Preferential usage of rifaximin for the treatment of hydrogen-positive small intestinal bacterial overgrowth / Rifaximina como tratamiento de elección en pacientes con sobrecrecimiento bacteriano con prueba de hidrógeno positiva

Objectives: Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is challenging to treat and diagnose and is associated with diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Although no FDA-approved medications exist for treatment of SIBO, rifaximin has recently received approval to treat diarrhea-predominant IBS and patients with methane-positive SIBO breath tests. The aim of this study is to evaluate patient response to rifaximin for SIBO based on breath test results. Materials and methods: All patients underwent breath testing to evaluate for SIBO during a 42-month period. Patients were defined as having a positive glucose breath test for SIBO based on an increase of ≥ 20 ppm of hydrogen and/or ≥ 10 ppm of methane 90 minutes after ingesting glucose. Patient demographic and symptom data, antibiotic treatment regimens, symptomatic response to therapy, and repeat treatments were recorded. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Results: A total of 53 of 443 patients had positive breath testing for SIBO. Response rates to rifaximin (550 mg three times daily for 14 days) were 47.4% for hydrogen positivity alone and 80% for both hydrogen and methane positivity. Conclusions: Rifaximin was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic regimen for SIBO therapy. Patients with hydrogen or hydrogen and methane positive breath tests responded well to rifaximin therapy. For patients with hydrogen-positive SIBO, rifaximin may prove a highly effective therapy in providing symptom relief from the effects of SIBO.

Objetivos: El sobrecrecimiento bacteriano de intestino delgado es una entidad difícil de diagnosticar y tratar, frecuentemente asociada con el síndrome de intestino irritable. A pesar que la FDA no ha aprobado medicamentos para tratar el sobrecrecimiento bacteriano, la rifaximina ha sido recientemente aprobada para tratar el intestino irritable tipo diarrea y en pacientes con test de aliento metano positivo en sobrecrecimiento bacteriano. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la respuesta a rifaximina de los pacientes con sobrecremiento bacteriano con prueba de aliento positiva. Material y métodos: Todos los pacientes que se realizaron prueba de aliento por sobrecrecimiento bacteriano durante un periodo de 42 meses. Se definió un paciente con sobrecrecimiento bacteriano positivo si tenía un incremento mayor a 20 ppm de hidrógeno y/o 10 ppm de metano luego de 90 minutos de la ingesta de glucosa. Se registraron los datos demográficos, síntomas, tratamiento antibióticos recibidos, respuesta a la terapia, y repetición de tratamientos. Resultados: Un total de 53 de 443 pacientes tuvieron prueba de aliento positiva para sobrecrecimiento bacteriano. La tasa de respuesta a rifaximina (550 mg tres veces x día x 14 días) fue 47.4% para pacientes con sólo test de hidrógeno positivo, y 80% para pacientes con tanto test de hidrógeno como metano positivos. Conclusiones: La rifaximina es el régimen antibiótico más frecuentemente utilizado en sobrecrecimiento bacteriano. Los pacientes con prueba de aliento de hidrógeno o hidrógeno y metano positivos respondieron bien a la rifaximina. Para pacientes con sobrecrecimiento bacteriano prueba de hidrógeno positiva, la rifaximina puede ser una terapia efectiva en mejorar síntomas.

Tuberculosis intestinal de difícil decisión diagnóstica y terapéutica / Intestinal tuberculosis of difficult diagnostic decision and therapeutic

En este reporte se describe un caso de tuberculosis intestinal (TBCI) de difícil decisión diagnóstica y terapéutica, en el cual se indicó un protocolo de tratamiento anti TBC durante 6 meses con resolución clínica, paraclínica y endoscópica(AU)

In this report we describe a case of intestinal Tuberculosis of difficult diagnostic and therapeutic decision which received anti-TBC treatment for 6 months with clinical, paraclinical and endoscopic resolution(AU)

El impacto del tratamiento de la encefalopatía hepática mínima en el pronóstico a largo plazo / The impact of minimal hepatic encephalopathy treatment in long-term prognosis

La encefalopatía hepática mínima (EHm) afecta del 30% al 50% de los pacientes cirróticos. Su detección es esencial por su relación con la encefalopatía hepática clínica, la alteración de la habilidad para conducir, el mayor riesgo de caídas, la alteración de la calidad de vida, la progresión más acelerada de la cirrosis y la supervivencia. A pesar de la información fidedigna de su relevancia clínica, pronóstica y social, la detección de EHm no está generalizada en la práctica clínica. El espectro de la encefalopatía hepática engloba diversas alteraciones de las funciones cerebrales, por lo que se requiere realizar más de un test para su diagnóstico. Además, las alteraciones iniciales difieren de un paciente a otro. Esto ha dificultado el desarrollo de una estrategia diagnóstica universal. Como resultado, no disponemos de datos suficientes para generar recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia del impacto del tratamiento de la EHm en la calidad de vida y la supervivencia, así como de su rentabilidad. Por lo tanto, las guías clínicas actuales sugieren que se evalúe la EHm cuando se afecta la calidad de vida de los pacientes, ya que no se conocen las consecuencias del tamizaje. Las terapias reductoras de amonio se consideran la piedra angular del tratamiento de la EHm. Los disacáridos no absorbibles, la rifaximina y, más recientemente, los probióticos, han mostrado efectos beneficiosos. Se necesitan más ensayos controlados con placebo para evaluar la eficacia, seguridad y rentabilidad de los regímenes de tratamiento disponibles para evaluar el impacto del tratamiento de la EHm en el pronóstico a largo plazo de estos pacientes.

Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) affects up to 30-50% of cirrhotic patients. The detection of MHE is essential because of its relationship with overt hepatic encephalopathy, impairment of motor vehicle driving abilities, higher risk of falls, quality of life impairment, faster cirrhosis progression and survival. Despite the robust evidence regarding its clinical, prognostic and social relevance, MHE testing is not widespread in routine clinical care. Hepatic encephalopathy spectrum covers various alterations in complex brain functions, requiring more than one test to be quantified. In addition, initial disturbances differ from one patient to another. All this has made it difficult to develop a universal diagnostic strategy. As a consequence, there is a lack of available robust data in the literature to generate evidence-based recommendations related to the impact of MHE treatment on quality of life and survival of these patients, as well as on cost-effectiveness. Therefore, current clinical guidelines suggest MHE testing only when patients have problems with their quality of life, since consequences of the screening procedure are still unclear. Ammonia lowering therapies have been considered the cornerstone of MHE treatment. Beneficial effects of non-absorbable disaccharides (lactulose or lactitol), rifaximin and more recently, probiotics have been reported. Further placebo-controlled trials are needed to assess the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of available treatment regimes to evaluate the impact of MHE treatment on the long-term prognosis of these patients.

Comparison of gut microbiotal compositional analysis of patients with irritable bowel syndrome through different bioinformatics pipelines / 北京大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVE@#To assess whether the same biological conclusion, diagnostic or curative effects regarding microbial composition of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients could be reached through different bioinformatics pipelines, we used two common bioinformatics pipelines (Uparse V2.0 and Mothur V1.39.5)to analyze the same fecal microbial 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing data.@*METHODS@#The two pipelines were used to analyze the diversity and richness of fecal microbial 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing data of 27 samples, including 9 healthy controls (HC group), 9 diarrhea IBS patients before (IBS group) and after Rifaximin treatment (IBS-treatment, IBSt group). Analyses such as microbial diversity, principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA), nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) were used to find out the microbial differences among HC group vs. IBS group and IBS group vs. IBSt group.@*RESULTS@#(1) Microbial composition comparison of the 27 samples in the two pipelines showed significant variations at both family and genera levels while no significant variations at phylum level; (2) There was no significant difference in the comparison of HC vs. IBS or IBS vs. IBSt (Uparse: HC vs. IBS, F=0.98, P=0.445; IBS vs. IBSt, F=0.47,P=0.926; Mothur: HC vs.IBS, F=0.82, P=0.646; IBS vs. IBSt, F=0.37, P=0.961). The Shannon index was significantly decreased in IBSt; (3) Both workshops distinguished the significantly enriched genera between HC and IBS groups. For example, Nitrosomonas and Paraprevotella increased while Pseudoalteromonadaceae and Anaerotruncus decreased in HC group through Uparse pipeline, nevertheless Roseburia 62 increased while Butyricicoccus and Moraxellaceae decreased in HC group through Mothur pipeline.Only Uparse pipeline could pick out significant genera between IBS and IBSt, such as Pseudobutyricibrio, Clostridiaceae 1 and Clostridiumsensustricto 1.@*CONCLUSION@#There were taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity differences between the two pipelines, Mothur can get more taxonomic details because the count number of each taxonomic level is higher. Both pipelines could distinguish the significantly enriched genera between HC and IBS groups, but Uparse was more capable to identity the difference between IBS and IBSt groups. To increase the reproducibility and reliability and to retain the consistency among similar studies, it is very important to consider the impact on different pipelines.

Manejo actualizado de la diarrea asociada a Clostridium difficile / Updated management of diarrhea associated with Clostridium difficile

The management of Clostridium difficile (CD) infection has changed in recent years. The latest clinical guidelines and systematic reviews suggest the use of vancomycin orally as the first line of treatment regardless the severity of the crisis (main difference compared to previous recommendations), this is due to changes in its epidemiology, the decrease in effectiveness and the increase of recurrences with the use of metronidazole, particularly in severe crisis. In addition, the use of new agents such as fidaxomicin has been approved. Fulminant crisis require an aggressive management combining oral treatment, enemas and intravenous therapy in addition to a collaborative management with the surgery team. With respect to recurrences, the use of vancomycin in pulses and with extended therapy schemes is suggested; fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is also an attractive therapy for patients with multiple recurrences. The following is a summary of the latest recommendations and available evidence regarding the management of CD infection in the most frequent situations, both in first crisis and in its recurrences.

El manejo de la infección por Clostridium difficile (CD) ha tenido modificaciones los últimos años. Las últimas guías clínicas y revisiones sistemáticas sugieren el uso de vancomicina vía oral como primera línea de tratamiento independiente de la severidad de la crisis (diferencia principal con recomendaciones previas), esto debido a cambios en su epidemiología, la disminución de la efectividad y al aumento de las recurrencias con el uso de metronidazol, particularmente en crisis severas. Además, han sido aprobados el uso de nuevos agentes como la fidaxomicina. Las crisis de carácter fulminante requieren un manejo agresivo combinando terapia oral, vía enemas e intravenosa, además de un manejo en conjunto con el equipo de cirugía. Respecto a las recurrencias se sugiere el uso de vancomicina en pulsos y con esquemas de terapia extendida siendo además, el trasplante de microbiota fecal (FMT) una terapia atractiva para pacientes con múltiples recurrencias. A continuación se resumen las últimas recomendaciones y evidencia disponible respecto del manejo de la infección por CD en las situaciones más frecuentes, tanto en la primera crisis como en sus recurrencias.

Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy in Cirrhosis- How Long to Treat?

Abstract: Introduction. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) can reverse after short-term treatment. However, relapse rate of MHE after stopping treatment has not been studied so far. We aimed to evaluate long-term (9 months) efficacy of a short-term (3 months) treatment of MHE with lactulose/rifaximin, for maintenance of remission from MHE. Material and methods. In this prospective study, consecutive patients with cirrhosis and MHE were treated with lactulose/rifaximin for 3 months. After treatment, they were followed up for 6 months. Psychometric testing for diagnosis of MHE was performed at baseline, 3 months and 9 months. Results. Of the 527 patients screened, 351 were found eligible and tested for MHE. Out of these, 112 (31.9%) patients had MHE (mean age 55.3 years; 75% males). They were randomized to receive Rifaximin (n = 57; 1,200 mg/day) or Lactulose (n = 55; 30-120 mL/day) for three months. At 3 months, 73.7% (42/57) patients in Rifaximin group experienced MHE reversal compared to 69.1% (38/55) in Lactulose group (p = 0.677). Six months after stopping treatment, 47.6% (20/42) in rifaximin group and 42.1% (16/38) patients in lactulose group experienced MHE relapse (p = 0.274). The overt hepatic encephalopathy development rate (7.1% vs. 7.9%) and mortality rate (0.23% vs. 0%) were similar in both groups. The Child-Turcotte-Pugh score and model for end stage liver disease (MELD) scores of patients who had MHE relapse were higher compared to those who didn’t. On multivariate regression analysis, MELD score was an independent predictor of MHE relapse. Conclusion. Of the patients who became MHE negative after short-term (3 months) treatment with rifaximin/lactulose, almost 50% had a relapse of MHE at 6 months follow-up.