Awareness and recommendation of home blood pressure measurement among physicians in India: Results from Asia HBPM survey 2020

Background: Awareness of hypertension and blood pressure (BP) control rates are still low in India. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is recognized as a valuable tool to diagnose and support hypertension treatment including the prevention of cardiovascular diseases(CVD) and target organ damage. We explored the prevailing knowledge and current recommendation of HBPM in daily practice by physicians in India. Materials and methods: As part of Asia HBPM Survey 2020, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare providers from India between June 2020 to June 2021. The questionnaire consisted of 37 questions and sub-questions related to HBPM awareness and recommendations to patients. Results: A total of 832 physicians participated in the survey. Almost 83% were male, whereas age, specialty and workplace were well distributed. 31.3% of physicians instruct their patients to measure their BP before taking antihypertensive drugs, while around 30% of physicians gave no instructions. The reference value of hypertension diagnosis amongst the physicians was substantially low based on clinic BP (34.4%) and home BP (15.1%). Among physicians who manage hypertensive patients, nearly 88% recommend HBPM to their patients, however, only 34.9% of their patients own HBPM device and 30.4% of the patients measure their own BP at home. Conclusion: The survey reveals that HBPM instructions to the patients are either lacking or not well aligned with the local hypertension guidelines which may have led to the low HBPM use among patients. Clear and practical educational material and sessions are needed to improve the understanding of HBPM amongst physicians

Investigation on home blood pressure monitoring among hypertensive patients / 预防医学

Objective @#To investigate the status and influencing factors of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) among hypertensive patients, so as to provide the evidence for building and maintaining HBPM among hypertensive patients. @*Methods@#Hypertensive patients hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University were sampled from July to December 2022, and subjects' general data, HBPM behaviors and cognition were collected using self-designed questionnaires. In addition, factors affecting regular HBPM were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model.@*Results@#Totally 440 questionnaires were allocated, and 422 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 95.91%. The respondents included 234 males (55.45%) and 188 females (44.55%), and had a median age of 70 (interquartile range, 15) years. There were 239 respondents with regular HBPM (56.64%). Of 422 respondents, 68 had good cognition of blood pressure monitoring (16.11%), and 79.15% did not think regular changes of their blood pressure within 24 hours, while 72.04% did not think it necessary to measure blood pressure more than twice a day. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that recommendation of regular blood pressure monitoring by healthcare workers (OR=4.341, 95%CI: 2.493-7.560), number of blood pressure measurements according to real circumstances (OR=3.858, 95%CI: 1.358-10.961), recording of measurement results (OR=4.945, 95%CI: 1.863-13.129), provision of data to doctors at admission (OR=2.023, 95%CI: 1.173-3.488) and good cognition of blood pressure monitoring (good, OR=11.939, 95%CI: 3.972-35.886; general, OR=9.681, 95%CI: 5.157-18.172) resulted in a high possibility of regular HBPM among respondents.@*Conclusion@#Hypertensive patients with recommendation of regular blood pressure monitoring by healthcare workers, number of blood pressure measurements according to real conditions, recording of blood pressure measurement results, provision of blood pressure to doctors at admission and good cognition of blood pressure monitoring are more likely to have regular HBPM.

Registro Nacional do Controle da Hipertensão Arterial Avaliado pela Medida de Consultório e Residencial no Brasil: Registro LHAR / National Registry of Hypertension Control Evaluated by Office and Home Measurements: The LHAR National Registry

