Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros








Intervalo de año
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(6): 1183-1189, Nov.-Dec. 2016. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-828943

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Introduction: Aim of this study is to investigate bacterial growth on non-infected devices and compare antibiotic-coated and non-coated implants. Materials and methods: The charts of 71 patients who underwent revision surgeries for penile prosthesis between 1995 and 2013 were reviewed. Of those, 31 devices were antibiotic-coated prostheses, while 40 of the implants were non-coated. Swab cultures were routinely obtained from corporal, pump or reservoir site during the operation. If a bacterial biofilm was determined on the prosthesis, it was also cultured. Results: A total of 5 different organisms were cultured from 18 patients. Of them, 4 devices were antibiotic-coated and the other 14 were non-coated devices. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common organism, while Staphylococcus hominis, beta hemolitic streptococcus, Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis were also cultured. All patients who had positive cultures were treated with appropriate antibiotics for four weeks postoperatively. Median follow-up time was 41 months, ranging between 8 and 82 months. One prosthesis (non-coated) became clinically infected in the follow-up period with a totally different organism. Culture positivity rates of antibiotic-coated and non-coated devices were 13% and 35% respectively and the result was significant (p=0.00254). Conclusions: Positive bacterial cultures are present on non-infected penile prostheses at revision surgeries in some of the patients. Antibiotic coated prostheses have much less positive cultures than non-coated devices.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Staphylococcus epidermidis/crecimiento & desarrollo , Prótesis de Pene/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Staphylococcus epidermidis/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Tiempo , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Prótesis de Pene/efectos adversos , Células Cultivadas , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Persona de Mediana Edad
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 33(1): 74-76, Jan.-Feb. 2007. ilus
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-447470

RESUMEN

We present a case of a patient who underwent a late penile prosthesis implant using bovine pericardium as a complement to the tunica albuginea involved in intense fibrosis that destroyed the corpus cavernosum after an infectious manifestation. The advantages of using bovine pericardium in the substitution of the tunica albuginea are discussed and its first use as a penile prosthesis lining is reported.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Animales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bovinos , Bioprótesis , Implantación de Pene/métodos , Prótesis de Pene/microbiología , Pericardio/trasplante , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Reoperación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA