Supporting evidence-based judicial decisions on health care in Brazil: an experience report / Apoio técnico-científico à tomada de decisão judicial em saúde no Brasil: um relato de experiência / Apoyo técnico-científico a la toma de decisiones judiciales en salud en Brasil: un relato de experiencia

Objective: The main objective of this study is to report on the implementation and results of the "Supporting Health-Related Judicial Decisions in Brazil" project conducted at the Health Technology Assessment Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês through the "Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Institucional do Sistema Único de Saúde", in Brazil. Methods: This study is an experience report of a project conducted at the Health Technology Assessment Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês. Results: The activities of the project occurred in 2023 and included two online training courses on primary studies and systematic reviews, 11 one-day workshops with technical-scientific content for members of the Technical Support Centers for the Judiciary (NATJus), 40 online technical-scientific consultations for magistrates on a digital platform, 11 technical-scientific reports addressing the most legally claimed technologies in Brazil; two methodological tools, a national forum (hybrid event), 10 chat-based mentorships for NATJus members; and the maintenance of an open-access blog, by publishing news on relevant topics on law and health. Discussion and conclusion: This project has contributed to the improvement of the judicial decision-making process by providing a range of activities aimed at aiding the prioritization of health technologies that are clearly effective and safe over those that are ineffective, harmful, or have uncertain effects.

Objetivo: O objetivo principal deste estudo é relatar a implementação e os resultados do projeto "Apoio técnico-científico à tomada de decisão judicial em Saúde no Brasil" realizado no Hospital Sírio-Libanês por meio do "Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Institucional do Sistema Único de Saúde". Métodos: Este estudo é um relato de experiência de um projeto realizado no Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde do Hospital Sírio-Libanês. Resultados: As atividades do projeto ocorreram em 2023 e incluíram dois cursos de formação online sobre estudos primários e revisões sistemáticas, 11 oficinas de um dia com conteúdo técnico-científico para membros dos Núcleos de Apoio Técnico ao Judiciário (NATJus), 40 consultas on-line técnico-científicas para magistrados em plataforma digital, 11 relatórios técnico-científicos abordando as tecnologias mais reivindicadas judicialmente no Brasil; duas ferramentas metodológicas, um fórum nacional (evento híbrido), 10 mentorias via chat para membros do NATJus; e a manutenção de um blog de acesso aberto, com publicação de notícias sobre temas relevantes de direito e saúde. Discussão e conclusão: Este projeto contribuiu para a melhoria do processo de tomada de decisão judicial, fornecendo uma série de atividades destinadas a ajudar na priorização de tecnologias de saúde que sejam claramente eficazes e seguras em detrimento daquelas que são ineficazes, prejudiciais ou têm efeitos incertos.

Objetivo: El objetivo principal de este estudio es informar sobre la implementación y los resultados del proyecto "Apoyo a las Decisiones Judiciales Relacionadas con la Salud en Brasil" realizado en el Centro de Tecnología en Salud del Hospital Sírio-Libanês a través del "Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Institucional do Sistema Único de Saúde", en Brasil. Métodos: Este estudio es un informe de experiencia de un proyecto realizado en el Centro de Tecnología en Salud del Hospital Sírio-Libanês. Resultados: Las actividades del proyecto ocurrieron en 2023 e incluyeron dos cursos de capacitación en línea sobre estudios primarios y revisiones sistemáticas, 11 talleres de un día de contenido técnico-científico para miembros de los Centros de Apoyo Técnico al Poder Judicial (NATJus), 40 consultas técnico-científicas en línea para magistrados en plataforma digital, 11 informes técnico-científicos que abordan las tecnologías más reclamadas legalmente en Brasil; dos herramientas metodológicas, un foro nacional (evento híbrido), 10 mentorías basadas en chat para miembros de NATJus; y el mantenimiento de un blog de acceso abierto, mediante la publicación de noticias sobre temas relevantes en derecho y salud. Discusión y conclusión: Este proyecto ha contribuido a mejorar el proceso de toma de decisiones judiciales proporcionando actividades para priorizar las tecnologías sanitarias claramente eficaces y seguras frente a aquellas que son ineficaces, nocivas o de efectos inciertos.

La Pregunta de Investigación y su Asociación con los Niveles de Evidencia y Grados de Recomendación en Estudios de Investigación Clínica / The Research Question and its Association with the Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation in Clinical Research Studies

La mayoría de las preguntas de investigación (PI), conducirán a un proyecto que apunta a generar nuevo conocimiento, sin embargo el escenario, la población a estudio y la metodología pueden ser muy diferentes, lo que determinará que los resultados obtenidos y por ende, el nivel de evidencia (NE) y el grado de recomendación (GR) puedan variar notablemente. El objetivo de este artículo fue proporcionar recomendaciones para formular una PI asociada al NE y respectivos GR que se pueden desprender a partir de los resultados generados. Este artículo entregará algunos conocimientos sobre la PI y su relación con los NE y GR de la evidencia generada a partir de resultados obtenidos por un proceso de investigación en diferentes escenarios de investigación.

SUMMARY: Most research questions (RQ) will lead to a project that aims to generate new knowledge. However, the setting, study population and methodology may be very different, which will determine the results obtained and therefore, the level of evidence (LOE) and the grade of recommendation (GOR) may vary significantly. The aim of this study was to provide recommendations to formulate a RQ associated with the LOE and respective GOR that can be derived from the generated results. This article will provide some knowledge about the RQ and its relationship with the LEO and GOR of the generated evidence from results obtained by a research process in different research scenarios.

Necrotizing sialometaplasia: systematic review and meta analyses over the past 46 years

Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize the main characteristics of this disease in relation to diagnosis, clinical aspects, progression and treatment as well as correlating them with remission time. Material and Methods: A systematic search was performed following the guidelines given by PRISMA and the Joanna Briggs Institute. PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were the databases used. Results: The final analysis resulted in 108 articles with 173 clinical cases. The longest remission time for signs and symptoms (>7 weeks) was registered among male patients (p = 0.02) and outside the oral cavity; however no significant correlation was observed (p>0.05). A high risk of bias was the most common rating among the articles analyzed (55%); followed by moderate (27%) and low (18%). The lack of standardization in clinical case report descriptions made it difficult to gain a thorough knowledge of the essential characteristics of the NS patho-logical processes. Conclusion: It is recommended that publications follow the standards recommended by the literature; in addition, studies using advanced technologies to better understand NS's pathological path are recommended so as to propose effective treatments for this disease. (AU)

Consideraciones bioéticas en el manejo de la esclerosis lateral amiotrófica: Una aproximación al quehacer fonoaudiológico

Introducción: La esclerosis lateral amiotrófica (ELA) es la forma más común de enfermedad degenerativa de motoneurona en la edad adulta y es considerada una enfermedad terminal. Por lo mismo, el accionar del fonoaudiólogo debe considerar el respeto a los principios bioéticos básicos para garantizar una asistencia adecuada. Objetivo: Conocer aquellas consideraciones bioéticas relacionadas al manejo y estudio de personas con ELA para luego brindar una aproximación hacia el quehacer fonoaudiológico. Método: Se efectuó una búsqueda bibliográfica en las bases de datos PubMed, Scopus y SciELO. Se filtraron artículos publicados desde 2000 hasta junio de 2023 y fueron seleccionados aquellos que abordaban algún componente bioético en población con ELA. Resultados: Aspectos relacionados al uso del consentimiento informado y a la toma de decisiones compartidas destacaron como elementos esenciales para apoyar la autonomía de las personas. Conclusión: Una correcta comunicación y una toma de decisiones compartida son claves para respetar la autonomía de las personas. A su vez, la estandarización de procedimientos mediante la investigación clínica permitirá aportar al cumplimiento de los principios bioéticos de beneficencia y no maleficencia, indispensables para la práctica profesional.

Introduction: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most common form of degenerative motor neuron disease in adulthood and is considered a terminal disease. For this reason, the actions of the speech therapist must consider respect for basic bioethical principles to guarantee adequate assistance. Objective: To know those bioethical considerations related to the management and study of people with ALS to then provide an approach to speech therapy. Methodology: A bibliographic search was carried out in the PubMed, Scopus, and SciELO databases. Articles published from 2000 to June 2023 were filtered and those that addressed a bioethical component in the population with ALS were selected. Results: Aspects related to the use of informed consent and shared decision-making stood out as essential elements to support people's autonomy. Conclusion: Proper communication and shared decision-making are key to respecting people's autonomy. In turn, the standardization of procedures through clinical research will contribute to compliance with the bioethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, essential for professional practice.

Outcomes of a Community of Practice on Quebec Speech Language Pathologists' Voice Assessment Practices and Professional Identity

In a context where different protocols for recommended practices in clinical voice assessment exist, while there are gaps in the literature regarding the evidence base supporting assessment procedures and measures, clinicians from regions where a strong community holding expertise in clinical and scientific voice practices lack can struggle to confidently develop their voice assessment practices. In an effort to improve voice assessment practices and strengthen professional identity among speech-language pathologists in Quebec, Canada, a community of practice (CoP) was established, with the aim of promoting knowledge sharing, implementing change in clinical practice, and improving professional identity. Thirty-nine participants took part in the CoP activities conducted over a four-month period, including virtual meetings and in-person workshops. Participants had a high rate of attendance (> 74% participation rate in virtual meetings), and were highly satisfied with their participation and intended to remain involved after the project's end. Statistically significant changes in voice assessment practices were observed post-CoP, regarding probability of performing assessments (p < .001), and perceived importance of assessment for evaluative purposes (p <.001), as well as improvements in assessment specific confidence, specifically for procedure of auditory-perceptual assessment (p < .001) and purpose of aerodynamic assessment (p = .05). Moreover, there was an increase in professional identity post-CoP (p < .001) and participants felt they made significant learnings. The present study highlighted the need to involve SLPs in future research to identify assessments that are relevant to the specific evaluative objectives of SLPs working with voice, and suggests CoPs are an efficient tool for that purpose.

En un contexto en el que existen diferentes protocolos para las prácticas recomendadas en la evaluación vocal clínica, y en el que se presentan vacíos en la literatura respecto a la base de evidencia que respalda los procedimientos y medidas de evaluación, los profesionales de regiones donde no hay una comunidad sólida con experiencia en prácticas vocales clínicas y científicas pueden enfrentar dificultades para desarrollar con confianza sus prácticas de evaluación vocal. Con el propósito de mejorar las prácticas de evaluación vocal y fortalecer la identidad profesional entre los logopedas de Quebec, Canadá, se estableció una comunidad de práctica (CdP). Esta tenía como objetivo fomentar el intercambio de conocimientos, implementar cambios en la práctica clínica y mejorar la identidad profesional. Un total de treinta y nueve participantes se involucraron en las actividades de la CdP, llevadas a cabo durante un período de cuatro meses, que incluyeron reuniones virtuales y talleres presenciales. Los participantes tuvieron una alta tasa de asistencia (> 74% de participación en las reuniones virtuales) y expresaron un alto grado de satisfacción con su participación, manifestando su intención de continuar involucrados después de la finalización del proyecto. Se observaron cambios estadísticamente significativos en las prácticas de evaluación vocal posterior a la CdP, en lo que respecta a la probabilidad de llevar a cabo evaluaciones (p < .001) y la percepción de la importancia de la evaluación con fines evaluativos (p < .001), así como mejoras en la confianza específica en la evaluación, particularmente en el procedimiento de evaluación auditivo-perceptual (p < .001) y el propósito de la evaluación aerodinámica (p = .05). Además, se registró un aumento en la identidad profesional posterior a la CdP (p < .001) y los participantes sintieron que obtuvieron aprendizajes significativos. El presente estudio destacó la necesidad de involucrar a los logopedas en investigaciones futuras, para identificar evaluaciones pertinentes a los objetivos evaluativos específicos de los logopedas que trabajan con la voz, y sugiere que las CdP son una herramienta eficiente con ese propósito.

¿Qué condiciones deben reunir las guías de diagnóstico y tratamiento para ser verdaderas guías de práctica clinica basadas en la evidencia? / What conditions should the diagnosis and treatment guidelines meet, to be true clinical practice guidelines based on evidence?

Resumen Las guías de diagnóstico y tratamiento elaboradas por las sociedades científicas médicas, constituyen una herramienta muy útil para el ejercicio profesional de la especialidad. Sustentadas en bibliografía actualizada, representan un material de enorme valor con reco mendaciones de los expertos en los diversos temas de la especialidad. En el presente artículo se intenta determinar si las mismas podrían ser diseñadas acercándolas lo más estrechamente posible al formato de las Guías de Práctica Clínica Basadas en la Evidencia (GPC-BE), para lo cual se revisan las etapas en su elaboración y los requisitos que deberían cumplir para ser conside radas como tales. Las GPC-BE son un "conjunto de recomendaciones elaboradas de forma sistemática para ayudar a los profe sionales y a los pacientes en la toma de decisiones sobre la atención sanitaria más apropiada, seleccionando las opciones diagnósticas y/o terapéuticas más adecuadas en el abordaje de un problema de salud o una condición clínica específica". Su objetivo es mejorar la efectividad, la eficiencia y la seguridad de las decisiones clínicas, y pueden servir de base para la elaboración de políticas de salud. La elaboración de las GPC representa un proceso complejo, que requiere conocimientos, experiencia y re cursos tanto en tiempo como en dinero. Su robustez no depende de quienes la realizan, sino de cómo es realiza da. Ello implica la participación de técnicos que aporten la evaluación de la evidencia por el método GRADE, y la consideración de aspectos de costo-efectividad.

Abstract The guides for diagnosis and treatment prepared by scientific medical societies constitute a very useful tool for the professional practice of the specialty. Supported by an updated bibliography, they represent material of enormous value with recommendations from experts on the various topics of the specialty. This article attempts to determine if they could be designed as "Evidence - Based Clinical Practice Guide lines" (CPG BE), for which the stages in their develop ment and the requirements that they reviewed. The CPG BE are a "set of recommendations prepared systematically to help professionals and patients in making decisions about the most appropriate health care, selecting the most appropriate diagnostic and/or therapeutic options to address a problem of health or a specific clinical condition". Their objective is to improve the effectiveness, efficiency and safety of clinical deci sions, and they can serve a basis for the development of health policies. The preparation of CPGs represents a complex pro cess, which requires knowledge, experience and re sources, both in time and money. Its robustness does not depend on who does it, but on how it is done. This implies the participation of technicians who provide the evaluation of the evidence using the GRADE method and the consideration of cost-effectiveness aspects.

Efficiency and comparability of using new evidence platforms for updating recommendations: experience with a type-2 diabetes guideline in Colombia / Eficiencia y comparabilidad del uso de nuevas plataformas de evidencia para la actualización de recomendaciones: experiencia con una guía de diabetes tipo 2 en Colombia

INTRODUCTION: Updating recommendations for guidelines requires a comprehensive and efficient literature search. Although new information platforms are available for developing groups, their relative contributions to this purpose remain uncertain. METHODS: As part of a review/update of eight selected evidence-based recommendationsfor type 2 diabetes, we evaluated the following five literature search approaches (targeting systematic reviews, using predetermined criteria): PubMed for MEDLINE, Epistemonikos database basic search, Epistemonikos database using a structured search strategy, Living overview of evidence (L.OVE) platform, and TRIP database. Three reviewers independently classified the retrieved references as definitely eligible, probably eligible, or not eligible. Those falling in the same "definitely" categories for all reviewers were labelled as "true" positives/negatives. The rest went to re-assessment and if found eligible/not eligible by consensus became "false" negatives/positives, respectively. We described the yield for each approach and computed "diagnostic accuracy" measures and agreement statistics. RESULTS: Altogether, the five approaches identified 318 to 505 references for the eight recommendations, from which reviewers considered 4.2 to 9.4% eligible after the two rounds. While Pubmed outperformed the other approaches (diagnostic odds ratio 12.5 versus 2.6 to 5.3), no single search approach returned eligible references for all recommendations. Individually, searches found up to 40% of all eligible references (n = 71), and no combination of any three approaches could find over 80% of them. Kappa statistics for retrieval between searches were very poor (9 out of 10 paired comparisons did not surpass the chance-expected agreement). CONCLUSION: Among the information platforms assessed, PubMed appeared to be more efficient in updating this set of recommendations. However, the very poor agreement among search approaches in the reference yield demands that developing groups add information from several (probably more than three) sources for this purpose. Further research is needed to replicate our findings and enhance our understanding of how to efficiently update recommendations.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La actualización de recomendaciones de las guías de práctica clínica requiere búsquedas bibliográficas exhaustivas y eficientes. Aunque están disponibles nuevas plataformas de información para grupos desarrolladores, su contribución a este propósito sigue siendo incierta. MÉTODOS: Como parte de una revisión/actualización de 8 recomendaciones basadas en evidencia seleccionadas sobre diabetes tipo 2, evaluamos las siguientes cinco aproximaciones de búsqueda bibliográfica (dirigidas a revisiones sistemáticas, utilizando criterios predeterminados): PubMed para MEDLINE; Epistemonikos utilizando una búsqueda básica; Epistemonikos utilizando una estrategia de búsqueda estructurada; plataforma (L.OVE) y TRIP . Tres revisores clasificaron de forma independiente las referencias recuperadas como definitivamente o probablemente elegibles/no elegibles. Aquellas clasificadas en las mismas categorías "definitivas" para todos los revisores, se etiquetaron como "verdaderas" positivas/negativas. El resto se sometieron a una nueva evaluación y, si se consideraban por consenso elegibles/no elegibles, se convirtieron en "falsos" negativos/positivos, respectivamente. Describimos el rendimiento de cada aproximación, junto a sus medidas de "precisión diagnóstica" y las estadísticas de acuerdo. RESULTADOS: En conjunto, las cinco aproximaciones identificaron 318-505 referencias para las 8 recomendaciones, de las cuales los revisores consideraron elegibles el 4,2 a 9,4% tras las dos rondas. Mientras que Pubmed superó a las otras aproximaciones (odds ratio de diagnóstico 12,5 versus 2,6 a 53), ninguna aproximación de búsqueda identificó por sí misma referencias elegibles para todas las recomendaciones. Individualmente, las búsquedas identificaron hasta el 40% de todas las referencias elegibles (n=71), y ninguna combinación de cualquiera de los tres enfoques pudo identificar más del 80% de ellas. Las estadísticas Kappa para la recuperación entre búsquedas fueron muy pobres (9 de cada 10 comparaciones pareadas no superaron el acuerdo esperado por azar). CONCLUSIONES: Entre las plataformas de información evaluadas, Pubmed parece ser la más eficiente para actualizar este conjunto de recomendaciones. Sin embargo, la escasa concordancia en el rendimiento de las referencias exige que los grupos desarrolladores incorporen información de varias fuentes (probablemente más de tres) para este fin. Es necesario seguir investigando para replicar nuestros hallazgos y mejorar nuestra comprensión de cómo actualizar recomendaciones de forma eficiente.

Topical agents for the prevention ofradiodermatitis in cancer patients: A systematic review / Agentes tópicos para prevenção de radiodermatiteem pacientes com câncer: revisão sistemática

Objetivo: Analisar as evidências sobre o efeito dos agentes tópicos empregados para a prevenção da radiodermatite em pacientes com câncer. Método: Revisão sistemática de estudos clínicos randomizados duplos-cegos construída conforme recomendações do Joanna Briggs Institute e busca nas bases de dados MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, além da literatura cinzenta. Utilizaram-se a ferramenta de avaliação crítica do JBI para ensaios clínicos randomizados para avaliar a possibilidade de viés, o Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation para a qualidade das evidências e o Gradepro® para recomendá-las. Resultados: Selecionaram-se 13 estudos que avaliaram diferentes agentes tópicos para prevenir a radiodermatite, a saber: corticosteroides, de ação antioxidante e fitoterápicos. A qualidade metodológica de cada estudo foi apropriada, mas a qualidade da evidência gerada pela reunião deles foi baixa, independentemente do tipo de agente tópico empregado, sugerindo que a confiança no seu efeito é limitada e tornando a força de recomendação fraca. Conclusão: Alguns agentes tópicos mostraram-se promissores para a prevenção de radiodermatite, mas as evidências aqui reunidas sobre a eficácia deles não permitem indicar seu uso para a prevenção de radiodermatite em pacientes com câncer. (AU)

Objective: To analyze the evidence on the effect of topical agents to prevent radiodermatitis in cancer patients. Methods: Systematic review of double-blind randomized clinical studies built according to JBI recommendations and search in the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus, in addition to the Gray Literature. The JBI critical assessment tool for randomized clinical trials was used to assess the possibility of bias, GRADE for the quality of evidence, and Gradepro® to recommend them. Results: Thirteen studies were selected that evaluated different topical agents to prevent radiodermatitis, namely: corticosteroids, with antioxidant action and herbal medicines. The methodological quality of each study was appropriate. Still, the quality of evidence generated by pooling them was low, regardless of the type of topical agent employed, suggesting that confidence in its effect is limited and weakening the strength of the recommendation. Conclusions: Some topical agents have shown promise for the prevention of radiodermatitis, but the evidence gathered here about their effectiveness does not indicate their use for the prevention of radiodermatitis in cancer patients. (AU)

Objetivo: Analizar la evidencia sobre el efecto de los agentes tópicos utilizados para la prevención de la radiodermatitis en pacientes con cáncer. Método: Revisión sistemática de estudios clínicos aleatorizados, doble ciego, elaborados según las recomendaciones del JBI y buscados en MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science, Embase y Scopus, además de literatura gris. Se utilizó la herramienta de evaluación crítica JBI para ensayos clínicos aleatorios para evaluar la posibilidad de sesgo, GRADE para la calidad de la evidencia y Gradepro® para recomendarla. Resultados: Se seleccionaron trece estudios que evaluaron diferentes agentes tópicos para prevenir la radiodermatitis, a saber: corticosteroides, con acción antioxidante y fitoterapia. La calidad metodológica de cada estudio fue apropiada, pero la calidad de la evidencia generada al combinarlos fue baja, independientemente del tipo de agente tópico empleado, lo que sugiere que la confianza en su efecto es limitada y debilita la fuerza de la recomendación. Conclusión: Algunos agentes tópicos se han mostrado prometedores para la prevención de la radiodermatitis, pero la evidencia aquí reunida sobre su eficacia no nos permite indicar su uso para la prevención de la radiodermatitis en pacientes con cáncer. (AU)

