Bariatric surgery: an IDF statement for obese Type 2 diabetes / Cirurgia bariátrica: uma comunicação da IDF sobre o diabetes tipo 2 em obesos

The International Diabetes Federation Taskforce on Epidemiology and Prevention of Diabetes convened a consensus working group of diabetologists, endocrinologists, surgeons and public health experts to review the appropriate role of surgery and other gastrointestinal interventions in the treatment and prevention of Type 2 diabetes. The specific goals were: to develop practical recommendations for clinicians on patient selection; to identify barriers to surgical access and suggest interventions for health policy changes that ensure equitable access to surgery when indicated; and to identify priorities for research. Bariatric surgery can significantly improve glycaemic control in severely obese patients with Type 2 diabetes. It is an effective, safe and cost-effective therapy for obese Type 2 diabetes. Surgery can be considered an appropriate treatment for people with Type 2 diabetes and obesity not achieving recommended treatment targets with medical therapies, especially in the presence of other major co-morbidities. The procedures must be performed within accepted guidelines and require appropriate multidisciplinary assessment for the procedure, comprehensive patient education and ongoing care, as well as safe and standardized surgical procedures. National guidelines for bariatric surgery need to be developed for people with Type 2 diabetes and a BMI of 35 kg/m² or more.

A Força-Tarefa para Epidemiologia e Prevenção da International Diabetes Federation reuniu um grupo de trabalho com diabetologistas, endocrinologistas, cirurgiões e especialistas em saúde pública para revisar o papel correto da cirurgia e outras intervenções gastrointestinais no tratamento e prevenção do diabetes tipo 2 em obesos. Os objetivos específicos foram: desenvolver recomendações práticas para a seleção dos pacientes; identificar barreiras ao acesso à cirurgia e sugerir intervenções para mudanças das políticas de saúde que garantam equidade de acesso à cirurgia, quando indicada, e identificar prioridades para a pesquisa. A cirurgia bariátrica pode gerar uma melhora significativa no controle glicêmico em pacientes com obesidade grave e diabetes tipo 2. Ela é um tratamento efetivo, seguro e de bom custo-benefício para pacientes obesos com diabetes tipo 2. A cirurgia pode ser considerada um tratamento apropriado para pessoas com diabetes tipo 2 e obesidade que não consigam atingir as metas recomendadas de tratamento com terapias medicamentosas, especialmente na presença de outras comorbidades maiores. Os procedimentos devem ser executados por meio de diretrizes aceitas e requerem uma avaliação multidisciplinar, um processo amplo de educação do paciente e cuidados contínuos, além de procedimentos cirúrgicos seguros e padronizados. As diretrizes nacionais para a cirurgia bariátrica devem ser desenvolvidas para pacientes com diabetes tipo 2 e IMC de 35 kg/m² ou mais.

non opioid fast track anesthetic regimen for colonic resection

Fast-tracking implies a preoperative patient care paradigm that reduces time to recovery and discharge. The current study adopted fast-track anesthetic techniques, comparing outcome of a multimodal non-opioid and another opioid regimen, on recovery profiles after colonic surgery, with standard anesthetic practice. Seventy five ASA II colectomy patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Control group for conventional general anesthetic technique and two fast-track anesthesia groups using combined light general anesthesia and epidural techniques. Epidural maintenance was by infusion cocktail of bupivacaine-fentanyl in opioid-based group, while in non-opioid group by bupivacaine-ketamine which were both continued postoperatively for pain in lower doses and concentrations. Postoperative analgesia in control group was achieved by morphine. Supplemental ketorolac and acetaminophen were added only to non-opioid group. Early and intermediate recovery profiles were compared among the three groups together with recorded side effects. All patients in fast-track groups had significant shorter times to: awakening, extubation, orientation, both PACU arrival and discharge, hospital stay with a significant lower mean VAS for pain at rest, and rescue analgesia, compared to control group. Control group had a significant higher rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting, drowsiness and pruritis. Non-opioid fast-track regimen had a significant shorter PACU and hospital stay with lower side-effects rate than opioid one. Fast-track anesthesia enhanced recovery profile. Non-opioid regimen was superior to opioid-based, having a better recovery profile and a lower rate of side-effects