of the experimental group was 10.00%, the control one's was 3.33%. Significant difference existed in bacterial clearance rate and the stomatedysodia rate between the two groups. Conclusions Oral irrigation with EOW in oral trachea cannula patients can decrease or con-trol the field planting of bacterium in pharynx oralis and stomatodysodia, and prevent pulmonary infection.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE To observe the effect of electrolyzed oxidizing water(EOW) on the surface sterilization of indoor environment.METHODS Sterilized the surface of ground,wall,table,mob and thermostat-controlled water-bath in cell culture room and good laboratory practice(GLP) with EOW,then to draw the materials and culture with culture dish for 48 h in a 37℃ incubator,and count the colony number.Sterilization method and grouping: group A treated as a control,group B sterilized with EOW,group C sterilized with ultraviolate ray for 30 min and group D first treated with ultraviolate ray for 30 min,then sterilized with EOW.RESULTS In group A,the bacteria were overgrew and formed flakiness in 10/10 culture dishes;1 colony was formed in group B,the sterilization effective rate was 90%.The bacteria culture of group C found no bacteria growing after sterilization with ultraviolate ray,however,sample from surface and culture after sterilization were seen bacteria,though the number of bacteria was less than group A.The bacteria culture outcome of group D was negative.CONCLUSIONS The EOW has a good sterilization effect,it is safe and untoxic,costly cheap and convenient to use,and fit to claim of environmental protection.
RESUMEN
Objective To observe the effectiveness of electrolyzed oxidizing water(EOW) in disinfections of endoscopes and compared with that of 2% glutaraldehyde. Methods (1) Disinfections of bacteri-a:Specimens were obtained immediately from endoscopes after being used, disinfected and washed out for bacterial culture. Endoscopes were immersed in either EOW or 2% glutaraldehyde for 1 , 3 and 5 minutes. Each time group consisted of 30 cases. (2 ) Effectiveness on disinfections of H. Pylori: endoscopes either from patients with H. Pylori infection or artificially contaminated with H. Pylori were washed out and exposed for 1 ,3 and 5 minutes in each of the disinfectants. PCR was used to detect DNA of H. Pylor. (3) Effectiveness of disinfections of HBV : Endoscopes were contaminated with HBV-positive serum, and the exposure time to both disinfectants were 1,3,5 and 10 minutes respectively. Thirty samples were studied in each time groups. Results ( 1 ) After manual cleaning and disinfections for 1, 3 and 5min in EOW, no vegetative bacteria were found. In 2% glutaraldehyde processing group, 5/30, 4/30 and 1/30 specimens remained bacteria positive, respectively. (2)There was no positive specimens found after 3 and 5 minutes' exposure in EOW in the group of H. Pylori, but 2/30 positive specimens were found in the 1 minute group. While 3/30, 4/30 and 4/30 positive specimens were found after exposure in 2% glutaraldehyde. (3) In the group of HBV, there is no positive case found after exposure in EOW, while in 2% glutaraldehyde groups, there were 2,5 ,4 and 5 cases remained positive in 1 ,3,5 and 10 minutes group respectively. Conclusion EOW is superior to 2% glutaraldehyde in disinfections of Hp or HVB with high-speed and thoroughness, and worthy to be recommended in disinfections of endoscopes.
RESUMEN
Objective: To clinically evaluate the efficacy of electrolyzed oxidizing water (EOW) as a root canal irrigation solution on disinfecting bacteria and removing the smear-layer to keep the non-bacterium state in the root canal. Methods: In the first experiment, 108 single-rooted teeth that needed root canal treatment were randomly divided into two groups. EOW was used as the root canal irrigation solution in the experimental group while 30 ml/L H2O2, saline solution, and 75 g/L EDTA solution were used as controls. Bacteriological examinations were conducted from each tooth before and after treatment with the root canal irrigation solutions. In the second experiment, the 20 fresh human extracted teeth were divided into two groups and treated as same as the first experiment in root canal preparation and irrigation. After irrigation, the apical canal wall was observed using SEM. Results: There was no significant difference in bacterial growth and removing the smear layer between the group using EOW and that using saline solution, 30 ml/L H2O2 and 75 g/L EDTA solution. Conclusion:The results indicate EOW is useful as a clinical root canal irrigation solution.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE To realize the disinfectant effect of medical instrument by acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water(EOW).METHODS Two groups of subjects participated in this study,and chlorinated disinfectant is used in the control group. Adopting stability test to measure effective chlorine and pH,and to compute the bacterium elimination rate after disinfection. Contrast the result with the experimental group.RESULTS The pH mean value and the effective chlorine mean value of two groups before and after instrument immersing in had no remarkable differences. Medical instrument sterilized by EOW for 5 minutes,the bacterium eliminative rate was 100.0%,while sterilized by the chlorinated disinfectant needed 30 minutes. Sterilizing effects of two groups were the same,but sterilizing time was obviously short in experimental group.CONCLUSIONS The acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water can be used in medical instrument's disinfection. The effect is good,and the process is fast. EOW is better than chlorinated disinfectant in saving of resources economizing.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE To determine the value of acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water (EOW) for disinfecting endoscopes in the children's hospitals. METHODS The detection methods of field sampling were used for monitoring the effect of EOW disinfection. Washed after-use endoscopes were disinfected by EOW for 3-5min. Bacteriological tests on samples of pre-and post-disinfection made for 30 samples of laryngoscopes,30 examples of gastroscopes and 16 samples of enteroscopes,which were selected randomly. RESULTS Through EOW disinfection,the bacteria were not found on the laryngoscopes. The total number of bacteria on digestive endoscopes was conformed to the Standards of Disinfection Techniques and no pathogenic bacteria were detected. CONCLUSIONS Applying EOW to disinfection of endoscopes for clinical purpose can fulfill the State Standards completely. EOW has strongly germicidal activity,also with characteristic aslo act rapidly,securely and environment friendly,and without any irritant odor. These rusults indicate a widely potential use of EOW as in children's hospitals,especially,with a positive significance in health care of pediatric patients.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE To confirm the clinical disinfection effect of acidity electrolyzed oxidizing water(AEOW).METHODS According to the standards of disinfection techniques supplied by Health Ministry of China,the disinfection effect of health care worker,object surfaces and medical apparatus and instrument were investigated.RESULTS The log reduction of the bacteria on the hands,object surfaces and medical instruments were more than 1.00.The number of the bacteria on the endoscopes were 0-2 CFU per piece on average.No pathogenic bacteria were detected out.The disinfection effect of each experimental group was qualified.CONCLUSIONS The field disinfection effect of AEOW is accepted.
RESUMEN
Objective The aim of the paper is to investigate the alteration of the physical-chemical properties and disinfection effect of electrolyzed-oxidizing water during storage, and to provide theory support for its application. Methods A typical electrolyzed-oxidizing water was stored under a closed and light condition for 66 days and its physical-chemical parameters and disinfection effect were measured at fixed periods. Results The results showed that the chlorine loss of the electrolyzed-oxidizing water was quite fast and reached 50% and 100% after 10 days and 66 days of storage period respectively, the pH value was quite stable, from 2.5 to 2.47. The oxidation-reduction potential(ORP) of the water decreased slowly only from 1 146 mV to 1 100 mV within 45 day, but decreased rapidly after 45 days of storage. The results also showed that the inactivation of Bacillus subtilis var niger spores by the electrolyzed-oxidizing water also decreased rapidly after one week of storage,from 100%(the first week) to less than 90%(after 10 days). Conclusion The electrolyzed-oxidizing water can keep its strong disinfection effect after 7-10 days of storage. It was believed that the chlorine loss from the electrolyzed-oxidizing water was the main reason for the decrease of its disinfection effect during storage.