Hipodermóclise como tecnologia integrativa ao processo infusional em crianças / Hypodermoclysis as an integrative technology for the infusion process in children / Hipodermoclisis como tecnología integradora para el proceso de infusión en niños

Objetivo: Identificar as evidências científicas acerca da efetividade e da segurança da hipodermóclise em comparação à via intravenosa, no processo de infusão de fluidos, para reidratação de crianças até 10 de idade, com leve a moderada desidratação, nos contextos hospitalares e domiciliares. Métodos: Revisão sistemática conduzida conforme as recomendações do Instituto Joanna Briggs®, com protocolo publicado e registrado. A busca foi realizada em cinco recursos informacionais diferentes (bases de dados, literatura cinzenta, referências dos estudos). Todo o processo de seleção foi conduzido por revisores independentes. Resultados: Foram identificados 1410 estudos e dois foram incluídos na análise. Devido a heterogeneidade dos estudos não foi possível a realização da meta-análise. Os desfechos analisados foram volume total de líquido infundido, alteração da desidratação conforme escala de Gorelick e peso, número de tentativas para inserção do cateter, e eventos adversos. Conclusão: Demonstra-se benefícios do uso da hipodermóclise como prática integrativa ao processo de infusão de fluidos em crianças, porém com baixo nível de evidência. Novas pesquisas com alta qualidade metodológica serão promissoras para sua implementação no cuidado ao paciente pediátrico. (AU)

Objective: To identify scientific evidence about the effectiveness and safety of hypodermoclysis compared to the intravenous route, in the fluid infusion process, for rehydration of children up to 10 years of age, with mild to moderate dehydration, in hospital and home settings. Methods: Systematic review conducted according to the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs® Institute, with a published and registered protocol. The search was performed in six databases, five gray literature databases, and references of the included studies. The entire selection process was conducted by independent reviewers. Results: 1410 studies were identified and two were included in the analysis. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, it was not possible to carry out the meta-analysis. The outcomes analyzed were total volume of fluid infused, change in dehydration according to the Gorelick scale and weight, number of attempts to insert the catheter, and adverse events. Conclusion: Benefits of the use of hypodermoclysis as an integrative practice in the fluid infusion process in children are demonstrated, but with a low level of evidence. New research with high methodological quality will be promising for its implementation in pediatric patient care. (AU)

Objetivo: Identificar evidencia científica sobre la efectividad y seguridad de la hipodermoclisis en comparación con la vía intravenosa, en el proceso de infusión de líquidos, para la rehidratación de niños hasta los 10 años de edad, con deshidratación leve a moderada, en el ámbito hospitalario y domiciliario. Métodos: Revisión sistemática realizada de acuerdo con las recomendaciones del Instituto Joanna Briggs®, con protocolo publicado y registrado. La búsqueda se realizó en seis bases de datos, cinco bases de datos de literatura gris y referencias de los estudios incluidos. Todo el proceso de selección fue realizado por revisores independientes. Resultados: Se identificaron 1410 estudios y se incluyeron dos en el análisis. Debido a la heterogeneidad de los estudios, no fue posible realizar el metanálisis. Los resultados analizados fueron el volumen total de líquido infundido, el cambio en la deshidratación según la escala y el peso de Gorelick, el número de intentos de insertar el catéter y los eventos adversos. Conclusión: Se demuestran los beneficios del uso de la hipodermoclisis como práctica integradora en el proceso de infusión de líquidos en niños, pero con un bajo nivel de evidencia. Nuevas investigaciones con alta calidad metodológica serán prometedoras para su implementación en la atención del paciente pediátrico. (AU)

Factores clave en la elección de desenlaces apropiados para estudios clínicos / Key factors in the choice of appropriate outcomes for clinical trials

La investigación en salud es la base del conocimiento médico y de las recomendaciones en los sistemas de salud. Por ello, la elección de desenlaces apropiados en estudios de intervenciones terapéuticas es un paso fundamental en la producción de evidencia y, posteriormente, para la toma de decisiones. En este artículo proponemos tres factores clave para la elección de desenlaces: la inclusión de desenlaces reportados por pacientes, ya que ponen el foco del efecto de la intervención en la percepción que tienen los propios pacientes de su estado de salud y calidad de vida; la consideración de desenlaces clínicamente relevantes, los cuales son mediciones directas del estado de salud del paciente y, por ende serán determinantes en la toma de decisiones; y la utilización de herramienta que estandariza y permite la homogeneización en la medición e interpretación de desenlaces, facilitando la producción y posterior síntesis de evidencia apropiada para el ecosistema de evidencia. La correcta elección de los desenlaces permitirá que la evidencia generada de estos estudios ayude a los tomadores de decisiones en salud y los profesionales clínicos a entregar cuidados apropiados centrados en el paciente y a optimizar el uso de recursos en salud e investigación clínica.

