The Safety and Usefulness of Combined Video-Assisted Mediastinoscopic Lymph Adenectomy and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Left-sided Lung Cancer / 대한흉부외과학회지

BACKGROUND: The use of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) to perform major pulmonary resection with systematic node dissection (SND) for lung cancer by is commonly used in clinics. However, the feasibility of SND by VATS remains controversial. Video-assisted mediastinal lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) increases the quality of mediastinal lymph node staging in lung cancer. The video-mediastinoscope allows systematic lymphadenectomy by bimanual preparation. This study was conducted to assess safety and usefulness and clinical feasibility of VAMLA expanding Linder-Dahan mediastinoscope with VATS lobectomy for left sided lung cancer. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between February 2004 to April 2008, a total 50 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy for left sided lung cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty patients (group A) underwent VAMLA followed by VATS lymphadenectomy and 20 patients (group B) underwent VATS lymphadenectomy for SND. RESULT: There were no statistical differences in operation times, chest tube indwelling times, or hospital days between the 2 groups. The number of dissected total nodes (p=0.001) and N2 nodes (p=0.013) were higher in group A than in group B, but there was no difference in N1 nodes. Postoperative complications included 2 prolonged air leakages (> or =10 days) in each group, one pneumonia in group A, and one vocal cord palsy in group B. There were no early operative mortalities. CONCLUSION: Mediastinal staging of resectable lung cancer is performed by VAMLA. This new technique is the basis for VATS lobectomy particularly for left-sided lung cancer, because a higher percentage of mediastinal lymph nodes undergo complete resection using VAMLA.

Survival of Stage IIIA NSCLC Patients with Changes in N Stage after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy / 대한흉부외과학회지

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients histologically proven to have stage N2 disease by mediastinoscope or thoracoscope underwent subsequent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This study was designed to find out if there were any differences in survival or recurrence rates between N2 positive and N2 negative patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between January 1998 and December 2005, we retrospectively analyzed 69 patients who were divided into three groups. Group A consisted of patients whose N stage was downstaged, group B of patients whose N stage was the same, and Group C of patients who could not undergo surgery because of disease progression during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. We analyzed and compared the mean survival, three-year survival, mean disease-free survival, and three-year disease-free survival rates for the three groups. RESULT: There were no demographic differences among the groups. The mean survival was 58, 47, and 21 months for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The mean survival was longest in group A, but no statistically significant difference was found on A-B or B-C group comparison (p>0.05). However, a significant difference was noted between group A and group C (p:0.01). Three-year survival rates were 67%, 41%, and 21.6% for groups A, B, and C, respectively, with a statistical difference similar to that seen in mean survival. The mean disease-free survival was 44 months in group A and 45 months in group B, with no statistically significant difference noted. No significant differences were noted in the three-year disease-free survival rates (55.1%, 46.8%). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in survival or recurrence rates with changes in N stage after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, mean survival, three-year survival, and three-year disease-free survival rates tended to be higher in downstaged patients. Nevertheless, the difference was statistically insignificant, and therefore further studies with more patients and longer follow-up are necessary to clarify the positive effects on the survival and prognosis of downstaged patients.

Esophagectomy with Operating Mediastinoscope / 대한흉부외과학회지

Esophagectomy has a high morbidity rate, mainly related to pulmonary complications. The respiratory morbidity of open esophagectomy is high, ranging from 6% to 10%. This high morbidity is partially responsible for the 6~15% mortality rate of esophagectomy. Many techniques of esophagectomy without thoracotomy have been described since the initial report of Orringer and Sloan. Endoscopic microsurgical dissection of the esophagus was clinically introduced in 1989. Endoscopic microsurgical dissection of the esophagus was developed as a minimally invasive procedure that avoids thoracotomy and provides precise vision during the operation in order to reduce mediastinal trauma and to improve the peri-and post-operative situation. A 20 year-old women who accidentally swallowed about 150 cc of glacial acetic acid underwent an esophagectomy using the operating mediastinoscopy, cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, pyloromyotomy, and feeding jejunostomy tube placement for esophageal stricture. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the 17th postoperative day. Our clinical experience shows that endoscopic microsurgical dissection of esophagus is a safe and feasible method because it offers excellent optical control and enables the surgeon to operate in a minimally invasive manner.