The value of 18F-PSMA PET/CT whole body tumor burden in predicting the serum PSA progression in prostate cancer / 西安交通大学学报(医学版)

【Objective】 To analyze the correlation of whole body tumor burden of 18F-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission computed tomography （18F-PSMA PET/CT） with prostate specific antigen （PSA） and Gleason score so as to evaluate the value of 18F-PSMA PET/CT whole body tumor burden for predicting serum PSA progression in prostate cancer. 【Methods】 We retrospectively recruited 213 patients with prostate cancer who underwent 18F-PSMA PET/CT scanning from March 2019 to April 2021. The serum PSA and Gleason score were collected. Whole body tumor burden was measured by a semi-automatic method. The correlation of tumor burden with serum PSA and Gleason score was analyzed. After radical prostatectomy， the patients were divided into groups according to negative or positive 18F-PSMA PET/CT. PSA differences between groups were compared， and the receiver operating characteristic curve （ROC） of the subjects was drawn so as to obtain the threshold value of PSA to predict the positive rate of 18F-PSMA PET/CT. The patients were followed up for PSA after radical surgery， divided into groups according to the progress of PSA， and the differences in tumor burden between groups were compared. 【Results】 In Gleason score ≤7， =8， and ≥9 groups， whole body tumor burden was correlated with PSA in each group （P=0.001）， and tumor burden significantly differed between the groups （P<0.001）. In initial diagnosis and treatment group， biochemical recurrence group， and medication group， the correlation between tumor burden and PSA was statistically significant （P=0.001）. The Gleason score of primary prostate lesion was significantly correlated with systemic tumor burden （P<0.001）. The area under ROC curve of PSA predicting the positive rate of 18F-PSMA PET/CT after radical prostatectomy was 0.821； when PSA>0.577 ng/mL， the sensitivity and the specificity were 66.7% and 96.8%， respectively. The mean whole body tumor burden in 18F-PSMA PET/CT positive patients with PSA progression was higher than that in patients without PSA progression. 【Conclusion】 The whole body tumor burden of 18F-PSMA PET/CT is significantly correlated with PSA， which is helpful in predicting the serum PSA progression in prostate cancer. PSA can predict the positive rate of 18F-PSMA PET/CT to a certain extent. At the same time， PSA can also predict positive results of 18F-PSMA PET/CT to a certain extent， and guide clinical rational selection of this examination.

Circulating miR-152 helps early prediction of postoperative biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer / 中华男科学杂志

Objective@#To investigate the value of circulating miR-152 in the early prediction of postoperative biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.@*METHODS@#Sixty-six cases of prostate cancer were included in this study, 35 with and 31 without biochemical recurrence within two years postoperatively, and another 31 healthy individuals were enrolled as normal controls. The relative expression levels of circulating miR-152 in the serum of the subjects were detected by qRT-PCR, its value in the early diagnosis of postoperative biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer was assessed by ROC curve analysis, and the correlation of its expression level with the clinicopathological parameters of the patients were analyzed.@*RESULTS@#The expression of circulating miR-152 was significantly lower in the serum of the prostate cancer patients than in the normal controls (t = －5.212, P = 0.001), and so was it in the patients with than in those without postoperative biochemical recurrence (t = －5.727, P = 0.001). The ROC curve for the value of miR-152 in the early prediction of postoperative biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer showed the area under the curve (AUC) to be 0.906 (95% CI: 0.809－0.964), with a sensitivity of 91.4% and a specificity of 80.6%. The expression level of miR-152 was correlated with the Gleason score, clinical stage of prostate cancer, biochemical recurrence, and bone metastasis (P 0.05).@*CONCLUSIONS@#The expression level of circulating miR-152 is significantly reduced in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy and could be a biomarker in the early prediction of postoperative biochemical recurrence of the malignancy.

Relación entre el diagnóstico clínico preoperatorio y el histopatológico posoperatorio, en pacientes con cáncer prostático localizado / Relationship between clinical preoperative diagnosis and postoperative histology in patients with localized prostate cancer

Introducción: Las variables relevantes preoperatorias con que cuenta el urólogo para una toma de decisión frente a un cáncer prostático localizado son: la edad, el tacto rectal, el antígeno prostático específico (APE) e informe histológico de la biopsia por punción con el Gleason. Además se pueden incluir otras variables como el volumen prostático, número de muestras de biopsias positivas, porcentaje de la muestra comprometida, etc. Nosotros quisimos evaluar el grado de concordancia entre el diagnóstico clínico-patológico preoperatorio con el hallazgo histológico, posoperatorio en pacientes prostatectomizados, debido a la implicancia pronóstica y en la toma de decisión que pudiese tener. Material y Método: Se estudiaron retrospectivamente 119 prostatectomías radicales entre marzo de 2004 y junio de 2009. Se consideraron: edad, tacto, antígeno prostático específico (APE) y score de Gleason. Se excluyeron pacientes con tratamiento antiandrogénico u hormonal neoadjuvante. Resultados: En el preoperatorio la mediana de edad fue de 66 años (61-68), de APE 7,35 ng/ml (5,38-11,8) y de Gleason fue de 6 (5-7). El 87,4 por ciento de los pacientes tenía un APE >4,0 ng/ml. El 54 por ciento (n= 64) tenía un estadio clínico T1c y el 46 por ciento (n= 55) un estadio T2. En el posoperatorio 23,5 por ciento (n= 28) tuvo un estadio pT2 y el 74 por ciento (n= 88) un estadio pT3. En pacientes con estadio pT2 el APE preoperatorio fue de 5,9 ng/ml (4,4-9,4), en el estadio pT3 fue de 7,9 ng/ml (5,7-12,8). El score de Gleason en pT2 fue de 5 (5-6), en el pT3 fue de 6 (5-7). No encontramos diferencia de edad en los estadios pT2 (67 años) y pT3 (68 años). Conclusiones: En el estudio histopatológico posoperatorio de pacientes con estadio clínico T1c y T2, se confirmó un estadio pT2 sólo en 23,5 por ciento, el 74 por ciento tenían un estadio pT3 (a, b). En el cáncer prostático localizado, el tacto rectal no fue útil en su correlación con el estadio histológico...

Introduction: Relevant preoperative variables in patients with localized prostate cancer are: age, digital rectal examination (DRE), prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level and Gleason score in the transrectal biopsy. Other variables include prostate volume, number of positive biopsy samples, percentage of involvement in the biopsy, etc. We evaluated the agreement between the preoperative clinico pathologic diagnosis and the postoperative histology report in patients submitted to prostatectomy. Material and method: This is a retrospective review of 119 radical prostatectomies performed between March 2004 and June 2009. We recorded age, DRE, PSA level, and Gleason score. Patients receiving anti-androgenic treatment or neoadjuvant hormonal treatment were excluded. Results: Preoperative findings: median age was 66 years (61-68), median PSA level was 7.35 ng/ml(5.38-11.8) and median Gleason score was 6 (5-7). PSA level >4 ng/ml was found in 87.4 percent of the patients. Clinical stage T1c was found in 54 percent (n=64) of the cases whereas 46 percent (n=55) were stage T2. Postoperative findings: stage pT2 was found in 23.5 percent (n=28) of the patients whereas 74 percent (n =88)were pT3 stage. In pT2 patients, preoperative PSA was 5,9 ng/ml (4.4-9.4). In pT3 patients, PSA was7.9 ng/ml (5.7-12.8). Gleason score in pT2 was 5 (5-6); in pT3 patients, Gleason score was 6 (5-7). No age difference was found between pT2 stage (67 years) and pT3 stage (68 years).Conclusions: Postoperative histology in patients with T1c and T2 stages confirmed a pT2 stage only in 23.5 percent of the cases; 74 percent of the cases were pT3 (a,b) stage. In localized prostate cancer, DRE was not useful for the correlation with pathologic staging, especially for stage pT3 cases. Preoperative Gleason score was relatively useful; we found understaging 36.2 percent of the cases and overstaging 21.8 percent of the patients. These variables should be considered in the initial evaluation of...