Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
1.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;34(6): 680-686, Nov.-Dec. 2019. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1057486

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective: Treatment of acute diseases of the aorta is still associated with high mortality and morbidity. It is believed that interventions for these diseases on overtime hours (night shifts or weekend shifts) may increase mortality. In this study, we investigated the effect of performing acute type A aortic dissection surgery on overtime hours in terms of postoperative outcomes. Methods: 206 patients who underwent emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection were retrospectively evaluated. Two groups were constituted: patients operated on daytime working hours (n=61), and patients operated on overtime hours (n=145), respectively. Results: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and repeat surgery were higher in group 1. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of operative and postoperative results. Mortality rates and postoperative neurological complications in group 1 were 9.8% and 13.1%, respectively. In group 2, these rates were 13.8% and 12.4%, respectively (P=0.485 - P=0.890). Multivariate analysis identified that cross-clamp time, amount of postoperative drainage, preoperative loss of consciousness and postoperative neurological complications are the independent predictors of mortality. Conclusions: As the surgical experience of the clinics improves, treatment of acute type A aortic dissections can be successfully performed both overtime and daytime working hours.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Enfermedad Aguda , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Atención Perioperativa , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad
2.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;34(6): 694-698, Nov.-Dec. 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1057496

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the relationship between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with in-hospital mortality in type A acute aortic dissection (AAD). Methods: A total of 96 patients who presented to the emergency department between January 2013 and June 2018 with a diagnosis of type A AAD were enrolled in this study. White blood cell count subtypes such as NLR and PLR were calculated at the time of admission. The end point was in-hospital mortality. Results: Of the 96 type A AAD patients included in this analysis, 17 patients (17.7%) died during hospitalization. NLR and PLR were significantly elevated in patients with type A AAD (P<0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, the best NLR cut-off value to predict in-hospital mortality was 9.74, with 70.6% sensitivity and 76.8% specificity, whereas the best PLR cut-off value was 195.8, with 76.5% sensitivity and 78.1% specificity. Conclusion: Admission NLR and PLR levels were important risk factors and independently associated with in-hospital mortality of type A AAD patients.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Plaquetas/citología , Linfocitos/citología , Disección Aórtica/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Enfermedad Aguda , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad
3.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;33(2): 143-150, Mar.-Apr. 2018. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-958392

RESUMEN

Abstract Introduction: Hypothermic circulatory arrest is widely used for correction of acute type A aortic dissection pathology. We present our experience of 45 consecutive patients operated in our unit with bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest. Methods: Between January 2011 and April 2015, 45 consecutive patients were admitted for acute type A aortic dissection and operated emergently under moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion. Results: Mean age was 58±11.4 years old. Median circulatory arrest time was 41.5 (30-54) minutes while the 30-day mortality and postoperative permanent neurological deficits rates were 6.7% and 13.3%, respectively. Unadjusted analysis revealed that the factors associated with 30-day mortality were: preoperative hemodynamic instability (OR: 14.8, 95% CI: 2.41, 90.6, P=0.004); and postoperative requirement for open sternum management (OR: 5.0, 95% CI: 1.041, 24.02, P=0.044) while preoperative hemodynamic instability (OR: 8.8, 95% CI: 1.41, 54.9, P=0.02) and postoperative sepsis or multiple organ dysfunction (OR: 13.6, 95% CI: 2.1, 89.9, P=0.007) were correlated with neurological dysfunction. By multivariable logistic regression analysis, postoperative sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction independently predicted (OR: 15.9, 95% CI: 1.05, 96.4, P=0.045) the incidence of severe postoperative neurological complication. During median follow-up of 6 (2-12) months, the survival rate was 86.7%. Conclusion: Bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion and direct carotid perfusion for cardiopulmonary bypass, in the surgical treatment for correction of acute aortic dissection type A, is a valuable technique with low 30-day mortality rate. However, postoperative severe neurological dysfunctions remain an issue that warrants further research.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Encéfalo/irrigación sanguínea , Puente Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Reperfusión/métodos , Paro Circulatorio Inducido por Hipotermia Profunda/métodos , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Factores de Tiempo , Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/mortalidad , Reperfusión/efectos adversos , Reperfusión/mortalidad , Modelos Logísticos , Enfermedad Aguda , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Paro Circulatorio Inducido por Hipotermia Profunda/efectos adversos , Paro Circulatorio Inducido por Hipotermia Profunda/mortalidad , Hemodinámica , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología
4.
Arch. cardiol. Méx ; Arch. cardiol. Méx;88(5): 454-459, dic. 2018. graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1142156

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective: To present the current in-hospital outcomes and mid-term survival of acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) surgery performed by a group of dedicated high-volume thoracic aortic surgeons in a University Hospital in Argentina. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data over a 6-year period (2011---2016) was performed on a consecutive series of 53 adult patients who underwent emer- gency cardiac surgery for AAAD in the Buenos Aires University Hospital in Argentina. Results: A mean of 8.8 AAAD repairs were performed yearly during the 6-year period. In-hospital mortality was 17%, and was statistically equivalent to the expected operative mortality rate of 21% (EuroSCORE II) (observed-to-expected mortality ratio 0.81; p = 0.620). New neurological deficit appeared postoperatively in 6% of cases, and the observed major postoperative morbidity rate was 42%. All-cause death cumulative survival probability was 0.711 (SE 0.074), with a mean follow-up period of 49.2 (SE 5.0) months. Cumulative survival probability for in-hospital survivors was 0.903 (SE 0.053), with a mean follow-up period of 62.5 (SE 3.6) months. Conclusion: Although the present results do not reach international standards, AAAD surgery in our institution was associated with an acceptable mortality risk and satisfactory mid-term survival compared with previous local studies. In addition to in-hospital mortality, the incidence of new permanent neurological deficit after surgery must be considered the most devastating complication to avoid. Patient-focused care in referral aortic centers with surgery performed by specialized teams should be encouraged in order to improve surgical outcomes in acute aortic dissection surgery in Argentina.


Resumen Objetivo: Presentar los resultados hospitalarios actuales y la supervivencia a mediano plazo de la cirugía de la disección aguda aórtica tipo A (DAAA) realizada por un grupo de cirujanos de alto volumen de cirugías en un Hospital Universitario de Argentina. Método: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de datos recolectados en forma prospectiva durante 6 años (2011-2016) de una serie de 53 adultos sometidos a cirugía de emergencia por DAAA en un Hospital Universitario de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Resultados: Durante 6 años se operaron en promedio 8.8 DAAA por año. La mortalidad hospitalaria fue del 17% y estadísticamente equivalente a una tasa de mortalidad esperada del 21% por el EuroSCORE II (razón de mortalidad observada/esperada 0.81; p = 0.620). El déficit neurológico postoperatorio apareció en el 6% de los casos, y la tasa de morbilidad mayor fue del 42%. La probabilidad acumulada de supervivencia fue de 0.711 (EE 0.074), con un promedio de seguimiento de 49.2 (EE 5.0) meses. La supervivencia acumulada descartando la mortalidad operatoria fue de 0.903 (EE 0.053), con un promedio de seguimiento de 62.5 (EE 3.6) meses. Conclusiones: Aunque estos resultados no alcanzan los estándares internacionales, la cirugía de la DAAA en nuestra institución estuvo asociada a un riesgo aceptable de mortalidad y una supervivencia satisfactoria a mediano plazo comparadas con estudios previos locales. Además de la mortalidad, la incidencia de daño neurológico permanente después de la cirugía debe considerarse la complicación más devastadora a evitar.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Argentina , Factores de Tiempo , Enfermedad Aguda , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Hospitales Universitarios , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad
5.
Arch. cardiol. Méx ; Arch. cardiol. Méx;88(5): 496-502, dic. 2018. graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-1142161

RESUMEN

Resumen Objetivo: Revisión y análisis de la disección aórtica (DA) en la población mexicana. Método: Revisión retrospectiva de 434 expedientes electrónicos de pacientes con angiotomografía de aorta entre noviembre de 2014 y octubre de 2015. Se obtuvo una muestra de 32 pacientes con diagnóstico de DA de primera vez. Se realizó un análisis de las DA según género, grupo etario, clasificación de Stanford/De Bakey y mortalidad a 6 meses del diagnóstico. Se realizó análisis de significación estadística mediante la Chi-cuadrada para las variables independientes de género, síndrome de Marfan, hipertensión arterial sistémica y enfermedad ateromatosa calcificada en asociación con subtipos, sitios de reentrada y datos de hipoperfusión. Resultados: El 65.6% de los pacientes fueron masculinos, con un promedio de edad de 54.5 años, y el 34.4% fueron femeninos, con un promedio de edad de 42.5 años. El subtipo B/3 fue el más frecuentemente diagnosticado. La tasa de mortalidad a 6 meses fue del 18.7%. Se halló asociación significativa con p marginal en pacientes con síndrome de Marfan y subtipos de DA según Stanford (p = 0.0506), así como asociación significativa en pacientes con aneurisma de aorta abdominal y subtipos de DA según Stanford (p = 0.047104). Conclusiones: La DA es una emergencia en la cual el diagnóstico por imagen y el manejo oportuno son fundamentales para mejorar el pronóstico. En nuestra muestra encontramos asociación significativa de pacientes con antecedente de síndrome de Marfan y aneurisma aórtico abdominal con disecciones según la categoría de Stanford. El resto de las variables independientes no mostraron asociación significativa, en probable relación con el tamaño de la muestra.


Abstract Objective: To review aortic dissection (AD) in the Mexican population. Method: A retrospective study was conducted using 434 medical records of patients with aortic angio-tomography between November 2014 and October 2015. A sample was obtained of 32 patients with a first time diagnosis of AD. An analysis was performed of the dissections according to gender, age group, Stanford/De Bakey classification, and mortality rate 6 months after diagnosis. Statistical analysis was performed by obtaining the Chi squared index for the independent variables of gender, Marfan syndrome, systemic arterial hypertension, as well as calcified atheromatous disease in association with dissection subtypes, re-entry sites, and hypo-perfusion signs. Results: The patients included 65.6% males with a mean age of 54.5 years, and 34.4% females with mean age of 42.5 years. The most common dissection subtype was B/3. Mortality rate at 6 months was 18.7%. There was a significant association, with a marginal P in patients with Marfan syndrome and Stanford subtypes of AD (P = .0506). There was a significant association in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm, when compared with Stanford subtypes of AD (P = .047104). Conclusions: AD is an emergency in which diagnosis and timely management are essential to improve prognosis. In the sample presented here, a significant association was found in patients with a history of Marfan syndrome and abdominal aneurysms with dissections according to the Stanford classification. The rest of the independent variables did not show any significant association, probably related to the size of the sample.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tamaño de la Muestra , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Disección Aórtica/fisiopatología , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Síndrome de Marfan/complicaciones , México
6.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;31(2): 115-119, Mar.-Apr. 2016. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-792655

RESUMEN

Abstract Introduction: Optimal surgical management for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) remains unclear. The in-hospital mortality rate is still high (15%), and the intraoperative bleeding is an independent risk factor for hospital mortality. Objective: The aim of our study was describe a new method for aortic anastomosis in the repair of AAAD and report the hospital mortality and bleeding complications. Methods: Between January 2008 and November 2014, 24 patients, 16 male, median age 62 years, underwent surgical treatment of AAAD. The surgical technique consisted of intussusception of a Dacron tube in the dissected aorta, which is anastomosed with a first line of 2-0 polyester everting mattress suture and a second line of 3-0 polypropylene running suture placed at the outermost side. Open distal anastomosis was performed with bilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion in 13 (54.1%) patients. Results: Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamping time ranged from 75 to 135 min (mean=85 min) and 60 to 100 min (mean=67 min), respectively. The systemic circulatory arrest ranged from 29 to 60 min (mean=44.5 min). One (4.1%) patient required reoperation for bleeding, due to the use of preoperative clopidogrel. The postoperative bleeding was 382-1270 ml (mean=654 ml). We used an average of 4.2 units of red blood cells/patient. There were two (8.3%) hospital deaths, one due to intraoperative bleeding and another due to mesenteric ischemia. The average length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital was 44 hours and 6.7 days, respectively. Conclusion: This new method for surgical correction of AAAD was reproducible and resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aorta/trasplante , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Suecia , Brasil , Resultado del Tratamiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Tereftalatos Polietilenos/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Periodo Perioperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Datos Preliminares , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad
7.
Rev. bras. pesqui. méd. biol ; Braz. j. med. biol. res;49(6): e5194, 2016. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-951685

RESUMEN

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival and risk factors of traditional open surgical repair (OSR) vs thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) for complicated type-B aortic dissection (TBAD). A total of 118 inpatients (45 OSR vs 73 TEVAR) with TBAD were enrolled from January 2004 to January 2015. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards analysis were performed to identify the long-term survival rate and independent predictors of survival, respectively. Meta-analysis was used to further explore the long-term efficacy of OSR and TEVAR in the eight included studies using Review Manager 5.2 software. An overall 10-year survival rate of 41.9% was found, and it was similar in the two groups (56.7% OSR vs 26.1% TEVAR; log-rank P=0.953). The risk factors of long-term survival were refractory hypertension (OR=11.1; 95%CI=1.428-86.372; P=0.021] and preoperative aortic diameter >55 mm (OR=4.5; 95%CI=1.842-11.346; P=0.001). Long-term survival rate did not differ significantly between OSR and TEVAR (hazard ratio=0.87; 95%CI=0.52-1.47; P=0.61). Compared with OSR, TEVAR did not show long-term advantages for patients with TBAD. Refractory hypertension and total aortic diameter >55 mm can be used to predict the long-term survival of TBAD in the Chinese Han population.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Enfermedad Aguda , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad
8.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;30(2): 205-210, Mar-Apr/2015. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-748940

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective: Report initial experience with the Frozen Elephant Trunk technique. Methods: From July 2009 to October 2013, Frozen Elephant Trunk technique was performed in 21 patients (66% male, mean age 56 ±11 years). They had type A aortic dissection (acute 9.6%, chronic 57.3%), type B (14.3%, all chronic) and complex aneurysms (19%). It was 9.5% of reoperations and 38% of associated procedures (25.3% miocardial revascularization, 25.3% replacement of aortic valve and 49.4% aortic valved graft). Aortic remodeling was evaluated comparing preoperative and most recent computed tomography scans. One hundred per cent of complete follow-up, mean time of 28 months. Results: In-hospital mortality of 14.2%, being 50% in acute type A aortic dissection, 8.3% in chronic type A aortic dissection, 33.3% in chronic type B aortic dissection and 0% in complex aneurysms. Mean times of cardiopulmonary bypass (152±24min), myocardial ischemia (115±31min) and selective cerebral perfusion (60±15min). Main complications were bleeding (14.2%), spinal cord injury (9.5%), stroke (4.7%), prolonged mechanical ventilation (4.7%) and acute renal failure (4.7%). The need for second-stage operation was 19%. False-lumen thrombosis was obtained in 80%. Conclusion: Frozen Elephant Trunk is a feasible technique and should be considered. The severity of the underlying disease justifies high mortality rates. The learning curve is a reality. This approach allows treatment of more than two segments at once. Nonetheless, if a second stage is made necessary, it is facilitated. .


Resumo Objetivo: Relatar experiência inicial com a técnica "Frozen Elephant Trunk". Métodos: Entre julho de 2009 e outubro de 2013, 21 pacientes, 66% homens, média de idade de 56±11 anos, 66,7% portadores de dissecção da aorta tipo A de Stanford (9,6% agudas e 57,1% crônicas), tipo B (14,3%, todas crônicas) e aneurismas complexos (19%), foram operados pela técnica Frozen Elephant Trunk. Foram 9,5% de reoperações e 38% com procedimentos associados (25,3% revascularizações do miocárdio, 25,3% troca da valva aórtica e 49,4% tubos valvulados). Remodelamento da aorta foi avaliado com a comparação de angiotomografia pré-operatória e pós-operatória mais recente. Seguimento 100% dos pacientes, tempo médio de 28 meses. Resultados: Mortalidade hospitalar de 14,2%, sendo 50% nas dissecções do tipo A agudas, 8,3% nas tipo A crônicas, 33,3% nas tipo B crônicas e 0% nos aneurismas complexos. Tempos médios de CEC (152±24min), isquemia miocárdica (115±31min) e perfusão cerebral seletiva (60±15min). Principais complicações pós-operatórias foram sangramento (14,2%), acidente vascular encefálico (4,7%), paraplegia (9,5%), intubação>72h (4,7%) e insuficiência renal aguda (4,7%). Houve necessidade de complementação do tratamento (distal ao stent) em 19%. Houve trombose da falsa luz em 80%. Conclusão: Frozen Elephant Trunk é opção técnica a ser utilizada. A gravidade e extensão da doença justificam mortalidade mais elevada. A curva de aprendizado é uma realidade. Esta abordagem permite abordar mais de dois segmentos de aorta em um estágio, mas se necessário segundo estágio, este é facilitado. .


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Aortografía/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crónica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;29(3): 396-401, Jul-Sep/2014. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-727159

RESUMEN

Aortic dissection is a cardiovascular event of high mortality if not early diagnosed and properly treated. In Stanford type A aortic dissection, there is the involvement of the ascending aorta, whereas in type B the ascending aorta is not affected. The treatment of type A aortic dissection is mainly surgical. The hospital mortality of type B aortic dissection surgical treatment is approximately 20%, while medical therapy is 10%. However, half the patients who are discharged from hospital after medical treatment, progress to aortic complications in the following years, and the mortality in three to five years may reach 25-50%. In addition, the surgical treatment of aortic complications after medical treatment, has also a significant mortality. This way, the endovascular treatment comes up as an interesting alternative of a less invasive treatment for this disease. They presented a mortality rate lower than 10% with more than 80% success rate of occlusion and thrombosis of the false lumen. The INSTEAD TRIAL, which randomized patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection for optimal medical therapy and endovascular treatment in addition to optimal medical therapy, showed that after three years of follow up, patients who underwent endovascular treatment had lower mortality and aorta-related complications. Therefore, there is a current tendency to recommend the endovascular treatment as a standard for the treatment of type B aortic dissection.


A dissecção da aorta é um evento cardiovascular de alta mortalidade quando não diagnosticado precocemente e tratado adequadamente. Na dissecção de aorta do tipo A de Stanford há o envolvimento da aorta ascendente enquanto na do tipo B este a aorta ascendente não está acometida. O tratamento da dissecção de aorta do tipo A é predominantemente cirúrgico. A mortalidade hospitalar do tratamento cirúrgico da dissecção da aorta do tipo B é de aproximadamente 20%, enquanto a do tratamento clínico é de 10%. Entretanto, metade dos pacientes que recebem alta hospitalar após o tratamento clínico, evoluem com complicações aórticas nos anos subsequentes, sendo que a mortalidade em três a cinco anos pode atingir 25 a 50%. Além disto, o tratamento cirúrgico das complicações aórticas, após o tratamento clínico, também apresenta alta mortalidade. Desta forma, o tratamento endovascular surge como interessante alternativa para o tratamento menos invasivo desta doença. Inicialmente indicado apenas para os casos complicados, apresentavam mortalidade hospitalar menor que 10% com mais de 80% de sucesso de oclusão e trombose da falsa luz. O INSTEAD TRIAL, que randomizou pacientes com dissecção de aorta do tipo B não complicada para o tratamento médico otimizado e para o tratamento endovascular em adição ao tratamento médico otimizado, demonstrou que após três anos de acompanhamento, aqueles pacientes submetidos ao tratamento endovascular apresentaram menor mortalidade e complicações relacionados a aorta. Portanto, atualmente há uma tendência em se indicar o tratamento endovascular como padrão para o tratamento da dissecção de aorta do tipo B.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; Arq. bras. cardiol;101(6): 528-535, dez. 2013. ilus, tab
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-701270

RESUMEN

FUNDAMENTO: Ainda não foram analisadas as características epidemiológicas das doenças da aorta torácica (DAT) no estado de São Paulo e no Brasil, assim como o seu impacto na sobrevida desses pacientes. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar o impacto da mortalidade das DAT e caracterizá-la epidemiologicamente. MÉTODOS: Análise retrospectiva dos dados do Sistema Único de Saúde para os códigos de DAT do registro de internações, de procedimentos e dos óbitos, a partir do Código Internacional de Doenças (CID-10), registrados na Secretaria de Saúde do Estado de São Paulo durante o período de janeiro de 1998 a dezembro de 2007. RESULTADOS: Foram 9.465 óbitos por DAT, 5.500 homens (58,1%) e 3.965 mulheres (41,9%); 6.721 dissecções (71%) e 2.744 aneurismas, 86,3% diagnosticados no IML. Foram 6.109 internações, 67,9% do sexo masculino, sendo que 21,2% evoluíram a óbito (69% homens), com proporções semelhantes de dissecção e aneurisma entre os sexos, respectivamente 54% e 46%, porém com mortalidade distinta. Os homens com DAT morrem mais que as mulheres (OR = 1,5). A distribuição etária para óbitos e internações foi semelhante, com predomínio na sexta década. Foram 3.572 operações (58% das internações) com mortalidade de 20,3% (os pacientes mantidos em tratamento medicamentoso apresentaram mortalidade de 22,6%; p = 0,047). O número de internações, de cirurgias, de óbitos dos pacientes internados e geral de óbitos por DAT foi progressivamente superior ao aumento populacional no decorrer do tempo. CONCLUSÕES: Atuações específicas na identificação precoce desses pacientes, assim como a viabilização do seu atendimento, devem ser implementadas para reduzir a aparente progressiva mortalidade por DAT imposta à nossa população.


BACKGROUND: The epidemiological characteristics of thoracic aortic diseases (TAD) in the State of São Paulo and in Brazil, as well as their impact on the survival of these patients have yet to be analyzed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the mortality impact of TAD and characterize it epidemiologically. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from the public health system for the TAD registry codes of hospitalizations, procedures and deaths, from the International Code of Diseases (ICD-10), registered at the Ministry of Health of São Paulo State from January 1998 to December 2007. RESULTS: They were 9.465 TAD deaths, 5.500 men (58.1%) and 3.965 women (41.9%); 6.721 dissections (71%) and 2.744. aneurysms. In 86.3% of cases the diagnosis was attained during autopsy. There were 6.109 hospitalizations, of which 67.9% were males; 21.2% of them died (69% men), with similar proportions of dissection and aneurysm between sexes, respectively 54% and 46%, but with different mortality. Men with TAD die more often than women (OR = 1.5). The age distribution for deaths and hospitalizations was similar with predominance in the 6th decade. They were 3.572 surgeries (58% of hospitalizations) with 20.3% mortality (patients kept in clinical treatment showed 22.6% mortality; p = 0.047). The number of hospitalizations, surgeries, deaths of in-patients and general deaths by TAD were progressively greater than the increase in population over time. CONCLUSIONS: Specific actions for the early identification of these patients, as well as the viability of their care should be implemented to reduce the apparent progressive mortality from TAD seen among our population.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de la Aorta/mortalidad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/clasificación , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Aorta/clasificación , Brasil/epidemiología , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;28(4): 435-441, out.-dez. 2013. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-703109

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Management of aortic root aneurysm or dissection has been the subject of much discussion that has led to some modifications. The current trend is a valve-sparing root replacement. We compared the outcome following valve sparing root repair with Bentall procedure. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients who underwent root replacement for aneurysm or dissection and compared the outcomes of valve-sparing root replacement with those of the Bentall procedure from January 2007 to December 2011 at our institution. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients had valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSR, including reimplantation or remodeling) (23 males and 2 females), and 45 patients had the Bentall procedure (34 males and 11 females). Patients who underwent a VSR were younger with a mean age of 55.4 ± 14.8 years compared to those who underwent the Bentall procedure with a mean age of 60.6 ± 12.7 (P=ns). The preoperative aortic insufficiency (AI) in the VSR group was moderate in 8 (32%) patients, and severe in 6 (24%). Preoperative creatinine was 1 ± 0.35 mg/dl in the VSR group and 1.1 ± 0.87 mg/dl in the Bentall group. In the VSR group, 3 (12%) patients had emergency surgery; by contrast, in the Bentall group, 8 (17%) patients had emergent surgery. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (excluding coronary reimplantation) was performed in 8 (32%) patients in the VSR group and in 12 (26.6%) patients in the Bentall group (P=0.78); additional valve procedures were performed in 2 (8%) patients in the VSR group and in 11 (24.4%) patients in the Bentall group. The perioperative mortality was 8% (n=2) and 13.3% (n=6), for the VSR and Bentall procedures, respectively (P=0.7, ns). The total duration of intensive care unit stay was 116.6 ± 106 hours for VSR patients and 152.5 ± 218.2 hours for Bentall patients (P=0.5). The overall length of stay in the hospital was 10 ± 8.1 days for VSR and 11 ± 9.52 days for Bentall (P=0.89). The one-year survival was 92% for the VSR group and 79.0% for the Bentall group. The seven-year survival for the VSR group was 92% and 79% for the Bentall group (95% CI [1.215 to 0.1275], P=0.1). CONCLUSION: Aortic valve-sparing root replacement can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality with a comparable long-term survival to the Bentall procedure.


INTRODUÇÃO: Manejo de aneurisma da aorta ou dissecção da raiz tem sido objeto de muita discussão que levou a algumas modificações. A tendência atual é o uso da técnica de substituição valve-sparing (VSR). Nós comparamos o resultado da reparação da raiz utilizando a técnica de substituição valve-sparing com o procedimento de Bentall. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados, retrospectivamente, 70 pacientes submetidos à substituição da raiz de aneurisma ou dissecção, comparando os resultados da técnica de substituição valve-sparing com os do procedimento Bentall de janeiro de 2007 a dezembro de 2011 em nossa instituição. RESULTADOS: Vinte e cinco pacientes foram submetidos à substituição da valva aórtica com o uso da técnica valve-sparing (VSR, incluindo o reimplante ou remodelação) (23 homens e duas mulheres), e 45 pacientes pelo procedimento de Bentall (34 homens e 11 mulheres). Pacientes que se submeteram à VSR eram mais jovens, com idade média de 55,4 ± 14,8 anos em comparação àqueles que foram submetidos ao procedimento Bentall, idade média de 60,6 ± 12,7 anos (P = ns). A insuficiência aórtica pré-operatória no grupo VSR foi moderada em oito (32%) pacientes e grave em seis (24%). Creatinina pré-operatória foi 1 ± 0,35 mg/dl, no grupo do VSR, e 1,1 ± 0,87 mg/dl, no grupo de Bentall. No grupo VSR, três (12%) pacientes foram operados em caráter de emergência e, no grupo de Bentall, oito (17%). Revascularização do miocárdio concomitante (excluindo reimplante coronariano) foi realizada em oito (32%) pacientes no grupo VSR e, em 12 (26,6%), no grupo de Bentall (P=0,78); procedimentos valvares adicionais foram realizados em 2 (8%) pacientes no grupo do VSR e em 11 (24,4%) no grupo de Bentall. A mortalidade perioperatória foi de 8% (n = 2) e 13,3% (n = 6), para os procedimentos de VSR e Bentall, respectivamente (P=0,7, ns). O tempo de internação na unidade de terapia intensiva foi de 116,6 ± 106,0 horas para pacientes VSR e 152,5 ± 218,2 horas para pacientes Bentall (P=0,5). O tempo de permanência no hospital foi de 10 ± 8,1 dias para VSR e 11 ± 9,52 dias para Bentall (P=0,89). A sobrevida em um ano foi de 92,0 % para o grupo VSR e 79,0% para o grupo de Bentall. A sobrevivência de sete anos para o grupo VSR foi de 92% e 79% para o grupo de Bentall (IC95% [1,215 a 0,1275], P=0,1). CONCLUSÃO: A técnica valve-sparing substituição da raiz aórtica pode ser realizada com a morbidade e mortalidade aceitáveis, e sobrevivência aceitável a longo prazo comparável com o procedimento de Bentall.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Factores de Edad , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Bioprótesis , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;28(2): 176-182, abr.-jun. 2013. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-682427

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate surgical results using Castro Bernardes intraluminal ring in ascending aorta surgery, instead of conventional suture. METHODS: 95 patients underwent ascending aorta surgery from December 2008 to April 2011 at Madre Tereza Hospital (Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil), using Castro Bernardes intraluminal ring instead of conventional suture of the aorta. RESULTS: Ninety five patients underwent ascending aorta surgery with Castro-Bernardes intraluminal ring. Thirty patients presented acute dissection and 65 aneurism. Overall postoperative mortality was 15.78% (15/95). Nine patients in 15 (60%) died due to acute type A dissection. For acute type A dissection, mortality was 30% and for aneurism mortality was 9.23%. The intraluminal ring was inserted in distal position in 89 patients and in proximal and distal position in 6 patients. Mortality was related to Bentall & De Bono or Cabrol associated techniques. Average extracorporeal circulation time was 57.4 minutes and average aortic cross-clamping time was 37 minutes. CONCLUSION: The use of Castro Bernardes intraluminal ring in ascending aortic surgery avoiding conventional suture reduces extracorporeal circulation time and aortic cross-clamping time, improving surgical results. This approach simplifies ascending aortic surgery whether the disease is type A dissection or aneurysm, and may be considered a good alternative technique.


OBJETIVO: Demonstrar os resultados do uso do anel intraluminal de Castro Bernardes no tratamento cirúrgico dos aneurismas e dissecções da aorta ascendente. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 95 pacientes submetidos a cirurgia de aorta ascendente, no período de dezembro de 2008 a abril de 2011, no Hospital Madre Teresa (Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil), nos quais foi utilizado anel intraluminal de Castro Bernardes, ao invés de sutura convencional na aorta. RESULTADOS: A mortalidade pós-operatória geral foi de 15,78% (15 pacientes em 95). Dos óbitos, 60% (nove pacientes) foram por dissecção aguda tipo A. Do total de 95 pacientes operados, 30 apresentavam dissecção aguda tipo A, com mortalidade de 30% e 65 pacientes apresentavam aneurismas de aorta ascendente, com mortalidade de 9,23%. Utilizou-se o anel em posição distal em 89 pacientes e, em posições proximal e distal, em seis A mortalidade foi maior no grupo de pacientes submetidos a técnica cirúrgica de Bentall & De Bono ou Cabrol, quando comparados àqueles submetidos ao uso de prótese de Dacron, associada ou não à plastia ou troca valvar aórtica. O tempo médio de circulação extracorpórea (CEC) foi de 57,4 minutos e o tempo médio de pinçamento de aorta, 37 minutos. CONCLUSÃO: A utilização do anel intraluminal de Castro Bernardes, que evita sutura convencional, foi eficaz em reduzir o tempo de CEC e de pinçamento de aorta e, por conseguinte, de melhorar os resultados pós-operatórios. Essa opção contribuiu para simplificar o tratamento cirúrgico dos aneurismas e dissecções da aorta ascendente e constitui boa alternativa técnica.


Asunto(s)
Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Distribución por Edad , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Periodo Posoperatorio , Distribución por Sexo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;28(2): 190-199, abr.-jun. 2013. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-682429

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There are debates regarding the optimal approach for AAAD involving the aortic root. We described a modified reinforced aortic root reconstruction approach for treating AAAD involving the aortic root. METHODS: A total of 161 patients with AAAD involving the aortic root were treated by our modified reinforced aortic root reconstruction approach from January 1998 to December 2008. Key features of our modified approach were placement of an autologous pericardial patch in the false lumen, lining of the sinotubular junction lumen with a polyester vascular ring, and wrapping of the vessel with Teflon strips. Outcome measures included post-operative mortality, survival, complications, and level of aortic regurgitation. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were included in the study (mean age: 43.3 1 15.5 years). The mean duration of follow-up was 5.1 1 2.96 years (2-12 years). A total of 10 (6.2%) and 11 (6.8%) patients died during hospitalization and during follow-up, respectively. Thirty-one (19.3%) patients experienced postoperative complications. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 99.3%, 98%, 93.8%, and 75.5%, respectively. There were no instances of recurrent aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm, or pseudoaneurysm during the entire study period. The severity of aortic regurgitation dramatically decreased immediately after surgery (from 28.6% to 0% grade 3-4) and thereafter slightly increased (from 0% to 7.2% at 5 years and 9.1% at 10 years). CONCLUSION: This modified reinforced aortic root reconstruction was feasible, safe and durable/effective, as indicated by its low mortality, low postoperative complications and high survival rate.


OBJETIVO: Há um debate sobre a melhor abordagem para dissecção aguda da aorta tipo A (DAAA) envolvendo a raiz da aorta. Nós descrevemos abordagem aórtica reforçada modificada de reconstrução de raiz para o tratamento DAAA envolvendo a raiz da aorta. MÉTODOS: Um total de 161 pacientes com DAAA envolvendo a raiz da aorta foram tratados pelo nosso abordagem reforçada modificada da reconstrução da raiz da aorta de janeiro de 1998 a dezembro de 2008. As características-chave da nossa abordagem modificada foram a colocação de um remendo de pericárdio autólogo na falsa luz, forro do lúmen supravalvar com um anel vascular, poliéster e envolvimento dos vasos com tiras de teflon. A avaliação pós-operatória incluiu mortalidade, sobrevivência, complicações, e grau de insuficiência aórtica. RESULTADOS: Um total de 161 pacientes foram incluídos no estudo (média de idade: 43,3 1 15,5 anos). A duração média de acompanhamento foi de 5,1 1 2,96 anos (2-12 anos). Um total de 10 (6,2%) e 11 (6,8%) pacientes morreram durante a internação e durante o acompanhamento, respectivamente. Trinta e um (19,3%) pacientes apresentaram complicações pós-operatórias. A 1 -, 3 -, 5 -, e as taxas de sobrevivência de 10 anos foram 99,3%, 98%, 93,8% e 75,5%, respectivamente. Não houve casos de dissecção aórtica recorrente, aneurisma ou pseudoaneurisma da aorta durante o período de estudo. A gravidade da regurgitação aórtica diminuiu drasticamente logo após a cirurgia (de 28,6% para grau 0 de 3-4%) e, posteriormente, teve ligeiro aumento (de 0% a 7,2% em 5 anos e de 9,1% aos 10 anos). CONCLUSÃO: A reconstrução da raiz da aorta reforçada modificada é viável, segura e durável/eficaz, como indicado pelas baixas mortalidade e complicações pós-operatórias e taxa de sobrevivência elevada.


Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Periodo Posoperatorio , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;26(2): 250-257, abr.-jun. 2011. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-597746

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endovascular stent-graft repair of aortic dissections is a relatively new procedure, and although apparently less invasive, the efficacy and safety of this technique have not been fully established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mortality in patients with complicated Stanford type B aortic dissections submitted to endovascular treatment. METHODS: Clinical, anatomical, imaging and autopsy data of 23 patients with complicated type B aortic dissections were reviewed from November 2004 to October 2007. The main indications for transluminal thoracic stent-grafting included: persistent pain in spite of medical therapy, signs of distal limb ischemia, signs of aortic rupture, progression of aneurismal dilation of the descending aorta during follow-up (defined as a diameter > 50 mm) and the diameter of descending thoracic aorta of 40mm or larger at the onset of aortic dissection. Data were analyzed statistically; all p-values were two-tailed and differences < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Continuous variables were expressed as mean (± SD), and medians were compared by the Student's t test. Differences in categorical variables between the groups were analyzed by the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The procedure presented primary technical success in 82.6 percent of patients. Four patients (17.4 percent) had an incomplete proximal entry seal. Three patients (13 percent) died within 30 days of the procedure and eight patients (34.8 percent) died after 30 days. CONCLUSION: Endovascular correction of complicated Stanford type B aortic dissections is a feasible and effective treatment option.


INTRODUÇÃO: O tratamento endovascular na dissecção de aorta é um procedimento relativamente novo e, embora aparentemente menos invasivo, a eficácia e a segurança dessa técnica não estão totalmente estabelecidas. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a mortalidade e complicações nos pacientes submetidos a tratamento endovascular na dissecção de aorta tipo B de Stanford. MÉTODOS: Foram revisados, a partir de novembro de 2004 a outubro de 2007, em estudo clínico, anatômico, de imagens e dados da autopsia de 23 pacientes com dissecção aórtica tipo B. As principais indicações para o procedimento foram: dor persistente apesar da terapia médica, sinais de isquemia distal do membro, sinais de ruptura da aorta, progressão da dilatação do aneurisma da aorta descendente, durante o seguimento (definida como um diâmetro > 5 cm) e descendente da aorta torácica de 40 mm ou mais de diâmetro no início da dissecção aórtica. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente considerados erro alfa de 5 por cento. As variáveis contínuas foram expressas como média (± dp) e medianas e comparadas pelo teste t Student. As diferenças entre os grupos em variáveis categóricas e analisadas pelo chi-quadrado ou teste exato de Fisher. RESULTADOS: O procedimento apresentou sucesso técnico primário em 82,6 por cento dos pacientes. Quatro (17,4 por cento) pacientes tinham um selo de entrada incompleto proximal. Três (13 por cento) pacientes morreram antes de 30 dias e oito (34,8 por cento), após 30 dias do procedimento. CONCLUSÃO: Os procedimentos endovasculares são factíveis na dissecção da aorta torácica tipo B, na qual as complicações das causas de mortalidades alertam sobre a gravidade da doença e de intercorrências das próteses como no caso das fistulas.


Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Stents/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Aguda , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 138(8): 982-987, ago. 2010. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-567609

RESUMEN

Background: Tipe A aortic dissection involves the ascending aorta and has high mortality rates without surgical treatment. Aim: To report the results of surgical treatment of type A aortic dissection. Material and Methods: Retrospective review of medical records of 100 patients aged 17 to 78 years (73 percent males) operated between January 2000 and August 2008, for type A aortic dissection. Follow up was performed with telephone interviews and review of national death records. Results: Eighty three percent of patients had an acute dissection. Operative mortality was 27 and 20 percent for patients with acute and chronic dissection, respectively. Mortality was 50 percent among patients aged 70 years or more, compared with 21 percent among their younger counterparts, The most common complication was bleeding that required a new surgical procedure in 18 percent of patients. Actuarial survival was 70 percent at five years. Cardiovascular problems caused the death of two of the nine patients that died during follow up. Conclusions: Surgical mortality among patients with type A aortic dissection was higher among patients with acute episodes and those aged 70 years or more.


Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Enfermedad Aguda , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Cir. & cir ; Cir. & cir;78(1): 45-51, ene.-feb. 2010. ilus
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-565710

RESUMEN

Introducción: La enfermedad aneurismática de la aorta ascendente (EAAA) se caracteriza por su baja frecuencia, comportamiento heterogéneo, riesgo de rotura y disección, que conllevan elevada mortalidad, por lo que la cirugía electiva es fundamental. Se han desarrollado diversos procedimientos quirúrgicos, considerándose la técnica de Bentall el estándar de referencia. Se describe la mortalidad hospitalaria de la EAAA tratada quirúrgicamente mediante el procedimiento de Bentall. Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo en el que se incluyeron 23 pacientes con EAAA operados entre el 1 de marzo de 2005 y el 30 de septiembre de 2008; la información fue obtenida de los expedientes clínicos. Resultados: Los 23 pacientes correspondieron a 1.2 % de las cirugías efectuadas. Edad media de 46 años (rango 16 a 74), sexo masculino 83 %. Etiología: degeneración inespecífica de la capa media con implicación valvular 43 %, aorta bivalva 22 %, síndrome de Marfán, de Turner y aneurismas posestenóticos, 9 % cada uno. Enfermedad de Takayasu y espondilitis anquilosante, 4 % cada uno. Enfermedad cardiaca asociada en seis (26 %): coartación aórtica (2), cardiopatía isquémica (1), comunicación interauricular (1), insuficiencia mitral severa (1) y rodete subaórtico (1). Procedimientos realizados: cirugía de Bentall 20 (87 %), aortoplastia con prótesis valvular tres (13 %). Complicaciones: sangrado anormal con reintervención 17 %, neumonía nosocomial 13 %, arritmias 13 %, choque séptico 9 %. Mortalidad tres (13 %): choque séptico y fibrilación ventricular. Conclusiones: La mortalidad hospitalaria para la cirugía de Bentall fue semejante a la registrada en otros centros especializados. Los eventos relacionados con la patología aórtica, técnica quirúrgica, prótesis valvular aórtica y la disfunción ventricular izquierda, obligan a realizar estudios de seguimiento a largo plazo.


BACKGROUND: Ascending aortic aneurysm disease (AAAD) shows a low frequency, heterogeneous behavior, high risk of rupture, dissection and mortality, making elective surgery necessary. Several procedures have been developed, and the Bentall technique is considered as the reference standard. The objective was to describe the hospital mortality of AAAD surgically treated using the Bentall procedure. METHODS: We carried out a descriptive study. Included were 23 patients with AAAD who were operated on between March 1, 2005 and September 30, 2008 at our hospital. Data were obtained from clinical files, and descriptive statistics were selected for analysis. RESULTS: The study population was comprised of 23 patients with an average age of 46 years; 83% were males. Etiology was nonspecific degeneration of the middle layer with valve implication in 43%, bivalve aorta in 22%, Marfan syndrome, Turner's syndrome and poststenotic aneurysms each represented 9%, and Takayasu disease and ankylosing spondylitis 4% each. Associated heart disease was reported in six (26%) patients as follows: aortic coarctation (2), ischemic cardiopathy (1), atrial septal defect (1), severe mitral insufficiency (1) and subaortic membrane (1). Procedures carried out were Bentall surgery in 20 (87%) patients and aortoplasty with valve prosthesis in three (13%) patients. Complications reported were abnormal bleeding with mediastinal exploration (17%), nosocomial pneumonia (13%), arrhythmia (13%), and septic shock (9%). Mortality was reported in three (13%) patients due to septic shock and ventricular fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical mortality with the Bentall procedure is similar to published results by other specialized centers. Events related to the basic aortic pathology, surgical technique, aortic valve prosthesis and left ventricular dysfunction encourage longterm studies with follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Aneurisma de la Aorta/etiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica/etiología , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Choque Séptico/etiología , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Fibrilación Ventricular/etiología , Fibrilación Ventricular/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Neumonía/etiología , Síndrome de Marfan/complicaciones
17.
Journal of Tehran Heart Center [The]. 2009; 4 (4): 218-221
en Inglés | IMEMR | ID: emr-137120

RESUMEN

Acute aortic dissection [AAD] is the most frequent catastrophic event of the aorta; it occurs nearly three times as frequently as the rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Sixty percent of dissection cases are classified as proximal or type A and 40% as distal or type B, according to the Stanford Classification. The most frequent causes of death in acute type B dissection are aortic rupture and malperfusion syndrome. We herein review recent data suggesting different management modalities of type B aortic dissection, including medical, surgical, and endovascular treatments. Although medical therapy is still the standard approach in uncomplicated cases, there are subgroups of patients who may benefit from endovascular management. Endovascular techniques or surgery are valuable options for complicated cases. Hybrid suites, multidisciplinary approaches, and good imaging techniques can be considered as the key to success in this regard


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aneurisma de la Aorta
19.
Rev. argent. cardiol ; 75(2): 96-102, mar.-abr. 2007. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-521624

RESUMEN

Objetivo: El propósito de esta publicación es comunicar nuestros resultados inmediatos y a mediano plazo del tratamiento endovascular de la aorta torácica descendente mediante implante de endoprótesis. Material y métodos: Entre agosto de 1999 y agosto de 2006, 74 pacientes consecutivos, 53 hombres y 21 mujeres, fueron tratados por vía endovascular con implante de una prótesis autoexpandible. La edad media fue de 60 ± 14,8 años. Las indicaciones para tratamiento fueron disección aguda (n = 8); 11 por ciento, disección crónica (n =31); 42 por ciento, hematoma intramural (n = 5); 7 por ciento, aneurisma verdadero (n = 17); 23 por ciento, úlcera penetrante (n = 4); 5 por ciento y seudoaneurisma traumático (n = 9); 12 por ciento. Resultados: El implante del dispositivo fue exitoso en 73 (98,6) pacientes; no se requirió conversión quirúrgica en ninguno de ellos. Ningún paciente presentó paraplejía o déficit neurológico. La mortalidad a los 30 días fue del 8,1 por ciento (n = 6). La mediana de seguimiento fue de 33,5 meses (rango 1-79) y la sobrevida global fue del 84 por ciento (IC 69-92 por ciento) y del 91 por ciento (IC 77-97 por ciento), según se incluyese o no la mortalidad temprana. El 93 por ciento (IC 84-97 por ciento) de los pacientes estaban libres de complicaciones relacionadas con el procedimiento. La mayoría de las complicaciones ocurrieron durante el primer año de seguimiento. Conclusiones: El tratamiento endovascular de la aorta torácica descendente con implante de endoprótesis autoexpandible es factible y seguro. La baja incidencia de eventos en relación con las series quirúrgicas publicadas hace que este procedimiento sea de elección en pacientes seleccionados.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Stents , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad
20.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 134(5): 575-580, mayo 2006. tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-429863

RESUMEN

Background: Surgery of the aortic arch is a very complex procedure since it requires protective strategies for the brain, heart and rest of the body. Aim: To communicate our experience in the first 23 total or partial replacements of aortic arch. Material and methods: Retrospective search in the database of the Cardiovascular Surgery Unit for patients subjected to partial or total replacement of the aortic arch since 1998. Results: Between 1988 and 2002, 23 patients were operated. Seventeen had aortic dissection (10 acute and 7 chronic), five had an atherosclerotic aneurysm and one had a traumatic lesion. Thirteen patients were subjected to a replacement of the arch plus ascending aorta, six to a replacement of the arch plus descending aorta and four to a replacement of the arch, ascending and descending aorta. Seven patients had previous operation of the thoracic aorta. Arterial perfusion was done via the femoral artery, axillary artery or a combination of both. A hypothermic circulatory arrest was induced in 22; it was associated with cerebral retro perfusion alone in 8 patients, antegrade cerebral perfusion in 5; isolated or associated axillary perfusion was used in five patients. In seven, procedures on the aortic or mitral valve, or coronary artery operations were added. Operative mortality was 26%, 3 of the 8 patients operated as an emergency and 3 of 15 elective operations. There was no mortality among those without dissection and of 7 chronic dissections, one died. All patients were followed for an average of 45 months. Two patients required reinterventions on the aorta and one for colon cancer. There was one late death of unknown cause. Postoperative complications were agitation, bleeding and temporary vocal cord dysfunction. Conclusions: There is a learning curve, where more extensive operations, particularly those done as emergency or for dissections, had an increased operative risk.


Asunto(s)
Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Encéfalo/irrigación sanguínea , Paro Circulatorio Inducido por Hipotermia Profunda , Circulación Extracorporea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA