Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery ; (12): 885-894, 2023.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-981683

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE@#To review the research progress of meniscus repair in recent years, in order to provide help for the clinical decision-making of meniscus injury treatment.@*METHODS@#The domestic and foreign literature related to meniscal repair in recent years was extensively reviewed to summarize the reasons for the prevalence of meniscal repair, surgical indications, various repair methods and long-term effectiveness, the need to deal with mechanical structural abnormalities, biological enhancement repair technology, rehabilitation treatment, and so on.@*RESULTS@#In order to delay the occurrence of osteoarthritis, the best treatment of meniscus has undergone an important change from partial meniscectomy to meniscal repair, and the indications for meniscal repair have been expanding. The mid- and long-term effectiveness of different meniscal repair methods are ideal. During meniscus repair, the abnormality of lower limb force line and meniscus protrusion should be corrected at the same time. There are controversies about the biological enhancement technology to promote meniscus healing and rehabilitation programs, which need further study.@*CONCLUSION@#Meniscal repair can restore the normal mechanical conduction of lower limbs and reduce the incidence of traumatic osteoarthritis, but the poor blood supply and healing ability of meniscal tissue bring difficulties to meniscal repair. Further development of new biological enhanced repair technology and individualized rehabilitation program and verification of its effectiveness will be an important research direction.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Meniscectomía/métodos , Extremidad Inferior , Osteoartritis
2.
Rev. cuba. ortop. traumatol ; 36(1)abr. 2022. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1409051

RESUMEN

Introducción: La gonartrosis es una entidad frecuente, que afecta especialmente a personas mayores de 60 años de edad. Para su tratamiento se combinan modalidades conservadoras y quirúrgicas y dentro de esta última, las realizadas por la vía artroscópica. Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados de las técnicas quirúrgicas por vía artroscópica en pacientes con gonartrosis primaria mayores de 64 años de edad. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio pre experimental de diseño (preprueba-posprueba) en 40 pacientes mayores de 64 años tratados por vía artroscópica con el diagnóstico de gonartrosis primaria, en el Hospital Universitario Manuel Ascunce Domenech de la ciudad de Camagüey de octubre 2012 a mayo de 2019. La investigación tiene un nivel de evidencia IV y recomendación D. Resultados: El promedio de edad de los pacientes estudiados fue de 69,6 años con predominio del sexo femenino sobre el masculino, y una razón de 3:1. La afección tricompartimental predominó en la mayoría de los enfermos, así como el grado IV según la clasificación de Outerbridge. Predominaron las lesiones de cartílago y meniscos asociadas. Los tratamientos por vía artroscópica más empleados fueron el desbridamiento y la meniscectomía parcial. Se detectó significación estadística entre un antes y un después. Conclusiones: Los resultados de la investigación muestran que los procedimientos realizados a través de la vía artroscópica en pacientes mayores de 64 años de edad con gonartrosis primaria son efectivos en más de la mitad de los enfermos(AU)


Introduction: Gonarthrosis is a common entity that especially affects people over 60 years of age. For its treatment, conservative and surgical modalities are combined, and within the latter, those carried out by the arthroscopic route. Objective: To evaluate the results of arthroscopic surgical techniques in patients with primary gonarthrosis older than 64 years of age. Methods: A pre-experimental design study (pre-test-post-test) was carried out in 40 patients older than 64 years treated arthroscopically due to the diagnosis of primary gonarthrosis, at Manuel Ascunce Domenech University Hospital in Camagüey from October 2012 to May. of 2019. The research has a level of evidence IV and recommendation D. Results: The average age of the patients studied was 69.6 years, with a predominance of females, and a ratio of 3:1. Tricompartmental involvement prevailed in most of the patients, as well as grade IV according to the Outerbridge classification. Associated cartilage and meniscus injuries predominated. The most used arthroscopic treatments were debridement and partial meniscectomy. Statistical significance was detected between before and after. Conclusions: The results of the investigation show that the procedures carried out through the arthroscopic route in patients older than 64 years of age with primary gonarthrosis are effective in more than half of the patients(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Artroscopía/métodos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Meniscectomía/métodos
3.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; 69(1): 35-41, Jan.-Feb. 2019. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-977411

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective: Postoperative pain control is important in terms of early recovery and rehabilitation in arthroscopic meniscectomy. For this purpose, we aimed to compare the effects of intraarticular tramadol, magnesium, and ketamine with combinations of pericapsular bupivacaine on postoperative pain and recovery in arthroscopic meniscectomy. Methods: Ninety patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy were enrolled in the study. Group T was given tramadol, Group K was given ketamine, and Group M was given magnesium reconstituted intraarticularly, and all groups received periarticular bupivacaine. Comparisons were made in terms of the patients' postoperative Visual Analogue Scale scores with and without movement, need for additional analgesics, first analgesic time, mobilization times, adverse effects, and satisfaction with the analgesics. Results: The Visual Analogue Scale scores were lowest in Group T at 0 minutes, and were higher in the 15th and 30th minutes and 1st, 2nd, and 6th hours. Visual Analogue Scale values with movement were found to be high in Group M at 0 and 15 minutes, but they were found to be higher in group T in the 30th minute, 1st, 2nd and 6th hour. The groups were similar in terms of postoperative additional analgesic use, number of analgesic use, and satisfaction with analgesics; however, the first analgesic time was earlier in Group M, and the first mobilization time was earlier in Group K. Conclusion: Intraarticular ketamine enables early mobilization and less need for additional analgesics, it also provides a better analgesic effect in comparison with intraarticular tramadol and magnesium.


Resumo Objetivo: O controle da dor pós-operatória é importante para recuperação e reabilitação precoces em meniscectomia artroscópica. Portanto, nosso objetivo foi comparar os efeitos de tramadol, magnésio e cetamina administrados por via intra-articular em associação com bupivacaína pericapsular sobre a dor e a recuperação após meniscectomia artroscópica. Métodos: Noventa pacientes submetidos à meniscectomia artroscópica foram incluídos no estudo. O Grupo T recebeu tramadol, o Grupo K recebeu cetamina e o Grupo M recebeu magnésio em doses reconstituídas por via intra-articular e todos os grupos receberam bupivacaína por via periarticular. As avaliações foram feitas mediante comparação dos escores em escala visual analógica no pós-operatório dos pacientes em movimento e em repouso, necessidade de analgésicos adicionais, tempo até a primeira necessidade de analgésico, tempo de mobilização, efeitos adversos e satisfação com os analgésicos. Resultados: Os escores da escala visual analógica foram menores no minuto zero e maiores nos minutos 15 e 30 e nas horas 1, 2 e 6 no Grupo T. Os escores da escala visual analógica em movimento foram maiores nos minutos zero e 15 no Grupo M e maiores no minuto 30 e nas horas 1, 2 e 6 no Grupo T. Os escores dos grupos foram semelhantes em relação à necessidade de analgésico adicional no pós-operatório, ao consumo de analgésico e à satisfação com os analgésicos, mas os tempos até a primeira necessidade de analgesia e até a primeira mobilização foram mais curtos nos grupos M e K, respectivamente. Conclusão: A administração intra-articular de cetamina permite mobilização precoce e diminui a necessidade de analgésicos adicionais, além de proporcionar um melhor efeito analgésico em comparação com tramadol e magnésio por via intra-articular.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Artroscopía , Tramadol/administración & dosificación , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Meniscectomía/métodos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Magnesio/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA