Landmark studies in neuro-ophthalmology

@#High-quality clinical evidence, derived from well-designed and implemented clinical trials, serves to advance clinical care and to allow physicians to provide the most effective treatments to their patients. The field of ophthalmology, including the subspecialty of neuro-ophthalmology, abounds with such high-quality clinical trials that provide Level 1 clinical evidence. This review article summarizes the research design, key findings, and clinical relevance of select monumental clinical studies in neuro-ophthalmology with the primary goal of providing the readers with the rationale for current standard of care of various neuro-ophthalmic diseases. This includes the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial, Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial, Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial, Rescue of Hereditary Optic Disease Outpatient Study, and Controlled High-Risk Avonex® Multiple Sclerosis Study

Optic Neuritis of Korean Adult

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to describe the clinical features and characteristics of optic neuritis patients compared with those of patients enrolled in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT). METHODS: We retrospectively included consecutive patients diagnosed with optic neuritis between 2006 and 2015. The inclusion criteria were the same as those of the ONTT; an acute or subacute unilateral visual symptom ≤8 days in duration, a relative afferent pupillary defect, and a visual field defect in the affected eye. RESULTS: The 41 patients (14 females, 27 males) were of mean age 32.7 years. The incidence of papilledema was 58.5%, thus higher than that of ONTT patients (p = 0.004), and the incidence of ocular pain was 75.6%, lower than that of ONTT patients (p = 0.002). Six months after intravenous methylprednisolone therapy, 29 of 32 eyes (90.6%) recovered visual acuity of ≥1.0 or better, and only one eye exhibited poor visual acuity (≤0.5). Orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 34 patients, and most (91.2%) exhibited optic nerve enhancement. The three patients who did not exhibit enhancement reported no pain. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical features of Korean optic neuritis patients differed from those of patients of the ONTT. Most patients exhibited optic nerve MRI enhancement associated with ocular pain. If enhancement of the optic nerve is lacking, diseases other than optic neuritis should be suspected because most optic nerves with neuritis exhibit enhancement on MRI.

Clinical profile and short-term outcomes of optic neuritis patients in India.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical profile and short‑term visual outcome of optic neuritis (ON) patients in India. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study carried out over a period of 3 years, 99 eyes of 83 ON patients were examined and followed up for 10.8 ± 8.2 months for type of presentation, recurrence rate, and visual outcome. Results: Mean age was 27.6 ± 8.8 years. Female preponderance was seen (70% of cases). Papillitis (53.5% of eyes) was more common than retrobulbar neuritis (46.5% of eyes). Bilateral presentation was seen in 19.3% cases. Baseline median logMAR visual acuity (VA) was 1.6 ± 0.8, which improved to 0.2 ± 0.6, with approximately 64% of eyes retaining VA of 20/40 or more. Two patients had previous diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). MS was newly diagnosed in two patients. Recurrence was seen in 16% of eyes and was more common in cases of retrobulbar neuritis. Conclusion: The clinical profile of ON in Indian patients is different from that in the Western population. Unlike reported in the Western literature, papillitis is frequent in the Indian setup, with lower recurrence rates but poorer outcomes.