Role of extracellular DNA in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation and its susceptibility to sodium hypochlorite

Abstract Objective This study investigated the role of extracellular deoxyribonucleic acid (eDNA) on Enterococcus faecalis ( E. faecalis ) biofilm and the susceptibility of E. faecalis to sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Methodology E. faecalis biofilm was formed in bovine tooth specimens and the biofilm was cultured with or without deoxyribonuclease (DNase), an inhibitor of eDNA. Then, the role of eDNA in E. faecalis growth and biofilm formation was investigated using colony forming unit (CFUs) counting, eDNA level assay, crystal violet staining, confocal laser scanning microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The susceptibility of E. faecalis biofilm to low (0.5%) or high (5%) NaOCl concentrations was also analyzed by CFU counting. Results CFUs and biofilm formation decreased significantly with DNase treatment (p<0.05). The microstructure of DNase-treated biofilms exhibited less structured features when compared to the control. The volume of exopolysaccharides in the DNase-treated biofilm was significantly lower than that of control (p<0.05). Moreover, the CFUs, eDNA level, biofilm formation, and exopolysaccharides volume were lower when the biofilm was treated with DNase de novo when compared to when DNase was applied to matured biofilm (p<0.05). E. faecalis in the biofilm was more susceptible to NaOCl when it was cultured with DNase (p<0.05). Furthermore, 0.5% NaOCl combined with DNase treatment was as efficient as 5% NaOCl alone regarding susceptibility (p>0.05). Conclusions Inhibition of eDNA leads to decrease of E. faecalis biofilm formation and increase of susceptibility of E. faecalis to NaOCl even at low concentrations. Therefore, our results suggest that inhibition of eDNA would be beneficial in facilitating the efficacy of NaOCl and reducing its concentration.

Validity of mechanism of gene transfer in the process called conjugation in bacteria.

We have attempted a new evaluation of the process of conjugation in bacteria, because of some basic dissimilarities observed between this and that of eukaryotes, or plants and animals. Reference donor and recipient strains, widely used to prove conjugation in bacteria, were chosen; addition of DNase during the conjugation process, led to an unexpected but highly reproducible increase in the transconjugant colony counts (TCC; ca. > or = 1 log), when compared with that of the controls without DNase. Transconjugants were also obtained when the same live donors were substituted with the UV-killed ones although the TCC was very low initially. Contrarily, donors treated with DNA-intercalating agents, e.g. acridine orange or ethidium bromide, resulted in a complete failure to produce transconjugants. There was a quantitative relationship between the DNase used on donors and levels of DNA sugars/nucleotides/DNA, which possibly resulted from interaction between the DNase and DNA being present/produced on the donor surface. This may be indicative of what may actually happen in the donor-recipient mixtures in the conjugation test proper, where the recipient DNase may activate a donor DNA production cycle. The evidences presented did not suggest that the donor DNA in the conjugation process is actually vestibuled through any intercellular conjugation passages, and is susceptible to the action of DNase or the intercalating dyes.