Health research is the foundation of medical knowledge and healthcare system recommendations. Therefore, choosing appropriate outcomes in studies of therapeutic interventions is a fundamental step in producing evidence and, subsequently, for decision-making. In this article, we propose three key factors for the choice of outcomes: the inclusion of patient-reported outcomes, since they focus on the patient's perception of their health status and quality of life; the consideration of clinically relevant outcomes, which are direct measurements of the patient's health status and, therefore, will be decisive in decision-making; and the use of core outcome sets, a tool that standardizes the measurement and interpretation of outcomes, facilitating the production and synthesis of appropriate evidence for the evidence ecosystem. The correct choice of outcomes will help health decision-makers and clinicians deliver appropriate patient-centered care and optimize the use of resources in healthcare and clinical research.

Nurse Champions: Transforming Evidence-Based Practice

Nursing practice in an organization result from the leadership processes developed for the profession. It is reflected in the performance of nurses in interprofessional teams and the quality of care they provide to patients1. Evidence-based practice (EBP) refers to decision-making in the development and delivery of health care services according to the best available research evidence, the experience of health care providers, and the values and preferences of patients. The adoption or implementation of EBP by organizations can lead to safer practices, better outcomes for individuals, and lower healthcare costs2. In the literature, "champions" have been identified as determinants and agents of change to ensure adoption within institutions.

Evaluación de la calidad de guías de práctica clínica para el tratamiento de adultos con COVID-19 leve o moderada, utilizando la herramienta AGREE II / Assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of adults with mild or moderate COVID-19, using the AGREE II tool

INTRODUCCIÓN: Varias guías de práctica clínica para el tratamiento de la COVID-19 se han desarrollado durante los dos últimos años de pandemia, sin embargo, su calidad metodológica es poco clara. OBJETIVO: Realizar una evaluación sistemática de la calidad de las guías de práctica clínica publicadas entre 2021 y octubre de 2022 para el tratamiento de la COVID-19, utilizando la herramienta AGREE II, e identificar las recomendaciones formuladas en dichas guías. JUSTIFICACIÓN: Durante la pandemia, surgieron múltiples guías, pero la claridad so-bre su calidad metodológica fue limitada. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de guías de práctica clínica sobre el tratamiento para la COVID-19 leve o moderada utilizando metabuscadores como Epistemonikos y Trip Database, y sitios web de organizaciones de sa-lud. Las guías seleccionadas fueron evaluadas con el instrumento AGREE II. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron 11 GPC, presentando altas puntuaciones en los dominios de alcance y propósito (98,74 %), participación de los implicados (97,22 %), rigor en la elaboración (92 %), claridad de presentación (100 %), aplicabilidad (85,61 %), e independencia editorial (100 %). Aunque la ca-lidad general de las guías fue alta, se identificó la necesidad de mejorar en los aspectos de rigor en la elaboración y aplicabilidad de las recomendaciones. CONCLUSIONES: Encontramos que la calidad de las guías de práctica clínica evaluadas, en su mayoría es alta y, por lo tanto, son recomendables, aunque reconocemos la necesidad de mejorar la descripción de los dominios de rigor en la elaboración y aplicabilidad de las recomendaciones.

INTRODUCTION: Several clinical practice guidelines for the management of COVID-19 have been developed during the last two years of the pandemic, but their methodological quality is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of COVID-19 published between 2021 and October 2022 using the AGREE II tool, and to identify the recommendations made in these guidelines. JUSTIFICATION: During the pandemic, many guidelines were published, but clarity about their methodological quality was limited. METHODS: A systematic search for clinical practice guidelines on the management of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 was performed using meta-search engines such as Epistemoni-kos and Trip Database, as well as health organization websites. The selected guidelines were appraised using the AGREE II instrument. RESULTS: Eleven clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) were evaluated, showing high scores in the domains of scope and purpose (98.74%), stakehol-der involvement (97.22%), rigor of development (92%), clarity of presentation (100%), applica-bility (85.61%), and editorial independence (100%). Although the overall quality of the guidelines was high, there was identified a need for improvement in the areas of rigor of development and applicability of the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the quality of the evalua-ted clinical practice guidelines is predominantly high, and therefore, they are recommendable. However, we recognize the need to improve the descriptions of the domains of rigor of develop-ment and applicability of the recommendations,

Utilização da toxina botulínica para o tratamento de cicatriz queloide: revisão de escopo / Use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of keloid scars: scoping review

Introdução: Cicatrizes visíveis podem acarretar agravos, sejam estéticos, psicológicos, funcionais ou sociais, principalmente de grande extensão e volume, como os queloides. A descoberta de novos tratamentos de queloides não é fácil, visto a presença de alguns entraves metodológicos e éticos, sendo uma área pouco explorada. A toxina botulínica tem sido apresentada como alternativa terapêutica em estudos nacionais e internacionais, sendo necessária uma compilação e destaque dos principais estudos que possam subsidiar a prática clínica. Assim, o objetivo foi apresentar uma revisão de escopo sobre a utilização terapêutica da toxina botulínica para o tratamento de cicatrizes queloides. Método: A revisão foi realizada através da estratégia PICO e utilizando o Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Foi realizada nas bases de dados PubMed/ Medline, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde e SciELO, considerando estudos do período de 2016 até setembro de 2021. Resultados: Foram encontrados 34 artigos no geral relacionados ao tema. Após filtragem e seleção, a revisão foi construída com apoio de 5 artigos. Os estudos variaram entre coorte, relatos de caso, ensaio clínico randomizado e caso-controle. Foi possível observar como principais resultados a ação a curto prazo da toxina botulínica na redução de queloides, maior efetividade na redução dos sintomas e possibilidades de utilização clínica para diferentes populações e manifestações clínicas. Conclusão: O mecanismo de ação da toxina botulínica pode facilitar o tratamento de queloides e redução de sintomas, sendo necessários estudos mais robustos para definição de protocolos cínicos de gestão de cicatrizes.

Introduction: Visible scars can cause problems, whether aesthetic, psychological, functional, or social, mainly of great extension and volume, such as keloids. The discovery of new treatments for keloids is not easy, given the presence of some methodological and ethical obstacles, and it is an area that is little explored. Botulinum toxin has been presented as a therapeutic alternative in national and international studies, requiring a compilation and highlighting of the main studies that can support clinical practice. Thus, the objective was to present a scoping review on the therapeutic use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of keloid scars. Method: The review was carried out using the PICO strategy and using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. It was carried out in the PubMed/ Medline, Virtual Health Library, and SciELO databases, considering studies from 2016 to September 2021. Results: Overall, 34 articles related to the topic were found. After filtering and selection, the review was constructed with the support of 5 articles. The studies varied between cohorts, case reports, randomized clinical trials, and casecontrol. It was possible to observe as main results of the short-term action of botulinum toxin in reducing keloids, greater effectiveness in reducing symptoms, and possibilities of clinical use for different populations and clinical manifestations. Conclusion: The mechanism of action of botulinum toxin can facilitate the treatment of keloids and reduce symptoms, requiring more robust studies to define effective scar management protocols.

Clinical guidelines for herpes labialis: recommendations and quality evaluation according to AGREE II / Diretrizes clínicas para o herpes labial: recomendares e avalia$ao de qualidade de acordo com o AGREE II

ABSTRACT Cold sores require Healthcare professionals to employ specific approaches for prevention and management, with the need for effective therapeutic guidelines and ongoing improvement in patient care. Aim To evalúate the methodological quality of Clinical Guidelines (CG), clinical guides and manuals for care of the population affected by herpes labialis, to verify their compliance with evidence-based health standards. Materials and Method A search was conducted for CG on labial herpes in the MedicalLiteratureAnalysis andRetrieval System Online (Medline) database, Google Scholar, Brazilian Virtual Health Library (BVS), and sites of institutions/professional categories, using the descriptors "herpes labialis" or "oral herpes". Document quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II). The Kappa test was used to avoid randomness or poor agreement between results. Results Analysis of the 12 selected publications on the management of labial herpes revealed flaws in quality, as the publications did not follow a quality standard. The main quality flaws identified were in "rigor in development" and "applicability. " Conclusions Priorities need to be redefined in the development of CG for clinical practice related to fever blisters to reduce the variability of the quality standard, and generate reliable, applicable recommendations.

RESUMO A Herpes labial requer dos profissionais abordagens específicas para prevenido e manejo, com a ne-cessidade de diretrizes terapéuticas eficazes e continuo aprimoramento do cuidado ao paciente. Objetivo avaliar a qualidade metodológica de documentos que abordaram Diretrizes Clínicas (DC), guias clínicos e manuais para o cuidado da populando afetada pelo herpes labial, verificando sua conformidade com padroes de saúde baseados em evidencias. Materiais e Método As DC sobre herpes labial foram pesquisadas na base de dados Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Google Académico, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) e em sites de instituigoes/categorias profissionais, utilizando os descritores "herpes labial" ou "herpes oral". Utilizamos aferramenta The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II) para a avaliagdo da qualidade. O teste Kappa também foi utilizado para evitar aleatoriedade ou baixa concordáncia entre os resultados. Resultados Na análise das 12 publicagoes selecionadas sobre o manejo do herpes labial, foram identificadas falhas na qualidade dos documentos, que ndo seguiram um padrdo de qualidade. As principais falhas de qualidade identificadas foram em "rigor no desenvolvimento" e "aplicabilida-de". Conclusao é necessário um reenfoque para definir prioridades no desenvolvimento de DC para a prática clínica do herpes labial, a fim de reduzir a variabilidade do padrdo de qualidade e gerar recomendagoes que possam ser confiáveis e aplicáveis.

Precise Clinical Positioning of Chinese Patent Medicine in Paradigm of "Target Spectral Effect of Prescription"： A Case Study of Qizhi Tongluo Capsules / 中国实验方剂学杂志

The clinical value of Chinese patent medicine is the core direction of the development of the traditional Chinese medicine industry. The precise clinical positioning determines the way to prove the value of the drug， and is a key link to highlight the clinical value. This paper presented a case study of clinical positioning for Chinese patent medicine， namely Qizhi Tongluo capsules， and the key technical framework of precise clinical positioning of Chinese patent medicine， which was manifested as a comparison of prescription target spectral effect， discovery of core value of prescription， and confirmation of clinical positioning trial. The technical framework was designed to address a range of issues in the realm of precise clinical positioning. Before the clinical positioning trial， based on the multi-component， multi-target， and multi-phenotype data of prescription and clinical indication， the multi-omics network analysis technology was used to identify the core value of the traditional Chinese medicine varieties and predict the potential clinical advantages. Then， based on the predicted clinical advantages， reasonable efficacy indicators were selected， and the clinical efficacy was judged and verified by dynamic and flexible innovative clinical trials to improve the success rate of clinical positioning. This research paradigm integrates "omics technology" with "evidence-based" principles and follows the "precise evidence-based" concept. This research aims to provide a new strategy and method for the precise medication and positioning of Chinese patent medicine with traditional Chinese medicine characteristics after being put into the market and provide more technical thinking for traditional Chinese medicine to move towards precise medicine.

Meta-analysis of Distribution Frequency of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome in Primary Osteoporosis / 中国实验方剂学杂志

ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the distribution of traditional Chinese medicine（TCM） syndromes of primary osteoporosis（POP） in China by using evidence-based medicine methods， and to understand the distribution law of the syndromes. MethodChina National Knowledge Infrastructure（CNKI）， VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database（VIP）， WanFang Data Knowledge Service Platform（WanFang） and China Biology Medicine（CBM） were searched to obtain representative literature， and each database was searched from the 1994 World Health Organization defined diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis until May 1， 2023. Two researchers independently screened literature according to the criteria， extracted data， and cross-checked them. Meta analysis was conducted using R4.1.3， and subgroup analysis was performed. ResultA total of 56 Chinese papers were included， involving 14 415 patients. After standardized classification of syndromes， 11 articles were excluded， and Meta analysis results of the ultimately included 45 Chinese articles showed that the distribution frequencies of liver-kidney Yin deficiency syndrome， spleen-kidney Yang deficiency syndrome and kidney deficiency and blood stasis syndrome in 12 723 patients were 27%［95% confidence interval（CI） 0.24-0.31］， 32%（95% CI 0.29-0.36）， 36%（95% CI 0.30-0.42）. Subgroup analysis showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of the three TCM syndromes in the north and south（P<0.05）. In addition， the incidence of TCM syndrome fractures in different types of POP was 15%（95% CI 0.09-0.24） for liver-kidney Yin deficiency syndrome， 20%（95% CI 0.12-0.30） for spleen-kidney Yang deficiency syndrome， and 31%（95% CI 0.25-0.39） for kidney deficiency and blood stasis syndrome. ConclusionThe distribution of syndromes in POP patients is mainly kidney deficiency， accompanied by liver and spleen dysfunction. Liver-kidney Yin deficiency syndrome， spleen-kidney Yang deficiency syndrome and kidney deficiency and blood stasis syndrome are all the main syndromes of POP and osteoporotic fractures， and kidney deficiency and blood stasis syndrome is most closely related to the development of osteoporotic fractures. The reference standards for syndrome determination among the included studies are inconsistent， and in the future， it is necessary to focus on their determination standards to obtain consensus research results， at the same time， conduct large-scale syndrome research to obtain representative research results， providing a basis for clinical practice and research.

Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: a clinical analysis based on 10 years of published data in China / 口腔疾病防治

Objective@#To investigate the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) to provide a reference for the early diagnosis and timely treatment of DNM.@*Methods@#Data on DNM in China was electronically retrieved from the core databases and comprehensively reviewed from June 2012 to June 2023. The infection, pathogenic microorganisms, main symptoms, comorbidities and treatment methods of DNM were analyzed.@*Results@#The data of a total of 781 DNM patients, with an average age of (52.97 ± 5.64) years, were retrieved, including 554 males and 227 females. Odontogenic source, tonsillitis, pharyngeal abscess, sialoadenitis, upper respiratory tract infection, foreign body injury, or iatrogenic traumatic procedures are common causes. Among these, odontogenic infection is the most common source. Streptococcus sp. (n = 217) and Staphylococcus sp. (n = 82) were most isolated, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (equally n = 59). A total of 69.4% (542/781) of DNM patients recruited in this study were discovered to have various comorbidities, and more than one-third of these patients (n = 185) had diabetes. Of the broad antibiotics, carbapenem was most frequently used as treatment, and vancomycin was the most frequently coadministered. The mediastinal drainage approach varies widely, and the optimal regimen is still unknown. Seventy-two patients were treated with video-assisted thoracoscopic/mediastinoscopic surgical drainage, 22 patients were treated with percutaneous catheter drainage, 30 underwent the transcervical approach, and 40 underwent thoracotomy. A total of 617 patients who were selected underwent the appropriate combined operation for surgical drainage according to the specific location of the infected focus. The overall mortality rate of all 781 DNM patients included was 11.2%.@*Conclusion@#The most effective diagnosis and treatment of DNM is a high degree of clinical vigilance followed by prompt and adequate drainage with intensive care, including hemodynamic monitoring, nutritional support, computer tomographic scanning repeated as necessary, and combined use of systemic antibiotics.

Summary of optimal evidences for early fluid resuscitation management in patients with acute pancreatitis / 重庆医学

Objective To systematically retrieve,evaluate and integrate the best evidences on the early fluid resuscitation management in the patients with acute pancreatitis(AP)at home and abroad to provide ref-erence for clinical decision.Methods The related evidences on the early fluid resuscitation management in the AP patients were retrieved by computer from the databases of BMJ Best Practice,Up To Date,JBI,National Institute for Health and Care Excellence,Registered Nurses Association of Ontario,Guideline International Network,Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network,International Association of Pancreatology,American Pancreatic Association,American College of Gastroenterology,Yimaitong,Cochrane Library,PubMed,Em-bass,CINAHL,The Web of Science,CNKI,Wanfang databases.The retrieval time limit was from the data-base establishment to March 20,2022.The literatures types included thematic evidence summarization,guide-lines,evidence summaries,systematic reviews and expert consensus.The researchers conducted the literature quality evaluation.The literatures meeting the standard conducted the evidence extraction.Results A total of 13 arti-cles were included,including 3 special subject evidence summary,4 guidelines,2 evidence summary,2 systematic evalu-ation and 2 expert consensus.A total of 16 pieces of best evidence were integrated,involving 4 aspects of organization management,evaluation and monitoring,fluid infusion strategy and health education.Conclusion It is recommended to use the target-oriented therapy for early fluid resuscitation management,and perform the fluid resuscitation immediate-ly after diagnosis,according to the patient's underlying disease,disease changes and monitoring indicators,implement precise early fluid resuscitation in order to reverse pancreatic microcirculation disorder,increase tissue perfusion and improve the patient's prognosis.