Antagonistas de mineralocorticoides en coriorretinopatía central serosa crónica / Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

INTRODUCCIÓN: La coriorretinopatía central serosa consiste en la filtración de fluido desde la coroides y su acumulación en el espacio subretinal. Su forma crónica se asocia a pérdida visual permanente. Los antagonistas de mineralocorticoides son una alternativa de tratamiento para esta patología, aunque no existe evidencia clara sobre su efectividad. MÉTODOS: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos tres revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron 22 estudios primarios, de los cuales, cuatro corresponden a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que el uso de antagonistas de mineralocorticoides en coriorretinopatía central serosa crónica probablemente resulta en poca o nula diferencia en la agudeza visual corregida. No es posible establecer con claridad si su uso disminuye el grosor del fluido subretinal, debido a que la certeza de la evidencia ha sido evaluada como muy baja. Además, esta intervención podría resultar en poca o nula diferencia en la aparición de efectos adversos, pero la certeza de la evidencia es baja.

INTRODUCTION: Central serous chorioretinopathy consists of the leakage of fluid from the choroid and its accumulation into the subretinal space. Its chronic form is associated with permanent vision loss. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are an alternative treatment for this condition, although there is no clear evidence about their effectiveness. METHODS: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified three systematic reviews including 22 studies overall and four of them are randomized trials. We concluded that in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists probably make little or no difference to best-corrected visual acuity. We are uncertain whether this intervention reduces subretinal fluid height because the certainty of the evidence is very low. Furthermore, this intervention may make little or no difference in terms of adverse effects, but the certainty of the evidence is low.

Intravitreal Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor versus Observation in Acute Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: One-year Results

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) compared with observation for treating acute central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). METHODS: A retrospective study of 36 patients with acute CSC, including 21 patients treated with anti-VEGF (anti-VEGF group) and 15 patients with observation (observation group). Patients in the anti-VEGF group received a single dose of bevacizumab or ranibizumab at baseline. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) and resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) were assessed. The integrity of the foveal inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) line at 12 months was also analyzed. RESULTS: Resolution of SRF was achieved in 20 of 21 eyes in the anti-VEGF group and in 12 of 15 eyes in the observation group (p = 0.151). Mean BCVA and CFT were not different between the two groups at 12 months (p > 0.05). The amount of change in BCVA, however, differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.044). Final OCT more frequently detected the foveal IS/OS line in the anti-VEGF group than in the observation group (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: In terms of BCVA, anti-VEGF and observation only had similar therapeutic effects in acute CSC patients. In some patients, however, the rapid resolution of SRF by anti-VEGF might reduce the risk of photoreceptor degeneration and improve long-term visual acuity.