RESUMEN
The rapid development of high-speed railway in China has proposed higher requests for the comfort level of high-speed trains. However, there is no internationally unified evaluation criterion for high-speed train comfort currently, which therefore substantially affects the comparability and standardization of research results for high-speed train comfort. This paper systematically reviews the research literature about evaluation indicators and standards related to high-speed train comfort, and finds that there is currently no unified definition, evaluation indicators, as well as evaluation criterion for high-speed train comfort. Most current evaluation criteria are based on a single indicator. Some indicators are simultaneously developed by different apartments and differ between each other, and there is no comprehensive indicator or criteria for high-speed train comfort, restricting the comparison of high-speed train comfort across regions. It is recommended that the administrative department of high-speed railroad in China should organize experts to establish a unified definition of high-speed train comfort, comprehensive evaluation indicators and relevant judgment criteria for high-speed train comfort, in face of the rapid development and globalization of high-speed trains.
Asunto(s)
China , Vías Férreas , Estándares de ReferenciaRESUMEN
This article aims to provide a review of the domestic and foreign studies on the quality indicators for evaluating the psychiatric nursing care in recent years. According to Donabedian model， the research progress of quality indicators for evaluating the psychiatric nursing care were described from the three dimensions of structure quality， process quality and outcome quality. This paper summarizes the status of the research， points out the shortcomings of existing research， and provides references for the future research on the quality indicators for evaluating the psychiatric nursing care.
RESUMEN
Objective:To construct of comprehensive quality of evaluation index system about palliative care in general hospitals, so as to provide reference for promoting the scientific and standardized development of palliative care.Methods:Based on the structure-process-outcome quality model, literature research and Delphi method were used to determine the quality of palliative care evalution index system and index weight for general hospitals.Results:A total of 12 experts were consulted for two rounds,the rates of questionnaire retrieve were 12/15 and 12/12 respectively. The authoritative coefficients were 0.909 and 0.879, the Kendall′s W values were 0.27, 0.32 and 0.26 respectively with good coordination degree ( χ2=6.50, 106.62, 494.64, all P<0.05). Finally, the quality of palliative care indicator system in general hospitals was constructed, which included 3 first-level indicators, 30 second-level indicators and 157 third-level indicators. Conclusions:The establishment process of the construction of quality of palliative care indicator system in general hospitals was scientific and reasonable, focusing on the development characteristics of palliative care and can make significant contributions to improve the quality of palliative care.
RESUMEN
Objective:To construct the evaluation index system of nursing quality in nurse-led Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) clinic, and to provide a tool for evaluation of nursing quality in nurse-led TCM clinic.Methods:Based on Donabedian three-dimensional quality model of "struction-process-outcome" the inital index system of nurse-led TCM clinic was formed through literature review, evidence level and quality evaluation were conducted based on Johns Hopkins evidence-based nursing method. Through 2 rounds of experts′ consultation, the index system was finally determined. The index weight was calculated by analytic hierarchy process.Results:Two rounds of experts consultations resulted in the effective response rate of 95.65%(22/23) and 86.36%(19/22), the expert authority coefficient was 0.80 and 0.81, coefficients of variation ranged from 0.043 to 0.326 and 0.000 to 0.215, and the Kendall coordination coefficient was 0.261 and 0.214, respectively, showing statistically significant difference ( P<0.05 for both); the final indicator system consisted of 3 first-level indicators, 9 second-level indicators and 53 third-level indicators. Conclusions:The evaluation index system of nurse-led TCM clinic has good reliability, and can provide reference for the evaluation of nursing qualityin nurse-led TCM clinic.
RESUMEN
Objective:This paper aim to analyze the influencing factors of individual academic performance based on the construction of a research-oriented hospital, to provide possible reference for improving the service of science and technology management.Methods:Selecting 45 experts determine the constituent index and assign value of the academic performance evaluation system by using Delphi method. The index setting emphasized clinical application orientation, and weighted total score was used as the academic performance evaluation standard. Conduct a-350-person anonymous questionnaire survey and use descriptive analysis and multiple logistic regression methods to analyze the influencing factors.Results:The system includes a total number of 6 first-level indicators and 43 second-level indicators. The authoritative coefficients of the consulting experts are 8.5±0.6, and the Kendall of the two rounds of consultation are 0.78 and 0.83( P<0.05). The questionnaire results show that respondents with Ph. D degree, senior professional titles, mentor qualification, from large team and higher scientific research service support have better academic performance. personal background, team support and scientific research services have significant impact on academic performance. Conclusions:In order to improve the scientific research strength of the hospital, it is significant to focus on systematic scientific research training, strengthening discipline teams and research platforms, and improving the professional level of scientific research management.
