RESUMEN
Abstract Background: Systemic inflammatory responses mimicking infectious complications are often present in surgical patients. Methods: The objective was to assess the association between withholding early antimicrobial therapy while investigating alternative diagnoses and worse outcomes in nonseptic patients with suspected nosocomial infection in a retrospective cohort of critically ill surgical patients. The initiation of antibiotic therapy within 24 h of the suspicion of infection was defined as the Early Empirical Antibiotic strategy (EEA) group and the initiation after 24 h of suspicion or not prescribed was defined as the Conservative Antibiotic strategy (CA) group. Primary outcome was composite: death, sepsis, or septic shock within 14 days. Main exclusion criteria were sepsis or an evident source of infection at inclusion. Results: Three hundred and forty patients were eligible for inclusion (74% trauma patients). Age, sex, reason for hospital admission, SAPS3 score, SOFA score, and use of vasopressors or mechanical ventilation were not different between the groups. Within 14 days of inclusion, 100% (130/130) of EEA patients received antibiotics compared to 57% (120/210) of CA patients. After adjusting for confounding variables, there was no association between primary outcome and the groups. In a post hoc subgroup analysis including only patients with a posteriori confirmed infection (by microbiological cultures), delay in initiation of adequate antimicrobial therapy was independently associated with the primary outcome (Odds Ratio = 1.19 per day of delay; 95% CI 1.05-1.37). Conclusions: Withholding early empiric antibiotic therapy was not associated with progression of organ dysfunction within 14 days in nonseptic surgical patients with suspected nosocomial infection without an obvious source.
RESUMEN
The Choosing Wisely initiative has become a significant benchmark as a strategy to reduce low value tests and therapies. An original initiative of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) which has been growing gradually and is now present in over 18 countries, with the support of more than 80 scientific societies around the world. In Colombia, the strategy is being accepted by the Colombian Association of Scientific Societies (ACSC), which with the support of six pioneer Colombian scientific societies, have encouraged the development and implementation of "do not do recommendations", with a view to fulfil the right to self-regulation of human resources in healthcare, reducing those medical behaviors that could be ineffective or harmful to the patient. This article is an overview of the most significant items of the initiative which has been conducted by the ACSC, with the support of the Colombian Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (S.C.A.R.E.) as a pioneer.
La iniciativa Choosing Wisely se ha convertido en un significativo referente como estrategia para reducir pruebas y tratamientos de bajo valor. Planteada originalmente por la American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), ha ido creciendo gradualmente y ya se encuentra en más de 18 países, y cuenta con el apoyo de más de 80 sociedades científicas del mundo. En Colombia, la estrategia está siendo adaptada por la Asociación Colombiana de Sociedades Científicas (ACSC), quienes, con el apoyo de seis sociedades científicas colombianas como pioneras, han motivado la elaboración e implementación de "recomendaciones de no hacer", con el objetivo de materializar el derecho a la autorregulación del talento humano en salud, reduciendo aquellas conductas médicas que pueden ser inefectivas u ocasionar daño al paciente. En este artículo hacemos un recuento de los puntos más importantes de la iniciativa, cuál ha sido la labor de la ACSC, y el papel que la Sociedad Colombiana de Anestesiología y Reanimación (S.C.A.R.E.) ha tenido como sociedad pionera.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE@#To investigate iron accumulation level over the whole brain and explore the possible neuromechanism of medication-overuse headache (MOH) using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM).@*METHODS@#Thirty-seven MOH patients and 27 normal control subjects were enrolled in the study for examinations with both a multiecho gradient echo magnetic resonance (MR) sequence and brain high resolution structural imaging. A voxel-based analysis was performed to detect the brain regions with altered iron deposition, and the quantitative susceptibility mapping values of the positive brain regions were extracted. Correlation analysis was performed between the susceptibility values and the clinical variables of the patients.@*RESULTS@#In patients with MOH, increased susceptibility values were found mainly in the bilateral substantia nigra (SN) (MNI coordinate: 8, -18, -14; -6, -16, -14) as compared with the normal control subjects (P < 0.001), but these alterations in iron deposition were not significantly correlated with the clinical variables of the patients (P > 0.05). The susceptibility value in the left SN had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.734, and at the cut-off value of 0.077, its diagnostic sensitivity was 72.97% and its specificity was 70.37% for distinguishing MOH from normal controls; The susceptibility value in the right SN had an AUC of 0.699 with a diagnostic sensitivity of 72.97% and a specificity of 62.96% at the cut-off value of 0.084.@*CONCLUSION@#Increased iron deposition occurs in the bilateral SN of MOH patients, which provides a new insight into the mechanism of mesocorticolimbic dopamine system dysfunction in MOH. QSM technique can be used as a non-invasive means for quantitative analysis of brain iron deposition in migraine neuroimaging.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Encéfalo , Sustancia Negra , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Cefaleas Secundarias , Cefalea , Hierro , Mapeo Encefálico/métodosRESUMEN
Migraine is a common, highly prevalent genetic neurological disorder. Its most burdensome form is the chronic migraine, which is clinically defined by the presence of headache on ≥15 days/month for longer than three months, with eight or more typical migraine days. Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is a secondary headache disorder associated with the overuse of symptomatic headache medications on ≥10 days/month for longer than 3 months. Chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache often coexist and most chronic migraineurs have medication overuse headache. Despite that, general practitioners and health professionals do not know about MOH. This review aims at presenting insights, recent knowledge, and guidance regarding the approach and treatments for patients with a dual diagnosis of chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache.
A enxaqueca é um distúrbio neurológico genético comum e altamente prevalente. Sua forma mais grave é a enxaqueca crônica, que é clinicamente definida pela presença de cefaleia ≥15 dias/mês por mais de três meses, com oito ou mais dias típicos de enxaqueca. A cefaleia por uso excessivo de medicamentos (MOH) é uma cefaleia secundária associada ao uso excessivo de medicamentos sintomáticos para cefaleia em ≥10 dias/mês por mais de 3 meses. A enxaqueca crônica e a cefaleia por uso excessivo de medicamentos geralmente coexistem e a maioria dos pacientes com enxaqueca crônica apresenta cefaleia por uso excessivo de medicamentos. Apesar disso, os clínicos gerais e os profissionais de saúde não conhecem o MS. Esta revisão tem como objetivo apresentar insights, conhecimentos recentes e orientações sobre a abordagem e tratamentos para pacientes com diagnóstico duplo de enxaqueca crônica e cefaleia por uso excessivo de medicamentos.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Psychiatric symptoms and analgesic overuse may contribute to migraine chronification. Impulsivity is a common symptom in several psychiatric disorders that can potentiate substance overuse, including analgesics. Dopamine has been associated with migraine pathophysiology and impulsivity. Objective: This review aims to assess the current knowledge about the potential association between migraine and impulsivity. Methods: PubMed and LILACS were queried using relevant descriptors related to migraine and impulsivity. Results: Five articles were selected; however, none revealed a significant correlation between migraine and impulsivity. This lack of correlation was verified in different migraine subtypes (with or without aura, chronic, or episodic). Conclusion: The heterogeneity in patient grouping and diverse impulsivity assessment tools of the studies precluded definitive conclusions. The Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11) was the most frequently used tool. Given the paucity of data and the potential impact on migraine management, further studies are crucial to elucidate the potential association between migraine and impulsivity.
Introdução: Sintomas psiquiátricos e uso excessivo de analgésicos podem contribuir para a cronificação da enxaqueca. A impulsividade é um sintoma comum em vários transtornos psiquiátricos que pode potencializar o uso excessivo de substâncias, incluindo analgésicos. A dopamina tem sido associada à fisiopatologia e impulsividade da enxaqueca. Objetivo: Esta revisão tem como objetivo avaliar o conhecimento atual sobre a potencial associação entre enxaqueca e impulsividade. Métodos: PubMed e LILACS foram consultados utilizando descritores relevantes relacionados à enxaqueca e impulsividade. Resultados: Foram selecionados cinco artigos; no entanto, nenhum revelou uma correlação significativa entre enxaqueca e impulsividade. Essa falta de correlação foi verificada em diferentes subtipos de enxaqueca (com ou sem aura, crônica ou episódica). Conclusão: A heterogeneidade no agrupamento de pacientes e as diversas ferramentas de avaliação da impulsividade dos estudos impediram conclusões definitivas. A Escala de Impulsividade Barratt (BIS-11) foi o instrumento mais utilizado. Dada a escassez de dados e o potencial impacto no tratamento da enxaqueca, mais estudos são cruciais para elucidar a potencial associação entre enxaqueca e impulsividade.
RESUMEN
Affecting 1-2% of the world's population and representing up to 40% of patients in specialist headache services, medication overuse headache remains a challenge. Starting with the need to make professionals aware since basic care, through patient education and ending with adequate (and successful) management, there is still much to be done. This literature review seeks to draw attention not only to the importance of recognizing the condition, but mainly to bring out the latest in the best management of patients who suffer from pain more than 14 days a month and who still see analgesics as the only way to manage their pain.
Afectando 1-2% da população mundial e representando até 40% dos pacientes em serviços especializados em cefaleias, a cefaleia por uso excessivo de medicamentos continua a ser um desafio. Começando pela necessidade de conscientizar os profissionais desde a atenção básica, passando pela educação do paciente e terminando no manejo adequado (e bem sucedido), ainda há muito a ser feito. Esta revisão de literatura busca chamar a atenção não apenas para a importância do reconhecimento da condição, mas principalmente trazer à tona o que há de mais moderno no melhor manejo de pacientes que sofrem com dores por mais de 14 dias por mês e que ainda veem os analgésicos como a única forma de administrar sua dor.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , AdultoRESUMEN
Gastric-acid suppressants are one of the most frequently used classes of drugs worldwide. Several studies about their overprescribing have been carried out in recent years. The aim of the study was to assess the appropriateness of these drugs at an internal medicine service of a tertiary hospital in Venezuela. A retrospective record review of patients admitted to the internal medicine service from January 2020 to February 2021 was performed. Data about indications for gastric-acid suppressants, the type used, and their continuation at discharge were collected. The prescribing was grouped into two categories, appropriate or inappropriate, according to current clinical guidelines. Of the 1203 patients who were newly prescribed gastric-acid suppressants in hospital during the study period, 993 (82.5%) had an inappropriate prescription. Prophylaxis of peptic ulcers in low-risk patients was the most frequent no evidence-based indication (20.24%). Seven hundred sixty-two patients were discharged on gastric-acid suppressants. Of these, 74.7% did not have an acceptable indication to continue this treatment on an outpatient basis. Many hospitalized patients in a Venezuelan academic tertiary healthcare center were given gastric acid suppressants not in accordance with the current clinical practice guidelines.
Los supresores del ácido gástrico son uno de los grupos farmacológicos más frecuentemente prescritos en todo el mundo. En los últimos años se han realizado varios estudios sobre su prescripción inadecuada. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la idoneidad de estos medicamentos en un servicio de medicina interna de un hospital de tercer nivel en Venezuela. Se realizó una revisión retrospectiva de historias medicas de pacientes ingresados en el servicio de medicina interna desde enero de 2020 hasta febrero de 2021. Se recogieron datos sobre indicaciones de supresores de ácido gástrico, tipo utilizado y su continuación al alta. La prescripción se agrupó en dos categorías, adecuada o inadecuada, según las guías clínicas vigentes. Entre los 1203 pacientes a los que se les prescribió recientemente supresores de ácido gástrico en el hospital durante el período de estudio, 993 (82,5%) tenían una prescripción inapropiada. La profilaxis de úlceras pépticas en pacientes de bajo riesgo fue la indicación no basada en evidencia más frecuente (20,24%). Setecientos sesenta y dos pacientes fueron dados de alta con supresores de ácido gástrico. De estos, el 74,7% no tenía una indicación apropiada para continuar este tratamiento de forma ambulatoria. Un alto número de pacientes hospitalizados en un centro asistencial de nivel terciario en Venezuela fueron prescritos con supresores de ácido gástrico que no se ajustaban a las guías de práctica clínica vigentes.
RESUMEN
Introducción: El consumo desmedido de medicamentos o polifarmacia constituye una problemática de salud a escala mundial. El uso prolongado de estos fármacos supera en riesgos o efectos adversos a los beneficios que pudieran aportar, solo apreciables ante situaciones de necesidad evidente. Objetivo: Caracterizar la automedicación en dirigentes estatales en la Delegación Provincial de la Agricultura en Cienfuegos. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo de corte trasversal con dirigentes referente a la automedicación en la Delegación Provincial de la Agricultura en Cienfuegos. El universo se conformó por 23 personas. Se utilizaron las variables edad, sexo, cumplimiento del tratamiento médico, medicamento consumido con y sin prescripción. Se utilizó la estadística descriptiva. Resultados: Predominó el sexo masculino (14 personas; 60,86 por ciento). Se destacó el grupo etario 40-59 con 11 personas (54,80 por ciento). Los inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina son los medicamentos de mayor consumo bajo indicación médica (8 personas; 34,78 por ciento). 11 casos cumplieron con el tratamiento (73,33 por ciento). El dolor resultó el síntomas más frecuente (19 personas; 82,60 por ciento. Los antinflamatorios no esteroideos se consumen más sin indicación médica (17 casos; 80,95 por ciento). Conclusiones: la automedicación se caracterizó por ser una práctica cotidiana que se realiza de manera consciente; aun cuando se desconozca sus complicaciones posteriores. El consumo de medicamento sin autorizo del facultativo responde al tipo de lesión o padecimiento a tratar; donde no existe distinción entre ambos sexos(AU)
Introduction: the excessive consumption of drugs or polypharmacy constitutes a health problem on a global scale. Prolonged use of these drugs outweighs the risks or adverse effects that they could provide (only appreciable in situations of obvious need). Objective: to characterize self-medication in state leaders in the Provincial Delegation of Agriculture of Cienfuegos. Methods: an observational, descriptive, retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out with leaders regarding self-medication in the Provincial Delegation of Agriculture of Cienfuegos. The universe was made up of 23 people. The variables age, sex, compliance with medical treatment, medication consumed with and without a prescription were used. It used the descriptive statistic. Results: male sex predominated (14 people; 60.86 percent). The age group 40-59 stood out with 11 people (54.80 percent). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are the most widely used drugs under medical indication (8 people; 34.78 percent). 11 cases complied with the treatment (73,33 percent). Pain was the most frequent symptom (19 people; 82.60 percent). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are consumed more without medical indication (17 cases; 80.95 percent). Conclusions: self-medication is a daily practice that is carried out consciously; even if its subsequent complications are unknown. The consumption of medication without the authorization of the physician responds to the type of injury or condition to be treated; where there is no distinction between both sexes(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Automedicación/efectos adversos , Polifarmacia , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudio ObservacionalRESUMEN
Resumen Introducción: Los marcadores clínicos de la cefalea por uso excesivo de medicación (CMA) se basan en la clasificación de las cefaleas desarrollada por la Sociedad Internacional de Cefaleas (IHS). Esta clasificación incluye sólo dos criterios: la frecuencia de los días de cefalea debe ser de 15 o más días al mes durante al menos tres o más meses; - y el número de días de uso excesivo de la medicación debe ser de 10 o 15 días al mes dependiendo del tipo de medicación. Sin embargo, los pacientes suelen tener otros marcadores clínicos asociados distintos, que la mayoría de los médicos pasan por alto durante la evaluación inicial. Metodología: Este estudio es un estudio prospectivo, longitudinal y observacional de 76 pacientes ingresados en la Unidad de Cefaleas del hospital DIPRECA. Todos ellos fueron diagnosticados de HMO según los criterios establecidos por su ICHD III beta.(1) Los pacientes recibieron un tratamiento estándar que incluía desintoxicación y medicación preventiva y fueron seguidos durante 6 meses. Se registraron los síntomas de interés en cada visita de seguimiento clínico y se administraron escalas de evaluación como Zung, MIDAS, HIT-6. Resultados: Los medicamentos sobreutilizados incluyeron antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINE), triptanes y cornezuelos. Los síntomas clínicos más significativos asociados fueron: despertar por la mañana con dolor de cabeza, despertar al paciente al amanecer por dolor de cabeza, dificultades de atención, depresión, dolor cervical y síndrome de dolor miofascial. Todos los síntomas mejoraron significativamente al iniciar el tratamiento, al igual que la calidad de vida medida por las escalas MIDAS y HIT-6. Discusión: Al evaluar a los pacientes con HMO, hay que tener en cuenta tanto los criterios diagnósticos de la ICHD III beta como los síntomas comunes y específicos que se observan en la mayoría de los casos de HMO.
Introduction: Clinical markers of medication overuse headache (MOH) are based on headache classification developed by the International Headache Society (IHS). This classification include only two criteria: frequency of headache days must be 15 or more days per month for at least three or more months; - and the number of days of overuse medication must be either 10 or 15 days per month depending on the type of medication. However, patients often have others distinct associated clinical markers, which are overlooked by most physicians during the initial evaluation. Methodology: This study is a prospective, longitudinal and observational study of 76 patients admitted to DIPRECA´s hospital Headache Unit. They were all diagnosed with, MOH according to the criteria established by the his ICHD III beta.(1) Patients were given standard treatment including detoxification and preventive medications and followed for 6 months. Symptoms of interest were recorded in at each clinical monitoring visit and assessment scales such as Zung, MIDAS, HIT-6 were administered. Results: Overused medications included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triptans and ergots. The most significant clinical symptoms associated were: awaking in the morning with headache, awaking the patient at dawn by headache, attention difficulties, depression, cervical pain and myofascial pain syndrome. All symptoms significantly improved when treatment began, as did quality of life as measured by MIDAS and HIT-6 scales. Discussion: In evaluating patients with MOH consider both the ICHD III beta diagnostic criteria and the common and specific symptoms seen in most cases of MOH.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Abuso de Medicamentos/efectos adversos , Cefalea/inducido químicamente , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Migrañosos/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
Abstract Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the strength and ratios of the plantar flexors and ankle dorsiflexors in recreational runners with medial tibial stress syndrome and to assess the association between muscle strength and the level of pain in this population. Methods: Two groups (control and medial tibial stress syndrome) of eighteen runners each participated in this cross-sectional study. Isokinetic dynamometry was used to evaluate muscle strength, and for the analysis, the normalized isokinetic peak torque controlled by gender was used. Results: The medial tibial stress syndrome group showed lower normalized isokinetic peak torque in the dorsiflexors in the concentric (p = 0.008) eccentric (p = 0.011) contraction, as well as a lower plantar flexor, normalized isokinetic peak torque in the concentric (p = 0.001) and eccentric (p = 0.02) when compared to the control group. However, there was no difference in the normalized isokinetic peak torque ratio representative of the stance (p = 0.62) and swing phase (p = 0.16), and the level of pain was not correlated with the strength concentric (p = 0.32) and eccentric (p = 0.621) of plantar flexors, nor to the concentric (p = 0.21) and eccentric of dorsiflexors (p = 0.54). Conclusion: Recreational runners with MTSS showed decreased muscle strength in the sagittal plane of the ankle, no correlation with the level of pain, and no changing the ratio between plantar flexors and dorsiflexors.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Carrera/fisiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Fracturas por Estrés , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Articulación del Tobillo , Estudios TransversalesRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze literature data about unnecessary exposure of pediatric emergency patients to ionizing agents from imaging examinations, nowadays and during times of COVID-19. Data sources: Between April and July 2020, articles were selected using the databases: Virtual Health Library, PubMed and Scientific Electronic Library Online. The following descriptors were used: [(pediatrics) AND (emergencies) AND (diagnostic imaging) AND (medical overuse)] and [(Coronavirus infections) OR (COVID-19) AND (pediatrics) AND (emergencies) AND (diagnostic imaging)]. Inclusion criteria were articles available in full, in Portuguese or English, published from 2016 to 2020 or from 2019 to 2020, and articles that covered the theme. Articles without adherence to the theme and duplicate texts in the databases were excluded. Data synthesis: 61 publications were identified, of which 17 were comprised in this review. Some imaging tests used in pediatric emergency departments increase the possibility of developing future malignancies in patients, since they emit ionizing radiation. There are clinical decision instruments that allow reducing unnecessary exam requests, avoiding over-medicalization, and hospital expenses. Moreover, with the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a growing concern about the overuse of imaging exams in the pediatric population, which highlights the problems pointed out by this review. Conclusions: It is necessary to improve hospital staff training, use clinical decision instruments and develop guidelines to reduce the number of exams required, allowing hospital cost savings; and reducing children's exposure to ionizing agents.
RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar dados da literatura sobre exposição desnecessária de pacientes da emergência pediátrica a agentes ionizantes dos exames de imagem, na atualidade e em tempos de COVID-19. Fontes de dados: Entre abril e julho de 2020 ocorreu a seleção dos artigos, utilizando-se as bases de dados: Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, PubMed e Scientific Electronic Library Online. Utilizaram-se os descritores: [(pediatrics) AND (emergencies) AND (diagnostic imaging) AND (medical overuse)] e [(Coronavirus infections) OR (COVID-19) AND (pediatrics) AND (emergencies) AND (diagnostic imaging)]. Incluíram-se artigos disponíveis na íntegra, em português ou inglês, publicados no período de 2016 a 2020 ou de 2019 a 2020, e artigos que contemplassem o tema. Excluiu-se artigos sem aderência com a temática e textos duplicados. Síntese dos dados: Identificaram-se 61 publicações, sendo 17 utilizadas para a elaboração desta revisão. Alguns exames de imagem utilizados nos Setores de Urgência e Emergência (SUEs) pediátricos, por emitirem radiação ionizante, aumentam a possibilidade de desenvolver malignidades futuras nas crianças. Destarte, há instrumentos de decisão clínica que possibilitam diminuir requisições de exames desnecessários, evitando a sobremedicalização e os gastos hospitalares. Ademais, com a pandemia da COVID-19, cresceu a preocupação com o uso excessivo de exames de imagem na população pediátrica, o que reafirma a problematização deste estudo. Conclusões: Veem-se como necessárias a capacitação da equipe hospitalar, a utilização de instrumentos de decisão clínica e a confecção de protocolos que possam avaliar a singularidade da criança. Isso permitirá reduzir o número de exames requeridos, possibilitando economia de custos hospitalares e redução da exposição de crianças a agentes ionizantes.
RESUMEN
Este artigo visa analisar aspectos no cuidado aos "hiperutilizadores" na Atenção Básica por meio da percepção dos profissionais e dos usuários. Foi realizada uma pesquisa qualitativa de caráter exploratório, do tipo estudo de caso, em que "hiperutilizadores" e profissionais foram entrevistados. A maneira como os profissionais definem quem é um usuário "hiperutilizador" é mais complexa do que o número total de consultas realizadas, passando pela identificação das necessidades em saúde que motivam a busca por cuidados. Os usuários com necessidades que extrapolam o alcance do modelo biomédico muitas vezes não têm as suas necessidades corretamente identificadas ou consideradas legítimas, e são considerados "hiperutilizadores" independentemente do número de consultas. O estudo serviu como um analisador da Atenção Básica à Saúde (ABS). Mantém-se um modelo ainda centrado na racionalidade biomédica, com pouca abertura para a "vida como ela é" e para o conhecimento e o "agir-leigo". (AU)
El objetivo de este artículo es analizar aspectos en el cuidado a los "hiperutilizadores" en la atención básica, a partir de la percepción de los profesionales y de los usuarios. Se realizó una investigación cualitativa, de carácter exploratorio, del tipo estudio de caso, en la que fueron entrevistados "hiperutilizadores" y profesionales. La manera en que los profesionales definen quién es un usuario "hiperutilizador" es más compleja que el número total de consultas realizadas y pasa por la identificación de las necesidades de salud que motivan la búsqueda de cuidados. Los usuarios con necesidades que extrapolan el alcance del modelo biomédico, muchas veces no tienen sus necesidades correctamente identificadas o consideradas legítimas y son considerados "hiperutilizadores", independientemente del número de consultas. El estudio sirvió como un analizador de la ABS. Se mantiene un modelo que todavía está centrado en la racionalidad biomédica, con poca apertura para la "vida tal como es" y para el conocimiento y el "actuar-lego". (AU)
This article aims to analyze aspects involved in the health assistance provided for "high users" in primary care, based on the perception of professionals and users. A qualitative and exploratory case study was carried out in which "high users" and professionals were interviewed. The way in which primary care professionals define who is a "high user" is more complex than the total number of medical consultations and involves identifying the health needs that motivate users to seek assistance. Users whose needs are beyond the scope of the biomedical model often do not have their needs correctly identified or considered legitimate and are viewed as "high users" regardless of the number of appointments. The study served as an analyzer of primary care. A model still centered on the biomedical rationality is maintained, with little opening to "life as it is" and to "lay-action" and knowledge. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Servicios de Salud , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud , Entrevista , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in the treatment of delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Data sources: The PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scielo and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for RCTs published prior to August 3, 2020. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies that 1) used an RCT design; 2) evaluated the effectiveness of steroidal or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in treating DOMS; and 3) therapeutically used drugs after exercise were included. Results: In total, 26 studies (patients = 934) were eligible for inclusion in the qualitative analysis on the treatment of DOMS. The results of the meta-analysis showed no superiority between the use and non-use of NSAIDs in the improvement of late muscle pain, as no statistically significant differences were verified (21 studies, n= 955; standard mean difference (SMD)= 0.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.58, 0.63; p=0.94; I2=93%). The quality of the synthesized evidence was very low according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, and there was significant heterogeneity among the included studies. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that NSAIDs are not superior to controls/placebos in treating DOMS. The inclusion of both studies with dose-response protocols and those with exercise protocols may have influenced the results. In addition, the high risk of bias identified reveals that limitations need to be considered when interpreting the results. Level of evidence I; ystematic review of RCT (Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trials).
RESUMEN Objetivo: Investigar la efectividad de las intervenciones farmacológicas en el tratamiento del dolor muscular de aparición tardía (DOMS). Metodología: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis de ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorios (RCT). Fuentes de datos: Se realizaron búsquedas en las bases de datos de PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scielo y Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) para ECA publicados antes del 3 de agosto de 2020. Criterios de elegibilidad para la selección de estudios: Estudios en los que 1) se utilizó un diseño de RCT; 2) se evaluó la eficacia de los fármacos antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINE) y esteroideos en el tratamiento de DOMS; y 3) se incluyó el uso terapéutico de medicamentos para dolor después del ejercicio. Resultados: En total, 26 estudios (pacientes = 934) fueron elegibles para su inclusión en el análisis cualitativo sobre el tratamiento de DOMS. Los resultados encontrados en el metanálisis no demostraron superioridad entre el uso y no uso de AINE para mejorar el dolor muscular tardío cuando se comparó con una condición de control, ya que no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas (21 estudios, n = 955; media estándar diferencia = 0,02; intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95% −0,58, 0,63; p = 0,94; I2 = 93%). La calidad de la evidencia encontrada se clasificó como muy baja según los criterios del "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE), principalmente porque existe una heterogeneidad significativa entre los estudios incluidos. Conclusión: Los resultados demuestran que los AINE no son superiores a los controles o placebos en el tratamiento de DOMS. La inclusión de ambos modelos de estudio con protocolos de dosis-respuesta y protocolos de ejercicio puede haber influido en los resultados. Además, el alto riesgo de sesgo identificado revela que la interpretación de los resultados debe verse con limitaciones. Nivel de evidencia: I; Revisión sistemática de ECRC (Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y controlados).
RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar a eficácia das intervenções farmacológicas no tratamento da dor muscular de início tardio (DOMS). Desenho: Revisão sistemática e metanálise de estudos clínicos randomizados e controlados (RCTs). Fontes de dados: Os bancos de dados PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scielo e Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) foram pesquisados em busca de RCTs publicados antes de 3 de agosto de 2020. Critérios de elegibilidade para selecionar estudos: Estudos que 1) usaram um desenho de RCT; 2) avaliaram a eficácia de anti-inflamatórios esteroides ou não esteroides (AINEs) no tratamento de DOMS e 3) incluíram tratamento medicamentoso depois de exercício. Resultados: No total, 26 estudos (pacientes = 934) foram elegíveis para inclusão na análise qualitativa do tratamento de DOMS. Os resultados da metanálise não mostraram superioridade entre o uso e não uso de AINEs na melhora da dor muscular tardia, pois não foram verificadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas (21 estudos, n = 955; diferença média padronizada (SMD) = 0,02; Intervalo de confiança (IC) de 95% −0,58, 0,63; p = 0,94; I2 = 93%). A qualidade da evidência encontrada foi muito baixa de acordo com os critérios da Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), e verificou-se heterogeneidade significante entre os estudos incluídos. Conclusão: Os resultados demonstram que os AINEs não são superiores aos controles ou placebos no tratamento de DOMS. A inclusão de estudos com protocolos de dose-resposta e com protocolos de exercícios podem ter influenciado os resultados. Além disso, o alto risco de viés identificado revela que as limitações devem ser consideradas na interpretação dos resultados. Nível de evidência I; Revisão sistemática de ECRC (Estudos clínicos randomizados e controlados).
RESUMEN
Abstract Background: Migraine is a prevalent neurological disease that leads to severe headaches. Moreover, it is the commonest among the primary headaches that cause medication overuse headache (MOH). The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is one of the structures most associated with medication overuse. Objective: To determine microstructural changes in the OFC among migraine patients who developed MOH, through the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) technique. Methods: Fifty-eight patients who had been diagnosed with migraine based on the Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-III-B) were included in the study. Patients were sub-classified into two groups, with and without MOH, based on the MOH criteria of ICHD-III-B. DTI was applied to each patient. The OFC fractional anisotropy (FA), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the two groups were compared. Results: The mean age of all the patients was 35.98±7.92 years (range: 18-65), and 84.5% (n=49) of them were female. The two groups, with MOH (n=25) and without (n=33), were alike in terms of age, gender, family history, migraine with or without aura and duration of illness. It was found that there was a significant difference in FA values of the left OFC between the two groups (0.32±0.01 versus 0.29±0.01; p=0.04). Conclusions: An association was found between MOH and changes to OFC microstructure. Determination of neuropathology and factors associated with medication overuse among migraine patients is crucial in terms of identifying the at-risk patient population and improving proper treatment strategies specific to these patients.
RESUMO Introdução: A migrânea é uma doença neurológica prevalente que causa fortes dores de cabeça. Além disso, é a mais comum entre as cefaleias primárias que causam cefaleia por uso excessivo de medicamentos (CUEM). O córtex orbitofrontal (OF) é uma das estruturas mais associadas ao uso excessivo de medicamentos. Objetivo: Determinar alterações microestruturais no córtex OF em pacientes com migrânea que desenvolveram CUEM, por meio da técnica de imagem por tensor de difusão (ITD). Métodos: Cinquenta e oito pacientes com diagnóstico de migrânea, com base na Classificação das Cefaleias (ICHD-III-B), foram incluídos no estudo. Os pacientes foram subclassificados em dois grupos, com e sem CUEM, com base nos critérios de CUEM da ICHD-III-B. A ITD foi aplicada a cada paciente. Os valores de anisotropia fracionada OFC (AF) e coeficiente de difusão aparente (CDA) dos dois grupos foram comparados. Resultados: A média de idade de todos os pacientes foi de 35,98±7,92 anos (variação: 18‒65), sendo 84,5% (n=49) do sexo feminino. Os dois grupos, com CUEM (n=25) e sem (n=33), são semelhantes em termos de idade, sexo, história familiar, migrânea com ou sem aura e duração da doença. Verificou-se que houve diferença significativa nos valores de AF do córtex OF esquerdo entre os dois grupos (0,32±0,01 versus 0,29±0,01; p=0,04). Conclusões: Foi encontrada associação entre o CUEM e as alterações na microestrutura do córtex OF. A determinação da neuropatologia e dos fatores associados ao uso excessivo de medicamentos entre pacientes com migrânea é crucial para identificar a população de pacientes em risco e melhorar as estratégias de tratamento adequadas específicas para esses pacientes.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Cefaleas Secundarias/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico por imagen , Corteza Prefrontal , Imagen de Difusión Tensora , Uso Excesivo de Medicamentos Recetados , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
La actividad deportiva en niños y adolescentes ha presentado un aumento sostenido en nuestro país en los últimos años; esto ha generado un aumento de las lesiones deportivas por sobreuso. Éstas pueden tener múltiples orígenes, dependiendo de la edad y la actividad del paciente. La mayoría son de manejo conservador, sin embargo, algunas requieren manejo quirúrgico. Lo más importante es la prevención de estas lesiones mediante el uso de equipo apropiado, regulando la intensidad y tipo de entrenamiento y tratando precozmente las lesiones.
Sports activity in children and adolescents has presented a sustained increase in our country in recent years, generating an increase in sports-related overuse injuries. These injuries vary in nature, depending on the patient Ìs age and level of training. Most are conservatively managed; although, some will require surgical treatment. It is important, however, to try to prevent these injuries by using appropriate equipment, regulating the intensity and type of training and treating injuries early
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/fisiopatología , Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/terapia , Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/prevención & controlRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: Choosing Wisely (CW) is an initiative that aims to advance the dialogue between physicians and patients about low-value health interventions. Given that thyroid conditions are frequent in clinical practice, we aimed to develop an evidence-based list of thyroid CW recommendations. Materials and methods: The Thyroid Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM) named a Task Force to conduct the initiative. The Task Force work was based on an electronic Delphi approach. The 10 recommendations that received the highest scores by the Task Force were submitted for voting by all SBEM associates. The 5 recommendations that received the highest scores by SBEM associates are presented herein. Results: The Task Force was composed of 14 thyroidologists from 10 tertiary-care, teaching-based Brazilian institutions. The brainstorming/ideation phase resulted in 69 recommendations. After the removal of duplicates and recommendations that did not adhere to the initiative's scope, 35 remained. Then the Task Force voted to attribute a grade (0 [lowest agreement] to 10 [highest agreement]) for each recommendation. The 10 recommendations that received the highest scores by the Task Force were submitted to all SBEM associates. A total of 683 associates voted electronically, attributing a grade (0 to 10) for each recommendation. The 5 recommendations that received the highest scores by the SBEM associates compose our final list. Conclusion: A set of recommendations to avoid unnecessary medical tests, treatments, or procedures for thyroid conditions are offered with a transparent methodology. This initiative aims to foster productive interactions between physicians and patients, stimulating shared decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/terapia , Glándula Tiroides , Endocrinología , Sociedades Médicas , BrasilRESUMEN
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is advised only in cases of suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) or impossibility of receiving oral medication, although there has been a persistent practice of their inappropriate use in health institutions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to measure the inappropriate use of IV PPIs in a high complexity hospital in Brazil and to estimate its costs. METHODS: Retrospective study of 333 patients who received IV omeprazole between July and December of 2018 in a high complexity hospital in Brazil. RESULTS: IV omeprazole was found to be appropriately prescribed in only 23.4% patient reports. This medication was administered mainly in cases of suspected UGIB (19.1%) and stress ulcer prophylaxis in patients with high risk of UGIB unable to receive medication orally (18.7%). It was observed a statistically significant association between adequate prescription and stress ulcer prophylaxis in patients with high risk of UGIB unable to receive medication orally; patient nil per os with valid indication for PPIs usage; prescription by intensive care unit doctors; prescription by emergency room doctors; intensive care unit admission; evolution to death; sepsis; and traumatic brain injury (P<0.05). On the other hand, inadequate prescription had a statistically significant association with surgical ward prescription and non-evolution to death (P<0.05). The estimated cost of the vials prescribed inadequately was US$1696. CONCLUSION: There was a high number of inappropriate IV omeprazole prescriptions in the studied hospital, entailing greater costs to the institution and unnecessary risks.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: Atualmente, o uso intravenoso (IV) dos inibidores de bomba de prótons (IBPs) é indicado em poucas situações, como em casos de hemorragia digestiva alta ou impossibilidade de recebê-los via oral. Há diversos estudos mostrando o uso excessivo desse fármaco, na forma intravenosa, desnecessariamente e acarretando altos custos aos hospitais. OBJETIVO: Avaliar as indicações, posologias, duração do tratamento e custos das prescrições de omeprazol intravenoso. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de 333 pacientes que receberam omeprazol intravenoso entre julho a dezembro de 2018 em um hospital de alta complexidade no Brasil. RESULTADOS: A prescrição de omeprazol intravenoso foi considerada totalmente adequada em apenas 23,4% das prescrições analisadas. O medicamento foi administrado principalmente em casos de suspeita de hemorragia digestiva alta (HDA) (19,1%) e profilaxia de úlcera de estresse em paciente com alto risco de HDA impossibilitado de receber via oral (18,7%). Foi observada associação estatisticamente significativa entre prescrição adequada e profilaxia de úlcera de estresse em paciente com alto risco de HDA impossibilitado de receber medicamento via oral; paciente em nil per os com indicação válida de IBPs; prescrição por médico da UTI; prescrição por médico do pronto atendimento; admissão na UTI; evolução a óbito; sepse; e traumatismo cranioencefálico (P<0,05). Já a prescrição inadequada teve associação estatisticamente significativa com prescrição por setor cirúrgico e a não evolução a óbito (P<0,05). O custo estimado do total de ampolas prescritas inadequadamente foi de US$1696,00. CONCLUSÃO: Houve um elevado número de prescrições de omeprazol intravenoso inadequadas no hospital estudado, acarretando um custo elevado para a instituição.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Omeprazol , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Brasil , Estudios Retrospectivos , HospitalesRESUMEN
À medida que os avanços médico-tecnológicos continuam a se tornar mais facilmente disponíveis, o diagnóstico de pseudo-doenças atingiu o cerne dos sistemas de saúde e tornou-se uma das atividades mais prejudiciais da medicina moderna, tanto individual quanto coletivamente, pois ameaça a sustentabilidade dos sistemas de saúde. Aqui descrevemos um caso hipotético, mas baseado em casos reais, de uma jovem de 36 anos diagnosticada com um carcinoma papilífero de tireoide após ter sido submetida a um check-up excessivo e desnecessário solicitado por um ginecologista em uma consulta de rotina. (AU)
As medical technological advances continue to become more readily available, diagnosis of pseudo-disease has hit the heart of medicine and has become one of the most harmful activities in modern medicine, both individually and collectively speaking as it threatens the sustainability of health systems. Here we describe a hypothetical case (but based on many similar real ones) of a young adult woman in her middle 30's that has been diagnosed with a papillary thyroid cancer after she had been submitted to an excessive and unnecessary check-up elicited by a gynaecologist in a routine medical consultation. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Procedimientos Innecesarios/efectos adversos , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud , Diagnóstico ClínicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate, within a private health insurance, the ordering frequency and the costs related to inappropriate tumor markers test orders. METHODS: This study analyzed data regarding tumor markers requests within a private health insurance between 2010 and 2017. Patients included in this analysis were ≥ 50 years old, had available medical records, and had at least 1 tumor markers tested within the study period. Tests were considered inappropriate when tumor markers were used in screening for neoplasms, ie, when there was no previous diagnosis. We evaluated data regarding age, sex, the ordering physician's medical specialty, and test costs. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2017, 1112 tumor markers tests were performed and increased from 52 to 262 per year. Our sample consisted mostly of women (69.50%) with a mean age of 59.40 (SD 8.20) years. Most orders were inappropriate (87.80%) and represented 79.40% of all expenses with tumor markers tests. Cardiology professionals were the medical specialty that requested the most tumor markers tests (23.90%), followed by internal medicine specialists (22.70%) and gynecologists (19.20%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high percentage of inappropriate test orders in the study period, resulting in elevated costs. Studies of this nature deserve the attention of health care managers, and interventions should be performed in order to reduce the inappropriate use of tumor markers tests in clinical practice.
OBJETIVO: investigar no âmbito de um plano de saúde privado a frequência de solicitação e os custos relacionados à solicitação inapropriada de marcadores tumorais. METODOLOGIA: Utilizou-se a base de dados de um plano de saúde privado entre os anos de 2010 a 2017. Foram incluídos na pesquisa, sujeitos com idade ≥ 50 anos, que apresentavam prontuários médicos acessíveis e que havia realizado a dosagem de algum marcadores tumorais no período. Considerou-se como "exame inapropriado" quando o marcador tumoral foi utilizado como rastreio de neoplasia, ou seja, quando não havia o diagnóstico prévio. Foram avaliados os dados referentes à idade, sexo, especialidade do médico solicitante e informações sobre os custos desses exames. RESULTADOS: Foram realizados um total 1.112 testes no período, representando um aumento de 52 para 262 exames/ano. A amostra foi composta na maioria pelo sexo feminino (69,50%), com média de idade de 59,40 ± 8,20 anos. A maioria das solicitações foram inapropriadas (87,80%). Notou-se que a solicitação desses exames, impactaram cerca de 79,40% dos gastos totais do plano de saúde com marcadores tumorais. Os cardiologistas foram a especialidade que mais solicitaram marcadores tumorais em 23,90% das ocasiões, seguidos pelos especialistas em clínica médica (22,70%) e ginecologistas (19,20%). CONCLUSÕES: Observamos um alto percentual de pedidos de exames inadequados no período do estudo, resultando em custos elevados. Estudos dessa natureza merecem a atenção dos gestores de saúde e intervenções devem ser realizadas a fim de reduzir o uso inadequado de testes de marcador tumoral na prática clínica.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/economía , Planes de Salud de Prepago/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Innecesarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Innecesarios/economía , Costos y Análisis de CostoRESUMEN
RESUMEN La cefalea por abuso de medicamentos es una condición neurológica endémica y discapacitante que afecta a entre el 1 y el 2 % de la población general y ayuda a la cronificación de una cefalea previa de base, generalmente la migraña. Se define como una cefalea que aparece 15 o más días al mes en pacientes con cefalea primaria preexistente, como consecuencia del abuso habitual de medicación aguda o sintomática contra la cefalea (durante 10 o más o 15 o más días al mes, según el fármaco) en un periodo superior a tres meses. Suele, aunque no siempre, remitir al detener el abuso de la medicación. El tratamiento requiere varios pasos: educación, retiro del medicamento usado en exceso, desintoxiación e inicio de manejo profiláctico.
SUMMARY Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is an endemic and disabling neurological condition that affects between 1-2 % of the general population, which helps chronify a previous underlying headache, usually migraine. It is defined as a headache that appears 15 or more days a month in a patient with pre-existing primary headache as a consequence of habitual abuse of acute or symptomatic headache medication (for 10 or more, or 15 or more days a month, depending on the drug) in a period of more than three months. Usually, but not always, remit when stopping medication abuse. Treatment requires several steps: education, withdrawal of excess medication, detoxification, and initiation of prophylactic management.