Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
2.
Artículo en Inglés | IMSEAR | ID: sea-134780

RESUMEN

The concept of ‘consent’ comes from the ethical issue of respect for individual dignity as well as right to self determination. Indian Constitution covers issue of consent under Article 21 dealing with right to life with dignity. In law, the tort of battery is defined as ‘Application of force to the person of another without lawful justification’ and there in lies the essence of requirement of consent for any medical treatment. Consent has been defined to mean “voluntary agreement, compliance, or permission for a specified act or purpose”. [1] This paper deals with review of literature on the issue of ‘age of consent’ in medical profession, Civil and Criminal Laws in India, judicial pronouncements, medical literature, etc. some textbooks mentioned age of consent as 12 years and others 18 years, while others used the words like: major, adult, minor, child and guardian, etc. author has made a sincere effort to reach at a consensus about the age of consent in medical profession.


Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Empleos en Salud , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado de Menores/legislación & jurisprudencia , India , Tutores Legales , Consentimiento Paterno/legislación & jurisprudencia , Consentimiento por Terceros/legislación & jurisprudencia
3.
Bol. Asoc. Méd. P. R ; 92(4/8): 83-88, Apr.-Aug. 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-411268

RESUMEN

In most hospitals in Puerto Rico the dying process of terminally ill patients is inappropriately prolonged. And this occurs often without the patient's consent and in violation of basic ethical principles. Three erroneous beliefs are prevalent: 1--That withdrawing life support therapy is morally or legally different from not starting it. 2--That there is a moral and legal difference between appropriate acts and appropriate omissions. 3--That good medical practice is determined by the courts instead of the medical profession. Institutional policies are not in harmony with contemporary medical ethics. To avoid possible legal entanglements medical institutions permit their faculties to prolong the suffering of patients in violation of two basic moral principles: nonmaleficence and respect for autonomy. An illustrative case provides a philosopher and a moral theologian the opportunity to analyze the applicable moral principles. A professor of jurisprudence reviews statutes evolved at the State and Federal level that support the rights of patients and their families to refuse unwanted treatments. Medical faculties must ensure that institutional policies do not violate their professional ethics. The medical profession and the citizenry at large should lobby for the passage of statutes in Puerto Rico which clearly validate the necessary harmony between medical ethics and the law


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Ética Médica , Principios Morales , Órdenes de Resucitación , Consentimiento por Terceros , Consentimiento por Terceros/legislación & jurisprudencia , Inutilidad Médica , Órdenes de Resucitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Puerto Rico , Religión y Medicina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA