RESUMEN
Targeted therapy has brought revolutionary breakthroughs for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. New targeted drugs have prolonged the survival of patients with advanced differentiated thyroid cancer. Multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors, represented by sorafenib and lenvatinib, have remarkably improved the progression-free survival of patients. Novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting BRAF and RET mutation have also achieved remarkable curative effects, greatly enriching the treatment methods for thyroid cancer. This article reviews the latest research progress on targeted therapy in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.
RESUMEN
The majority patients of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) with indolent progression have general good prognosis after standard primary treatments including surgery, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression and radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. However, there are still some patients suffered from recurrence or distant metastasis after initial treatment. They may lose the ability of uptaking iodine during their natural course of disease or treatment and could not benefit from subsequent RAI treatment, which will result in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC). Options are very limited for RAIR-DTC patients, which is associated with a poor prognosis. Recently, with the research advances on the molecular mechanism of RAIR-DTC, redifferentiation combined with RAI therapy have been increasingly used to treat RAIR-DTC, and some outcomes are quite encouraging. This paper reviews the progress of signaling pathway inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors, DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, retinoids and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists in redifferentiating therapy of RAIR-DTC.
RESUMEN
Differentiated thyroid cancer(DTC) generally carries good prognosis through standard treatment. While,it could dedifferentiate into radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer(RAIR-DTC),which progresses rapidly with high mortality and limited treatment methods. Recently,along with the increasing of studies on genetic features,signal transduction pathways and immune microenvironment of RAIR-DTC,as well as the development of new radionuclide tracers,more theoretical bases have been provided for the targeted therapy of RAIR-DTC.
RESUMEN
Background and purpose:The evaluation of treatment response is one of the most important building blocks in determining the best strategy for the management of malignant tumors. In lymphoma and several solid cancer types, PET/CT-based response evaluation has been shown to be valuable, especially in visualizing the effect of the targeted treatment, which induces tumor activity changes not necessarily followed by tumor shrinkage. This study aimed to evaluate the role of18F-FDG PET/CT in the monitoring of response to sorafenib treatment in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) patients; and to compare the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria.Methods:This was a single-center retrospective analysis of 14 patients with RR-DTC treated with sorafenib in the period from Dec. 2011 to Dec. 2014. A Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was used to assess the differences in percentage changes between the sum of diameter and ∑SUVmax. These values of responses were statistically compared using the chi-square test (Fisher’s exact test). The differences in PFS between response categories according to either RECIST 1.1 or the EORTC criteria were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was estimated between PFS and either morphologic (RECIST 1.1) or metabolic response (EORTC criteria) categories.Results:There was an agreement between the RECIST 1.1 and EORTC criteria in 10 of the 14 patients (χ2=2.345,P=0.424). The remaining 4 patients with SD in-cluded 2 patients with PMR and 2 patients with PMD. Differences in PFS among different response categories according to either RECIST 1.1 (χ2=8.571,P=0.003) or EORTC criteria (χ2=8.781,P=0.003) were statistically significant. Correlations were found between PFS and either morphologic (r=0.741,P=0.002) or metabolic (r=0.816,P=0.0004) response criteria. Conclusion:18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is of value in the monitoring of response to sorafenib in patients with RR-DTC. Although RECIST 1.1 and EORTC criteria agree in 71.4% patients, PET-based metabolic response criteria seems to be more accurate in predicting therapeutic outcome and may be more suitable than morphologic response criteria for the eval-uation of response to targeted therapy.