Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Recent Advances in Ophthalmology ; (6): 976-978, 2017.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-660240

RESUMEN

Objective To observe the effect of implantation of iris-claw intraocu lax lens combined with pupil reconstruction on aphakic eyes caused by ocular trauma.Methods The clinical data of 17 patients (17 eyes) of aphakic eyes treated with irisclaw intraocular lens implantation and pupil reconstruction were analyzed retrospectively,and the visual acuity,corneal endothelial cell count,intraocular pressure,intraocular lens location,pupil condition and postoperative complications were observed.Results Intraocular lens were implanted and pupils were repaired in all 17 patients (17 eyes) successfully,with no complications of intraocular lens dislocation and corneal decom pensation.The postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (0.52 + 0.17) was better than the preoperative visual acuity (0.04 + 0.02) and preoperative best corrected visual acui ty (0.44 +0.13).The corneal endothelial cell count was (1993.88 + 127.24) mm-2 6 months after operation,which was lower than that of preoperative date (2178.88 + 132.61)mm-2 (P < 0.05).Preoperative intraocular pressure (15.91 + 2.73) mmHg (1 kPa =7.5 mmHg) was not significantly different from postoperative intraocular pressure (16.69 + 2.61) mmHg (1 kPa =7.5 mmHg) (P > 0.05).The postoperative pupil size [(4.4 + 0.2) mm] was smaller than that of preoperative date [(5.5 + 0.3) mm] (P < 0.05).The symptoms of photophobia,glare and diplopia did not occur postoperatively.Conelusion Pupil reconstruction combined with iris-claw intraocular lens implanta tion is a safe and effective method for aphalic eyes combined with absence of capsule support and ruptured iris.

2.
Recent Advances in Ophthalmology ; (6): 976-978, 2017.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-657799

RESUMEN

Objective To observe the effect of implantation of iris-claw intraocu lax lens combined with pupil reconstruction on aphakic eyes caused by ocular trauma.Methods The clinical data of 17 patients (17 eyes) of aphakic eyes treated with irisclaw intraocular lens implantation and pupil reconstruction were analyzed retrospectively,and the visual acuity,corneal endothelial cell count,intraocular pressure,intraocular lens location,pupil condition and postoperative complications were observed.Results Intraocular lens were implanted and pupils were repaired in all 17 patients (17 eyes) successfully,with no complications of intraocular lens dislocation and corneal decom pensation.The postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (0.52 + 0.17) was better than the preoperative visual acuity (0.04 + 0.02) and preoperative best corrected visual acui ty (0.44 +0.13).The corneal endothelial cell count was (1993.88 + 127.24) mm-2 6 months after operation,which was lower than that of preoperative date (2178.88 + 132.61)mm-2 (P < 0.05).Preoperative intraocular pressure (15.91 + 2.73) mmHg (1 kPa =7.5 mmHg) was not significantly different from postoperative intraocular pressure (16.69 + 2.61) mmHg (1 kPa =7.5 mmHg) (P > 0.05).The postoperative pupil size [(4.4 + 0.2) mm] was smaller than that of preoperative date [(5.5 + 0.3) mm] (P < 0.05).The symptoms of photophobia,glare and diplopia did not occur postoperatively.Conelusion Pupil reconstruction combined with iris-claw intraocular lens implanta tion is a safe and effective method for aphalic eyes combined with absence of capsule support and ruptured iris.

3.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2016 Mar; 64(3): 216-221
Artículo en Inglés | IMSEAR | ID: sea-179171

RESUMEN

Aim: To study the efficiency and safety of iris reconstruction combined with iris‑claw intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the patients with iris‑lens injuries. Settings and Design: Retrospective, noncomparable consecutive case series study. Materials and Methods: Eleven patients (11 eyes) following iris‑lens injuries underwent iris reconstructions combined with iris‑claw IOL implantations. Clinical data, such as cause and time of injury, visual acuity (VA), iris and lens injuries, surgical intervention, follow‑up period, corneal endothelial cell count, and optical coherence tomography, were collected. Results: Uncorrected VA (UCVA) in all injured eyes before combined surgery was equal to or <20/1000. Within a 1.1–4.2‑year follow‑up period, a significant increase, equal to or better than 20/66, in UCVA was observed in six (55%) cases, and in best‑corrected VA (BCVA) was observed in nine (82%) cases. Postoperative BCVA was 20/40 or better in seven cases (64%). After combined surgery, the iris returned to its natural round shape or smaller pupil, and the iris‑claw IOLs in the 11 eyes were well‑positioned on the anterior surface of reconstructed iris. No complications occurred in those patients. Conclusions: Iris reconstruction combined with iris‑claw IOL implantation is a safe and efficient procedure for an eye with iris‑lens injury in the absence of capsular support.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA