RESUMEN
Abstract The aim of this study was to assess, correlate, and compare users' perceptions and preference related to maxillary removable retainers. Volunteers were recruited to use four retainer types: conventional wrap-around (CWA), wrap-around with an anterior opening (OWA), "U" wrap-around (UWA), and clear thermoplastic retainer (CT). The main outcomes were the volunteers' perceptions, evaluated with a 100-mm visual analogue scale, and their preferred retainer. The retainers were used for 21 days each (washout intervals of 7 days). Nineteen volunteers (27 ± 4.53 years) were randomly divided into four groups that used the four retainers, but with a different sequence. Perceptions were evaluated immediately after the use of each retainer and the preference at the end of the research. Repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman tests with post-hoc Tukey's test (intergroup comparisons), and Pearson and Spearman analyses (correlations between perceptions) were applied. The WA retainers did not significantly differ among themselves. The CT was rated significantly worse in speech (p ≤ 0.001), discomfort (p < 0.001), and occlusal interference (p < 0.001), and did not significantly differ from the others in esthetics. Users preferred significant more the WA retainers in comparison with the CT retainers. The occlusal interference caused by the CT was positively correlated to other perceptions, such as changes in speech and discomfort. WA retainers presented similar preference and perceptions, but were significantly better than the CT. The CT occlusal coverage appeared to be the primary cause of its rejection.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Diseño de Aparato Ortodóncico/estadística & datos numéricos , Retenedores Ortodóncicos/normas , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Valores de Referencia , Análisis de Varianza , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Estudios Cruzados , Escala Visual Analógica , MaxilarRESUMEN
La estabilidad es un requerimiento primordial a tener en cuenta en un tratamiento ortodóntico. Su excelencia es difícil de obtener pero hay requisitos a cumplimentar para acercanos a ella. La contención puede ser fija o removible; temporaria o definitiva; activa o pasiva. Su indicación depende fundamentalmente de los factores de crecimiento de la anomalía corregida, del estado periodontal, de la edad del paciente. La contención se usa preferentemente en forma definitiva en dentición permanente, realizándose, en realidad, una "retención" de los objetivos logrados. La removible, activa, suele ser de uso transitorio en pacientes jóvenes, se realiza una "contención" que tiende a compensar los factores de crecimiento. Todo paciente debe ser informado inicialmente de esta etapa del tratamiento ya que es tan importante como la corrección de la anomalía misma