"Tirando o jaleco": notas etnográficas sobre as práticas obstétricas em um hospital de ensino / "Taking off the lab coat": ethnographic notes on obstetric practices in a university hospital

Resumo O estudo teve como objetivo descrever e analisar aspectos do cotidiano da assistência ao parto em um hospital universitário no Sul do Brasil. A expressão "tirando o jaleco" serve como uma metáfora para iluminar o processo de conversão da enfermeira obstetra em pesquisadora em um ambiente hospitalar. Trata-se de uma de pesquisa qualitativa que lançou mão da perspectiva socioantropológica como referencial teórico e metodológico. Os resultados mostraram uma recorrente ausência de informações sobre condutas e decisões médicas dadas as mulheres, desconsiderando-as como sujeitos de direitos, a despeito do que preconiza a política de humanização do parto, revelando nuances do parto e do nascimento pautadas no modelo tecnocrático de assistência. Esse modelo de assistência vigente nos hospitais de ensino requer importantes mudanças através da incorporação de práticas com fundamentos científicos, da inclusão de enfermeiras obstetras e do respeito à mulher como protagonista deste evento.

Abstract The study aimed to describe and analyze everyday aspects of childbirth care in a university hospital in southern Brazil. The expression "taking off the coat" serves as a metaphor to illuminate the process of converting the obstetrician nurse into a researcher in a hospital environment. This is a qualitative research work that made use of the perspective socio-anthropology as a theoretical and methodological framework. The results showed a recurrent lack of information about medical conduct and decisions given to women, disregarding them as subjects of rights, despite what the policy of humanization of childbirth, revealing nuances of childbirth and birth based on the model assistance technocracy. This current care model in teaching hospitals requires important changes through the incorporation of practices with scientific foundations, the inclusion of obstetric nurses and respect for women as the protagonists of this event.

Consideraciones bioéticas sobre la relación médico-paciente para el uso del cannabis medicinal en Perú / Bioethical considerations in the physician-patient relationship for the use of medicinal cannabis in Peru

RESUMEN En noviembre de 2017 se despenalizó en el Perú el uso medicinal del cannabis. Los desafíos que ello plantea son diversos y el presente artículo se centra en los relativos a la relación médico-paciente. Dado el status quo del cannabis medicinal, es necesario que el protocolo de tratamiento médico que el Ministerio de Salud debe elaborar, formule condiciones claras que guíen la decisión de los médicos de prescribir cannabis sin que ello afecte sus obligaciones éticas de promover el bien y de no causar daño a sus pacientes. Este artículo desarrolla tres consideraciones importantes para la prescripción de cannabis medicinal. En primer lugar, recomienda el registro y educación de los médicos que deciden prescribir cannabis medicinal. En segundo lugar, propone criterios generales que indican los casos en los que el uso del cannabis medicinal es apropiado, y finalmente, establece la necesidad de que exista una relación médico-paciente bona-fide para la prescripción del cannabis medicinal.

ABSTRACT In November 2017, medical use of cannabis was decriminalized in Peru. The challenges are diverse and this article focuses on those challenges related to the doctor-patient relationship. Given the status quo of medicinal cannabis, the medical treatment protocol to be developed by the Ministry of Health must formulate clear conditions to guide the physicians' decision to prescribe cannabis without affecting their ethical obligations to promote good and cause no harm to their patients. This article develops three important considerations for prescribing medicinal cannabis. First, it recommends the registration and education of physicians who decide to prescribe medicinal cannabis. Secondly, it proposes general criteria specifying the cases in which the use of medicinal cannabis is appropriate and, finally, it establishes the need for a bona-fide doctor-patient relationship for the prescription of medicinal cannabis.

Libertad de prescripción médica / Freedom of medical prescription

Resumen Los médicos requieren flexibilidad para sus prescripciones. Sin embargo, algunos límites están marcados tanto por el conocimiento vigente como por las restricciones de acceso, normas y reglamentos. El Comité de Ética y Transparencia en la Relación Médico-Industria (CETREMI) propone varias sugerencias para ayudar a los pacientes, que incluyen la selección de las mejores alternativas para cada caso, la protocolización de variaciones a los estándares de prescripción (dosis, indicaciones, etcétera) por escrito en el expediente y eludir modas, novedades no probadas, argumentos simplemente publicitarios o promocionales y conflictos de interés.

Abstract Doctors require flexibility for prescription. However, some limits are laid down both by current knowledge and by restrictions imposed by access and rules and regulations. The Committee for Ethics and Transparency in the Physician-Industry Relationship (CETREMI) of the National Academy of Medicine proposes several suggestions to help patients, which include the selection of the best alternatives for each case, formalization of prescription standards variations (doses, drug indications, etc.) written down in the medical records, and avoidance of fashions, untested novelties, argumentations solely based on advertising or commercial promotion and conflicts of interest.

Threats to bioethical principles in medical practice in Brazil: new medical ethics code period

We aimed to outline the profile of medical professionals in Brazil who have violated the deontological norms set forth in the ethics code of the profession, and whose cases were judged by the higher tribunal for medical ethics between 2010 and 2016. This survey was conducted using a database formed from professional ethics cases extracted from the plenary of the medical ethics tribunal of the Federal Council of Medicine. These were disciplinary ethics cases that were judged at appeal level between 2010 and 2016. Most of these professionals were male (88.5%) and their mean age was 59.9 years (SD=11.62) on the date of judgment of their appeals, ranging from 28 to 95 years. Most of them were based in the southeastern region of Brazil (50.89%). Articles 1 and 18 of the medical ethics code were the rules most frequently violated. The sentence given most often was the cancellation of their professional license (37.6%) and the acts most often sentenced involved malpractice, imprudence, and negligence (18.49%). It is acknowledged that concern for the principles of bioethics was present in the appeal decisions made by the plenary of the medical ethics tribunal of the Federal Council of Medicine.

Objeción de conciencia, profesión médica y proyecto sobre despenalización del aborto en Chile / Conscientious objection and the values of medical profession

It is usual to understand conscientious objection as a doctor’s refusal to perform a legitimate intervention, for subjective personal reasons unrelated to medicine. It is then accepted only by respect to professional autonomy and freedom of beliefs. Understood in that way it would be thus reasonable to limit it, curtail it or delete it, since the objector would not be willing to grant benefits that correspond to his medical profession. This work aims to show exactly the opposite, taking as an example the project of law that pretends to decriminalize abortion in some situations in Chile. Is the objector who defends medical activity relying on ethic codes that seek to preserve the values and principles of our profession.

El médico y la objeción de conciencia: opinión del Departamento de Ética del Colegio Médico de Chile A. G. / Position paper from the Department of Ethics of the Chilean College of Physicians about conscientious objection

The Chilean bill that regulates abortion for three cases (Bulletin Nº 9895-11) includes the possibility that health professionals may manifest their conscientious objection (CO) to perform this procedure. Due to the broad impact that the issue of C O had, the Ethics Department of the Chilean College of Physicians considered important to review this concept and its ethical and legal basis, especially in the field of sexual and reproductive health. In the present document, we define the practical limit s of CO, both for the proper fulfillment of the medical profession obligations, and for the due respect and non-discrimination that the professional objector deserves. We analyze the denial of some health institutions to perform abortions if it is legalize d, and we end with recommendations adjusted to the Chilean reality. Specifically, we recognize the right to conscientious objection that all physicians who directly participate in a professional act have. But we a lso recognize that physicians have ineludib le obligations towards their patients, including the obligation to inform about the existence of this service, how to access to it and -as set out in our code of ethics- to ensure that another colleague will continue attending the patient.

Physician 'defiance' towards hand hygiene compliance: Is there a theory-practice-ethics gap?

The theory-practice gap has always existed. This gap is often cited as a culmination of theory being idealistic and impractical, even if practical and beneficial, is often ignored. Most of the evidence relating to the non-integration of theory and practice assumes that environmental factors are responsible and will affect learning and practice outcomes, hence the gap. Therefore, the author believes that to 'bridge the gap' between theory and practice, an additional dimension is required: ethics. A moral duty and obligation ensuring theory and practice integrate. In order to effectively implement new practices, one must deem these practices as worthy and relevant to their role as healthcare providers [HCP]. Hence, this introduces a new concept which the author refers to as the theory-practice-ethics gap. This theory-practice-ethics gap must be considered when reviewing some of the unacceptable outcomes in healthcare practice [3]. The literature suggests that there is a crisis of ethics where theory and practice integrate, and healthcare providers are failing to fulfill our duty as patient advocates. Physician hand hygiene practices and compliance at King Abdulaziz Cardiac Centre [KACC] are consistent with those of other physicians in the global healthcare arena. That is one of noncompliance to King Abdulaziz Medical City [KAMC] organizational expectations and the World Health Organization [WHO] requirements? An observational study was conducted on the compliance of cardiac surgeons, cardiologists and nurses in the authors' cardiac center from January 2010 to December 2011. The hand hygiene [HH] compliance elements that were evaluated pertained to the WHO's five moments of HH recommendations. The data was obtained through direct observation by KAMC infection prevention and control practitioners. Physician hand hygiene compliance at KACC was consistently less than 60%, with nurses regularly encouraging physicians to be diligent with hand hygiene practices in the clinical area. Hand hygiene compliance will not improve unless evidence-based recommendations are adopted and endorsed by all healthcare professionals and providers

Conhecimento dos médicos do Estado de São Paulo e considerações sobre o Código de Ética Médica / Knowledge of physicians in the state of São Paulo regarding the Code of Medical Ethics / El conocimiento de los médicos del Estado de São Paulo sobre el Código de Ética Médica

Em vigor desde 13 de abril de 2010, o Código de Ética Médica (CEM) brasileiro atualizou o documento de 1988, aperfeiçoou a redação de artigos, inseriu novos contextos e destacou os princípios fundamentais da ética. O artigo, além de abordar aspectos históricos e tecer considerações sobre o novo Código de Ética, conclui que houve ampla aceitação pelos médicos, reforçando sua utilidade como fonte permanente de consulta. Um ano após sua entrada em vigor, o CEM já integrava a rotina dos médicos, sendo que todos estavam cientes de sua publicação e a maioria já o havia consultado, três vezes em média, segundo dados primários de levantamento feito pelo Conselho Regional de Medicina do Estado de São Paulo, analisado pelos autores.

En vigor desde el 13 de abril de 2010, el Código de Ética Médica (CEM) brasileño actualizó el anterior, del 1988, perfeccionó la redacción de articulos, introdujo nuevos contextos y destacó los principios fundamentales de la ética. Además de abordar los aspectos históricos y hacer análisis sobre el nuevo Código de Ética, el presente trabajo llegó a la conclusión de que este fue ampliamente aceptado por los médicos, fortaleciendo su utilidad como una fuente permanente de consulta. Un año después de su entrada en vigor, el CEM ya formaba parte de la rutina de los médicos, siendo que todos tenían conocimiento de su publicación y la mayoría ya lo había consultado tres veces, en promedio, según datos primarios de un estudio hecho por el Consejo Regional de Medicina del Estado de São Paulo y analizados por los autores.

In force since April 13, 2010, the Brazilian Code of Medical Ethics (CEM) updated the 1988 document, improved the writing of articles, inserted new contexts and highlighted the fundamental principles of ethics. The article, besides addressing historical aspects and considerations on the new Code of Ethics, concludes that there was wide acceptance by doctors, strengthening its usefulness as a source of permanent consultation. One year after starting to be effective, CEM was already part of doctors’ daily routine, with everyone being aware of its publication and most of them would already have consulted the code three times in average, according to primary survey data carried out by the Regional Medicine Council of São Paulo State, analyzed by the authors.

Fraturas do fêmur proximal no idoso: estudo de custo da doença sob a perspectiva de um hospital público no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil / Hip fractures in the elderly: cost of illness study in a public hospital perspective, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

O artigo visa a estimar o custo direto médico do tratamento hospitalar de pacientes idosos com fraturas de fêmur proximal, no Hospital Municipal Lourenço Jorge, na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Estudo observacional, prospectivo, para estimar a utilização de recursos e custos diretos médicos associados à hospitalização por fratura de fêmur proximal em idosos, em 2007 e 2008, sob a perspectiva do prestador de serviços. Foi utilizado um instrumento de coleta de dados através do qual foram registrados recursos identificados na revisão prospectiva dos prontuários. Aos recursos utilizados foram atribuídos custos em reais (R$) baseando-se em valores do ano 2010. Foram realizadas análises descritivas dos custos e utilização de recursos, bem como avaliada a associação de variáveis clínicas e demográficas com o custo final observado. Foram incluídos 82 pacientes, 81,7 por cento do sexo feminino, idade média de 76,96 anos, hospitalização média de 12,66 dias. A mediana de custo por paciente foi de R$ 3.064,76 (IC95 por cento: 2.817,63 a 3.463,98). Hospitalização clínica e procedimento cirúrgico foram responsáveis por 65,61 por cento e 24,94 por cento dos custos, respectivamente. Pacientes submetidos ao tratamento cirúrgico até o quarto dia de hospitalização apresentaram mediana de custos menor do que pacientes submetidos após o quarto dia (R$ 2.136,31 e R$ 3.281,45, p<0,00001). Observou-se também diferença significativa nos custos finais por tipo de procedimento cirúrgico realizado. O custo do tratamento das fraturas de fêmur proximal no idoso foi significativamente maior nos pacientes submetidos à cirurgia após o quarto dia de hospitalização. Hospitalização clínica e procedimento cirúrgico foram os principais componentes do custo final observado.

This paper aims to assess direct medical costs associated to hospital treatment of hip fractures in the elderly in the Municipal Hospital Lourenço Jorge (HMLJ), Rio de Janeiro. Observational, prospective study to assess resource utilization and direct medical costs associated to elderly hip fracture hospitalization in 2007 and 2008, under the health care provider perspective. A standard data collection instrument was used to register identified resources during prospective medical charts review. The resource utilization was converted into Brazilian Real (R$), based on 2010 prices. Descriptive analysis of costs and resource utilization and their association with clinical and demographic variables were performed. Eighty two patients were included, 81.7 percent female, mean age of 76.96 years, hospitalization mean time of 12.66 days. Median total costs per patient were R$ 3,064.76 (IC95 percent: 2,817.63 - 3,463.98). Clinical hospitalization and surgical procedure were responsible for 65.61 percent and 24.94 percent of costs, respectively. Median costs for patients submitted to surgical procedure until the fourth day of hospitalization were lower than median costs for patients submitted after the fourth day (R$ 2,136.45 and R$ 3,281.45, respectively, p<0.00001). A significant difference in average costs per type of surgical procedure was also observed. Cost associated to inpatient treatment of hip fractures in the elderly was higher in patients who performed surgery after the fourth day of hospitalization. Clinical hospitalization and surgical procedure were the main cost components observed.

Uma boa prática médica / Good clinical practice

São abordadas as diretrizes para a condução de um estudo clínico em seres humanos. Esta revisão discute e apresenta as novas orientações internacionais para o desenvolvimento e acompanhamento de um ensaio clínico destacando as funções e responsabilidades de todos os envolvidos no processo