RESUMEN
Objective To study the clinical effect of Periocline ointment as the auxiliary treatment of chronic periodontitis. Methods 100 cases of chronic periodontitis in our hospital were selected as the subjects (from May 2016 to June 2017). The patients in the experimental group and the control group underwent periodontal examination, and the baseline was recorded. The control group was treated with routine treatment, the patients treated on the basis of analysis of Periocline ointment in the treatment of two groups of patients treated for 4 weeks. Results After treatment, the patients in the experimental group for attachment level (4.84±0.74) mm, probing depth (3.45±0.47) mm, bleeding index for (2.43±0.52) was significantly better than the control group related clinical indicators of periodontal probing depth and attachment level, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The number of effective cases in the experimental group was 47 cases (94%), significantly higher than the control group, the number of effective treatment in 44 cases (88%), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Periocline ointment as the auxiliary treatment of chronic periodontitis can improve the treatment efficiency, improve clinical indexes of patients, is worthy of clinical application.
RESUMEN
Objective To study the clinical effect of Periocline ointment as the auxiliary treatment of chronic periodontitis. Methods 100 cases of chronic periodontitis in our hospital were selected as the subjects (from May 2016 to June 2017). The patients in the experimental group and the control group underwent periodontal examination, and the baseline was recorded. The control group was treated with routine treatment, the patients treated on the basis of analysis of Periocline ointment in the treatment of two groups of patients treated for 4 weeks. Results After treatment, the patients in the experimental group for attachment level (4.84±0.74) mm, probing depth (3.45±0.47) mm, bleeding index for (2.43±0.52) was significantly better than the control group related clinical indicators of periodontal probing depth and attachment level, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The number of effective cases in the experimental group was 47 cases (94%), significantly higher than the control group, the number of effective treatment in 44 cases (88%), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Periocline ointment as the auxiliary treatment of chronic periodontitis can improve the treatment efficiency, improve clinical indexes of patients, is worthy of clinical application.