Predictors of long-term healing for endorectal advancement flap for anorectal fistulas

Introduction: Anorectal fistulas are some of the commonest surgical proctologic disorders treated by surgeons. Despite the recent introduction of various sphincter preserving techniques, the search for the optimal operation continues. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of long-term healing for the endorectal advancement flap. Methods: A retrospective review of a single surgeon experience with the endorectal advancement flap for anorectal fistulas over an 18-year period. The impact of various patient and fistula related factors were analyzed for their impact on the primary endpoint of long-term fistula healing. Results: 87 patients underwent endorectal advancement flap (Male/Female 42.5/57.5%). Median age was 41 years. Sixty-nine patients (79.3%) had anal fistula while 18 patients had rectal fistula (20.7%). An anterior based fistula was noted in 45 patients (51.7%). The most common etiology was cryptoglandular disease (87.4%). The median operative time was 75minutes (range 36-250). Postoperative septic complications were noted in 4 patients (4.6%). Fistula healing was documented in 80 patients (93%). During a median follow-up of 4 months (range 1-38, 1 patient lost to follow-up), recurrence was noted in 8 patients (9.3%), yielding an overall long-term success rate of 83.7%. The long-term healing rate was higher in patients with fistulas from cryptoglandular etiology (86.6%) compared to fistulas from other etiologies (63.6%) [p = 0.027]. Conclusions: The endorectal advancement is associated with a high healing rate, a low postoperative septic complication rate, and infrequent risk for recurrence. Long-term healing without recurrence is achieved more frequently in patients with cryptoglandular etiology of the fistula compared to patients with non-cryptoglandular etiology. (AU)

Fístula rectovaginal posobstétrica: tratamiento quirúrgico mediante avance de colgajo endorrectal / Postobstetric rectovaginal fistula: surgical treatment using endorectal advancement flap

Introducción: Las fístulas rectovaginales ocurren con una frecuencia menor a 5 % respecto a otros tipos de fístulas de la región anorrectal; el trauma obstétrico es la causa más común de este tipo de fístulas. Existen diversos procedimientos quirúrgicos para la reparación de las mismas. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de 16 pacientes con diagnóstico de fístula rectovaginal posobtétrica, atendidas en el Hospital Juárez de México entre enero de 1992 y diciembre de 2006. Se analizó edad de las pacientes, tipo de trauma obstétrico, tiempo de inicio de la sintomatología después del parto, localización y tamaño de la fístula, índice de éxito y recidivas mediante el tratamiento con avance de colgajo endorrectal, y necesidad de esfinteroplastia complementaria. Resultados: La edad promedio fue de 25.6 años. En todas las pacientes, la sintomatología inició después de un parto vaginal durante el cual se realizó episiotomía o hubo desgarro perineal. Todas las fístulas fueron menores de 2.5 cm de diámetro y de localización baja. Con el colon preparado, en todas las pacientes se reparó la fístula rectovaginal mediante avance de colgajo endorrectal. En dos pacientes se llevó acabo, además, esfinteroplastia del esfínter anal. Los resultados fueron satisfactorios en 15 pacientes (93.7 %); no hubo mortalidad operatoria y no fueron utilizados estomas de protección. Conclusiones: El colgajo endorrectal es un procedimiento seguro para la reparación de fístulas rectovaginales de origen posobstétrico, algunos casos pueden requerir esfinteroplastia del esfínter anal.

BACKGROUND: Rectovaginal fistulas account for <5% of all rectal fistulas. Obstetrical injuries are the most common cause of these types of fistulas. There have been a multitude of surgical approaches developed for operative repair. METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 2006, 16 patients with postobstetric rectovaginal fistula were treated at the Hospital Juárez of México. Age, type of obstetric trauma, time elapsed between delivery and beginning of symptoms, location, and size of the fistulas, rate of success and recurrence with the use of endorectal flap, and need for complementary sphincteroplasty were all evaluated. RESULTS: Median age of the patients was 25.6 years. All women reported that their symptoms began after a vaginal delivery that included an episiotomy or 4th degree laceration. All fistulas were low and small (<2.5 cm in diameter). Patients received bowel preparation and underwent rectovaginal repair using endorectal advancement flap. In two cases, additional overlap repair of the anal sphincter was performed. Result of repair was good to excellent in 15 patients (93.7%). There were no operative mortalities, and no covering stomas were used. CONCLUSIONS: Endorectal flap repair provides successful postobstetric rectovaginal fistula closure. Concomitant sphincteroplasty may be necessary in some cases.