Anafilaxia y anafiláctico / Anaphilactic shock and anaphilaxis

Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening clinical condition that results from the activation of mast cells/basophils, inflammatory pathways, or both. It can be specific (allergic), or non-specific (non-allergic). Most anaphylaxis are mediated by IgE, but there are also some mediated by IgM and complement activation. Incidence is about 1:10,000 anesthesia. Recent studies show that the drugs or substances mostly implicated in producing perioperative anaphylaxis are: neuromuscular blockers (60.6%), antibiotics (18.2%), patent blue dye (5.4%) and latex (5.2%). However, all drugs and substances used during anesthesia and surgery, perhaps with the sole exception of inhalation agents and crystalloids, have been reported as potentially causes of anaphylaxis. The clinical presentation is multisystemic, producing signs and symptoms mainly on skin, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and central nervous systems. In its advanced phase, it may evolve to anaphylactic shock, causing tissue hypoperfusion and leading to altered cell integrity and multiple organ failure, associated with high mortality. Diagnosis is based on clinical presentation (history and clinical manifestations), biological evidence (serum tryptase levels, serum histamine levels and search for specific IgE) and allergological evidence (skin tests, provocation test, mediator release tests and tests of activation of basophils). Treatment include 3 stages: general measures, first-line or primary treatment and second-line or secondary treatment. General measures consist of: Trendelenburg position, invasive monitoring (according to the severity of the clinical presentation), 100% oxygen administration, discontinuation of drugs and/or suspected agents and asking for help. The primary treatment is epinephrine in doses proportional to the clinical manifestations, airway support, 100% oxygen and aggressive resuscitation with intravenous fluids. Secondary treatment includesadministration of bronchialodilators, corticosteroids, and antihistamines.

Una anafilaxia es una condición clínica potencialmente mortal que resulta de la activación específica (alérgica), o no específica (no alérgica) de mastocitos/ basófilos, vías inflamatorias o ambos. La mayoría de las anafilaxias son mediadas por IgE, pero también las hay por IgM y activación del complemento. Su incidencia es de 1:10.000 anestesias. En los últimos estudios, los fármacos o sustancias más implicadas en producir anafilaxia perioperatoria son los bloqueadores neuromusculares (60,6%), los antibióticos (18,2%), las tinturas azules (5,4%) y el látex (5,2%), sin embargo, todas las drogas y sustancias usadas durante la anestesia y la cirugía, tal vez con la única excepción de los agentes inhalatorios y los cristaloides, han sido reportadas como potencialmente causantes de anafilaxia. El cuadro clínico es multisistémico, originando signos y síntomas centrados en la piel y los sistemas respiratorio, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal y nervioso central. En su fase avanzada puede evolucionar a anafiláctico, causando hipoperfusión tisular y llevando a alteración en la integridad celular y falla de múltiples órganos, con alta mortalidad asociada. El diagnóstico se basa en evidencias clínicas (historia y manifestaciones clínicas), evidencias biológicas (niveles de triptasa sérica, de histamina sérica y búsqueda de IgE específicas) y evidencias alergológicas (pruebas cutáneas, test de provocación, pruebas de liberación de mediadores y pruebas de activación de basófilos. El tratamiento incluye 3 etapas: medidas generales, tratamiento de primera línea o primario y tratamiento de segunda línea o secundario. Las medidas generales consisten en poner al paciente en posición de Trendelemburg, iniciar monitorización invasiva según la intensidad del cuadro clínico, administración de oxígeno al 100%, discontinuación de drogas y/o agentes posiblemente incriminados y pedir ayuda. El tratamiento primario es la adrenalina, en dosis proporcionales a las manifestaciones clínicas, el soporte de la vía aérea manteniendo el oxígeno ql 100% y la reanimación agresiva con fluidos endovenosos. El tratamiento secundario incluye la administración de broncodilatadores, corticoesteroides y antihistamínicos.

Specific questionnaire detects a high incidence of intra-operative hypersensitivity reactions

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of intra-operative immediate hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil, from January to December 2010. We developed a specific questionnaire to be completed by anesthesiologists. This tool included questions about hypersensitivity reactions during anesthesia and provided treatments. We included patients with clinical signs compatible with immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Hhypersensitivity reactions were categorized according to severity (grades I-V). American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA 1-6) was analyzed and associated with the severity of hypersensitivity reactions. RESULTS: In 2010, 21,464 surgeries were performed under general anesthesia. Anesthesiologists answered questionnaires on 5,414 procedures (25.2%). Sixty cases of intra-operative hypersensitivity reactions were reported. The majority patients (45, 75%) had hypersensitivity reactions grade I reactions (incidence of 27.9:10,000). Fifteen patients (25%) had grade II, III or IV reactions (intra-operative anaphylaxis) (incidence of 7:10,000). No patients had grade V reactions. Thirty patients (50%) were classified as ASA 1. The frequency of cardiovascular shock was higher in patients classified as ASA 3 than in patients classified as ASA 1 or ASA 2. Epinephrine was administered in 20% of patients with grade III hypersensitivity reactions and in 50% of patients with grade II hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients had hypersensitivity reactions grade I reactions; however, the incidence of intra-operative anaphylaxis was higher than that previously reported in the literature. Patients with ASA 3 had more severe anaphylaxis; however, the use of epinephrine was not prescribed in all of these cases. Allergists and anesthesiologists should implement preventive measures to reduce the occurrence of anaphylaxis.

Perioperative anaphylaxis / Anafilaxia perioperatória / Anafilaxia perioperatoria

Anaphylaxis remains one of the potential causes of perioperative death, being generally unanticipated and quickly progress to a life threatening situation. A narrative review of perioperative anaphylaxis is performed.

A anafilaxia continua sendo uma das causas potenciais de morte perioperatória, pois geralmente não é prevista e evolui rapidamente para uma situação ameaçadora da vida. Uma revisão da anafilaxia perioperatória é feita.

La anafilaxia sigue siendo una de las causas potenciales de muerte perioperatoria por ser generalmente no anticipada, y progresar rápidamente a una situación amenazante de la vida. Se realiza una revisión de la anafilaxia perioperatoria.

EPIDEMIOLOGÍA DE ANAFILAXIA EN UN SISTEMA DE SALUD PREPAGO DE LA CIUDAD DE BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA / Epidemiology of anaphylaxis in a medical care program in Buenos Aires, Argentina

Fundamentos. Anafilaxia es una reacción alérgica seria y que puede causar la muerte. Existen pocos datos sobre la incidencia y las características de anafilaxia en Argentina. Objetivos. Estimar la incidencia de anafilaxia en un sistema de salud prepago de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Describir el conocimiento de los pacientes con diagnóstico de anafilaxia sobre medidas de prevención y tratamiento. Marco de referencia. Hospital Italiano de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Diseño. Cohorte retrospectiva Población. Padrón del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires con diagnóstico de anafilaxia desde enero de 2006 a abril de 2014. Método. Se revisaron las historias clínicas electrónicas de 211 pacientes. La evaluación comprendió tanto el ámbito ambulatorio como internación y central de emergencias. Se realizó una encuesta telefónica para conocer el comportamiento y conocimiento de los pacientes que presentaron un episodio de anafilaxia. Se utilizó el software estadístico SPSS 19.0. Resultados. La densidad de incidencia calculada por cada 100.000 personasaño fue de 9,03 (IC95%: 7,53-10,84) para todas las causas de anafilaxia. Las causas más comunes reportadas fueron medicamentos 49,5% y alimentos 19,79%. El 63,4% no recibió prescripción de adrenalina autoinyectable, sólo el 30,9% tienen un plan de acción ante un nuevo evento. Conclusión. La anafilaxia es un problema de salud importante y común. Este estudio demuestra posibles deficiencias en la atención de los episodios de anafilaxia, no sólo en el tratamiento de episodios pasados, sino también por la falta de preparación adecuada para futuros episodios. (AU)

Background. Anaphylaxis is a serious allergic reaction that can cause death. There are few data of the incidence and characteristics of anaphylaxis in the population of Argentina. Objectives. estimate the incidence of anaphylaxis in medical care program of Buenos Aires city. Describe the knowledge of patients with diagnosis of anaphylaxis about prevention and treatment. Setting. Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Design. Retrospective cohort. Population. Census of the Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires with a diagnosis of anaphylaxis in electronic health records from January 2006 to April 2014. Method. Electronic medical records of 211 patients were reviewed, the evaluation included both inpatient and outpatient setting and emergency center. A telephone survey was conducted to understand the behavior and knowledge of the patients who had an episode of anaphylaxis. SPSS 19.0 statistical software was used. Results. The density of incidence calculated per 100,000 person-years was 9.03 (95% CI: 7.53-10.84) for all causes of anaphylaxis. The most commonly reported causes were drugs 49.5% and food 19.79%. The 63.4% of patients had never received the prescription of self-injectable epinephrine; only 30.9% have a plan of action before a new event. Conclusion. Anaphylaxis is an important and common health problem. This study demonstrates the potential gaps in care episodes of anaphylaxis, not only in the treatment of past episodes, also by the lack of adequate preparation for future episodes(AU)

Anaphylaxis in Latin America: a report of the online Latin American survey on anaphylaxis (OLASA)

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the Online Latin American Survey of Anaphylaxis (OLASA) were to identify the main clinical manifestations, triggers, and treatments of severe allergic reactions in patients who were seen by allergists from July 2008 to June 2010 in 15 Latin American countries and Portugal (n =634). RESULTS: Of all patients, 68.5 percent were older than 18 years, 41.6 percent were male, and 65.4 percent experienced the allergic reaction at home. The etiologic agent was identified in 87.4 percent of cases and predominantly consisted of drugs (31.2 percent), foods (23.3 percent), and insect stings (14.9 percent). The main symptom categories observed during the acute episodes were cutaneous (94.0 percent) and respiratory (79.0 percent). The majority of patients (71.6 percent) were treated initially by a physician (office/emergency room) within the first hour after the reaction occurred (60.2 percent), and 43.5 percent recovered in the first hour after treatment. Most patients were treated in an emergency setting, but only 37.3 percent received parenteral epinephrine alone or associated with other medication. However, 80.5 percent and 70.2 percent were treated with corticosteroids or antihistamines (alone or in association), respectively. A total of 12.9 percent of the patients underwent reanimation maneuvers, and 15.2 percent were hospitalized. Only 5.8 percent of the patients returned to the emergency room after discharge, with 21.7 percent returning in the first 6 hours after initial treatment. CONCLUSION: The main clinical manifestations of severe allergic reactions were cutaneous. The etiologic agents that were identified as causing these acute episodes differed according to age group. Following in order: drugs (31.2 percent), foods (23.3 percent and insect stings (14.9 percent) in adults with foods predominance in children. Treatment provided for acute anaphylactic reactions was not appropriate. It is necessary to improve educational programs in order to enhance the knowledge on this potentially fatal emergency.

Incidence of anaphylaxis in the emergency department: a 1-year study in a university hospital.

The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of anaphylaxis in an emergency department, identify rate and risk factors of recurrent anaphylaxis, and describe its clinical features and management. A retrospective study of patients who attended the emergency department at Thammasat University Hospital was conducted during 2003-2004 with anaphylactically related ICD-9 and ICD-10 terms. There were 64 patients who experienced 65 anaphylactic episodes during the 1-year period. The anaphylaxis occurrence rate was 223 per 100,000 patients per year. The most common manifestations were cutaneous symptoms and signs, followed by respiratory expression. Food allergy was the most common cause of anaphylaxis. Eighty-five percent of admitted cases had monophasic anaphylaxis. Patients with and without biphasic reactions did not differ significantly in terms of epinephrine and steroid usage. In conclusion, anaphylaxis is not rare. Epinephrine and steroid usage did not prevent biphasic reactions.

Anafilaxia e reações alérgicas / Anaphylaxis and allergic reactions

Objetivo: Revisar os fatores etiológicos, a fisiopatologia e principalmente o manejo terapêutico das reações anafiláticas. Métodos: A revisão bibliográfica foi baseada em livros-textos de alergia e terapia intensiva e referências do Medline. Resultados: As reações anafiláticas, que resultam da rápida liberação de potentes mediadores farmacologicamente ativos de mastóocitos e basófitos, podem acometer vários órgãos e sistemas, podendo levar o indivíduo à morte. Comentários: A anafilaxia é uma síndrome clínica com uma significativa taxa de mortalidade. Existem muitos fatores etiológicos desencadeantes do processo e múltiplos mecanismos fisiopatológicos envolvidos. O diagnóstico precoce permite, através de medicação efetiva, um melhor prognóstico. Na maioria dos casos, medidas profiláticas se tornam necessárias para que outros episódios não ocorram

Bee sting anaphylaxis in an urban population of South Australia.

The clinical manifestations and circumstances of bee sting anaphylaxis have been studied retrospectively in 98 subjects. Most reactions occurred in children but the most severe reactions were seen in adult males, of whom 7 lost consciousness and 2 required cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Most stings causing anaphylaxis occurred on the unprotected feet whilst the subject was on lawn in the afternoons in December, January and February when the maximum daily temperature was between 20 and 30 degrees C. This is the temperature range when bees are particularly active in gathering pollen. However, a significantly greater frequency of anaphylactic reactions occurred at higher temperatures when bees are less active, suggesting that high environmental temperature may predispose the individual to greater exposure to bees or possibly to anaphylactic reactions per se. The presence of atopy did not appear to predispose subjects to bee venom hypersensitivity. Considerable anxiety and lifestyle alteration were identified in some subjects. The alleviation of this anxiety is considered an appropriate indication for bee venom immunotherapy.