RESUMEN
Purpose: To compare the slit?lamp method and wavefront aberrometry method based on outcomes of toric realignment surgeries. Settings: Tertiary care ophthalmic hospital. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: This study included all eyes undergoing toric intraocular lens (TIOL) realignment surgery between January 2019 and December 2021 for which TIOL axis assessment by slit?lamp method and wavefront aberrometry method was available. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records, and we documented demographics, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), subjective refraction, and TIOL axis by slit?lamp and wavefront aberrometry methods on postoperative day 1 and day 14. In patients with misalignment, TIOL was realigned to the original position in group 1 (27 patients) and to an axis based on calculations provided by wavefront aberrometer in group 2 (25 patients). Post?realignment surgery, UCVA, subjective refraction, and TIOL axis by slit?lamp and wavefront aberrometry methods were assessed and analyzed. Results: We analyzed 52 eyes and found that the mean preoperative misalignment with the slit?lamp method (44.9° ±20.0°) and wavefront aberrometry (47.1° ±19.5°) was similar. The corresponding degrees of misalignment post?TIOL repositioning surgeries were 5.2° ±5.2° (slit?lamp method) and 4.7° ±5.1° (wavefront aberrometry) (P = 0.615). Both groups showed significant improvement in median log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) UCVA and reduction in median refractive cylinder. Conclusions: Slit?lamp method is as good as wavefront aberrometer method to assess TIOL axis. Toric realignment surgery is found to be safe, and realigning TIOL based on either slit?lamp method or wavefront aberrometer method equally improved UCVA and decreased residual refractive cylinder.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the power vector and aberrations before and after surgery for pterygium using a corneal topographer and a wavefront aberrometer. METHODS: The study group consisted of 34 eyes of 31 patients with pterygium, and were divided into two groups by pterygium size ( or = 3 mm, group II). Power vector and wavefront aberrations were evaluated using a corneal topographer (Oculus inc., Germany) and a wavefront aberrometer (LADARWAVE(R), Hartmann shack aberrometer, Alcon inc., US) at pre- and postoperative 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. RESULTS: The preoperative blurring strength (B) and high order aberrations significantly decreased at postoperative 3 months in all groups (P or = 3 mm). To reduce aberrations and astigmatism effectively, we suggested surgical intervention in eyes with pterygia sized < 3.0 mm.