Resumo Fundamento Sabe-se que em torno de 30% dos pacientes apresentam valores de pressão arterial (PA) mais elevados quando examinados no consultório do que em suas residências. No mundo, admite-se que apenas 35% dos hipertensos já tratados tenham alcançado meta pressórica. Objetivo Fornecer dados epidemiológicos sobre o controle da PA nos consultórios, em uma amostra de cardiologistas brasileiros, avaliado pela medida de consultório e monitorização residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA). Métodos Análise transversal. Observou-se pacientes com diagnóstico de hipertensão arterial, em tratamento anti-hipertensivo, podendo ou não estar com a PA controlada. A PA foi verificada no consultório por profissional médico, e no domicílio através da MRPA. A associação entre variáveis categóricas se deu por meio do teste do qui-quadrado (p < 0,05). Resultados Foram incluídos 2.540 pacientes, com idade média 59,7 ± 15,2 anos. A maioria dos pacientes eram mulheres (62%; n = 1.575). O estudo mostrou uma prevalência de 15% (n = 382) de hipertensão do avental branco não controlada, e 10% (n = 253) de hipertensão mascarada não controlada. A taxa de controle da PA no consultório foi 56,3%, e no domicílio, de 61%; 46,4% dos pacientes tiveram PA controlada no consultório e fora dele. Observou-se maior controle no sexo feminino e na faixa etária 49-61 anos. Observando o controle domiciliar com o novo ponto de corte das Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial de 2020, a taxa de controle foi de 42,4%. Conclusão O controle pressórico nos consultórios em uma amostra de cardiologistas brasileiros foi de 56,3%; 61% quando a PA foi obtida no domicílio, e 46,4% quando o controle foi observado tanto no consultório como no domicílio.

Abstract Background It is known that around 30% of patients have higher blood pressure (BP) values when examined at the office than at home. Worldwide, only 35% of patients with hypertension undergoing treatment have reached their BP targets. Objective To provide epidemiological data on BP control in the offices of a sample of Brazilian cardiologists, considering office and home BP measurement. Methods This is a cross-sectional analysis of patients with a hypertension diagnosis and undergoing antihypertensive treatment, with controlled BP or not. BP was assayed in the office by a medical professional and at home using home BP monitoring (HBPM). The association between categorical variables was verified using the chi-square test (p<0.05). Results The study included 2540 patients, with a mean age of 59.7 ± 15.2 years. Most patients were women (62%; n=1575). Prevalence rates of 15% (n=382) for uncontrolled white coat hypertension and 10% (n=253) for uncontrolled masked hypertension were observed. The rate of BP control in the office was 56.3% and at home, 61%. Meanwhile, 46.4% of the patients had controlled BP in and outside of the office. Greater control was observed in women and in the 49-61 years age group. Considering the new DBHA 2020 threshold for home BP control, the control rate was 42.4%. Conclusion BP control in the offices of a sample of Brazilian cardiologists was 56.3%; this rate was 61% when BP was measured at home and 46.4% when considering both the office and home.

Evaluation of blood pressure through home monitoring in brazilian primary care: a feasibility study / Avaliação da pressão arterial através da monitorização residencial na atenção básica brasileira: um estudo de viabilidade

Abstract Blood pressure measurements taken in a clinical setting are subject to errors, therefore there are advantages to monitoring blood pressure at home, especially in in patients diagnosed with hypertension. The study describes the feasibility of home monitoring to assess blood pressure in primary care and compares blood pressure measured at home and during a medical consultation. This cross-sectional study was carried out with patients whose used home blood pressure in the morning and evening, thrice for seven consecutive day sat home. Participants included patients older than 18 years with suspected whitecoat hypertension, taking antihypertensives, or those intolerant of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and excluded patients who did not follow the protocol, suffered from an irregular heart rate, and pregnant women. Of the 134 patients who participated in the study, 63.3% had altered blood pressure when measured at health facilities and 48% had higher blood pressure at home. The mean difference between the methods was 10.1 mmHg for systolic and 4.3 mmHg for diastolic. The prevalence of whitecoat hypertension was 19.4%. Blood pressure monitoring at home is a practicable strategy in the Brazilian healthcare system.

Resumo A medição da pressão arterial no consultório está sujeita a erros; assim, a monitorização residencial da pressão arterial é utilizada para o monitoramento e diagnóstico da hipertensão. Descrever a viabilidade da monitorização residencial para avaliar a pressão arterial na atenção primária e comparar os valores da pressão arterial através da monitorização residencial e medida de consultório. Estudo transversal realizado com pacientes que utilizaram a monitorização residencial pela manhã e pela noite, em triplicata por sete dias consecutivos em domicílio. Foram incluídos pacientes maiores de 18 anos, com suspeita de hipertensão do avental branco, utilizando anti-hipertensivos ou intolerantes a monitorização ambulatorial. Foram excluídos pacientes que não seguiram o protocolo, aqueles que apresentavam ritmo cardíaco irregular ou mulheres grávidas. 134 pacientes participaram do estudo, 63,3% apresentaram pressão arterial alteradas em consultório e 48% pela monitorização residencial. A diferença média dos métodos foi de 10,1 mmHg para sistólica e 4,3 mmHg para diastólica. A prevalência de hipertensão do avental branco foi 19,4%. A monitorização residencial da pressão arterial no sistema de saúde brasileiro provou ser uma estratégia viável.

Survey on home blood pressure measurement and blood pressure control rate among hypertensive patients in Beijing Yuetan community / 中华全科医师杂志

Objective@#To survey on the home blood pressure measurement and blood pressure control rate among patients with hypertension in Beijing Yuetan community.@*Methods@#A questionnaire survey was conducted among 504 hypertensive patients, who were visiting Beijing Yuetan Community Health Service Center and selected by convenience-sampling method during June 2018 to January 2019. The status of home blood pressure measurement, the awareness of hypertension, the blood pressure control rate and factors related to not regularly measuring were surveyed.@*Results@#Of the 504 patients, 93.7% (472/504) took regular medication, but only 61.5% (310/504) had regular blood pressure measurements; 92.5% (466/504) had sphygmomanometers at home with electronic type mainly; 89.9% (453/504) patients knew the method of blood pressure measurement, but only 11.5% (52/453) had their sphygmomanometer calibrated. Among those who measured blood pressure, 77.4% (240/310) measured per week. The main reason for not measuring blood pressure regularly was that there was no need to measure blood pressure without any discomfort, accounting for 50.0% (97/194). The office blood pressure control rate (with desktop mercury sphygmomanometer) was 62.3% (314/504); the blood pressure control rate both in the morning and at bed time was 61.3% (73/119), that in the morning was 68.1% (81/119) and at bed time was 75.6% (90/119). The control rates of systolic blood pressure and heart rate by home measurement at morning and bedtime were significantly higher than those by office measurement (χ2=5.02, 9.97, 15.51, 13.72; all P<0.05).@*Conclusions@#The home blood pressure monitoring rate and knowledge level of hypertension among patients with hypertension in Yuetan community are relatively low. There are some differences in blood pressure control rate between office measurement and home measurement. Comprehensive evaluation is needed in the management process, and the treatment plan should be adjusted according to the specific condition of patients.

Hipertensión arterial en niños y adolescentes: ¿cómo hacemos el diagnóstico? / Arterial hypertension in children and adolescents: how do we make the diagnosis?

El rotular a un niño o adolescente de hipertenso no es una tarea fácil en la actualidad. Sabemos que el pilar para el diagnóstico de Hipertensión Arterial sigue siendo la presión arterial de consultorio; pero tenemos que tener en cuenta que, por su escasa reproducibilidad éste método tiene limitaciones. Hoy existen métodos complementarios reproducibles, validados y confiables como el Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial (MAPA) y el Monitoreo Domiciliario de la Presión Arterial (MDPA) menos difundido en pediatría, que nos ayudan a llegar a un diagnostico correcto (AU)

Diagnosis of a hypertensive child or adolescent is not an easy task today. We know that the mainstay for diagnosing arterial hypertension remains the measuring of blood pressure at the office; however, it is necessary to bear in mind that, because of its low reproducibility, this method has limitations. Today there are reproducible, validated, and reliable complementary methods, such as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), that are less widespread in pediatrics, which may be helpful to make an adequate diagnosis.(AU)

The preliminary study of management model of morning hypertension in people with essential hypertension / 中国基层医药

Objective To analyze the epidemiological characteristics of morning hypertension in people with eseential hypertension in Dali Bai autonomous prefecture,and to study the management model for morning hypertension. Methods From May 2015 to January 2017,302 patients with hypertension in the People's Hospital of Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture were divided voluntarily into two groups,including single management group (group 1)and systematic management group (group 2 ).During six to twelve months follow －up,the changes in control rate of morning hypertension,serum biochemical indicators,KAP and Mofisky score were observed before and after intervention. Results The proportion of morning hypertension in people with hypertension was 62.25%,61.11% in men and 62.86%in females.The patients with morning hypertension had higher age,BMI,WC,TC,LDL－C,SBP,DBP,CRP, FBG,SCr,Sokolow－Lyon,Cornell,LVMI,UACR and MAU,more cervical plaque,and lower HDL －C and eGFR compared with non－morning hypertension(P＜0.05 －0.001).The number of patients with target organ damage was most in patients with morning hypertension by home blood pressure monitoring(HBPM),second in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring(ABPM),least in clinic blood pressure monitoring (CBPM)(P＜0.05 －0.001).After six to twelve months follow－up,compared with before intervention,the control rate of morning hypertension was increased (43.78%vs.61.39%),and SBP,DBP,HR,BMI,WC,TC,TG,UA,Scr were decreased in both two groups,which in the group 2 were lower than those in the group 1(P＜0.05 ).Compared with before intervention,the KAP score and Mofisky in the two groups after intervention were significantly improved(P＜0.05－0.01)[K score:(9.63 ±3.01)points vs.(14.26 ±2.89)points in the group 1,(10.11±2.34)points vs.(17.23 ±1.06)points in the group2;A score:(2.05 ±1.21)points vs.(2.98 ±0.25)points in the group 1,(2.08 ±1.65)points vs.(3.56 ±0.42)points in the group 2,P score:(4.39 ±2.36)points vs.(5.89 ±3.24)points in the group 1,(4.71±3.42)points vs.(7.26 ± 1.21)points in the group 2,Mofisky questionnaire score:(61.23 ±5.79)points vs.(72.36 ±6.18)points in the group 1,(60.89 ±6.47)points vs.(88.45 ±5.48)points in the group 2],which in the group 2 were higher than those in the group 1(P＜0.01).Conclusion The control rate of morning hypertension in patients with hypertension in Dali Bai autonomous prefecture is low,the HBPM is better way to predict the target organ damage,and systematic management model is effective to improve the control rate of morning hypertension and so do in KAP and Morisky score.

Home blood pressure variability and its influencing factors in maintenance hemodialysis patients / 医学研究生学报

Objective Blood pressure variability (BPV) is an independent risk factor for the death of patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).There is no study on the influencing factors of BPV at home in HD patients in China.The article aimed to investigate MHD patients'BPV at home and related influencing factors in order to provide theoretical basis for reducing home BPV (HBPV) clinically. Methods We chose 103 patients who were treated with MHD in the Renal Medicine Room of Nephrology Department in three upper first -class hospitals including Jiangsu Provincial People 's Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University and the Affiliated Hospi -tal of Jiangsu University from March 2017 to October 2017.We col-lected their 7 days'blood pressure monitoring at home and blood pressure before dialysis, average value and standard deviation in sys -tolic blood pressure monitoring at home, and took the coefficient of variation of systolic blood pressure as the expression of HBPV .The patients were divided into high BPV group (BPV≥5.8％) and low BPV group (BPV<5.8％) according to the average BPV.At the same time, we recorded indexes such as sex , age, dialysis age, primary disease, BMI, inter-dialytic weight gain (IDWG), left ven-tricular mass index(LVMI) and analyzed relative influencing factors by multiple linear regression . Results The age, IDWG and LV-MI were positive independent influencing factors of HBPV (R 2 =0.467,F=10.945,P<0.001).According to standardized regression co-efficient, the contribution of each variable to HBPV was as follows : PIBWG >Age>LVMI. Conclusion In clinical nursing, we should actively control the IDWG of patients , encourage patients to monitor their blood pressure at home , and increase their awareness of the importance of home BPV.Meanwhile, HBPV is an important index for predicting left ventricular hypertrophy and can be used as an objective tool to improve patients 'self-management ability.

Clinical analysis of home blood pressure monitoring in patients with transient hypertension / 重庆医学

Objective To screen the incidence of transient hypertension in conventional hypertensive management population of hypertension and analysis it's related etiology and constituent ratio.Methods People who met the diagnosis of hypertension were selected from inpatient and outpatient of this department.All patients were followed up for 2 months of home blood pressure monitoring,if the patients who were normal when monitoring home blood pressure were included in the trial and symptomatic hypertension was excluded.Results Three hundred of patients met the diagnostic criteria for hypertension,46 cases (15.3％) met the standard of transient hypertension,the etiology and constituent ratio of transient hypertension in the observed cases were as follows:25 cases (54.3％) of anxiety and depression,8 cases (17.4％) of acute cerebrovascular disease,7 cases (15.2％) of sleep disorders,4 cases(8.7％) of a variety of head and face pain,1 (2.2％)case of epilepsy tonic clonus,1 (2.2％)case of vertigo.Conclusion The application of interactive management of home blood pressure measurement is particularly helpful for screening patients with transient hypertension,and it can timely avoid excessive anti-hypertensive treatment.

Clinical Significance of Home Blood Pressure and Its Possible Practical Application

This review represents the clinical significance of home blood pressure (BP) and its possible practical application. Home BP is highly reproducible and its reproducibility is better than ambulatory BP. According to this feature home BP has a greater prognostic value at least than clinic BP and is extremely effective for the evaluation of drug effects and their duration. The introduction of home BP to the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension facilitates long-term BP control. Home BP is particularly important for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, children and renal diseases. Home BP measurements improve the adherence to medications and medical consultations, and are indispensable for diagnosis of white coat hypertension and masked hypertension. Such efficiency of home BP improves medical economy. Home BP can detect minimal charge in BP mediated by medication, and intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli and detect long-term change in BP. Thus, home BP is now indispensable for improvement in the management of hypertension in medical practice as well as for the recognition of hypertension in the general population. Standardization of the measurement procedure may elevate the position of home BP in the practice of diagnosing and treating hypertension.

Usefulness of Home Blood Pressure Reflected Anti-hypertensive Treatment and the Evolution of Blood Pressure Profiles

BACKGROUND: It is still unclear how self-measured home blood pressure (BP) evolves over time in treated hypertensive patients, and the usefulness of home BP based treatment is under debate. METHODS: The patients whose anti-hypertensive medications had not been changed at least 6 months were enrolled. They measured home BP at enrollment and at study end. The patients were classified into controlled hypertension (CH), hypertension with white coat effect (WCH), hypertension with reverse white coat effect (RWCH), and uncontrolled hypertension (UH), based on their clinic and home BP. Their home BP profiles were reflected in the patients' treatments, instead of relying solely on clinic BP. RESULTS: Ninety patients (mean age, 56.5 +/- 9.9; male, 57.8%) were analyzed and mean follow-up duration was 34.1 +/- 3.6 months. CH, WCH, RWCH, and UH patients were 33.3% (30 patients), 37.8% (34 patients), 5.6% (5 patients), and 23.3% (21 patients), respectively at enrollment. Almost all CH and WCH patients remained in normal range of home BP whereas about half of RWCH and UH patients moved to CH or WCH. As a result, the proportion of RWCH and UH decreased at the end of follow-up. Overall clinic and home BP reduced significantly in all groups. Clinic BP declined significantly in WCH and UH, whereas home BP declined significantly in RWCH and UH. That means the BP profiles shifted toward more reasonable states. CONCLUSIONS: BP profiles shifted toward more reasonable states after home BP based adjustment of anti-hypertensive medication. Measurement of home BP might be beneficial in anti-hypertensive treatment.

Physician's Awareness and Education for Patient on Life Style Modification and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Recommended in Hypertension Guideline

BACKGROUND: It is important to understand physicians' awareness and knowledge on hypertension guideline to comprehend physician oriented barrier against proper hypertension management. Current guidelines emphasize on the role of home blood pressure monitoring. The aim of this study is to investigate the level of awareness and knowledge of Korean physicians on home blood pressure monitoring recommended in current guideline. METHODS: A questionnaire survey asking home blood pressure measurement, as well as prehypertension and life style modification, was conducted among 36 primary physicians and 25 residents of a tertiary medical center. RESULTS: Except the limitation alcohol intake (80.3%), the physicians demonstrated above 90% of agreement with other contents of life style modification recommended by published guidelines (salt restriction, stop smoking, weight loss, and regular aerobic exercise). Majority (77.7%) of primary physicians recommend home blood pressure measurement to their patients. Significantly primary physicians were likely to recommend home blood pressure monitoring than residents (48% vs. 77.7%, p = 0.027). But both physicians and residents show poor compliance to home blood pressure monitoring guideline in the point of blood pressure measuring (12% vs. 19.4%, p > 0.05). But most of participants are aware of adverse effect of prehypertension (88.5%) and the need of its treatment (96.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This result suggest screening alcohol use disorder and brief counseling by physicians should be encouraged as a part of hypertension management and promoting physicians to equip the correct knowledge of home blood pressure measuring recommended in guideline is warranted.

Morning Hypertension in Treated Hypertensives: Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Morning hypertension is closely related to target organ damage and cardiovascular events. Little data is available concerning the baseline characteristics and comprehensive blood pressure analysis of hypertensive patients on treatment with morning hypertension. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 1,087 hypertensive patients who had taken stable anti-hypertensive medication at least 6 months. The enrolled patients measured their home blood pressure for 7 days. Baseline characteristics and the laboratory data were analyzed. Morning hypertension was defined as a morning blood pressure > or =135/85 mm Hg and systolic or diastolic blood pressure difference between morning and evening exceeding 10 mm Hg. RESULTS: One hundred seventy three patients with morning hypertension showed a preponderance of males, older patients, alcohol consumers, and greater waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio despite the same body mass index. Impaired fasting glucose and metabolic syndrome were more prevalent in the patients with morning hypertension. The morning hypertensives took more anti-hypertensive drugs and displayed higher blood pressure in the clinic and at home. CONCLUSION: The worse clinical variables and relatively poorly controlled blood pressure of those with morning hypertension supports a potential relationship of morning hypertension with poor cardiovascular outcome. Morning blood pressure should be monitored at home for the optimal treatment of hypertension.

Characteristics and Predictors of Masked Hypertension in Elderly Patients with Well-controlled Hypertension

BACKGROUND: Clinic-based blood pressure measurements may lead to untoward results in the management of hypertension. Masked hypertension (MH) has been shown to be related to a poor prognosis due to its hidden nature. The purpose of this study is to present the clinical predictors of MH in elderly patients over 65 years with well-controlled clinic blood pressure (CBP) and to evaluate the gap, the 'mask effect' (negative white-coat effect), between CBP and home blood pressure (HBP). METHODS: The BPs of 1,019 treated hypertensive patients were measured by a doctor at an out-patient clinic and by patients themselves at home. Clinical parameters for MH were analyzed in 511 patients with well-controlled CBP (45.6% men, mean age 57.1+/-9.0 years). RESULTS: Among the patients over 65 years (n=113, 46.8% men, mean age 68.4+/-7.3 years) and with well-controlled CBP, the prevalence of MH was 26.5% (30 patients). In multivariate-adjusted analysis, the risk of MH increased with physical inactivity (odds ratio [OR], 2.942; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.039-8.329; p=0.042), use of beta-blocker (OR, 4.242; 95% CI, 1.528-11.785; p=0.06) and systolic clinic BP (OR, 1.083; 95% CI, 0.017-1.154; p=0.013). Furthermore, HBP correlated well with CBP (r=0.329; p<0.001) and further with degree of ME (r=0.723; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In looking for MH, it would be useful to carefully assess patients taking beta-blockers, having higher CBP, and who are physically inactive by using self-monitoring home or ambulatory BP monitoring.

Blood pressure measurements taken by patients are similar to home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements

OBJECTIVE: To compare blood pressure measurements taken at home by physicians, nurses, and patients with office blood pressure measurement , ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and home blood pressure measurement. METHODS: A total of 44 patients seen by a home care program were studied. Protocol 1 a) blood pressure was measured by the patient, a physician and a nurse during a regular home visit (Home1); b) home blood pressure measurement was measured for 4 days (HBPM1); c) office blood pressure measurement was measured by a physician, a nurse, and the patient; and by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Protocol 2 blood pressure was measured by the patient, a physician, and a nurse during a special home visit in the presence of a physician and a nurse only (Home2); and b) home blood pressure measurement was taken for the second time (HBPM2). Echocardiography, guided by a two-dimensional echocardiograph, was performed. RESULTS: Protocol 1: a) office blood pressure measurement and Home1 were significantly higher than ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, except for systolic and diastolic office blood pressure measurement taken by the patient or a family member, systolic blood pressure taken by a nurse, and diastolic blood pressure taken by a physician. b) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and HBPM1 were similar. Protocol 2: a) HBPM2 and Home2 were similar. b) Home2 was significantly lower than Home1, except for diastolic blood pressure taken by a nurse or the patient. There were significant relationships between: a) diastolic blood pressure measured by the patient and the thickness of the interventricular septum, posterior wall, and left ventricular mass; and b) ambulatory and HBPM2 diastolic and systolic blood pressure taken by a physician (home2) and left ventricular mass. Therefore, the data indicate that home blood pressure measurement and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring had good prognostic values relative to "office...

Reliability of Home Blood Pressure Measurement / 中华高血压杂志

Objective To verify the reliability of home blood pressure measurement in clinic and research works by comparison three methods[home(H),office(O) and ambulatory(A)]of blood pressure(BP) measurements. Methods The"study-effects of salt substitution on blood pressure among the hypertensive patients and their families"was a randomized,double blinded control trial.In this study,BP was measured in 220 hypertensive patients using office,home and ambulatory BP measurements concurrently at the baseline and the end of the intervention. Two hundred seventeen patients had baseline eligible data,while at the end of the intervention,only 189 patients had eligible data.Bland-Altman method and Person's correlation analysis were used to compare the agreement of BP levels by 3 methods,and McNemar chi-square test compared rates of the agreement,assuming the ambulatory as the reference.Results The mean BP levels using office,ambulatory and home BP measurements were 149.5?16.4/87.2?9.5 mm Hg,137.8?17.1/83.2?10.3 mm Hg,and 138.0?14.2/82.4?9.3 mm Hg,respectively. H BP was more strongly related with ambulatory BP(SBP/DBP)(H:r=0.55/0.62 vs O:r= 0.36/0.46).The difference of BP between H and A was smaller[H:A—0.2 mm Hg/—0.7 mm Hg vs O:A(ll.7 mm Hg/4.0 mm Hg)].Intra-individual agreement between H and A SBP was significantly higher than that between O and A(28.3%vs 16.5%for≤|5| mm Hg and 49.7%vs 33.5%for≤|10| mm Hg,all P0.05).Conclusion Home and ambulatory BP was more strongly related and better agreement than office-ambulatory BP measurement.

Office Blood Pressure is Higher than Home Blood Pressure, and Digital Electronic Sphygmomanometer is Useful for Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients

BACKGROUND: To investigate the possibie difference, if any, between office blood pressure(BP) and home BP may be important in the diagnosis and treatment of hypersensive patients. This report deails the difference between the two BP's and the usefulness of digital electronic sphygmomanometer(DES) for self-monitoring of home BP. METHODS: The BP's of 14 patients with essential hypertension were measured with mercury sphygmomanometers at outpatient department by physician and with DES at home(twice a day) by the patients. Patients were followed up every 2 weeks for 4 weeks and previous 2 weeks' average home BP's were compared with the office BP's of each 2 weeks' end. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between office and home BP(both systolic and diastolic) ; office average BP(151/95mmHg) was higher than home average BP(136/86mmHg). CONCLUSION: Caution may be needed in the interpretation of office BP unless it is measured several times after adequate rest.