RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION@#Uncinectomy can be performed using various methods. The aim of the present study was to compare the results and complications of uncinectomy and middle meatus antrostomy using the standard and swing door techniques during functional endoscopic sinus surgery.@*METHODS@#In a prospective controlled study, 60 patients (aged 18-50 years) suffering from chronic maxillary sinusitis underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery from January 2007 to December 2008 at a tertiary care centre. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30: Group A underwent uncinectomy using the standard technique, while Group B underwent uncinectomy using the swing door technique.@*RESULTS@#Group B showed more improvement in symptoms, with a mean visual analogue scale score of 80.58 ± 14.34 compared to 78.50 ± 16.63 in Group A. Both groups had no major complications. At the end of Week 2, minor complications were observed in 8 (26.7%) of the patients from Group A and 2 (6.7%) from Group B. By the sixth week, the minor complication rate was 1 (3.3%) and 0 (0%) in Group A and Group B, respectively. When compared statistically during the second week using chi-square test, the difference in the minor complication rate was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05, χ@*CONCLUSION@#The swing door technique for uncinectomy produces good postoperative results, with fewer complications, as compared to the standard technique.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of uncinectomy for osteotomy method during endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). METHODS: This retrospective review study comprised 102 nasolacrimal duct obstruction patients that underwent endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with uncinectomy at our hospital between 2003 and 2006. The patients were classified into two groups based on records of preoperative endoscopic examination. Group A consisted of patients who had no nasal cavity abnormality, and Group B comprised patients who had a nasal cavity abnormality but received no treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included in Group B. The success rates of endonasal DCR were 89.5% in Group A and 90.6% in Group B, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.99). There were no cases of mucosal burn, orbital fat prolapse, spinal fluid leak, maxillary sinusitis, or delayed bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior resection of the uncinate process is the most important surgical step to expose the medial aspect of the lacrimal fossa and to form the precise location of osteotomy during endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.