RESUMEN
<p>Purpose: We investigated the benefits and problem of the palliative care provided by long-term care unit through a survey of staff in palliative care units (PCU) and long-term care units. Methods: Self-reported questionnaires were administered to staff who engaged in PCU and long-term care units. Questions included: awareness of WHO palliative care definition, and, the general idea on palliative care, possibility of cooperation with PCU, advantages / disadvantages, and idea for non-cancer palliative care in long-term care unit. Results: We got responses from 248 medical and nursing-care staff. The percentage of “knowing” the WHO definition was 76.5% in medical staff / 32.3% in care worker, 87.6% in PCU experience / 46.5% in non-experience. Categories of responses are good, advantageous, problematic, difficult requirement, difficulty, etc. The main answers were the difficulty of care, problems of knowledge and technique, and points of problems related to personnel shortage. Medical staff or PCU experienced staff pointed out needs of palliative care and improvement of knowledge and skills. Conclusion: Opinions acknowledging the benefits and necessities for palliative care of long-term care units and a number of problems were revealed.</p>
RESUMEN
<p>Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the current status of the palliative care provided by long-term care unit that was established together with palliative care unit (PCU). Methods: Self-reported questionnaires were administered to long-term care unit administrators at 24 facilities that was established together with PCU. Questions included: managing the use of narcotic drugs, situation about receiving cancer patients, situation about cooperation with PCU, and difficulty with palliative care. Results: Eighteen (75%) facilities responded to the questionnaire. Fourteen facilities of respondents reported that narcotic drugs were available and usable in long-term care unit, and ten facilities reported that the narcotic drugs could be used in the same way as PCU could. Ten facilities reported that they had doctor(s) knowledgeable about palliative care or prescribing narcotic drugs, and 11 facilities reported that they had nurse(s) experienced about palliative care. Cancer patients were accepted in all 18 long-term care units. Transferring from long-term care unit to PCU due to medical condition changes after hospitalization had been carried out in 17 facilities. Unit administrator’s perceived difficulty lack of staffing, lack of staff expertise and education, and issues surrounding narcotic drug management. Conclusion: These long-term care units were providing palliative care for cancer patients in cooperation with PCU. The survey results indicated the need for solving human resource, educational, and administrative problems.</p>
RESUMEN
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the palliative care for cancer patients provided by a long-term care unit. Methods: We retrospectively investigated the medical records of 194 patients who hospitalized in our long-term care unit between April 2010 and December 2014. The patients shared with a group of two, narcotic drugs non-use period (previous group; until March 2012) and narcotics use period (later group; in April 2012 or later), and it was compared with a background, hospitalization period, result on discharge, narcotic drug administration, symptom relief. And it was surveyed hospitalization dynamics of our palliative care unit for comparison. Result: Cancer patients were 16 (22%) in previous group of 74 patients and were 79 (66%) in later group of 120. The proportion of cancer patients in later group increased to three times (p<0.001). In later group, the average hospital stay was shortened to half (144 days, p<0.01) and the mortality discharge rates increased (78%, p<0.05). Narcotic drugs were administered to more than half (57%) of cancer patients in later group, and pain relief was significantly better. In the period of later group, number of hospitalized patients in palliative care unit was also increased. Conclusion: It was suggested that the long-term unit can perform palliative care for cancer patients in cooperation with the palliative care unit.
RESUMEN
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>Although many studies have shown the usefulness of influenza vaccine in elderly in-patients, the efficacy of vaccination with regard to the daily physical activities of patients has not been fully evaluated. To address this issue, we correlated the use of medical resources with vaccination status in patients categorized according to their daily activity levels.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The subjects comprised 237 in-patients at or above 51 years of age, who were hospitalized in the long-term care unit of a Japanese hospital between January and March, 1999. The vaccination status and medical resources use (i.e., oral antibiotics, injected antibiotics, blood cell count, chest X-ray) of each patient were recorded, and the patients were assigned to three subgroups, based on daily life activity scores.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Vaccinated in-patients in the 'bed-bound' category required fewer medical resources, i.e., oral antibiotics (-2.29 days,P<0.05), injected antibiotics (-5.02 days,P<0.001), blood cell counts (-4.66 times,P<0.001), and chest X-rays (-4.31 times,P<0.001), compared with unvaccinated in-patients. There were no significant differences in treatment parameters between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in the 'partly limited' or 'no limitation' categories.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>It is suggested that influenza vaccination significantly reduces the need for medical treatment only among those in-patients who are the least physically active. Further studies are required to replicate these findings, and to elucidate the underlying reasons for this reduction.</p>
RESUMEN
Objective: Although many studies have shown the usefulness of influenza vaccine in elderly in-patients, the efficacy of vaccination with regard to the daily physical activities of patients has not been fully evaluated. To address this issue, we correlated the use of medical resources with vaccination status in patients categorized according to their daily activity levels. Methods: The subjects comprised 237 in-patients at or above 51 years of age, who were hospitalized in the long-term care unit of a Japanese hospital between January and March, 1999. The vaccination status and medical resources use (i.e., oral antibiotics, injected antibiotics, blood cell count, chest X-ray) of each patient were recorded, and the patients were assigned to three subgroups, based on daily life activity scores. Results: Vaccinated in-patients in the ‘bed-bound’ category required fewer medical resources, i.e., oral antibiotics (−2.29 days, P<0.05), injected antibiotics (−5.02 days, P<0.001), blood cell counts (−4.66 times, P<0.001), and chest X-rays (−4.31 times, P<0.001), compared with unvaccinated in-patients. There were no significant differences in treatment parameters between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in the ‘partly limited’ or ‘no limitation’ categories. Conclusions: It is suggested that influenza vaccination significantly reduces the need for medical treatment only among those in-patients who are the least physically active. Further studies are required to replicate these findings, and to elucidate the underlying reasons for this reduction.