Carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter spp restricted the Therapeutic alternatives

Carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter has appeared an organism of uncertain resistivity towards antimicrobial agents. Among non-fermenting bacterium Acinetobacter is the second-most-commonly-isolated organisms in human. The fast intensify of their resistance to antibiotics, especially global emergence and extend of Acinetobacter strains resistant to carbapenem more restricted the therapeutic alternatives. The importation of A. baumannii and subsequent presence in hospitals has been well documented. In this study we evaluate the resistivity of Acinetobacter against carbapenem antibiotics at Jinnah University for Women, Karachi. Total 439 isolates of Acinetobacter were collected from different clinical samples of hospitalized patients, identified by standard microbiological methods. Antibiograms were done on Mueller-Hinton agar plates with disk diffusion method [Kirby Bauer method]. Disc tested: Meropenem [10 micro g/disk]. Among 439 samples, 300 [68.3%] samples were resistant to Meropenem and the remaining that is 139 [31.7%] showed sensitivity to the drugs. In developing countries including Pakistan the contentment of multi drug resistance and their dissemination in Acinetobacter species is not a simple task. While multiple drug resistance is increasing in this pathogen and Carbapenem conflict is quickly spreading which may become a major threat in future

Prevalência de carbapenemases em enterobactérias resistentes a carbapenêmicos em quatro hospitais terciários de Porto Alegre / Prevalence of carbapenemases in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in four tertiary care hospitals in Porto Alegre

INTRODUÇÃO: A disseminação de Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) no Brasil e a recente detecção de bactérias produtoras de New Delhi metalo-β-lactamase (NDM-1) em hospital terciário do sul do Brasil indicam a necessidade da avaliação da presença destas enzimas em enterobactérias resistentes a carbapenêmicos (ERC).OBJETIVO: Avaliar prevalência de carbapenemases nas ERC em quatro hospitais terciários de Porto Alegre, por meio de PCR multiplex em tempo real. MÉTODOS: Estudo descritivo, período de abril a dezembro de 2013. Isolados bacterianos de pacientes internados foram identificados pelo sistema automatizado VITEK 2, com realização do teste de suscetibilidade aos antimicrobianos. Amostras com isolados de ERC foram encaminhadas ao laboratório de referência para análise por PCR em tempo real para identificação de carbapenemases. RESULTADOS: Total de 701 isolados. As ERC predominantes foram K. pneumoniae (47% das amostras positivas) e Enterobacter cloacae (18%). As carbapenemases mais frequentes foram KPC (48%), OXA-48-like (3%) e NDM (2%). Em 47% das amostras não foi identificado o mecanismo de resistência. Isolados originados de culturas de vigilância foram associados com maior positividade para carbapenemases do que isolados de amostras clínicas (p<0,0001). Isolados de ERC pertencentes ao grupo Proteae (Proteus spp., Morganella spp., Providencia spp.) foram associados a menor positividade para carbapenemase do que isolados de outras ERC (p<0,0001). CONCLUSÃO: KPC foi a carbapenemase mais frequentemente detectada. A circulação de uma enzima OXA-48-like foi demonstrada, um achado novo e preocupante. O achado da carbapenemase NDM também é preocupante devido ao seu potencial de disseminação. Esses dados e outros estudos poderão contribuir para um entendimento maior da epidemiologia das ERC.

BACKGROUND: The spread of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) in Brazil and the recent detection of bacteria producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-1) in a tertiary care hospital in Porto Alegre indicate the need to evaluate the presence of these enzymes in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of carbapenemases in CRE in four tertiary care hospitals in Porto Alegre using multiplex real-time PCR.METHODS: Descriptive study from April to December 2013. Bacterial isolates from hospitalized patients were identified by VITEK 2 automated system, with antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Samples with CRE isolates were sent to the reference laboratory for analysis using real-time PCR for identification of carbapenemases. RESULTS: Total of 701 isolates. The predominant CRE were K. pneumoniae (46% of positive samples) and Enterobacter cloacae (18%). The most frequent carbapenemases were KPC (48%), OXA-48-like (3%), and NDM-1 (2%). In 47% of the samples no carbapenemase was identified. Isolates originated from surveillance cultures were associated with higher positivity for carbapenemases than isolates from clinical samples (p<0.0001). CRE isolates belonging to the Proteae group (Proteus spp., Morganella spp., Providencia spp.) were associated with less positivity for carbapanemase than isolates of other CRE (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: KPC was the most frequently detected carbapenemase. The movement of an OXA-48-like enzyme was demonstrated, a novel and worrisome finding. The finding of carbapenemase NDM is also worrisome due to its dissemination potential. These data and further studies may contribute to a better understanding of the epidemiology of CRE.