Judicialização no acesso a medicamentos: os números no período de 2019 a 2021 no município de Ponta Grossa, Paraná / Judicialization in access to medicines: the numbers in the period from 2019 to 2021 in the municipality of Ponta Grossa, Paraná

descrever o perfil das ações judiciais quanto ao fornecimento de medicamentos no município de Ponta Grossa, Paraná, entre 2019 a 2021. Metodologia: Utilizou-se o método descritivo-exploratório e retrospectivo, de abordagem quantitativa. Foram analisados 89 processos, sendo grande parte dos autores do sexo feminino (57,3%), com predomínio de assistência jurídica pública por meio do Ministério Público (69,7%) e com prescrições do serviço público (96,6%). Resultados: Observou-se que 93,3% das solicitações não constavam na Relação Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais. Ademais, verificou-se maior demanda do medicamento Avastin (31,5). As doenças que mais acometeram a parte autora foram retinopatia diabética (42,7%; n=38) e doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica (24,7%). Destaca-se que no período da coleta de dados, 79,8% dos processos encontravam-se finalizados. Os valores gastos com a judicialização de medicamentos variaram de R$ 407,94 a R$ 47.220,00. Considerações: Haja vista o número não exorbitante de ações judiciais, é possível que existam estratégias municipais efetivas, ou a ausência de Defensoria Pública no atendimento as demandas de saúde, pode ter tornado fator inibidor de acesso à justiça. Outro ponto quanto a delimitação no acesso, são os requisitos cumulativos firmados na tese pelo STF, quanto a concessão de medicamentos não previstos nas listas de dispensação do SUS. Conclui-se que há necessidade de aprimorar o diálogo entre o judiciário e o setor de saúde por meio dos seus gestores, bem como a realização de mais estudos para subsidiar um mapeamento, planejamento, descrição de gastos com a judicialização, aquisição de medicamentos e incorporação de novas tecnologias

Objective: to describe the profile of lawsuits regarding the supply of medicines in the city of Ponta Grossa, Paraná, between 2019 and 2021. Methods: A descriptive-exploratory and retrospective method was used, with a quantitative approach. A total of 89 processes were analyzed, most of which were female authors (57.3%), with a predominance of public legal assistance through the Public Prosecutor's Office (69.7%) and with prescriptions from the public service (96.6%). Results: It was observed that 93.3% of requests were not included in the National List of Essential Medicines. Furthermore, there was a greater demand for the drug Avastin (31.5). The diseases that most affected the author were diabetic retinopathy (42.7%; n=38) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (24.7%). It is noteworthy that during the data collection period, 79.8% of the processes were concluded. The amounts spent on the legalization of medicines ranged from R$ 407.94 to R$ 47,220.00. Considerations: Given the not exorbitant number of lawsuits, it is possible that there are effective municipal strategies, or the absence of a Public Defender's Office in meeting health demands, which may have become an inhibiting factor in access to justice. Another point regarding the delimitation of access, are the cumulative requirements signed in the thesis by the STF, regarding the concession of medicines not foreseen in the SUS dispensing lists. It is concluded that there is a need to improve the dialogue between the judiciary and the health sector through its managers, as well as to carry out more studies to support a mapping, planning, description of expenses with the judicialization, acquisition of medicines and incorporation of new technologies

Effects of Intravitreal Injection of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Drugs on Ocular Blood Vessels and Blood Flow in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy / 中国医学科学院学报

Diabetic retinopathy(DR)is the major microvascular disease in diabetic patients,and it is also one of the main blinding eye diseases in the current population.The typical pathological change of DR in the eyes is vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)-mediated neovascularization induced by retinal ischemic stimulation.Therefore,anti-VEGF drugs have gradually become one of the mainstream methods to treat DR and DR-induced diseases such as diabetic macular edema.Recent studies have proved that anti-VEGF drugs have certain effects on ocular blood vessels and blood flow in patients with DR,while the specific mechanism has not been fully elucidated.This article summarizes the research progress on the effects of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs on the ocular blood vessels and blood flow in patients with DR.

ETDRS panretinal photocoagulation combined with intravitreal ranibizumab versus PASCAL panretinal photocoagulation with intravitreal ranibizumab versus intravitreal ranibizumab alone for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy / Panfotocoagulação retiniana a laser padrão ETDRS associado a injeção intravítrea de ranibizumabe versus panfotocoagulação retiniana a laser padrão PASCAL associado a injeção intravítrea de ranibizumabe versus somente injeção intravítrea de ranibizumabe para o tratamento da retinopatia diabética proliferativa

ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare visual acuity, macular thickness, and the area of active neovascularization based on fluorescein angiography outcomes associated with standard single-spot panretinal photocoagulation in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) pattern combined with intravitreal ranibizumab injection versus multiple-spot full scatter (PASCAL) panretinal photocoagulation combined with intravitreal ranibizumab injection versus intravitreal injection alone in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Methods: Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and no prior laser treatment were randomly assigned to receive three different types of treatment. Panretinal photocoagulation in the ETDRS group was administered in two sessions (weeks 0 and 2), and panretinal photocoagulation in the PASCAL group was administered in one session (week 0). Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab was administered at the end of the first laser session in both the ETDRS and PASCAL groups and at week 0 in the intravitreal injection group. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations were performed at baseline and every 4 weeks through week 48. Results: Thirty patients (n=40 eyes) completed the 48-week study period. After treatment, best-corrected visual acuity was significantly (p<0.05) improved at all follow-up visits in the group receiving intravitreal injection alone, at all but week 4 in the ETDRS group, and at all but weeks 4 and 8 for the PASCAL group. A significant decrease in central subfield macular thickness was observed in the PASCAL group at weeks 4, 8, and 48; only at week 48 in the intravitreal injection group; and never in the ETDRS group. There was no significant difference among the three treatment groups with respect to change from baseline to week 48 in best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield macular thickness, or fluorescein leakage from active neovascularization in best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield macular thickness, or fluorescein leakage from active neovascularization. Conclusions: Intravitreal injection alone or combined with single- or multiple-spot panretinal photocoagulation yielded similar outcomes with respect to mean change in best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield macular thickness, and fluorescein leakage from active neovascularization at up to one-year of follow-up. All subjects provided written informed consent to participate (NCT02005432 in clinicaltrials.gov).

RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar as medidas de acuidade visual, espessura macular central e área de neovasos ativos na an­giofluoresceinografia submetidos a panfotocoagulação retiniana padrão ETDRS associado a injeção intravítrea de ranibizumabe versus panfotocoagulação padrão PASCAL associado a injeção intravítrea de ranibizumabe versus somente injeção intravítrea de ranibizumabe em pacientes com retinopatia diabética pro­liferativa. Métodos: Pacientes com retinopatia diabética proliferativa e virgens de tratamento, randomicamente divididos nas três diferentes terapias retinianas. Panfotocoagulação no grupo ETDRS em 2 sessões (semanas 0 e 2) e no grupo PASCAL, na semana 0. Injeção intravítrea de ranibizumabe realizado ao fim da primeira sessão de laser em ambos os grupos: ETDRS e PASCAL, e na semana 0 no grupo injeção intravítrea de ranibizumabe. Avaliações oftalmológicas, tomografia de coerência óptica e angiofluoesceinografia realizados na visita basal e a cada 4 semanas por 48 semanas. Resultados: Trinta pacientes (n=40 olhos) completaram as 48 semanas de seguimento. Após o tratamento, a acuidade visual melhorou significantemente em todas a visitas no grupo injeção intravítrea de ranibizumabe (p<0,05); em todas exceto na semana 4 no grupo ETDRS, em todas exceto nas semanas 4 e 8 no grupo PASCAL. Redução significativa na espessura do subcampo central foi evidenciada no grupo PASCAL nas semanas 4, 8 e 48; somente na semana 48 no grupo injeção intravítrea de ranibizumabe, e em nenhuma visita no grupo ETDRS. Redução também na área de neovasos ativos em todas as visitas em todos os grupos. Não houve diferença significante entre os três grupos com relação a mudança media na medidas de acuidade visual, espessura macular central ou área de neovasos ativos da visita inicial para a semana 48. Conclusões: Somente IVB ou este associado a panfotocoagulação ETDRS ou PASCAL, apresentaram efeitos semelhantes em relação a medidas de acuidade visual, espessura do subcampo central e área de neovasos ativos no decorrer de 48 semanas de seguimento.

Three versus five intravitreal aflibercept injections as the initial loading phase in the treatment of diabetic macular edema: one-year results / Três versus cinco injeções intravítreas de aflibercept como carga inicial do tratamento de edema macular diabético: resultados de um ano

ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare the efficacy of three initial monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections followed by pro re nata (3+PRN) dosing versus five initial monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections followed by pro re nata (5+PRN) dosing in patients with diabetic macular edema. Methods: A total of 60 treatment-naïve patients with macular edema who underwent intravitreal aflibercept injections (2 mg/0.05 mL) with at least one year of follow-up were analyzed in this retrospective and comparative study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the number of intravitreal aflibercept injections administered in the loading phase. The 3+PRN group comprised 27 patients, whereas the 5+PRN group comprised 33 patients. The visual and anatomical outcomes were compared between the two groups at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Results: Both 3+PRN and 5+PRN, showed statistically significant improvements in the best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thicknesse throughout the study period (p<0.001 and, p<0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of changes in the best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness (p=0.453 and, p=0.784, respectively). The mean number of intravitreal aflibercept injections was significantly greater in the 5+PRN group (6.1 ± 0.8) than in the 3+PRN group (3.9 ± 0.8) (p<0.001). Conclusion: The 3+PRN and 5+PRN regimens showed similar 12-month visual and anatomical outcomes following treatment with intravitreal aflibercept injections in patients with macular edema.

RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a eficácia de três injeções intravítreas mensais iniciais de aflibercept, seguidas de dosagem de pro re nata (3+PRN) versus cinco injeções mensais iniciais intravítreas de aflibercept, seguidas de doses de pro re nata (5 + PRN) em pacientes com edema macular diabético. Métodos: Foram analisados neste estudo retrospectivo e comparativo 60 pacientes que não receberam tratamento prévio com edema macular e foram submetidos a injeções intravítreas de aflibercept (2 mg/0,05 mL) com pelo menos um ano de acompanhamento. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos de acordo com o número de injeções intravítreas de aflibercept administradas na fase inicial. O grupo 3+PRN compreendeu 27 pacientes, enquanto o grupo 5+PRN compreendeu 33 pacientes. Os resultados visuais e anatômicos foram comparados entre os dois grupos no período inicial e aos 3, 6, 9 e 12 meses. Resultados: Tanto os grupos 3+PRN quanto 5+PRN mostraram melhoras estatisticamente significativas na acuidade visual melhor corrigida e na espessura macular central ao longo do período de estudo (p<0,001 e p <0,001, respectivamente). Não houve diferenças significativas entre os dois grupos em termos de alterações na acuidade visual melhor corrigida e na espessura macular central (p=0,453 e p=0,784, respectivamente). O número médio de injeções intravítreas de aflibercept foi significativamente maior no grupo 5+PRN (6,1 ± 0,8) do que no grupo 3+PRN (3,9 ± 0,8) (p <0,001). Conclusão: Os regimes 3+PRN e 5+PRN mostraram resultados visuais e anatômicos semelhantes em 12 meses após o tratamento com injeções intravítreas de aflibercept em pacientes com edema macular.

Changes in the ganglion cell complex thickness after anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema / Alterações na espessura do complexo de células ganglionares após tratamento anti-VEGF para edema macular diabético

ABSTRACT Purpose: To assess tomographic ganglion cell complex changes in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). Methods: We analyzed data from 35 eyes of 35 previously untreated patients in whom diabetic macular edema improved after three loading doses of anti-VEGF injection and who did not receive repeated injections. We recorded spectral domain-optical coherence tomography assessments of ganglion cell complex and central macular thickness at baseline and monthly for three months, and on the sixth and ninth month after treatment. We compared the results with those of the unaffected eyes in the same patients and with those in a control group of patients with diabetic macular edema who were untreated. Results: The mean age of the patients in the treatment group was 60 ± 4.38 years. The foveal thicknesses measured using optical coherence tomography decreased significantly from baseline to the third month post-injection (p<0.05). The mean ganglion cell complex thickness was 115.08 ± 16.72 µm before the first injection and 101.05 ± 12.67 µm after the third injection (p<0.05). The mean ganglion cell complex was 110.04 ± 15.07 µm on the sixth month (p>0.05) and 113.12 ± 11.15 µm on the ninth month (p>0.05). We found a significant difference between the patients and the control group in terms of mean ganglion cell complex thickness on the second- and third-months post-injection (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our study showed that the ganglion cell complex thickness in patients with diabetic macular edema decreased after the anti-VEGF injections. We cannot ascertain whether the ganglion cell complex thickness decreases were due to effects of the anti-VEGF agents or to the natural disease course.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar as alterações do complexo tomográfico das células ganglionares em pacientes com edema macular diabético tratados com injeções intravítreas do fator de crescimento endotelial anti-vascular (anti-VEGF). Métodos: Analisamos dados de 35 olhos de 35 pacientes previamente não tratados nos quais o edema macular diabético melhorou após três doses de injeção de anti-VEGF e que não receberam injeções repetidas. Registramos avaliações da tomografia de coerência óptica de domínio espectral do complexo de células ganglionares e da espessura macular central na linha de base e mensalmente por três meses e, também no sexto e nono mês após o tratamento. Comparamos os resultados com os olhos não afetados nos mesmos pacientes e com os de um grupo controle de pacientes com edema macular diabético que não foram tratados. Resultados: A média da idade dos pacientes no grupo de tratamento foi de 60 ± 4,38 anos. As espessuras foveais medidas pela tomografia de coerência óptica diminuiram significativamente desde o início até o terceiro mês após a injeção (p<0,05). A espessura média do complexo de células ganglionares foi de 115,08 ± 16,72 µm antes da primeira injeção e 101,05 ± 12,67 µm após a terceira injeção (p<0,05). A média do complexo de célula ganglionar foi de 110,04 ± 15,07 µm no sexto mês (p>0,05) e 113,12 ± 11,15 µm no nono mês (p>0,05). Encontramos uma diferença significativa entre os pacientes e o grupo controle quanto à média da espessura do complexo de células ganglionares no segundo e terceiro meses após a injeção (p<0,05). Conclusão: Nosso estudo mostrou que a espessura do complexo de células ganglionares em pacientes com edema macular diabético diminuiu após as injeções de anti-VEGF. Não podemos determinar se a diminuição da espessura do complexo de células ganglionares ocorreu devido aos efeitos dos agentes anti-VEGF ou ao curso natural da doença.

Unilateral intravitreal dexamethasone implant for diabetic macular edema: effect in the contralateral eye / Implante de dexametasona intravítreo unilateral no edema macular diabético: efeito no olho contralateral

ABSTRACT We describe three patients who had previous heart diseases and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy with clinically significant diabetic macular edema. They underwent unilateral dexamethasone intravitreal implantation. Without ophthalmological treatment in the fellow eye, patients showed marked bilateral improvement in best-corrected visual acuity, optical coherence images, and macular thickness values. These findings provide evidence of the bilateral effect of dexamethasone intravitreal implantation, which may be clinically useful in patients for whom the systemic effects of the drug may affect their general health.

RESUMO Descrevemos três pacientes que tiveram doenças cardíacas prévias e retinopatia diabética não proliferativa com edema macular diabético clinicamente significativo. Eles foram submetidos a implante intravítreo de dexametasona unilateral. Sem tratamento oftalmológico no olho contralateral, os pacien tes apresentaram uma melhora bilateral significativa na melhor acuidade visual corrigida, nas imagens de coerência óptica e nos valores da espessura macular. Esses achados fornecem evidências sobre o efeito bilateral do implante intravítreo de dexametasona, que pode ser clinicamente útil em pacientes para os quais os efeitos sistêmicos da droga possam afetar a saúde geral do paciente.

Comparative study between intravitreal ranibizumab and triamcinolone treatment of diabetic macular edema as regard to optical coherence tomography changes and visual acuity / Estudo comparativo entre o tratamento intravítreo com ranibizumabe e triancinolona do edema macular diabético quanto às alterações na tomografia de coerência óptica e na acuidade visual

Abstract Objectives: To compare the effect of intravitreal Ranibizumab (0.3mg) and Triamicinolone (4mg) on different parameters in spectral domain OCT and their relation to visual acuity of patients with diabetic macular edema. Methods: This study is designed as a prospective randomized study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups receiving either Pro re nata intravitreal Ranibizumab (0.3mg) or Triamicinolone acetonide (4mg), to whom Spectral Domain OCT was done as well as best corrected Log MAR visual acuity. Results: 40 patients were included in this study. Comparison and correlation of mean BCVA and mean CMT among and within treatment groups of our study revealed strong and significant relationship between both parameters and showing equal effect of both treatment types regarding them with the consideration that Triamicinolone acetonide treated group (Group B) showed statistically significant lower CMT compared to Ranibizumab treated group (Group A) at three and six months. Also both showed equal effectivity regarding improvement of the photoreceptors integrity and in turn the improvement of the BCVA. Meanwhile the association of CMT and IS/OS integrity was found to be significant only at six months in both groups (p =0.009 in Group A; p =0.031 in Group B). The fading initial effect of a single ranibizumab injection on macular edema can be augmented by following that one injection with two injections of the loading dose. Triamicinolone effect after single injection began to fade at 3 months. Conclusion: Both treatment types had good effect on reduction of CMT and improvement of BCVA and the IS/OS junction with difference in sustainability of their effects due to difference in their pharmacokinetics and need for repeated injections.

Resumo Objetivos: Comparar o efeito do ranibizumabe intravítreo (0,3mg) e triacmicinolona (4mg) em diferentes parâmetros do domínio espectral da OCT e sua relação com a acuidade visual de pacientes com edema macular diabético. Métodos: Este estudo foi concebido como um estudo prospectivo randomizado. Os pacientes foram divididos aleatoriamente em 2 grupos que receberam Ranibizumab Pro rata intravitreal (0,3mg) ou acetonido de Triamicinolona (4mg), a quem foi realizada a Spectral Domain OCT, bem como a melhor acuidade visual de Log MAR corrigida. Resultados: Quarenta pacientes foram incluídos neste estudo. A comparação e a correlação da acuidade visual média e CMT média entre e dentro de grupos de tratamento do nosso estudo revelaram uma relação forte e significativa entre ambos os parâmetros e mostrando um efeito igual de ambos os tipos de tratamento, considerando que o grupo tratado com acetonido Triamicinolona (Grupo B) apresentou significância estatística. menor CMT comparado ao grupo tratado com Ranibizumab (Grupo A) aos três e seis meses. Também ambos mostraram igual efetividade em relação à melhoria da integridade dos fotorreceptores e, por sua vez, a melhora do BCVA. Enquanto isso, a associação de CMT e IS / OS integridade foi significativa apenas aos seis meses em ambos os grupos (p = 0,009 no Grupo A; p = 0,031 no Grupo B). O efeito inicial enfraquecido de uma única injeção de ranibizumabe no edema macular pode ser aumentado seguindo-se aquela injeção com duas injeções da dose de ataque. O efeito triamicinolona após injeção única começou a diminuir aos 3 meses. Conclusão: Ambos os tipos de tratamento tiveram bom efeito na redução da CMT e melhora do BCVA e da junção IS / OS com a diferença na sustentabilidade de seus efeitos devido à diferença em sua farmacocinética e necessidade de injeções repetidas.

Optical biometry-based axial length alterations after intravitreal dexamethasone implant / Alterações do comprimento axial com base na biometria óptica após o implante de dexametasona intravítrea

ABSTRACT Purpose: To investigate changes in axial length after intravitreal dexamethasone implantation in patients with macular edema. Methods: We performed a prospective comparative study of 46 patients with unilateral macular edema, due to diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, and non-infectious uveitis, who underwent dexamethasone implantation. The fellow eyes of the patients were considered the control group. The central macular thickness was measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and axial length was measured by IOLMaster 700 optical coherence biometry. We compared axial length and central macular thickness values within the groups. Results: In the study group, the baseline central macular thickness was 460.19 ± 128.64 mm, significantly decreasing to 324.00 ± 79.84 mm after dexamethasone implantation (p=0.000). No significant change in central macular thickness measurements was seen in the control group (p=0.244). In the study group, the baseline axial length was 23.16 ± 0.68 mm, significantly increasing to 23.22 ± 0.65 mm after dexamethasone implantation (p=0.039). However, the control group exhibited no significant change in axial length (p=0.123). Conclusions: In addition to significantly reducing central macular thickness measurements, intravitreal dexamethasone implantation also significantly changes optical biometry-based axial length measurements.

RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar alterações no comprimento axial após implante de dexametasona intravítrea em pacientes com edema macular. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo prospectivo e comparativo de 46 pacientes com edema macular unilateral, devido à retinopatia diabética, oclusão da veia retiniana e uveíte não infecciosa, que foram submetidos ao implante de dexametasona. Os olhos contralateral de cada paciente foram considerados o grupo controle. A espessura macular central foi medida por tomografia de coerência óptica de domínio espectral, e o comprimento axial foi medido por meio de biometria de coerência óptica de domínio espectral e o comprimento axial foi medido pela biometria de coerência óptica com IOLMaster 700. Comparamos o comprimento axial e os valores da espessura macular central dentro dos grupos. Resultados: No grupo de estudo, a espessura macular basal foi de 460,19 ± 128,64 mm, diminuindo significativamente para 324,00 ± 79,84 mm após o implante de dexametasona (p=0,000). Nenhuma mudança significativa nas medidas da espessura macular central foi observada no grupo controle (p=0,244). No grupo de estudo, o comprimento axial basal foi de 23,16 ± 0,68 mm, aumentando significativamente para 23,22 ± 0,65 mm após o implante de dexametasona (p=0,039). No entanto, o grupo controle não apresentou alteração significativa no comprimento axial (p=0,123). Conclusões: Além de reduzir significativamente as medidas da espessura macular central, o implante de dexametasona intravítrea também altera significativamente as medidas de comprimento axial baseadas na biometria óptica.

Impacto orçamentário da incorporação de medicamentos para tratamento em segunda linha do edema macular diabético no SUS sob a perspectiva da Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Minas Gerais, Brasil / Budget impact of the incorporation of second-line drug treatment for diabetic macular edema in the Brazilian Unified National Health System from the perspective of the Minas Gerais State Health Department, Brazil / Impacto presupuestario de la incorporación de medicamentos para un tratamiento de segunda línea del edema macular diabético en el Sistema Único de Salud, desde la perspectiva de la Secretaría Estatal de Salud de Minas Gerais, Brasil

Resumo: Os objetivos foram efetuar a análise do impacto orçamentário para a incorporação de segunda linha terapêutica com terapia antiangiogênica de aplicação intravítrea, para tratamento de edema macular diabético, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) em Minas Gerais, Brasil, discutindo sua viabilidade à luz do orçamento do estado. A análise do impacto orçamentário com método determinístico, segundo diretriz do Ministério da Saúde. Foram incluídos os pacientes com provável falha ao tratamento de primeira linha, num horizonte temporal de 5 anos para todas as tecnologias avaliadas. Incluíram-se na análise os medicamentos bevacizumabe (uso off-label), ranibizumabe e aflibercepte. As populações foram calculadas tanto por demanda aferida quanto por estimativa epidemiológica. Como análises de sensibilidade efetuaram-se: cenário com difusão de tecnologia mais lenta; cenário com a entrada de bevacizumabe e ranibizumabe biossimilares no mercado; cenário com a desconsideração da inflação no período. O impacto orçamentário incremental, de acordo com as estimativas de demanda aferida e epidemiológica, respectivamente, foi de R$ 69.493.906,95-R$ 473.226.278,78 para bevacizumabe; R$ 349.319.965,60-R$ 2.378.732.103,09 para ranibizumabe e R$543.867.485,47-R$ 3.703.524.490,16 para aflibercepte. Bevacizumabe foi a alternativa financeiramente mais viável em todos os cenários das estimativas e análises de sensibilidade. Estimou-se incremento próximo a 3%, comparando com o orçamento de 2016 (demanda aferida). Avalia-se que a incorporação é viável dentro do SUS em Minas Gerais, mas sujeita às prioridades da gestão. A discrepância de preços entre produtos de eficácia semelhante é intrigante e tema fértil para estudos futuros.

Abstract: The study's objective was to perform budget impact assessment for the incorporation of second-line intravitreal antiangiogenic therapy for diabatic macular edema in the scope of the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, discussing the incorporation's state budget feasibility. The budget impact assessment was performed as a deterministic method according to Ministry of Health guidelines. The study included patients with probable first-line treatment failure in a five-year timeline for all the technologies assessed. The analysis included the drugs bevacizumab (off-label use), ranibizumab, and aflibercept. The populations were calculated both by observed demand and epidemiological estimate. The following sensitivity analyses were performed: a scenario with slower technology diffusion, a scenario with the market entry of biosimilar versions of bevacizumab and ranibizumab, and a scenario disregarding inflation during the period. The incremental budget impacts according to observed and epidemiologically estimated demand, respectively, were BRL 69,493,906.95 to BRL 473,226,278.78 for bevacizumab; BRL 349,319,965.60 to BRL 2,378,732,103.09 for ranibizumab; and BRL 543,867,485.47 to BRL 3,703,524,490.16 for aflibercept. Bevacizumab proved to be the most financially feasible alternative in all the scenarios of estimates and sensitivity analyses. An increment of nearly 3% was estimated, compared to the 2016 budget (observed demand). The study showed that the incorporation is feasible in the SUS, Minas Gerais State, but subject to management priorities. Price discrepancies between products with similar efficacy is intriguing and provides fertile ground for future studies.

Resumen: El objetivo fue efectuar un análisis del impacto presupuestario en la incorporación de una segunda línea terapéutica, con terapia antiangiogénica de aplicación intravítrea, para el tratamiento de edema macular diabético, en el ámbito del Sistema Único de Salud (SUS), en Minas Gerais, Brasil, discutiendo su viabilidad respecto al presupuesto del estado. Se realizó una análisis del impacto presupuestario con un método determinístico, según la directriz del Ministerio de Salud. Se incluyeron pacientes con probable fracaso al tratamiento de primera línea, en un horizonte temporal de 5 años para todas las tecnologías evaluadas. Se incluyeron en el análisis los medicamentos bevacizumab (uso off-label), ranibizumab y aflibercept. Las poblaciones se calcularon tanto por demanda evaluada, como por estimación epidemiológica. A modo de análisis de sensibilidad se planteó un escenario con una difusión de tecnología más lenta, un escenario con la entrada de bevacizumab y ranibizumab biosimilares en el mercado, y un escenario con la desconsideración de la inflación durante el período. El incremento del impacto presupuestario, de acuerdo con las estimativas de demanda evaluada y epidemiológica, respectivamente, fue BRL 69.493.906,95-BRL 473.226.278,78 en el caso del bevacizumab; BRL 349.319.965,60-BRL 2.378.732.103,09 en el de ranibizumab y BRL 543.867.485,47-BRL 3.703.524.490,16 en el aflibercept. El bevacizumab se mostró la alternativa financiera más viable en todos los escenarios de estimaciones y análisis de sensibilidad. Se estimó un incremento cercano al 3%, comparándolo con el presupuesto de 2016 (demanda evaluada). Se considera que la incorporación es viable dentro del SUS en Minas Gerais, pero sujeta a las prioridades de la gestión. La discrepancia de precios entre productos de eficacia semejante es intrigante y un tema fértil para estudios futuros.

Ginsenoside Rb1 attenuates diabetic retinopathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

Abstract Purpose: To investigated the effects of ginsenoside Rb1 on diabetic retinopathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Methods: Diabetes was induced by a single intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (80 mg/kg) in male Wistar rats. Ginsenoside Rb1 (20, 40 mg/kg) was injected (i.p.) once a day for 4 weeks. Then, using fundus photography, the diameter and vascular permeability of retinal vessels were investigated. Retinal histopathology was undertaken. Contents of malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) in retinas were assayed. Levels of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), glutathione cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC), and glutathione cysteine ligase modulatory subunit (GCLM) were measured. Results: Treatment with ginsenoside Rb1 attenuated the diabetes-induced increase in the diameter of retinal blood vessels. Ginsenoside Rb1 reduced extravasation of Evans Blue dye from retinal blood vessels. Ginsenoside Rb1 partially inhibited the increase in MDA content and decrease in GSH level in rat retinas. Nrf2 levels in the nuclei of retinal cells and expression of GCLC and GCLM were increased significantly in rats treated with ginsenoside Rb1. Conclusion: These findings suggest that ginsenoside Rb1 can attenuate diabetic retinopathy by regulating the antioxidative function in rat retinas.

Avaliação de fatores prognósticos a curto prazo com o uso de ranibizumabe em pacientes com edema macular diabético / Evaluation of short-term prognostic factors of ranibizumab in patients with dabetic macular edema

Resumo Objetivo: Investigar fatores prognósticos a curto prazo em pacientes portadores de edema macular diabético (EMD) tratados com injeções intravítreas (IV) de ranibizumabe (RZB). Métodos: Estudo descritivo transversal, retrospectivo, analisou-se 41 prontuários de uma clínica privada na cidade de Belo Horizonte - Minas Gerais, do período de agosto de 2016 a maio de 2017. Verificou-se dados gerais e história pregressa de pacientes que receberam IV mensais consecutivas para EMD, investigando-se sexo, idade e presença de tratamento prévio como possíveis fatores prognósticos determinantes nas mudanças na acuidade visual após o procedimento mensal. Resultados: No total da amostra, 51,2% eram indivíduos do sexo feminino. A média de idade foi de 64,20 ± 7,54 anos. Não houve associação estatisticamente significativa entre idade, gênero ou realização de tratamento prévio e melhora na acuidade visual. Conclusão: A principal estratégia de tratamento para o EMD estabelecida atualmente é através das injeções IV que apresentam eficácia comprovada na melhora da acuidade visual. Entretanto, aproximadamente metade dos pacientes não exibem resposta completa ou são refratários a essa abordagem terapêutica. Nesse sentido, o reconhecimento de fatores prognósticos pode ajudar os oftalmologistas a tomar decisões mais individualizadas, decidindo quais pacientes com EMD responderá às terapias anti-VEGF. Tendo em vista que não há estudos para averiguar os efeitos a curto prazo após injeções IV, no contexto apenas dessa melhora visual, esse trabalho se propôs a avaliar os possíveis fatores prognósticos, que se refletem em uma melhor resposta ao tratamento anti-VEGF, a partir da análise da melhor acuidade visual corrigida, em um contexto real da prática oftalmológica.

Abstract Purpose: Study the prognostic factors for short-term visual improvement in pacients treated with ranibizumab (IVR) for diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: cross-sectional descriptive study in which 41 eletronic medical records of patients who attended in a private medical clinic in Belo Horizonte - Minas Gerais in a period of August / 2016 to May / 2017. It was verified general data and previous history of patients who received consecutive monthly IVR for DME, analyzing sex, age and presence of previous treatment as possible prognostic factors determining the changes in visual acuity measured by the Snellen table after the monthly procedure. Results: In the total sample, 51.2% were female subjects. The mean age was 64.20 ± 7.54 years. Age, previous treatment and gender were not correlated with better visual acuity in any time. Conclusion: The major strategy of DME treatment nowadays is intravitreal injections, which have proved to be an effetive way of visual acuity improvement. However, many patients do not exhibit the expected outcome or are refractory to treatment. Aiming to predict the treatment efficacy in short term - also to provide the patient a reasonable expectation about the outcome - based on prognostic factors, new clinical studies are necessary since there are so few that approach this subject - such an important treatment of a very prevalent disease.

Fatores de risco associados à intervenção com injeção intravítrea de anti-VEGF em pacientes com edema macular diabético / Risk factors related to the intervention with intravitreal anti-VEGF injection in patients with diabetic macular edema

Resumo Objetivo: Propor um modelo de regressão logística para auxiliar na decisão de realização da injeção intravítrea (IIV) de anti-VEGF, a partir da quantificação e hierarquização dos fatores de risco que compõem o perfil dos indivíduos diabéticos. Métodos: Trata-se de estudo transversal, observacional e inferencial, realizado em três instituições da Paraíba, de julho de 2015 a setembro de 2016. O modelo de regressão logística foi utilizado para obtenção do modelo preditivo e os dados foram analisados no software R®. Resultados: Foram avaliados 80 pacientes com diabetes tipo 1 ou 2, maiores de 18 anos, dos quais 57,5% não tiveram indicação de IIV e 42,5% receberam indicação deste tratamento. No grupo com edema macular diabético (EMD), a média de idade foi de 60,65 anos, sendo 52,94% do sexo feminino. Ainda nesse grupo, a maioria apresentou retinopatia diabética não-proliferativa severa ou retinopatia proliferativa (79,41%). Foram identificados como fatores de risco para EMD: o indivíduo ser aposentado (OR=5,22; p-valor 0,05), ter histórico pessoal de retinopatia diabética (OR=20,27; p-valor 0,006) e de tratamento prévio com anti-VEGF (OR=23,23; p-valor 0,002). Conclusão: Os resultados da pesquisa evidenciaram que um indivíduo diabético com baixa visual e apresentando esses três fatores deve ser encaminhado o quanto antes ao especialista, pois possui, com 91,17% de acerto, risco de apresentar EMD com necessidade de IIV de anti-VEGF. Essa ferramenta pode servir como coadjuvante na tomada de decisão, sobretudo do não-retinólogo, a fim de encaminhar para diagnóstico e tratamento precoces os indivíduos com EMD, o que pode ser decisivo na prevenção da perda visual irreversível nesses pacientes.

Abstract Purpose: To propose a predictive model to aid in the decision to perform the intravitreal anti-VEGF injection, based on the risk factors quantification and hierarchy presented by diabetic patients. Methods: It is a cross-sectional, observational and inferential study carried out in three institutions in Paraíba from July 2015 to September 2016. The logistic regression model was used to obtain the predictive model and data were analyzed in R(r) software. Results: Eighty patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes, over 18 years of age, were included, 57.5% of whom had no indication of IIV and 42.5% received an indication of this treatment. In the group with diabetic macular edema (DME), the mean age was 60.65 years, of which 52.94% were female. In this group, the majority presented severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy or proliferative retinopathy (79.41%). The main risk factors for DME were: be retired (OR = 5.22, p-value0.05), had a personal history of diabetic retinopathy (OR = 20.27, p-value 0.006), and previous treatment with anti-VEGF (OR = 23.23, p-value 0.002). Conclusion: The results of the research showed that a diabetic patient with low visual acuity and presenting these three factors should be referred as soon as possible to the specialist, since he presents a risk of presenting DME with need for anti-VEGF IIV, with 91.17% of accuracy. This tool can serve as an adjunct to decision making, especially the nonretinologist, in order to refer individuals with EMD to early diagnosis and treatment, which may be crucial in preventing irreversible visual loss in these patients.

Influence of the epiretinal membrane on ranibizumab therapy outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema / Influência da membrana epirretiniana sobre os resultados da terapia de ranibizumab em edema macular diabético

ABSTRACT Purpose: To investigate the influence of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) on intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: This retrospective study included 56 eyes of 48 patients with DME divided into two groups: the DME with ERM (study) and only DME (control) groups. Changes in the central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated. Results: In the study group, although the CMT was significantly reduced following the first injection (p<0.001), BCVA did not improve significantly (p=0.296). However, after the first injection, the control group exhibited both a significant decrease in CMT (p<0.001) and improvement in BCVA (p<0.001). However, the improvement in BCVA in the control group was not significantly different from the outcome of the study group. Conclusions: We observed a negative short-term influence of the ERM on IVR treatment for DME.

RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar a influência da membrana epirretiniana (ERM) na terapia intravítrea com ranibizumab (IVR) para o edema macular diabético (DME). Métodos: Este estudo retrospectivo consistiu de 56 olhos de 48 pacientes com DME que foram divididos em dois grupos: o grupo DME com ERM (estudo) e o grupo só DME (controle). Foram avaliadas alterações na espessura central de macular (CMT) e melhor acuidade visual corrigida (BCVA). Resultados: No grupo de estudo, embora a CMT tenha sido significativamente reduzida após a 1ª injeção (p<0,001), a acuidade visual não melhorou significativamente (p=0,296). Após a 1ª injeção, o grupo controle apresentou diminuição significativa no CMT (p<0,001) e melhora na acuidade visual (p<0,001). No grupo controle, embora a mudança de CMT tenha sido significativa (p<0,001), a melhora da acuidade visual não foi significativa quando comparada com o grupo de estudo. Conclusões: No curto prazo, observou-se uma influência negativa da ERM sobre o IVR em DME.

Effect of intravitreal anti-VEGF on choroidal thickness in patients with diabetic macular edema using spectral domain OCT / Efeito de injeção intravítrea na espessura de coroide em pacientes com edema macular diabético utilizando OCT de domínio espectral

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate choroidal thickness (CT) using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging at baseline and 6 months after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with DME who underwent intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF (bevacizumab or ranibizumab) in a pro re nata (PRN) regimen. Subfoveal choroidal thickness was compared between values obtained at baseline and at 6-month follow-up visits. Results: Thirty-nine eyes (15 females, 24 males) from 39 patients were enrolled (mean age, 62.43 ± 8.7 years; range, 44-79 years). Twenty-three and 16 eyes were treated with ranibizumab and bevacizumab respectively. The mean number of anti-VEGF injections was 2.28 ± 1.27 (range, 1-5). Mean nasal, subfoveal, and temporal choroidal thickness (CT) measurements at baseline were 234.10 ± 8.63 µm, 246.89 ± 8.94 µm, and 238.12 ± 8.20 µm, respectively, and those at 6 months post-treatment were 210.46 ± 8.00 µm, 215.66 ± 8.29 µm, and 212.43 ± 8.14 µm, respectively. Significant differences in CT were observed between baseline and the 6-month follow-up at all measured points (p=0.0327). Conclusions: Over a 6-month period, the use of intravitreal anti-VEGF was associated with significant thinning of the choroid in patients with DME. The clinical significance of a thinner choroid in DME is currently unknown; however, it may contribute to long-term adverse effects on choroidal and retinal function, representing an area requiring future investigation.

RESUMO Objetivos: Avaliar a espessura de coroide pré-tratamento e após 6 meses da injeção intravítrea de anti-fator de crescimento vascular endotelial (anti-VEGF) em pacientes com edema macular diabético (EMD), utilizando a tomografia de coerência óptica de domínio espectral (SD-OCT). Métodos: Análise retrospectiva, com revisão de prontuários, foi realizada para identificação de pacientes submetidos a tratamento com injeções intravítreas de anti-VEGF, no regime pro re nata, para tratamento de EMD. As medidas da espessura de coroide pré-tratamento foi comparada com as medidas após acompanhamento de 6 meses. Resultados: Trinta e nove olhos de 39 pacientes (15 femininos, 24 masculinos) foram incluídos, com idade média de 62,43 ± 8,7 anos (variando de 44-79 anos). Trinta e três olhos foram tratados com ranibizumab e 18 com bevacizumab. O número médio de injeções de anti-VEGF foi 2,28 ± 1,27 (variando de 1-5). A medida média pré-tratamento da espessura de coroide nasal, subfoveal e temporal foi 234,10 ± 8,63 µm, 246,89 ± 8,94 µm e 238,12± 8,20 µm, respectivamente. Após acompanhamento de 6 meses as medidas médias da espessura de coroide foram 210,46 ± 8,00 µm, 215,66 ± 8,29 µm e 212,43 ± 8,14 µm. A diferença entre as medidas médias pré e pós tratamento foi estatisticamente significante (p=0,0327) em todos os pontos medidos. Conclusão: Após um período de 6 meses, o uso de injeções intravítreas de anti-VEGF foi associado com diminuição significante da espessura de coroide nos pacientes com EMD. O significado clínico de uma coroide mais fina nos pacientes com EMD é desconhecido mas pode causar eventos adversos a longo prazo para função da coroide e retina, representando uma área para futura investigações.

Assessment of Patient Pain Experience during Intravitreal 27-Gauge Bevacizumab and 30-Gauge Ranibizumab Injection

PURPOSE: To compare pain scores of patients during intravitreal 27-gauge bevacizumab and 30-gauge ranibizumab injection procedures. METHODS: Seventy eyes of 70 patients who had not previously undergone intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included in this study. Thirty-five patients received ranibizumab and 35 patients received bevacizumab. The diagnoses of the patients were: 27 age related macular degeneration, 15 diabetic macular edema, 9 diabetic vitreous hemorrhage, 6 central retinal vein occlusion, 11 branch retinal vein occlusion and 2 central serous chorioretinopathy. Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was injected into the vitreous cavity using a 27-gauge needle, and ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) was injected with 30-gauge needle. Patients were asked just after the injection to rate their perceived pain during the injection using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable/worst pain). The average of these scores was used as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The VAS pain scores in the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were 1.06 +/- 0.91 (range, 0 to 3) and 1.94 +/- 1.55 (range, 0 to 7), respectively, a significant difference (p = 0.005). Patients or =65 years of age in both the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were then compared. For patients or =65 years, there was not a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.238). Female and male patients in both ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were also compared. For female patients, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.016), although not for male patients (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-gauge intravitreal injection is more comfortable than 27-gauge injection. Injection of bevacizumab with 30-gauge needle syringes may be more tolerable for patients.

Assessment of Patient Pain Experience during Intravitreal 27-Gauge Bevacizumab and 30-Gauge Ranibizumab Injection

PURPOSE: To compare pain scores of patients during intravitreal 27-gauge bevacizumab and 30-gauge ranibizumab injection procedures. METHODS: Seventy eyes of 70 patients who had not previously undergone intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included in this study. Thirty-five patients received ranibizumab and 35 patients received bevacizumab. The diagnoses of the patients were: 27 age related macular degeneration, 15 diabetic macular edema, 9 diabetic vitreous hemorrhage, 6 central retinal vein occlusion, 11 branch retinal vein occlusion and 2 central serous chorioretinopathy. Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was injected into the vitreous cavity using a 27-gauge needle, and ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) was injected with 30-gauge needle. Patients were asked just after the injection to rate their perceived pain during the injection using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable/worst pain). The average of these scores was used as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The VAS pain scores in the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were 1.06 +/- 0.91 (range, 0 to 3) and 1.94 +/- 1.55 (range, 0 to 7), respectively, a significant difference (p = 0.005). Patients or =65 years of age in both the ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were then compared. For patients or =65 years, there was not a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.238). Female and male patients in both ranibizumab and bevacizumab groups were also compared. For female patients, there was a significant difference in the average VAS pain scores between groups (p = 0.016), although not for male patients (p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-gauge intravitreal injection is more comfortable than 27-gauge injection. Injection of bevacizumab with 30-gauge needle syringes may be more tolerable for patients.

Efficacy of Intravitreal Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor or Steroid Injection in Diabetic Macular Edema According to Fluid Turbidity in Optical Coherence Tomography

PURPOSE: To determine if short term effects of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or steroid injection are correlated with fluid turbidity, as detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients. METHODS: A total of 583 medical records were reviewed and 104 cases were enrolled. Sixty eyes received a single intravitreal bevacizumab injection (IVB) on the first attack of DME and 44 eyes received triamcinolone acetonide treatment (IVTA). Intraretinal fluid turbidity in DME patients was estimated with initialintravitreal SD-OCT and analyzed with color histograms from a Photoshop program. Central macular thickness and visual acuity using a logarithm from the minimum angle of resolution chart, were assessed at the initial period and 2 months after injections. RESULTS: Visual acuity and central macular thickness improved after injections in both groups. In the IVB group, visual acuity and central macular thickness changed less as the intraretinal fluid became more turbid. In the IVTA group, visual acuity underwent less change while central macular thickness had a greater reduction (r = -0.675, p = 0.001) as the intraretinal fluid was more turbid. CONCLUSIONS: IVB and IVTA injections were effective in reducing central macular thickness and improving visual acuity in DME patients. Further, fluid turbidity, which was detected by SD-OCT may be one of the indexes that highlight the influence of the steroid-dependent pathogenetic mechanism.

Diabetic retinopathy: could the alpha-1 antitrypsin be a therapeutic option?

Diabetic retinopathy is one of the most important causes of blindness. The underlying mechanisms of this disease include inflammatory changes and remodeling processes of the extracellular-matrix (ECM) leading to pericyte and vascular endothelial cell damage that affects the retinal circulation. In turn, this causes hypoxia leading to release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to induce the angiogenesis process. Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) is the most important circulating inhibitor of serine proteases (SERPIN). Its targets include elastase, plasmin, thrombin, trypsin, chymotrypsin, proteinase 3 (PR-3) and plasminogen activator (PAI). AAT modulates the effect of protease-activated receptors (PARs) during inflammatory responses. Plasma levels of AAT can increase 4-fold during acute inflammation then is so-called acute phase protein (APPs). Individuals with low serum levels of AAT could develop disease in lung, liver and pancreas. AAT is involved in extracellular matrix remodeling and inflammation, particularly migration and chemotaxis of neutrophils. It can also suppress nitric oxide (NO) by nitric oxide sintase (NOS) inhibition. AAT binds their targets in an irreversible way resulting in product degradation. The aim of this review is to focus on the points of contact between multiple factors involved in diabetic retinopathy and AAT resembling pleiotropic effects that might be beneficial.

Relación entre la prolactina y la retinopatía diabética / Relation between prolactin and diabetic retinopathy

La retinopatía diabética, como forma de microangiopatía, se caracteriza por la pérdida de los pericitos y de las células endoteliales, lo que conlleva a una alteración de la permeabilidad de los capilares retinianos. El factor de crecimiento del endotelio vascular estimula directamente el desarrollo de la vasculatura interna y externa del ojo, y actúa además como un factor de permeabilidad vascular. Por lo general, en condiciones naturales, existe un equilibrio entre las moléculas promotoras y las inhibidoras de la angiogénesis; sin embargo, cuando estas condiciones son alteradas, como sucede durante los episodios de hipoxia o inflamación, este equilibrio se rompe, e inclina la balanza hacia la formación de vasos anormales que se extienden y sangran dentro del vítreo, y pueden provocar el desprendimiento de la retina, con la consiguiente pérdida de la visión. Se han desarrollado algunos medicamentos antiangiogénicos que reducen la expresión del factor de crecimiento del endotelio vascular y del factor de crecimiento del tejido conectivo en las células del epitelio retiniano expuestas al estrés oxidativo. Se ha avanzado también en el desarrollo de otros medicamentos con acción antiangiogénica, con gran efectividad en su uso, solos o combinados con fotocoagulación láser y cirugía, pero son muy costosos, solo disponibles en centros muy especializados, y la vía de administración es intravítrea. En la actualidad se conoce que la hormona hipofisaria prolactina, puede prevenir la progresión y promover la regresión de la retinopatía diabética a través de su conversión proteolítica a vasoinhibinas, en particular, la fracción de menor peso molecular (16 kDa-Prolactina), con importante acción antiangiogénica, bloqueando la estimulación de la angiogénesis inducida por varios factores, como el factor de crecimiento del endotelio vascular, y el factor de crecimiento fibroblástico en la proliferación de las células endoteliales, lo cual abre la esperanza de nuevos medicamentos para el tratamiento de la retinopatía proliferativa, aspectos sobre los que trata la presente revisión(AU)

Diabetic retinopathy, as a form of microangiopathy, is characterized by loss of pericytes and of endothelial cells, which causes alteration of the permeability of the retinal capillaries. The growth factor of the vascular endothelium directly stimulates the development of the internal and external vasculature of the eye, and additionally acts as a vascular permeability factor. In general, under natural conditions, there is a balance of promoting and inhibitory cells of angiogenesis. However, if these conditions are changed -as it happens during the hypoxia or inflammation episodes- this balance breaks and this tips the balance in favor of the formation of abnormal vessels that spread over and bleed into the vitreous, an event that may cause the retinal detachment and the resulting loss of vision. Some antiangiogenic drugs have been developed to reduce the expression of the vascular endothelium growth factor and of the connective tissue growth factor in the retinal epithelium cells under oxidative stress. Advances have also been made in the development of other antiangiogenic drugs of high effectiveness when they are used alone or combined with laser photocoagulation and surgery, but they are very expensive, available only in highly specialized centers and with intravitreal administration. Nowadays, it is known that hyphophysial hormone called prolactin can prevent the progress and encourage the regression of diabetic retinopathy through its proteolytic conversion to vasoinhibins, particularly, the lowest molecular weight fraction (16 kDa-prolactin). This fraction has an important antiangiogenic action since it blocks the stimulation of angiogenesis induced by several factors such as the vascular endothelium growth factor and the fibroblastic growth factor in the proliferation of the endothelial cells, all of which brings the possibilities of new drugs for the treatment of proliferative retinopathy. These are the aspects addressed in the present review(AU)