RESUMEN
Background: To compare efficacy of intermittent prophylaxis during subsequent febrile episodes with antipyretics alone or antipyretics with anticonvulsant (clobazam) vis a vis no prophylactic interventions except need-based antipyretic measures in preventing recurrence of febrile seizures.Methods: This prospective randomized controlled interventional study was carried out in neurologically normal children. Study conducted over 14 months (March 2014 - May 2015), tertiary care hospital Mumbai. Inclusion criteria was, children aged from 6 month to 5 years with history of simple febrile seizure, lasting for less than 15 minutes, with Frequency less than one episode in 24 hours. Children with history of afebrile or complex febrile seizure, CNS comorbidity, family history of epilepsy, abnormal electroencephalogram, Unwillingness or non-feasibility of follow up were excluded from study. The patients were randomly grouped in A (No Prophylaxis n= 60), B (Antipyretic prophylaxis n=57) and C (Antipyretics + clobazam prophylaxis n=55). All cases were followed up telephonically every 15 days from date of first seizure as well as personal follow up at 1,3,6 months either in the hospital or at home. End point of study was taken as six months of follow-up from enrolment or lost-to-follow up. Efficacy of intervention was compared using chi-square test, Pearson chi-square test with/without Yates continuity correction and/or Fisher exact test, with p value of <0.05 as test of significance.Results: Sixty cases in group A developed febrile episodes and 6 of them developed recurrence of febrile seizures, with a recurrence rate of 10% among total cases and 9.67% among all febrile episodes. Recurrence rate was significantly higher (10%) in cases who did not receive any prophylactic intervention (Group A) as compared to pooled recurrence rate in group B and C together 1.78% (p=0.022).Conclusion: Regular antipyretic prophylaxis, alone or along with clobazam does not reduce the risk of recurrence in simple febrile seizures as compared to those who receive antipyretic intervention.
RESUMEN
[Objective]The paper was designed to introduce the Professor YE Jin's personal clinical experience which can provide an effective means for other pediatrician.[Method]By introducing the Professor YE Jin's personal clinical experience,we summarize the effective therapies about the infantile recurrent abdominal pain(RAP). [Result]According to the Professor YE Jin, the pathomechanism of RAP includes mainly cold stagnation, the indigestion, parasite and Qi stagnancy. RAP caused bycoldcan be treated from warming the middle-energizer and fending off the cold,RAP resulting from retention of food can be cured by removing the retention and invigorating the stomach, RAP incurred by ascaris can be cured by relieving ascariasis,expelling parasite and purgation simultaneously,and RAP resulting from Qi stagnation can be cured by soothing liver, regulating qi activity, rather than relieving pain merely. Based on the above-mentioned theory,she tends to use Liquorice and prefers Paeonia a lot in curing the disease, that is always effective in clinic as a result.The recurrence rate is also lower.One case was provided for verification.[Conclusion]Professor YE Jin thinks that warming the middle-energizer and fending off the cold, removing the retention and invigorating the stomach, the RAP can be improved the curative effect,and that can provide another idea for other clinicians.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study was aimed at evaluating the timing of clinical recurrence after surgical removal of the primary tumor. METHODS: The hazard rate for recurrence during the first 5 years after surgery was studied in 1,225 female patients from 1995 to 2003 at Kyungpook National University Hospital. Subset analyses were performed according to menopausal status and axillary lymph node involvement. RESULTS: The group of premenopausal women has one peak hazard rate in the 18~24 month period after surgery, while that of postmenopausal women has two peaks at 18~24 months and 42~48 months. The hazard rate of node positive group is much higher than node negative group at all periods. In the premenopausal group, patients with less than 3 node metastases have a peak hazard rate at about 18~24 months, while those with more than 4 lymph node metastases have that in 6~12 months. In the postmenopausal group, patients with less than 3 node metastases have the peak hazard rate at 18~24 months, while more than 4 lymph node metastases have two peaks at 18~24 months and 42~48 months. CONCLUSION: Both premenopausal and postmenopausal groups similarly show the peaked hazard rate of recurrence at about 2 years after surgery. In premonopausal young women, the status of nodal metastasis affects early recurrence, while in postmenopausal women, more nodal metastasis related with late recurrence at about 45 months. Menopausal status according to axillary node involvement shows the different recurrence pattern.
Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Ganglios Linfáticos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
0.05),but the 3-year recurrent rates were significantly different(P
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate the clinical effects, the therapy reactions,the living qualities of three treatments in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods From Jan 2001 to Jun 2002, 120 patients pathologically confirmed NPC who firstly underwent radiotherapy were divided into two groups: radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy group(RC, n = 60, 5 fractions per week, one time per day, 200 cGy per day to a total dose of 7 000 ～ 8 000 cGy. cisplatin and 5-Fu two cycles in the first and fourth week during radioation); radiotherapy with AiDi injection group(RAD, n = 60, radiotherapy was the same as that of RC. Continuously injecting AiDi for 10 days 50 ml per day was one cycle which was repeated 3 cycles every alternation of 7 days); another 60 patients who contemporaneity reciceved radiotherapy alone (radiotherapy was the same as that of RC) because of some reasons and were comparable in clilical materials were regarded as the third group (R) to compare with the above two groups. The life quality, 3-year survival rate, and acute or chronic radiation reactions in the three groups were observed. Results All patients were followed up for more than 3 years: the 3-year survival rate in RC (73.3%),which was homologous as that in RAD(65.0 %, P =0.347), was higher than that in R group(53.3%,P = 0.028), and the local recurrent was inverse(10.0%,26.7%,P = 0.033 6). The acute and chronic radiation reactions in RC was highest whereas that in RAD group is lowest(P