RESUMEN
Venous thromboembolism is a common surgical complication. It is highly regarded because of its tendency to cause fatal pulmonary embolism, so its nursing quality is of great significance to the outcome of patients. This paper summarizes the structural, process and outcome indicators of nursing quality evaluation in the precontrol of venous thromboembolism, aiming to provide reference for the formulation of nursing quality evaluation indicators in precontrol of venous thromboembolism suitable for our national conditions.
RESUMEN
Objective@#To develop the outcome evaluation index system for home care service of disabled elderly based on the long-term care insurance in Guangzhou.@*Methods@#Delphi method was used to develop the outcome evaluation index system for home care service of disabled elderly under the long-term care insurance in Guangzhou. The Analytic Hierarchy Process was used to determine the weights of all indexes.@*Results@#After two rounds of expert consultation, questionnaire response rates were 86.67%, 100%; expert authority coefficients were 0.843, 0.858; coefficients of variation ranged from 0.07 to 0.23 and 0.00 to 0.14; coordination coefficients ranged from 0.221 to 0.355 and 0.379 to 0.433 (P<0.01). The final index system consisted of 5 first-level indicators, 17 second-level indicators, and 59 third-level indicators. The analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weights of all indexes, and the consistency test (CR<0.1) was performed.@*Conclusions@#The outcome evaluation index system for home care service of disabled elderly under the long-term care insurance in Guangzhou was scientific and reliable, the weights of all indexes were reasonable, which could provide reference for the designated service institution on evaluation and improvement of the effect of home care service of long-term care insurance for disabled elderly.
RESUMEN
Objective To develop a quality evaluation indicator system of midwifery care in line with the modern service concept in Shanghai area under the background of over-medicalization trend of midwifery services, and to guide the improvement direction of midwifery quality. Methods Guided by the evidence-based framework of midwifery quality and indicator selection principles, the indicators for evaluating midwifery quality were preliminarily selected by literature review and theoretical analysis. Two rounds of Delphi survey among 53 experts from Shanghai were conducted to decide the final quality evaluation indicator system of midwifery care. Analytic hierarchy process ( AHP) and the importance′ sum average method were adopted to calculate weights coefficients of the indicators. Results 45 indicators for evaluating midwifery quality were preliminarily selected. The response rate of two rounds of Delphi survey were 76% and 100% , the authority coefficients were 0.90 and 0.89, expert opinion coordinate coefficients were 0.190 and 0.257, respectively. The final version of the indicator system consists of 11 structure quality indicators, 13 process quality indicators and 19 outcome quality indicators. The weight values of the three first-level indicators were 0.195 8, 0.310 8 and 0.493 4 respectively. The weight values of the 43 second-level indicators ranged from 0. 016 1 to 0. 028 6. Conclusions The quality evaluation indicator system of midwifery care developed fits evidence-based midwifery philosophy. It provides a scientific tool for midwifery quality evaluation in Shanghai, which can guide the improvement of midwifery quality.
RESUMEN
Objective The evaluation index system of quality of assisted fertility treatment care was constructed to provide the basis for scientific evaluation of quality of care in reproductive center. Methods Based on the structure-process-outcome (SPO) quality model, evaluation index system for fertility treatment care in the reproductive center was constructed by literature query, field process tracking, Delphi expert consultation and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Results The effective recovery rate ( RR ) of the two rounds of the questionnaire was 100% . The expert authority coefficient Cr values were 0.813, 0.845 respectively. The W value of the coordination coefficient was 0.331, 0.372, both of which were statistically significant (P<0.01). Finally, an evaluation index system of quality of assisted fertility treatment care with three dimensions, 14 secondary indicators and 47 items was formed. Yaaph software was used to determine the weight coefficients of primary and secondary indicators, and the consistency test ( Cr<0.1) was performed, and the variation coefficients of all tertiary items were <0.20. Conclusions The weight of the quality index system of assisted reproductive treatment care in reproductive center is reasonable, the indicators were clear, systematic and objective, and worthy of clinical promotion.
RESUMEN
Objective To establish an evaluation system for health education products of parasitic diseases by using a Del-phi method,so as to provide references for the evaluation of health education products.Methods An expert panel was estab-lished and evaluation indicators were determined by brainstorming and face-to-face discussion,then the weight of each evalua-tion indicator was determined through a two-round Delphi method and the evaluation system was established.Results The eval-uation indicators for material products,graphic design products and audio-visual products were established respectively by ex-pert panel.Four first indicators and 12 second indicators were included in each type of products.The consensus was achieved fol-lowing the two rounds of expert consultation among 23 knowledgeable and experienced experts,who considered"scientificity"and"acceptability"to be the most important of all the first indicators,and"information accuracy"and"behavioral guidance"of all the second indicators.Conclusion A scientific and rational evaluation system is established,and it can be used in compre-hensive evaluation of health education products for parasitic diseases.
RESUMEN
Objective:The objective of this study is to construct the evaluation indicator system of family doc-tors contracted service,to evaluate the main current family doctor contracted service in China from different aspects of health services. Methods:literature research method,field survey method and expert consultation method were used for the preliminary screening of the evaluation indicator; after consultation with Delphi experts to conduct a primary health care service management,using statistical analysis was used to build a family doctor evaluation indicator sys-tem. Results:The results show that the evaluation indicator system of family doctors contracted service was deter-mined,and consists of three first-level indicators,which were respectively preparatory,procedural and outcome eval-uation indicators;eight secondary indicators,which mainly include human resources input,basic medical treatment, basic public health,service efficiency and satisfaction and so on;and thirty-nine tertiary indicators,such as the num-ber of doctors per 10,000 population,the rate of first diagnosis,the rate of medical malpractice and the incidence of medical disputes of contracted residents,etc. Conclusions:The indicator system constructed in this study is sensitive and feasible,and it can comprehensively evaluate the work of family doctor contract,and provides a reference for the management,assessment and evaluation of family doctor contract service.
RESUMEN
Objective Risk management is one of the strong measurements to ensure the conduction of new drug research and development (R&D) projects .Therefore ,establishing a set of evaluation index system in the new drug R&D projects is of great significance to increase the project success rate .Methods By analyzing more than 20 new drug R&D projects of “the mil-itary science and technology major projects”in five years ,the risk factors were induced ,sorted and summed up ,and a set of e-valuation indicator was built up through Delphi method and experts interview .The quantitative study was completed through fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method .Results According to the different stages of new drug R&D projects ,the risk assess-ment indictors and their weight were established .Conclusion These indicators are more objective and accurate which contrib-ute to the risk control in the process of new drug R&D projects .
RESUMEN
Objective To explore and establish a kind of dissertation evaluation system which can fully reflects the characteristics of academic medical doctoral training.Methods 41 medical doctoral dissertation evaluation systems and related literatures were collected,to get the current situation of this dissertation evaluation system in our country and find the key points of various evaluation systems.A questionnaire survey was conducted among 350 doctoral supervisors coming from 6 universities so as to define the framework and connotation of evaluation indicators.Using the Delphi expert consultation method,the connotation of evaluation indicators and composition as well as the weight of various indicators was improved.Results The doctoral supervisors who participated in the research considered that building the dissertation evaluation system should follow the principle of science,innovation and fairness,and the evaluation frame-work should have secondary index and evaluation elements.The evaluation contents concluded choosing topic,literature review,basic theory and professional knowledge,paper writing,innovation,research ability and academic morals and so on.And on the basis of this,the paper explored and developed a more scientific and comparative dissertation quality evaluation system with medical specialty.Conclusion The cultivation units should take the educational goal of evaluation target and the requirements of awarding degree into consideration,seeking opinions fully to the first-line supervisors and combing quantitative and qualitative evaluation effectively with scientific and operable principles when specifying evaluation system.
RESUMEN
Based on previous research on the knowledge network,the paper summarizes the relevant research on the concept evolution,structure,model,evaluation index and practical application of the knowledge network based on the literature carrier,and provides reference for knowledge management and scientific innovation management.
RESUMEN
Objective To design and develop a multi-modality medical image fusion and evaluation simulation system to eliminate the deficiencies of the images by different technologies.Methods The system was developed with MATLAB 2014a development platform as well as MATLAB graphical user interface and image processing toolbox.Results Common methods were realized of multi-modality medical images,and the evaluation on seven objective indicators was implemented such as entropy,mutual information,cross entropy,mean,standard deviation and etc.Conclusion The system behaves well in interactivity,practicality and extensibility,and is of great significance for clinical diagnosis as well as teaching medical image processing in specialties of biomedical engineering,medical image technology and etc.[Chinese Medical Equipment
RESUMEN
Objective:To construct an evaluation indicator system for emergency response capability in health supervision institutions.Methods:It made an initial indicator system by using brain storming,literature method and expert consulting,and constructed an evaluation indicator system by Delphi method.Results:Both the response rates of two round questionnaires survey were 100％.The means of authoritative coefficient for the first-dimension indicators was 0.82.For the second round of expert consulting,the coordination coefficients of the first,second and third-dimension indicators were 0.954,0.820 and 0.565 respectively (P＜0.05).It constructed an evaluation indicator system for emergency response capability among health supervision institutions.There were 4 first-dimension indicators,10 second-dimension indicators and 37 third-dimension indicators in the indicators system.Conclusion:Experts opinions had high reliability.The process of screening indicators was normative.The indicator system was comprehensive,which could be used and examined in practice.
RESUMEN
Objective To design and develop a multi-modality medical image fusion and evaluation simulation system to eliminate the deficiencies of the images by different technologies.Methods The system was developed with MATLAB 2014a development platform as well as MATLAB graphical user interface and image processing toolbox.Results Common methods were realized of multi-modality medical images,and the evaluation on seven objective indicators was implemented such as entropy,mutual information,cross entropy,mean,standard deviation and etc.Conclusion The system behaves well in interactivity,practicality and extensibility,and is of great significance for clinical diagnosis as well as teaching medical image processing in specialties of biomedical engineering,medical image technology and etc.[Chinese Medical Equipment
RESUMEN
Objective:To construct an evaluation indicator system for emergency response capability in health supervision institutions.Methods:It made an initial indicator system by using brain storming,literature method and expert consulting,and constructed an evaluation indicator system by Delphi method.Results:Both the response rates of two round questionnaires survey were 100％.The means of authoritative coefficient for the first-dimension indicators was 0.82.For the second round of expert consulting,the coordination coefficients of the first,second and third-dimension indicators were 0.954,0.820 and 0.565 respectively (P＜0.05).It constructed an evaluation indicator system for emergency response capability among health supervision institutions.There were 4 first-dimension indicators,10 second-dimension indicators and 37 third-dimension indicators in the indicators system.Conclusion:Experts opinions had high reliability.The process of screening indicators was normative.The indicator system was comprehensive,which could be used and examined in practice.
RESUMEN
Four methods for evaluating the academic impact of scholars were described according to their literature information, including subjective evaluation method, bibliometric method, social network analysis and comprehen-sive evaluation method .Their development trend was studied by analyzing their characteristics and applications .
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE:To explore the assessment indicators of the accessibility of essential medicines to comprehensively evaluate the accessibility of essential medicinesand its coverage of medicine supply security and service quality and the improve-ment of the implementation of the new Healthcare reform. METHODS:Retrieved from Chinese and English Literature and the World Health Organization(WHO),theoretical analysis was conducted for the covering the core elements of essential medicines to explore construction ideas and content of essential medicines evaluation index system with international suitability,index appropri-ateness and operability. RESULTS&CONCLUSIONS:A series of medicine policy evaluation guide established by WHO is current-ly the main basis of the accessibility of essential medicines evaluation around the world,however,there are certain limitations for these indicators.According to the concept put forward by WHO and the related organizations,the core elements of the accessibility of essential medicines include:availability,affordability,supply system,sustainable financing,medicine quality and appropriate use.