Effects of Rosuvastatin on Apolipoprotein J in Balloon-Injured Carotid Artery in Rats / Efeitos da Rosuvastatina sobre Apolipoproteína J em Artérias de Ratos Lesionadas com Balão

Abstract Background: Restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in coronary heart disease remains an unsolved problem. Clusterin (CLU) (or Apolipoprotein [Apo] J) levels have been reported to be elevated during the progression of postangioplasty restenosis and atherosclerosis. However, its role in neointimal hyperplasia is still controversial. Objective: To elucidate the role Apo J in neointimal hyperplasia in a rat carotid artery model in vivo with or without rosuvastatin administration. Methods: Male Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups: the control group (n = 20), the model group (n = 20) and the statin intervention group (n = 32). The rats in the intervention group were given 10mg /kg dose of rosuvastatin. A 2F Fogarty catheter was introduced to induce vascular injury. Neointima formation was analyzed 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after balloon injury. The level of Apo J was measured by real-time PCR, immunohistochemistry and western blotting. Results: Intimal/medial area ratio (intimal/medial, I/M) was increased after balloon-injury and reached the maximum value at 4weeks in the model group; I/M was slightly increased at 2 weeks and stopped increasing after rosuvastatin administration. The mRNA and protein levels of Apo J in carotid arteries were significantly upregulated after rosuvastatin administration as compared with the model group, and reached maximum values at 2 weeks, which was earlier than in the model group (3 weeks). Conclusion: Apo J served as an acute phase reactant after balloon injury in rat carotid arteries. Rosuvastatin may reduce the neointima formation through up-regulation of Apo J. Our results suggest that Apo J exerts a protective role in the restenosis after balloon-injury in rats.

Resumo Fundamento: A reestenose após intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) após doença coronariana continua um problema não solucionado. Estudos relataram que os níveis de clusterina (CLU), também chamada de apolipoproteína (Apo) J, encontram-se elevados na progressão da reestenose pós-angioplastia e na aterosclerose. Contudo, seu papel na hihperplasia neointimal ainda é controverso. Objetivo: Elucidar o papel da Apo J na hiperplasia neointimal na artéria carótida utilizando um modelo experimental com ratos in vivo, com e sem intervenção com rosuvastatina. Métodos: ratos Wistar machos foram divididos aleatoriamente em três grupos - grupo controle (n = 20), grupo modelo (n = 20), e grupo intervenção com estatina (n = 32). Os ratos no grupo intervenção receberam 10 mg/kg de rosuvastatina. Um cateter Fogarty 2 F foi introduzido para induzir lesão vascular. A formação de neoíntima foi analisada 1, 2, 3 e 4 semanas após lesão com balão. Concentrações de Apo J foram medidas por PCR em tempo real, imuno-histoquímica e western blotting. Resultados: A razão área íntima/média (I/M) aumentou após a lesão com balão e atingiu o valor máximo 4 semanas pós-lesão no grupo modelo; observou-se um pequeno aumento na I/M na semana 2, que cessou após a administração de rosuvastatina. Os níveis de mRNA e proteína da Apo J nas artérias carótidas aumentaram significativamente após administração de rosuvastatina em comparação ao grupo modelo, atingindo o máximo na semana 2, mais cedo em comparação ao grupo modelo (semana 3). Conclusão: A Apo J atuou como reagente de fase aguda após lesão com balão nas artérias carótidas de ratos. A rosuvastatina pode reduzir a formação de neoíntoma por aumento de Apo J. Nossos resultados sugerem que a Apo J exerce um papel protetor na reestenose após lesão com balão em ratos.

Preclinical and early clinical experience with a biodegradable polymer-based, rapamycin-eluting, Indian drug-eluting coronary stent: the BIO-RAPID study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a biodegradable polymer based rapamycin-eluting coronary stent in a porcine model and demonstrate its safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary stenosis. BACKGROUND: The indefinite presence of the polymer after the implantation of drug-eluting stents may initiate and sustain inflammation and contribute to the occurrence of late complications. METHODS: Seven study stents and 5 polymer-coated (control) stents were implanted in porcine carotid arteries. Histomorphometric analysis was performed 8 weeks after stent implantation. After establishing the safety of the stent in the animal model, a single-center, non-randomized study in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions was performed. Forty-nine stents were implanted in 43 patients. The 6-month clinical follow-up was 91% (39/43) and angiographic follow-up was 67% (29/43). The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the principal efficacy endpoint was the 6-month angiographic late loss and binary restenosis rate. RESULTS: In the porcine model, the study stent showed acceptably low injury, inflammation and fibrin scores. There was a quantitative reduction in neointimal hyperplasia which was not statistically different from the control stent. However, in the first-in-man evaluation, there was significant suppression of intimal growth as evidenced by an angiographic late loss of 0.28 +/- 0.45 mm at 6 months. The restenosis rate was 10.3% (3/297). There was no death, stent thrombosis or myocardial infarction at 30 days or at 6 months. The 6-month target lesion revascularization rate was 3.47 percent; (1/29). CONCLUSION: This preclinical and early clinical experience demonstrates the safety and efficacy of a novel biodegradable polymer-based rapamycin-eluting coronary stent.

Two-year (mid-term) results for unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous interventions with drug-eluting stents.

OBJECTIVE: Bypass surgery remains the revascularization strategy of choice for left main trunk coronary artery disease in an unselected group of patients. Drug eluting stents have been proposed as a viable alternative to bypass surgery for left main trunk lesions but their intermediate and long term outcomes are still under scrutiny. METHODS: A series of 50 patients with significant unprotected left main trunk stenosis (>50%) underwent revascularization with drug eluting stents (sirolimus and paclitaxel stents) and were enrolled in a registry. Follow up angiography was clinically driven. Recurrent chest pain and ischemia on myocardial perfusion imaging were clinical parameters that mandated repeat angiography. Prespecified primary endpoints of this registry were defined as major adverse cardiac event at 2 year follow up. RESULTS: No differences in outcomes were noted with either type of drug eluting stent used in this study (Sirolimus versus Paclitaxel). The low major adverse cardiac event rate of 14% at 2 years warrants a randomized control trial in a low surgical risk group of patients comparing bypass grafting with left main trunk percutaneous intervention. CONCLUSION: This registry confirms findings by other investigators about the safety of unprotected LMT stenting in an unselected group of patients. The acceptable MACE rate at 2 years from registries such as this suggests the need for a randomized control trial comparing the two strategies.

Cobalt chromium stent with antiproliferative for restenosis trial in India (COSTAR I).

BACKGROUND: The CoStar stent is a novel cobalt chromium stent designed specifically for drug delivery. The COSTAR I trial represents the first-in-man study of the CoStar Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System evaluating three dose release formulations of paclitaxel in a bioresorbable polymer matrix in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. METHODS: The COSTAR I Trial was a prospective, multi-center registry enrolling 87 patients in four Indian centers for treatment of up to two de novo lesions = 25 mm in length in a reference vessel 2.5-3.5 mm in diameter. Three dose release formulations were studied: 30 microg eluted over 10 days bidirectionally (Group 1, n =10), 10 microg eluted over 30 days abluminally (Group 2, n=40) and 3 microg eluted over 30 days abluminally (Group 3, n = 37). RESULTS: Demographics and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups and treatment in all three groups included small caliber vessels (RVD 2.45 +/- 0.30 - 2.57 +/- 0.36 mm). The primary endpoint of in-stent late loss at four months was lowest in Group 2 (0.43 +/- 0.43 mm) compared to Group 1 and Group 3 (0.51 +/- 7 mn; 0.74 mm and 1.07 +/- 0.65 mm respectively). In-segment late loss followed similar trends, being lowest in Group 2 (0.24 +/- 0.39 mm) compared to Groups 1 and 3 (0.52 +/- 0.66 mm and 0.76 +/- 0.57 mm respectively). Group 2 demonstrated better angiographic out-comes at 12 months with in-stent late loss of 0.55 +/- 0.38 mm when compared to Groups 1 and 3 (0.90 +/- 0.76 mm and 0.74 +/- 0.55 mm respectively). Cumulative binary restenosis rates at twelve months were 1.9%, 35.7% and 39.1% in Groups 2, 1 and 3 respectively. Clinical outcomes trended similarly with cumulative MACE rates at twelve months being lowest at 7.5% in Group 2 as compared to 20% in Group 1 and 21.6% in Group 3 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this first-in-man feasibility trial, angiographic and clinical results seen with the extended release formulation at a higher dose (10 microg/30 days) demonstrate the feasibility of the CoStar stent platform in the treatment of native coronary lesions. It also demonstrates the importance of drug dose and release kinetics.